法國領土毗鄰海陸的地理位置，地緣政治擴張可依循海陸兩個方向進行：海上包括大西洋與地中海兩條路徑，法國經大西洋擴大在西印度群島以及北美洲殖民勢力，另一方面跨越地中海，將勢力延伸至北非、中東、紅海、印度洋以及南海，在非洲、印度次大陸和中南半島等地建立殖民地；陸地擴張路徑則是向東橫越北歐平原，直至烏拉山。對法國而言，最理想的狀況是同時發展海權及陸權，並能夠在海、陸雙邊壓制主要對手。但是，現實情況就非如此順利，法國的外交政策需考量國際體系、歐洲地緣政治的約制等因素，並隨國際體系變遷而調整外交、軍事政策，以符合國家能力，法國地緣戰略的歷史演變即是在如此條件背景下進行。
本文採取古典地緣政治研究途徑，藉由地理、地緣政治以及地緣戰略等三個概念，勾勒出長時期法國地緣政治以及地緣戰略變化，並依循以下推演過程：第一，法國所處地理位置構成地緣戰略原型，即海權與陸權的雙元擴張路徑，並據此實踐國家地緣戰略目標；第二，法國實踐地緣戰略目標的過程，所遭受的反作用力，其他權力核心的崛起以及結盟所形成的反法勢力，如何影響並使法國修正地緣戰略；第三，再檢視法國修正地緣戰略所凸顯的地緣政治意義，是否存在變與不變的特殊意涵；最後，透過歷史事實檢驗法國地緣戰略的演變，釐清哪些是關鍵的影響因素。
最後可歸結以下幾點法國地緣戰略的特性：（一）法國領土同時毗鄰海陸的地理特性，既是地緣政治擴張路徑，同時亦是海權受限的原因，凸顯法國地緣戰略的理想與現實雙面性；（二）法國對歐洲進行雙軌權力平衡政策，阻擾周遭區域成立新國家，擔任大國間權力平衡者；（三）大革命後法國仍以地緣政治，而非意識型態，作為對外政策的考量；（四）德意志區域統一衝擊法國地緣政治，壓制德國成為法國至今的地緣戰略；（五）歐洲地緣政治特性：控制世界，卻未能產生歐洲帝國。

The location of France is both adjacent to land and sea, therefore France’s geopolitical expansion could follow two directions of land and sea. Regarding sea expansion path, France established colonies in North America and West Indies by sailing across the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, across the Mediterranean France could expand her geopolitical influence to North Africa, Middle East, Rea Sea, India Ocean and the South China Sea. France also established colonies in Africa, India and Indochina. Regarding land expansion path, North European plain is best way for conquer European continent. The ideal scenario for France is expanding sea power and land power altogether by suppressing main competitors. However, France’s foreign policy needs to be considered with international system and European geopolitics. The geostrategy of France evolved under such historical context.
This dissertation applies classical geopolitical approach, includes concepts of geography, geopolitics and geostrategy, to depict the changes of France’s geopolitics and geostrategy for a long time. The study’s deductive logic accords with following points. First of all, location of France constructed her proto-type geostrategy as well as dual expansion by sea and land; secondly, in the situation that other European powers formed anti-France alliance, France practiced and revised her targets of geostrategy; thirdly, revisiting geopolitical meaning of France’s revised geostrategy, the study tries to find out geopolitical change and unchanged; finally, the study clarifies key effect factors through historical facts of evolution of France’s geostrategy.
In sum, this dissertation concludes the geostrategy of France as following: (1) France’s territory is the base of expansion by land and sea; it’s also the condition restricting French sea power. In other words, the location of France constructs her geostrategy pro and con; (2) France practices policy of “balance of power”, preventing from new state building nearby area, and being the balancer of big powers; (3) After French revolution, geopolitics, not ideology, is still the main consideration of France’s foreign policy; (4) Germany unification impacts French geopolitics, suppressing Germany is key geostrategy of France until now; (5) Controlling whole world without European empire is the attribute of European geopolitics.

