Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0201110-152733 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0201110-152733
論文名稱
Title
美國馬里蘭州專業發展學校實施現況之研究
The Study of Professional Development Schools in Maryland, USA
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
168
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2009-12-08
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-02-01
關鍵字
Keywords
學校組織變革、教師專業發展、師資培育、專業發展學校
professional development school, teacher education, teacher’s professional development, organizational change in schools
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5640 次,被下載 1828
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5640 times, has been downloaded 1828 times.
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討美國專業發展學校之實施現況,首先瞭解專業發展學校之定義、理論基礎及專業發展學校之理論,並以馬里蘭州之Towson大學及其合作小學之專業發展學校做為個案對象,以探究其合作模式與運作情形。本研究之目的有五:一、瞭解專業發展學校的定義;二、探究專業發展學校所立基的相關理論;三、闡述專業發展學校之理論,包含起源、目的、特性、型態及指標,探討相關研究以瞭解現況;四、探討在馬里蘭州專業發展學校實施的背景脈絡之下,以Towson大學及其合作之一所小學為個案,分析其專業發展學校實施之歷程;五、綜合論述研究結果,提出對我國師資培育大學與中小學夥伴關係建立之建議。
為達成上述目的,本研究採用文獻分析法與個案研究法,分別探討Towson大學之師資培育現況、Towson大學專業發展學校之教師專業發展現況及Towson大學專業發展學校之學校組織變革現況,期盼透過個案的探討及文獻的分析,得知Towson大學與其合作小學專業發展學校實施情況的全貌。
根據研究結果,本文進而提出下列數項結論:
一、專業發展學校強調以行動及調查之研究為導向,來改善學生學習成效
二、專業發展學校依不同背景脈絡而呈現多元化的特性
三、專業發展學校透過師資培育、教師專業發展、研究與調查之融合而提升學生學習成效
四、教師在專業發展學校中,能自發性的提升自我
五、教師須接受定期的評鑑以維持專業品質
六、專業發展學校為全員參與的環境,共同改進學生學習成效
最後,研究者再依據上述結論,針對我國師資培育制度尤其是教育實習制度提出數項建議,期能落實我國師資培育之成效,提升我國中小學師資之素質。
Abstract
The aims of this study were to understand current status of professional development schools in the state of Maryland, USA. The definition, theoretical framework and theories of PDS were discussed firstly. Then, the researcher went on analyzing the PDSs of Towson university and collaborative elementary schools in Maryland, in order to find out the collaborative model and their implementation. There were five purposes in this study. The first purpose was to understand the definition of PDS. Secondly, the theoretical framework was discussed. Thirdly, the theories of PDS were explained and explored. The forth purpose was to analyze the implementation in the PDSs of Towson University and the collaborative elementary schools in Maryland. Finally, to synthesize the results of this study, the researcher suggests some strategies in the establishment of partnership between teacher education universities and elementary schools.
For these purposes, the author made use of methods of document analysis and case study to discuss teacher education endeavors in Towson University, teacher’s professional development and organizational change in schools withibn collaborative elementary schools, in order to understand the current status of the PDSs in Towson University and the collaborative elementary schools.
According to the results, the following conclusions have been concluded:
1. Action research and inquiry into practicum should be highlighted in the PDSs, in order to improve the achievement of students from both sides.
2. Due to different context in the PDSs, diversified measures sould be provided.
3. Integration of teacher education, teacher’s professional development, research and inquiry did improve the learning achievement of students.
4. Teachers in PDSs can promote themselves in professional development.
5. Teachers in PDSs need to be evaluated regularly in order to maintain their professional quality.
6. Whole member of university, school, family or community are supposed to participate in the improvement of students’ achievement.

