Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0204110-130258 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0204110-130258
論文名稱
Title
台灣產大蓑蛾屬(鱗翅目:蕈蛾總科,蓑蛾科,Eumeta 屬)之系統分類檢討及雄蟲形態變異性與不對稱性之觀察
A taxonomic revision of the Eumeta bagworms (Lepidoptera: Tineioidea, Psychidae) of Taiwan, with special reference to the variation and asymmetry in male morphology
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
73
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-01-23
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-02-04
關鍵字
Keywords
形態保守、生命條碼、生殖腹片、複合種群、大蓑蛾屬
species-complex, conservative morphological character, barcode of life, Eumeta, pregenital abdomen
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5757 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5757 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
高度發展的性別二型性與極為保守的成蟲形態特徵使得蓑蛾科種級分類處理一直是形態學上的大挑戰。其中大蓑蛾屬(Eumeta)為一群廣泛分布於亞、澳、非洲大陸,成員外觀上極為相似的分類群,歷史上的混淆始於本屬模式種的錯誤鑑定及標本考證的困難性。早期台灣蓑蛾的分類文獻亦有大蓑蛾屬的紀錄,但實際分布的種數以及其分類地位曖昧不明。本研究大量採集飼養台灣產大蓑蛾屬幼蟲,以獲得包含成蟲雙性別形態、幼蟲發育階段與蓑巢形式的完整資訊,並採用初步的生命條碼相互佐證,確定台灣產有微型大蓑蛾(Eumeta minuscula)與多樣大蓑蛾(E. variegata)兩個種類。同時觀察到多樣大蓑蛾雄蟲普遍具有外部與生殖器形態的高度變異性與不對稱性,其第8 腹節的背、腹片反而是本屬最具有種級鑑定價值的形態特徵。接著檢視本屬的模式標本群與原始文獻,將過去已描述廣泛分布於南亞至東亞陸塊邊緣與島嶼的13 個形態種歸納為東洋種群。除微型大蓑蛾與E. crameri 相對小型且形態穩定可鑑種,其他外觀混亂的種類包含: E.variegata、E. maxima、E. layardi、E. japonica、E. pryeri、E. sikkima、E. wallacei、E. javanica、E. wallacei var. bougainvillea、E. formosicola 以及E. kiushiuana 共11種在此定義為多樣大蓑蛾複合種群(species-complex),以台灣島內的樣本為主要,檢討其分類地位。結果除E. japonica、E. javanica 以及E. kiushiuana 未檢視模式,其餘9 種形態差異符合台灣島內族群的變異程度,因此合併為多樣大蓑蛾。分子證據亦初步支持,然國外鄰近地區的樣本尚不足以代表本種的所有族群遺傳結構。產於中國雲南的例外個體有較高遺傳變異可能為一隱蔽種,其生殖器差異亦較其他個體獨特,因未有保留第8 腹節背、腹片,資料不足而暫處理為存疑種。
Abstract
There is a great challenge to deal with psychid taxonomy due to the sexual dimorphism and conservative morphology of male. The genus Eumeta is widely distributed among Asia, Australia and Africa, with taxa resembling each other in morphological aspects. This historical confusion was originated from misidentification of type specimen and difficulty of specimen vouchering. Previous studies also recorded Eumeta of Taiwan, but taxa still uncertain actually. In present study, reared specimens were used to acquire morphology of different development and larval case style, and corroborated each other with barcode of life. As the results, Eumeta minuscula and E. variegata were confirmed in Taiwan. A highly variation of male morphology with genitalia asymmetry were described. Additionally, the male 8th tergite and sternite were suggested valuable for species identification. Having examined the type series specimen and original description, 13 species distributed in orient were grouping. Except E. minuscula and E. crameri were smaller and identifiable, a mass of ambiguous species included E. variegata, E. maxima, E. layardi, E. japonica, E. pryeri, E. sikkima, E. wallacei, E. javanica, E. wallacei var. bougainvillea, E. formosicola and E. kiushiuana were defined as E. variegata species-complex, and then revised this complex mainly with Taiwanese specimens.