第一章 序論....................................................1
第一節 研究動機與目的........................................1
第二節 文獻回顧..............................................4
第三節 研究途徑與方法........................................21
第四節 研究流程與章節安排....................................28
第二章 法國崛起—全球大爭霸(1648-1815)…………………….........31
第一節 法國與哈布斯堡王朝的歐洲大陸衝突(1648-1715)…………...32
第二節 法國與英國的全球爭霸(1715-1763)…………………………...46
第三節 法國霸權的再現(1763-1815)…………………………………...59
第四節 小結..................................................73
第三章 法國地緣政治轉變—從理想到現實(1815-1945)……….........77
第一節 兩次革命與第二帝國(1815-1871)……………………………...78
第二節 德意志統一與第一次世界大戰(1871-1918)…………………...92
第三節 兩次大戰期間與第二次世界大戰(1918-1945)………………...105
第四節 小結..................................................116
第四章 大戰後的法國地緣政治—困境與突破…………………..........119
第一節 戴高樂主義—現實的困境(1949-1991)………………………...119
第二節 後冷戰時期歐洲地緣政治變動與法蘭西地緣戰略(1991-2009).132
第三節 後冷戰時期的法蘭西地緣政治意義……………………………..146
第四節 小結................................................. 154
第五章 結論....................................................157
第一節 研究發現............................................. 157
第二節 從事實與理論反思古典地緣政治學的適用性…………………..161
第三節 未來研究議題......................................... 167
參考書目........................................................169
附錄............................................................183

一、中文部分

（一） 專書

B. H. Liddell-Hart著，鈕先鍾譯，2008年，戰略論—間接路線。台北：城邦文化事業，二版。
B. H. Liddell-Hart著，鈕先鍾譯，1998年，第二次世界大戰戰史第一冊。台北：城邦文化事業。
Nicholai Bukharin著，呂智明譯，1988，帝國主義與世界經濟。台北：南方叢書出版社。
Paul Claval著，鄭勝華等譯，2007，地理學思想史。北京：北京大學出版社，三版。
Williamson Murray, Macgregor Knox and Alvin Bernstein等編，時殷弘等譯，2004，締造戰略：統治者、國家與戰爭。北京：世界知識出版社。
Daniel Levy, Max Pensky and John Torpey等編，2007，鄧伯宸譯，舊歐洲、新歐洲、核心歐洲。台北：立緒文化事業。
Charles de Gaulle著，尹國祥、郭彥譯，1975，戴高樂從政回憶錄。台北：黎明文化事業。
Jean Monnet，孫慧雙譯，1989，歐洲之父—莫內回憶錄。北京：國際文化出版公司。
Robert Kagan，蕭蓉、魏紅霞譯，2004，天堂與實力。北京：新華出版社。
William R. Keylor著，蔡百詮譯，1989年，二十世紀國際史。台北：幼獅文化事業公司。
G. de Bertier de Sauvigny and David H. Pinkney著，蔡百詮譯，1989年，法國史。台北：五南圖書出版公司。
Will and Ariel Durant著，幼獅翻譯中心編譯，1978，拿破崙的升沈。台北：幼獅文化事業公司。
Will and Ariel Durant著，幼獅翻譯中心編譯，1970，路易十四與法國。台北：幼獅文化事業公司，三版。
Stephen J. Lee著，王瓊淑譯，1999，三十年戰爭。台北：城邦文化出版。
蔡東杰，2006，西洋外交史。台北：風雲論壇有限公司。
張麟徵，2002，近代國際關係史。台北：揚智文化。
王曾才編著，1998，西洋近世史。台北：正中書局。
張錫模，2003，聖戰與文明—伊斯蘭與世界政治首部曲 AD610-1914。台北：玉山社。
--2007，地緣政治學教學講義。高雄：國立中山大學中山學術研究所。
賴建誠譯著，2003，年鑑學派管窺。台北：左岸文化。

（二） 期刊論文

莫大華，2008年6月，「批判性地緣政治戰略之研究」，問題與研究，47卷第2期，頁57-85。
時殷弘，2005年，「法國大革命、拿破崙和國際政治的變更」，歐洲研究，第6期，頁1-13。
藍玉春，2004年7、8月，「歐盟尼斯條約評析」，問題與研究，43卷第4期。，頁73-94。