Based upon the above conclusions, several suggestions have been raised by the researcher to play a solid basis for the country’s teacher education and to upgrade the quality of future teachers.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究問題背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 6
第三節 研究方法與步驟 8
第四節 研究範圍與限制 10
第五節 名詞釋義 12
第二章 文獻探討 15
第一節 專業發展學校之定義 15
第二節 專業發展學校之理論基礎 19
第三節 專業發展學校之理論 36
第四節 專業發展學校之實施現況與相關研究 59
第三章 馬里蘭州專業發展學校個案之背景 85
第一節 馬里蘭州專業發展學校實施之背景脈絡 85
第二節 TOWSON大學專業發展學校網絡之背景脈絡 88
第三節 OWINGS MILLS小學專業發展學校之背景脈絡 92
第四章 TOWSON大學及其專業發展學校實施現況 95
第一節 TOWSON大學之師資培育及實習制度現況 95
第二節 TOWSON大學專業發展學校之教師專業發展現況 110
第三節 TOWSON大學專業發展學校之學校組織變革現況 115
第四節 TOWSON大學及專業發展學校之綜合分析 118
第五章 結論與建議 121
第一節 結論 121
第二節 建議 124
參考文獻 127
附錄
附錄一 Owings Mills 小學校長訪談大綱...........................135
附錄二 NCATE 專業發展學校指標..................................137
附錄三 Maryland 州專業發展學校指標.............................147
附錄四 Towson 大學初等教育實習生評鑑表.........................149
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
王文科、王智弘(2007)。教育研究法(增訂十一版)。台北市:五南。
王文科、王智弘(2009)。教育研究法(增訂十三版)。台北市:五南。
王秋絨(1997)。我國國中師資培育學程之建構。台北市:師大書苑。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。行政院教育改革審議委員會總諮議報告書。
台北市:作者。
李新鄉(2006)。美國1990年以後之師資教育改革。教育資料集刊,32,239-256。
林生傳(2007)。教育研究法-全方位的統整與分析。台北市:心理。
林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育研究所
(主編),質的研究法(頁239-263)。高雄市:麗文文化。
林坤燦(2008)。當前臺灣國民小學師資培育情境分析。教育資料集刊,37,1-14。
林新發、王秀玲、鄧珮秀(2007)。我國中小學師資培育現況、政策與展望。教
育研究與發展期刊,3(1),57-80。
邱兆偉(1994)。美國師範教育改革的主導趨勢-專業發展學校的發展與成果。
比較教育通訊,33,4-21。
邱兆偉(1996)。美國專業發展學校理念的誕生與成長。比較教育通訊,39,1-12。
吳清山(2002)。當前教育改革的迷思與省思。學校行政雙月刊,17,2-9。
吳清山(2003)。當前學校組織變革的理念與策略。教師天地,123,4-16。
吳清山(2006)。師資培育的理念與實踐。教育研究與發展期刊,2(1),1-32。
吳清山、林天祐(1997)。教育名詞-組織變革。教育資料與研究,18,62。
吳清山、林天佑(1998)。教育名詞:專業發展學校。教育資料與研究,23,70。
吳清山、賴協志(2007)。台灣初等教育改革的省思:1997-2007。教育資料集刊,
33,1-27。
吳清山、高家斌(2007)。台灣中等教育改革分析:1994-2007。教育資料集刊,
34,1-24。
侯世昌(2005)。學校組織變革的芻議。現代教育論壇,13,297-303。
范熾文(2004)。學校組織變革的策略與做法:知識經濟觀點。線上檢索:2008
年5 月1 日,取自:http://w3.nioerar.edu.tw/93/930811/01.pdf
孫志麟(2002)。專業發展學校:理念、實務與啟示。國立臺北師範學院學報(教
育類),15,557-584。
孫志麟(2003)。教師專業成長的另類途徑:知識管理的觀點。國立臺北師範學
院學報,16(1),229-252。
孫志麟(2005)。實習學校新典範:專業發展學校的標準。載於台灣師範大學教
育學院舉辦之「華人世界近年教育改革檢討國際學術研討會」會議論文集(頁
1-24),台北市。
孫志麟、陳建銘(2007)。學校組織變革中的教師關注:發展階段與類型分析。
師大學報:教育類,52(1),159-180。
高熏芳、王慧鈴(2002)。師資培育機構與中小學教育伙伴關係之研究-教育合
作現況與需求之分析。淡江人文社會學刊,10,147-173。
許以平(1999)。美國「專業發展學校」在我國國民小學實施可行性之研究。國
立台北教育大學碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