Due to the morphological variety of whole examination involving with those of Taiwan, 8 species were treated as junior synonym of E. variegata, excluding E. japonica, E. javanica and E. kiushiuana that remain undetermined because the types
have not examined. Preliminary result of molecular work also supported this treatment as well, except an individual of China (Yunnan) that more information is needed.
目次 Table of Contents
List of Tables..............................................................................................II
List of Figures ...........................................................................................III
Abstract in Chinese………………………………………..……………IV
Abstract in English.....................................................................................V
Introduction.................................................................................................1
Materials & Methods ..................................................................................8
Results.......................................................................................................12
Discussion .................................................................................................32
References.................................................................................................38
參考文獻 References
Ball, S.L. & Armstrong, K.F. 2006. DNA barcodes for insect pest identification: a
test case with tussock moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Canadian Journal
of Forest Research 36: 337-350.
Ball, S.L., Hebert, P.D.N., Burian, S.K. & Webb, J.M. 2009. Biological
identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes. Journal of
the North American Benthological Society 24(3): 508-524.
Barcenas, N.M., Unruh, T.R. & Neven, L.G. 2009. DNA Diagnostics to identify
internal feeders (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) of pome fruits of quarantine
importance. Journal of Economic Entomology 98(2): 299-306.
Beccaloni, G.W., Scoble, M.J., Robinson, G.S. & Pitkin, B. (Eds). 2003. The Global
Lepidoptera Names Index (LepIndex). World Wide Web electronic publication.
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/entomology/lepindex [accessed 8 January 2010]
Bengtsson, B. Å. & Palmqvist, G. 2008. Familj Psychidae, pp. 492-557, Fjärilar:
Käkmalar - säckspinnare: Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae Psychidae.
ArtDatabanken, Uppsala, Sverige.
Brower, A.V.Z. 2006. Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimitation: of
Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Systematics and
Biodiversity 4(2): 127-132.
Butler, A.G. 1881. Descriptions of new genera and species of Heterocerous
Lepidoptera from Japan. The Transactions of the Entomological Society of
London: 1-23.
Butler, A.G. 1882. Descriptions of new species of Lepidoptera, chiefly from
Duke-of-York Island and New Britain. Annals and Magazine of Natural
History 5(10): 226-238.
39
Carew, M.E., Pettigrove, V. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2003. Identifying chironomids
(Diptera: Chironomidae) for biological monitoring with
PCR-RFLPchironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) for biological monitoring
with PCR-RFLP. Bulletin of Entemological Research 8: 287-293.
Caterino, M.S. & Tishechkin, A.K. 2006. DNA identification and morphological
description of the first confirmed larvae of Hetaeriinae (Coleoptera:
Histeridae). Systematic Entomology 31: 405-418.
Chiù, S.-C., Lo, K.-C., Chien, C.-C., Chen, C.-C. & Chen, C.-F. 1985. Biological
Control of the Citrus of Taiwan, pp. 1-8. In Chiu, S.C. [ed.], A Review of the
Biological Control of Crop Pests in Taiwan (1981-1984), Special Publication
No. 19. Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Taichung, Taiwan.
Common, I.F.B. 1990. Superfamily Tineoidea, pp. 174-180. In Common, I.F.B. [ed.],
Moths of Australia. Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.
Cooper, P.D. 2001. What physiological processes permit insects to eat Eucalyptus
leaves? Austral Ecology 26(5): 556-562.
Davis, D.R. & Robinson, G.S. 1998. The Tineoidea and Gracillarioidea, pp. 91-107.
In Kristensen, N.P. [ed.], Handbook of Zoology, Band IV, Arthropoda: Insecta,
Teilband 35, Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, Vol.1: Evolution,
Systematics, and Biogeography. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co., Berlin.
Davis, D.R. 1964. Bagworm moths of the western Hemisphere (Lepidoptera:
Psychidae). United States National Museum Bulletin 244: 53-56.
Davis, D.R. 1975a. A review of the West Indian moths of the family Psychidae with
descriptions of new taxa and immature stages. Smithsonian Contributions to
zoology 188: 1-66.