二、外文部分

（一） 專書
Allain, Jean-Claude., et al (els), 2007. Histoire de la Diplomatie Française II—De 1815 ā nos jours. Paris: Editions Perrin.
Albrecht-Carrié, René, 1973. A Diplomatic History of Europe Since the Congress of Vienna. New York : Harper & Row.
Autrand, Françoise., et al (els), 2007. Histoire de la Diplomatie Française I—Du Moyen Age à l’Empire. Paris: Editions Perrin.
Blouet, Brian W.(ed.), 2005. Global Geostrategy—Mackinder and the Defence of the West. New York: Frank Cass.
Bodin, Jean. Julian H. Franklin (Trans), 1992, On Sovereignty. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bozo, Frédéric, 1998. “France,” in Michael Brenner (ed.), NATO and Collective Security. New York: Macmillan Press INC, pp. 39-80.
Brenner, Michael, (ed.), 1998. NATO and Collective Security. New York: Macmillan Press INC.
Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1997. The Grand Chessboard—American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books.
Braudel, Fernand. Siân Reynolds(tran), 1993. The Identity of France Volume 1—History and Environment. New York: Harper Perennial.
Braudel, Fernand. Siân Reynolds(tran), 1992. The Identity of France Volume 2—People and Production. New York: Harper Perennial.
Brock, W. R. 1963. “England,” in J. O. Lindsay(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VII—The Old Regime 1713-63. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 241-268.
Bromley, J. S. (ed.), 1971. The New Cambridge Modern History Volume V I— The Rise of Great Britain and Russia 1688-1715/25. London: Cambridge University Press.
Bury, J. P. T. 1971. The New Cambridge Modern History Volume X—The Zenith of European Power 1830-70. London: Cambridge University Press.
Carr, E. H. 1963. What is History? New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
--1984. International Relations Between the Two World Wars 1919-1939. London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Cohen, Saul B., 1975. Geography and Politics in a World Divided. New York: Oxford University Press, 2nd Edition.
--2009. Geopolitics—The Geography of International Relations. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Second Edition.
Craig, Gordon. 1971. “The System of Alliances and the Balance of Power,” in J. P. T. Bury, The New Cambridge Modern History Volume X—The Zenith of European Power 1830-70. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246-273.
Creswell, Michael, 2006. A Question of Balance—How France and the United States Created Cold War Europe. London: Harvard University Press.
Clark, George. 1971. “The Nine Years War, 1688-1697,” in J. S. Bromley (ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VI—The Rise of Great Britain and Russia 1688-1715/25. London: Cambridge University Press,pp. 223-248.
Demangeon, A. 1920. Le Déclin de l’Europe. Paris: Payot & Cie.
De Montferrand, Bernard. 2006. Diplomatie—Des Volontés Françaises. Condé-sur-Noireau: Editions Alban.
De la Blache, P. Vidal., Millicent Todd Bingham(tran.), 1926. Priciples of Human Geography. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
De la Blache, P. Vidal. 1918. La France de l’Est--Lorraine-Alsace. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin, Twelfth Edition.
De Planhol, Xavier. Janet Lloyd (tran), 1994. An Historical Geography of France. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Faringdon, Hugh, 1989. Strategic Geography: NATO, the Warsaw Pact, and the Superpowers. New York: Routledge, 2nd Edition.
Friedman, George. 2009. The Next 100 years: A Forcast for the 21st Century. New York: Doubleday.
G. Chandler, David, 1971. “The Art of War on Land,” in J. S. Bromley (ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VI—The Rise of Great Britain and Russia 1688-1715/25. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 741-762.
Grygiel, Jakub J. 2006. Great Powers and Geopolitical Change. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gierowski, Józef and Andrzej Kamiński, 1971. “The Eclipse of Poland,” in J. S. Bromley (ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VI—The Rise of Great Britain and Russia 1688-1715/25. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 681-715.
Goodwin, A. (ed.), 1965. The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VIII—The American and French Revolutions 1763-93. London: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, A. 1965. “Introductory Summary,” in A. Goodwin(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VIII—The American and French Revolutions 1763-93. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-24.
Goodwin, A. 1965. “Reform and Revolution in France: October 1789-February 1793,” in A. Goodwin(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VIII—The American and French Revolutions 1763-93. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 680-713.
Gollwitzer, Heinz. 1969. Europe in the Age of Imperialism, 1880-1914. New York: W. W. Norton.
Crawley, C. W. (ed.), 1975. The New Cambridge Modern History Volume IX—War and Peace in an Age of Upheaval 1793-1830. London: Cambridge University Press.
Crawley, C. W. 1975. “International Relations, 1815-30,” in C. W. Crawley(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume IX—War and Peace in an Age of Upheaval 1793-1830. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 668-690.
Gray, Colin S., 2005. “In Defence of the Heartland: Sir Halford Mackinder and His Critics a Hundred Years on,” in Brian W. Blouet (ed.), Global Geostrategy—Mackinder and the Defence of the West. New York: Frank Cass, pp. 17-35.
Griffin, Charles C. 1978. “The States of Latin America,” in F. H. Hinsley(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume XI—Material Progress and World-Wide Problems 1870-1898. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 516-541.
Harrison, Michael M., 1981. The Reluctant Ally—France and Atlantic Security. Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Held, David and Anthony McGrew (eds), 2002. Governing Globalization. Malden: Polity Press.