郭玉霞、高正英(譯)(1987)。Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy
著。二十一世紀的師資教育(A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st
Century)。台北市:台灣書店。
郭實渝(2008)。教學建構主義的哲學基礎。台東大學教育學報,19(2),119-142。
教育部(2007)。中華民國師資培育統計年報(九十五年版)。台北市:作者。
張明輝(2003)。教育組織變革。2003 年12 月13 日,取自
http://web.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/%7Eminfei/artical/
educationorganizationchange.pdf
張德銳(1994)。變中求勝──論教育組織革新。國立編譯館館刊,23(2),235-267。
台北市:國立編譯館。
張德銳(2000)我國中小學學校組織變革的新方向。初等教育學刊,8,279-296。
陳建銘(2004)。學校組織變革及其因應策略。學校行政雙月刊,32,43-55。
梁雲霞(譯)(2008)。J. I. Goodlad著。一個稱為學校的地方:未來的展望(A
place called school)。台北市:聯經。
梁福鎮(2006)。我國教師專業發展的現況、問題與對策。教育科學期刊,6(2),
77-90。
翁福元(1999)。教育研究與教育政策的對話:一個概念性的討論。載於中華民
國比較教育學會(主編),教育研究與政策之國際比較(1-19)。台北市:揚
智文化。
符碧真(1997)。美國專業發展學校對我國新制師資培育制度之啟示。教育研究
資訊,5(5),31-44。
黃坤錦(2003)。教師在職進修與教師專業發展。教育資料集刊,28,241-258。
黃淑苓(2005)。教師專業發展的應然與實然。教育科學期刊,5(2),154-168。
楊思偉(1994)。美國荷姆斯小組「教師專業發展學校」之探討。載於中華民國
師範教育學會(主編),師範教育多元化與師資素質(頁17-33)。台北市:
師大書苑。
楊振昇(2003)。教師領導與教師專業發展。教育資料集刊,28,287-318。
楊棠焱(2007)。我國師資培育大學與附屬高級中學合作模式之研究。國立中山
大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
蔡清華(1997)。美國師資培育改革研究。高雄市:復文。
劉俐含(2007)。我國師資培育大學與附屬小學合作模式之研究。國立中山大學
教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
劉美慧、方永泉、孫志麟、譚光鼎、邱惜玄、鄭秀琴(2006)。台灣師大與僑大
整合後強化未來發展計畫成果報告:「中小學專業發展學校規劃」。教育部委
託之專題研究成果報告,未出版。
戴國良(2004)。組織行為學:從企業觀點出發。台北市:五南。
饒見維(2003)。教師專業發展-理論與實務。台北市:五南。

二、英文部分
Abdal-Haqq, I. (1998). Professional development schools: Weighing the evidence.
Washington, DC: AACTE.
Ausubel, D. P. (1970). The use of ideational organizers in science teaching.
Occasional paper series-Science paper 3. Columbus, Ohio: City University of
New York.
Baker, B. R.(1996). The role of the professional development school to prepare
teachers of young children. A description of two models: The Hillcrest
professional development school [and] the LaVega primary school. TX: Baylor
University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394647)
Baylor University School of Education(2008). Professional development school
teacher education handbook. Retrieved May 15, 2009,
from http://www.baylor.edu/soe/cp/index.php?id=39078
Bruce, H. K., & Scott, D. (2000). Forces driving organizational change: A business
school perspective. Journal of Education for Business,75(3), 133-137.
Bryant, G., King, N. R., Neapolitan, J. E., Madden, M. & Rifkin, L. (2004).
Transforming faculty roles by waving the magic wand. In J. E. Neapolitan, T. D.