Davis, D.R. 1975b. Two new species of bagworm moths from Venezuela with special
remarks on reproductive morphology in Psychidae (Lepidoptera: Psychidae).
Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 77(1): 66-77.
Davis, D.R. 1992. Checklist, pp. 65. In Heppner, J.B. & Inoue, H. [eds.], Lepidoptera
40
of Taiwan. Association for Tropical Lepidoptera and Scientific Publishers,
Florida, USA.
Decaëns, T. & Rougerie, R. 2008. Descriptions of two new species of Hemileucinae
(Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) from the region of Muzo in Colombia—evidence
from morphology and DNA barcodes. Zootaxa 1944: 34-52.
DeSalle, R., Egan, M.G. & Siddall, M. 2005. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species
delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal
Society B 360: 1905-1916.
Dierl, W. 1965. Festlegung eines lectotypus von Eumeta variegata (Snellen)
(Lepidoptera, Psychidae). Zoologische Mededekingen 40(29): 277-279.
Ebach, M.C. & Holdrege, C. 2005. DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy.
Nature 434(7034): 697-697.
Fleck, G., Brenk, M. & Misof, B. 2006. DNA taxonomy and the identification of
immature insect stages: the true larva of Tauriphila argo (Hagen 1869)
(Odonata: Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de
France (Nouvelle série) 42(1): 91-98.
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. 1994. DNA primers
for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from
diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular marine biology and biotechnology
3(5): 294-299.
Funakoshi, S. & Tanaka, H. 2003. Aerial dispersal behavior and positive
phototropism of hatched larvae of bagworm moth, Eumeta minuscula
(Lepidoptera, Psychidae). Transaction of the Lepidopterological Society of
Japan 54(2): 125-130.
Grapputo, A., Kumpulainen, T., Mappes, J. & Parri, S. 2005a. Genetic diversity
in populations of asexual and sexual bag worm moths (Lepidoptera:
41
Psychidae). BMC Ecology 5(1): 5.
Grapputo, A., Kumpulainen, T. & Mappes, J. 2005b. Phylogeny and evolution of
parthenogenesis in Finnish bagworm moth species (Lepidoptera: Psychidae:
Naryciinae) based on mtDNA-markers. Annales zoologici Fennici 42:
141-160.
Guilding, L. 1827. The natural history of Oiketicus. Transactions of the Linnaean
Society of London 15: 373-380.
Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate
large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52(5): 696-704.
Hajibabaei, M., Janzen, D.H., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P.D.N. 2006.
DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(4):
968-971.
Hampson, G.F. 1892. Family Psychidae, pp. 291-292. In Blanford, W.T. [ed.], The
Fauna of British India, Moths, Vol. 1. Taylor and Francis, London, UK.
Hasenfuss, I. & Kristensen, N.P. 1998. Skeleton and muscles: immatures, pp.
133-164. In Kristensen, N.P. [ed.], Handbook of Zoology, Band IV,
Arthropoda: Insecta, Teilband 36, Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, Vol.2:
Morphology, Physiolog and Development. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.,
Berlin.
Hättenschwiler, P. 1989. Genus Scoriodyta Meyrick, 1888, a new subfamily and
descripition of new species and forms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). New Zealand
Journal of Zoology 16: 51-63.
Hättenschwiler, P. 1992. Megalophanes turatii (Staudinger, 1877) neu für die
Schweiz (Lep. Psychidae). Mitteilungen der Entomologischen Gesellschaft
Basel 42(2): 40-45.
42
Hättenschwiler, P. 1994. Die mittel- und westeuropäischen Arten der Gattung
Pseudobankesia mit Beschreigung von zwei neuen Arten (Lep. Psychidae).
Mitteilungen der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel 44(3/4): 109-121.
Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L. & deWaard, J.R. 2003. Biological
identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270:
313-321.
Hebert, P.D.N., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H. & Hallwachs, W. 2004.
Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical
skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America 101(41): 14812-14817.
Heppner, J.B. 1991. Faunal regions and the diversity of Lepidoptera. Tropical
Lepidoptera 2(Supplement 1): 1-85.