Held, David and Anthony McGrew, 2002. “Introduction,” in David Held and Anthony McGrew (eds), Governing Globalization. Malden: Polity Press.
Hill, Christopher, 1998. “Closing the Capabilityes-Expectations Gap?” in John Peterson and Helene Sjursen (eds), A Common Foreign Policy for Europe? Competing Visions of the CFSP. New York: Routledge, pp.18-38.
Hinsley, F. H. (ed.), 1978. The New Cambridge Modern History Volume XI—Material Progress and World-Wide Problems 1870-1898. London: Cambridge University Press.
Hobson, J. A. 1965. Imperialism—A Study. New York: The University of Michigan Press.
Holsti, Kaleve J. 1991. Peace and War—Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648-1989. London: Cambridge University Press.
Ifestos, Panayiotis, 1988. Nuclear Strategy and European Security Dilemmas — Towards an Autonomous European Defence System? Brookfield: Gower Publishing Company Limited.
Ikenberry, John. 2001. After Victory—Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Joll, James. 1971. “Prussia and the German Problem, 1830-66,” in J. P. T. Bury, The New Cambridge Modern History Volume X—The Zenith of European Power 1830-70. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 493-521.
Kennedy, Paul. 1989. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers—Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Vintage Books.
Kissinger, Henry. 1994. Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.
Lacoste, Yves. 2006. Géopolitique—La Longue Histoire D’Aujourd’hui. France: Larousse.
Lewis, Michael. 1971. “Armed Forces and the Art of War: Navies,” in J. P. T. Bury, The New Cambridge Modern History Volume X—The Zenith of European Power 1830-70. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 274-301.
Lindsay, J. O. (ed.), 1963. The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VII—The Old Regime 1713-63. London: Cambridge University Press.
Lloyd, C. C. 1975. “Armed Forces and the Art of War—Navies,” in C. W. Crawley(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume IX—War and Peace in an Age of Upheaval 1793-1830. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 76-90.
Lossky, Andrew. 1971 “International Relations in Europe,” in J. S. Bromley (ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VI—The Rise of Great Britain and Russia 1688-1715/25. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 154-192.
Mackinder, Halford J. 1942. Democratic Ideals and Reality. Washington: National Defense University Press.
A. T. Mahan, 1987. The Influence of Sea Power Upon History 1660-1783. New York: Dover Publication, Inc.
Mongrenier, Jean-Sylvestre. 2006. La France, L’Europe, L’Otan—Une Approche Géopolitique de l’Atlantisme Français. Paris: Editions Unicomm.
Moore, Rebecca R., 2007. NATO’s New Mission—Projecting Stability in a Post-Cold War World. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1966. Politics among Nations—the Struggle for Power and Peace. New York NY: Alfred A. Knopf, fourth edition.
O’Loughlin, John(ed.), 1994. Dictionary of Geopolitics. London: Greenwood Press.
Ó Tuathail, Gearóid. 1996. Critical Geopolitics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Pierre, Goubert. Maarten Ultee(tran.), 1988. The Course of French History. New York: Routledge.
Parker, Geoffrey, 1985. Western Geopolitical Thought in the Twentieth Century. London: Groom Helm Ltd.
--1988. The Geopolitics of Domination. London: Routledge.
--1998. Geopolitics: Past, Present and Future. London: Pinter.
Peterson, John and Helene Sjursen (eds), 1998. A Common Foreign Policy for Europe? Competing Visions of the CFSP. New York: Routledge.
Peterson, John and Helene Sjursen, 1998. “Conclusion—The Myth of the CFSP?” in John Peterson and Helene Sjursen (eds), A Common Foreign Policy for Europe? Competing Visions of the CFSP. New York: Routledge, pp. 169-185.
Robson, Eric. 1963. “The Seven Years War,” in J. O. Lindsay(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VII—The Old Regime 1713-63. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 465-486.
Schirato, Tony and Jen Webb, 2003. Understanding Globalization. London: Sage publications Ltd.
Shennan, J. H. 1995. International Relations in Europe, 1689-1789. New York: Routledge.
Sloan, Stanley R., 2003. NATO, the European Union, and the Atlantic Community — the Transatlantic Bargain Reconsidered. New York: Rowman&Littlefield Publishers, INC.
Spykman, Nicholas J., 1942. America’s Strategy in World Politics—the United States and the Balance of Power. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
--1944. The Geography of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Sutton, Michael. 2007. France and the Construction of Europe, 1944-2007—The Geopolitical Imperative. New York: Berghahn Books.
Taylor, A. J. P. 1978. “International Relations,” in F. H. Hinsley(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume XI—Material Progress and World-Wide Problems 1870-1898. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 542-566.
--1980. The Struggle for Mastery in Europe 1848-1918. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thomson, Mark A. 1963. “The War of the Austrian Succession,” in J. O. Lindsay(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VII—The Old Regime 1713-63. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 416-439.
Thornton, A. P. 1978. “Rivalries in the Mediterranean, the Middle East and Egypt,” in F. H. Hinsley(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume XI—Material Progress and World-Wide Problems 1870-1898. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 567-592.
Watson, Adam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society—A Comparative Historical Analysis. London: Routledge
Wesseling, H. L., Diane Webb(tran.), 2004. The European Colonial Empires 1815-1919. New York: Pearson Education Limited.
Wilson, C. H. 1963. “The Growth of Overseas Commerce and European Manufacture,” in J. O. Lindsay(ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume VII—The Old Regime 1713-63. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27-49.