Proffitt, C. L. Whittmann, & T. R. Berkley (Eds.). Traditions, Standards &
Transformations: A model for professional development school networks (pp.
108-134). New York: Peter Lang.
Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy(1986). A nation prepared: Teachers
for the 21st Century. Report of the Task Force on Teaching as a Profession. NY:
Carnegie Forum.
Colburn, A. (1993). Creating professional development schools. Fastback 352. Phi
Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. Indiana: Bloomington.
Duke, D. L.(1990). Setting goals for professional development. Educational
Leadership, 47(8), 71-76.
Feiman-Nemser, Sharon. (1990). Teacher preparation: Structural and conceptual
alternatives. In W. R. Houston (Ed.). Handbook of research on teacher education
(pp. 212- 233). NY: MacMillan Publishing Co.
Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school(pp.271-320). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Goodlad, J. I. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hartzler-Miller, C. & Wainwright, T.(2004). Defining our own roles: Professional
renewal for teachers and university faculty. In J.E. Neapolitan, T.D. Proffitt, C.L. Wittman, & T.R. Berkeley (Eds.). Traditions, standards and transformations: A model for professional development school networks (pp. 55-69). New York: Peter Lang.
Hausfather, S. (2000). Laboratory schools to PDSs: The fall and rise of field
experiences in teacher education. The Educational Forum, 65(1), 31-39.
Holmes Group (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the holmes group. East
Lansing, MI: Author.
Holmes Group (1990). Tomorrow's schools: Principles for the design of professional
development schools . East Lansing, MI: Author.
Holmes Group (1995). Tomorrow's schools of education: A report of the Holmes
group . East Lansing, MI: Author.
John, P. G ., Kinnard P. W., Elizabeth M. V. & Michael E. B.(2001). Perceptions of
research from a second-year, multisite professional development schools
partnership. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(2), 75-83.
Kennedy, M. M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational
Researcher, 26(7), 4-12.
Klingner, J. K., Ahwee, S., van Garderen, D. & Hernandez, C. (2004). Closing the
gap: Enhancing student outcomes in an urban professional development school.
Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(3), 292-306.
LAEP(2002). Teacher networks. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from
http://www.laep.org/about/teachernetworks.html
LAEP(2003a). Professional development school. Retrieved May 13, 2009,
from http://www.laep.org/about/professionaldevelopment.html
LAEP(2003b). National board support network. Retrieved May 13, 2009,
from http://www.laep.org/about/nationalboardsupport.html
LAEP(2003c). Humanitas. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from
http://www.laep.org/about/humanitas.html
LAEP(2003d). Target science. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from
http://www.laep.org/about/targetscience.html
LAEP(2003e). Urban learning centers. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from
http://www.laep.org/about/urbanlearningcenters.html
LAEP(2003f). School to career academies. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from
http://www.laep.org/about/schooltocareeracademy.html
LAEP(2003g). Family care. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from
http://www.laep.org/about/familycare.html
LAEP(2003h). Public engagement. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from
http://www.laep.org/about/publicengagement.html
Levine, M. (1998). Designing standards that work for professional development
schools. Washington, DC: NCATE.
Levine, M., & Churins, E. J. (1999). Designing standards that empower professional
development schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 74 (3/4), 178-182.
Maryland State Department of Education. (1998). A review of professional
development schools in Maryland: State teacher education council, 1995-1997
report. Baltimore: Author.
Maryland State Department of Education. (2002). Standards for Maryland
professional development schools. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from
http://cte.jhu.edu/PDS/Resources/8X11_PDS_Standards.htm
Maryland State Department of Education. (2003). Professional development schools
in Maryland. Maryland: Author.
Maryland State Department of Education. (2007). Professional development school
assessment framework for Maryland. Retrieved January 09, 2010, from
http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/NR/rdonlyres/75608A85-6909-4BE3-A4
D8-D08C759D0A5A/14214/PDSAssessmentFrameworkRevisedAugust2007.pdf
Maryland State Department of Education. (2009a). 2009 Maryland report card –
Owings Mills elementary school. Retrieved January 09, 2010, from
http://www.msp.msde.state.md.us/Demographics.aspx?K=030402&WDATA=sc
hool#enrollment
Mebane, D. J. & Galassi, J. P. (2003). Variables affecting collaborative research and
learning in a professional development school partnership. Journal of
Educational Research, 96(5), 259-268.