（二） 期刊論文

Alliot-Marie, Michèle, 2003, “France Is Ready to Play Its Role in Global Security,” European Affairs.
Bryant, Janet, Autumn 2000, “France and NATO from 1966 to Kosovo: Coming Full Circle?” European Security, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 21-37.
Debré, Michel, April 1971, “France Global Strategy,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 395-406.
Elman, Colin and Miriam Fendius Elman, 2008, “The Role of History in International Relations,” Millennium Journal of International Studies, Vol.37, No.2, pp. 357-364
Ghez, Jeremy and F. Stephen Larrabee, April-May 2009, “France and NATO,” Survival, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 77-90.
Gomart, Thomas, Spring 2007, “France’s Russia Policy: Balancing Interests and Values,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 147-155.
Gougeon, Jacques-Pierre, été 2009, “France-Allemagne: Vers une Nouvelle Rivalité?” La Revue Internationale et Stratégique, No. 74, pp. 75-85.
Gray, Colin S., 1991, “Geography and Grand Strategy,” Comparative Strategy, Vol. 10, pp. 311-329.
Hoffmann, Stanley, 1992, “Dilemmes et Stratégies de la France Dans la Nouvelle Europe (1989-1991),” Politique Étrangére, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 879-892.
Howorth, Jolyon, 2002, “La France, l’OTAN et la Sécurité Européene: Statu Quo Ingérable, Renouveau Introuvable,” Politique Étrangére, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 1001-1016.
Kaplan, Robert D. May/June 2009, “The Revenge of Geograph,” Foreign Policy, pp. 96-105.
Kramer, Steven P., 1991. “La Question Française,” Politique Étrangére, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 959-974.
Mackinder, Halford J., July 1943, “The Round World and the Winning of the Peace,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 21, pp. 595-605.
Menon, Anand, 1995, “From Independence to Cooperation: France, NATO and European Security,” International Affairs, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 19-34.
Merchet, Jean-Dominique, 2005, “Les Transformations de l’armée Française,” Hérodote, No. 116, pp. 63-81.
Spykman, Nicholas J., Feb., 1938, “Geography and Foreign Policy I,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 28-50.
Vernet, Daniel, Oct. 1992, “The Dilemma of French Foreign Policy,” International Affairs, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 655-664.
Yost, David S., 1989, “France in the New Europe,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 69, pp. 107-128.