Morgan, P. W. & Eustis, A. M. (2004). Connecting teacher preparation and continuing
professional development: The boundary spanner’s role. In J. E. Neapolitan, T.
D. Proffitt, C. L. Wittmann, & T. R. Berkeley (Eds.), Traditions, standards, &
transformations-A model For professional development school networks (pp.
91-105). New York: Peter Lang.
MPA(n.d.a ). About us. Retrieved May 25, 2009, from
http://www.milwaukeepartnershipacademy.org
MPA(n.d.b ). Our work. Retrieved May 25, 2009, from
http://www.milwaukeepartnershipacademy.org
Mule, L. (2006). Preservice teachers’ inquiry in a professional development school
context: Implications for the practicum. Teaching & Teacher Education, 22(2),
205-218.
Murrell, P. C. (1998). Like stone soup: The role of the professional development
school in the renewal of urban schools. Washington DC: AACTE.
NCATE (2001). Standards for professional development schools. Washington ,
DC: Author.
NCATE(2007). About NCATE. Retrieved February 26, 2009, from
http://www.ncate.org/public/aboutNCATE.asp
NCATE(n.d. ). Professional development schools (PDS). Retrieved March 2, 2009,
from http://www.ncate.org/public/pdswhat.asp?ch=133
Neapolitan, J. E., & Scott, C.(2004).The NCATE professional development school
standards field test project. In J. E. Neapolitan, T. D. Proffitt, C. L. Wittmann, &
T. R. Berkeley (Eds.), Traditions, standards, & transformations-A model For
professional development school networks (pp. 145-155). New York: Peter Lang.
Nelson, M. D. (1998). Professional development schools: An implementation model.
NASSP Bulletin, 82, 93-102.
Owings Mills Elementary school (2009). About Owings Mills elementary. Retrieved
January 8, 2010, from http://owingsmillses.bcps.org/AboutPage.html
Parke, C. S., & Taylor, J. K. (2008). A collaborative research initiative between
middle school and university faculty. Research In The Schools, 15(2),20-35.
Pasch, S. H., & Pugach, M. C. (1990). Collaborative planning for urban professional
development schools. Contemporary Education, 61(3),135-143.
Patterson, J. (1997). Coming clean about organizational change: Leadership in the
real world.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED424662).
Proffitt, T. D., Madden, M., Wittmann, C. L., & Field, T. T. (2004). History and
development of the Towson professional development school network. In J. E.
Neapolitan, T. D. Proffitt, C. L. Wittmann, & T. R. Berkeley (Eds.), Traditions,
standards, & transformations-A model For professional development school
networks (pp. 3-18). New York: Peter Lang.
Robbins, S. P.(1992). Essentials of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Essentials of organizational behavior (9th ed.).
NJ:Pearson/Prentice-Hall.
Sadera, W., Wizer, D. & Newcomb, L. (2004). Technology integration within a
teacher education program and professional development school network. In J. E.
Neapolitan, T. D. Proffitt, C. L. Whittmann, & T. R. Berkley (Eds.). Traditions,
Standards & Transformations: A model for professional development school
networks (pp. 135-141). New York: Peter Lang.
Schon, D. A. (1983). Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New
York: Basic Books Inc.
Serna, S.(2004). Baylor university and Waco ISD's partnership attracts national
attention. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from
http://www.baylor.edu/pr/index.php?id=22098
Soares, L. M. (1998). Structure, content, and process in teacher training: The
relevance of Copernicus, Gardner, and Dewey. Clearing House, 71(4), 217-220.
Stallings, J. A., & Kowalski, T. (1990). Research on professional development
schools. In Houston, W. R., Haberman, M., & Sikula, J. (Eds.). Handbook of
research on teacher education: A project of the association of teacher educators
(pp.251-263). New York: Macmillan.
Su, Zhixin (1990). School-university partnerships: Ideas and experiments
(1986-1990). Occasional Paper No. 12. Seattle, WA.: Center for educational
Renewal, University of Washington.
Teitel, L. (2004). How professional development school make a difference: A review
of research. Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher
Education.
Texas Center for Educational Technology(1997).The partners. Retrieved May 18,
2009, from http://www.tcet.unt.edu/images/i21.pdf
The Holmes Partnership (n.d.a). Origins of the Holmes partnership (1987-1997).
Retrieved March 5, 2009, from
http://www.holmespartnership.org/about/history.cfm
The Holmes Partnership (n.d.b). Local partner list. Retrieved May 9, 2009, from
http://www.holmespartnership.org/membership/memberlist.cfm
TU(1997). Network history. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from
http://pages.towson.edu/wizer/pds/pds2.html
TU(2007). The institution. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from
http://wwwnew.towson.edu/coe/accreditation/section1/
TU(2008a). About TU. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from
http://www.towson.edu/main/abouttu/
TU(2008b). Departments. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from
http://wwwnew.towson.edu/coe/dept/
TU(2008c). Professional development school network. Retrieved November 6, 2009,
from http://www.towson.edu/coe/pdsn/
TU(2008d). Professional development. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from
http://www.towson.edu/coe/pdsn/pdsn_development.asp
TU(2008e). PDS action research information. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from
http://www.towson.edu/coe/cpp/pds/researchinfo.asp
TU(2008f). Institute for PDS studies. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from
http://www.towson.edu/coe/pdsn/pdsn_institute.asp#Background
TU(2008g). Department of special education- special education graduate
Programs. Retrieved January 12, 2010, from
http://www.towson.edu/coe/sped/masped/
TU(2009a). College of education. Retrieved November 6, 2009, from
http://wwwnew.towson.edu/coe/
TU(2009b). Department of early childhood education- undergraduate program.
Retrieved January 12, 2010, from http://www.towson.edu/coe/eced/undergrad/
TU(2009c). Department of elementary education- undergraduate program.
Retrieved January 12, 2010, from
http://www.towson.edu/coe/eled/elundergrad.asp
TU(2009d). Department of elementary education- elementary education (M.Ed.).
Retrieved January 12, 2010, from
http://grad.towson.edu/program/master/eled-med/current/index.asp
TU(2009e). Department of secondary education- master of education in secondary
education. Retrieved January 12, 2010, from
http://www.towson.edu/coe/sced/grad/
TU(2009f). Department of special education- bachelor of science in special
Education. Retrieved January 12, 2010, from
http://www.towson.edu/coe/sped/undergrad/
TU(2009g). Department of educational technology and literacy - graduate
programs in reading. Retrieved January 12, 2010, from
http://www.towson.edu/coe/rset/reed/reed.asp
TU(2009h). Department of educational technology and literacy - instructional
technology. Retrieved January 12, 2010, from
http://www.towson.edu/coe/rset/insttech/
TU(2009i). Department of instructional leadership and professional development.
Retrieved January 12, 2010, from
http://grad.towson.edu/program/master/hurd-edld-ms/index.asp
TU(2010a). Department of early childhood education- graduate programs.
Retrieved January 12, 2010, from http://www.towson.edu/coe/eced/grad/
TU(2010b). Department of secondary education- undergraduate program. Retrieved
January 12, 2010, from http://www.towson.edu/coe/sced/scundergrad.asp
UMSL (2002).Knowledge base and conceptual framework. Retrieved May 30, 2009,
From http://coe.umsl.edu/web/documents/KnowledgeBasebooklet.pdf
UMSL(n.d.). About the college of education. Retrieved May 30, 2009, from
http://coe.umsl.edu/web/about/index.html
Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A
framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational
Researcher, 26(7),13-22.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code