（三） 網站資料

Ehrhart, Hans-Georg, January 2000, “France and NATO: Change by Rapprochement?” Heft 121, Hamburg, pp. 1-32, http://www.ifsh.de/pdf/publikationen/hb/hb121.pdf
Joyner, James, 19 Mars, 2009, “France in Collision Course on NATO? “ Atlantic Council, http://www.acus.ort/print/3427
Michel, Leo, 6 Dec. 2008, “France’s Return to NATO Can Complement EU Security,” Speigel, http://www.spiel.de/international/0,1518,drunk-559304,00.html
Moran, Michael, “French Military Strategy and NATO Reintegration,” Council on Foreign Relations (March 12, 2009), http://www.cfr.org/publication/16619/french_military_strategy_and_nato_reintegration
Verluise, Pierre, “La France de Retour Dans le Commandement Integre de l’OTAN?” 1 Oct. 2007, http://www.diploweb.com/spip.php?page=imprimer&id_article=82

（四） 官方資料
Fifteenth Ambassadors Conference—Speech by M. Nicolas Sarkozy, President of the Republic (Paris), 27 August 2007, Http://www.premier-ministre.gouv.fr/en/information/press_871/fifteenth_ambassadors （2009年6月15日閱讀）
Le Ministère de la Défense, ALTO (trans), The French White Paper on Defence and National Security. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2008. http://merln.ndu.edu/whitepapers/France_English2008.pdf. （2009年7月1日閱讀）
Le Ministère de la Défense, Livre Blanc Sur la Defense, 1994, http://merln.ndu.edu/whitepapers/France1994part1.pdf. （2009年7月1日閱讀）
Lettre et Memorandum du General de Gaulle au General Eisenhower (17 Septembre 1958), http://www.ena.lu. （2009年7月1日閱讀）
NATO Allied Command Operation, http://www.nato.int/shape/news/2009/07/090727a.html （2009年7月1日閱讀）
Treaty on European Union, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/treaties/dat/11992M/htm/11992M.html#0104000047 （2009年7月8日閱讀）

（五） 新聞媒體

Le Figaro, “France / Otan : les arguments pour et contre ,” 11 Mars, 2009, http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2009/03/11/01003-20090311ARTFIG00495-franceotan-1
Le Figaro, “Pour Bayrou, Sarkozy jette aux orties l’héritage gaulliste ,” 12 Mars, 2009, http://www.lefigaro.fr/politique/2009/03/12/
Le Figaro, “Quand Mitterrand déjā négociait le retour dans l’Otan ,” 13 Mars, 2009, Http://www.lefigaro.fr/international /2009/03/11/
Le Figaro, “Otan : Jospin et Fabius font front commun contre Sarkozy ,” 18 Mars, 2009, http://www.lefigaro.fr/polituqye/2009/03/18
Le Monde, “L’Assemblée nationale donne son feu vert au retour de la France dans l’OTAN,” 17 Mars, 2009, http://www.lemonde.fr/web/imprimer_element/0,40-0@2-3224,50-1168927,0.html