Heylaerts, F.J.M. 1884. On the exotic psychids in the Leyden museum. Notes from
the Leyden Museum 6: 129-133.
Hulcr, J., Miller, S.E., Setliff, G.P., Darrow, K., Mueller, N.D., Hebert, P.D.N. &
Weiblen, G.D. 2007. DNA barcoding confirms polyphagy in a generalist
moth, Homona mermerodes (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Molecular Ecology
Notes 7: 549-557.
Inoue, H. 1954. Check list of the Lepidoptera of Japan, Part 1: Micropterigidae -
Phaloniidae. Rikusuisha, Tokyo, Japan.
Inoue, H. 1982. Psychidae, pp. 160-164, pl. 4. In Inoue, H. [ed.], Moth of Japan.
Kodansha, Tokyo, Japan.
Janzen, D. H., Hajibabaei, M., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W., Remigio, E. &
Hebert, P.D.N. 2005. Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex
Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society B 360: 1835-1845.
43
Kawada, A. 1932. Psychidae, pp. 1317-1318. In Uchida, S. [ed.], Iconographia
Insectorum Japonicorum. Hokuryukan, Tokyo.
Kirby, W.F. 1892. Psychidae. A Synonymic Catalogue of Lepidoptera Heterocera
(Moths) 1: 500-524.
Klots, A.B. 1970. Lepidoptera, pp. 115. In Tuxen, S.L. [ed.], Taxonomists's
glossary of genitalia in insects, 2 ed. Scandinavian university, Copenhagen,
Danmark.
Kozhanchikov, I.V. 1956. Psychidae, pp. 393-395. In Pavlovskii, E.N. [ed.], Fauna
of the U.S.S.R. Lepidoptera, Vol. III, No. 2. Zoologicheskii Institut Akademii
Nauk SSSR, moskva.
Landry, J.F. 2007. Taxonomic review of the leek moth genus Acrolepiopsis
(Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) in North America. The Canadian Entomologist
139(3): 319-353.
Leech, J.H. 1888. On the Lepidoptera of Japan and Corea - Part II. Heterocera, Sect. I.
Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London:
580-654.
Leonhardt, B.A., Neal, J.W., Klun, J.A., Schwarz, M. & Plimmer, J.R. 1983. An
unusual lepidopteran sex pheromone system in the bagworm moth. Science
219(4582): 314-316.
Mathew, G. 1985. Variations in the wing venation of Ptroma plagiophleps Hampson
(Lepidoptera: Psychidae). The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 24(4):
359-363.
Matsumura, S. 1931. Psychidae, pp. 1009-1010. In Matsumura, S. [ed.], 6000
illustrated insects of the Japan-Empire. Tôko Shoin, Tokyo.
McDonogh, R.S. 1939. The habitat distribution and dispersal of the psychid moth,
Luffia ferchaultella, in England and Wales. The Journal of Animal Ecology
44
8(1): 10-28.
Meyer, C.P. & Paulay, G. 2005. DNA barcoding: Error rates based on
comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology 3(12): e422.
Meyrick, E. & Lower, O.B. 1907. Revision of the Australian Psychidae.
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 31: 196-199.
Moore, F. 1883. Family Psychidae, pp. 102, The Lepidoptera of Ceylon Vol. II. L.
Reeve & Co., London, UK.
Moore, F. 1891. A new psychid injurious to sâl. Indian Museum Notes on Economic
Entomology 2: 63-67.
Moore, R.G., & Hanks, L.M. 2004. Aerial dispersal and host plant selection by
neonate Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Ecological
Entomology 29: 327-335.
Mutanen, M., Ruotsalainen, H. & Kaila, L. 2009. Variation in larval chaetotaxy in
Orthosia gothica (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): effects of mother, sex and side,
and implications for systematics. Systematic Entomology 34(4): 712-723.
Nair, K.S.S. 2000. General scenario of pests and diseases in natural forests and
plantation of Indonesia, pp. 15-44. In Nair, K.S.S. [ed.], Insect pests and
diseases in Indonesian forests: An assessment of the major threats, research
efforts and literature. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor,
Indonesian.
Nielsen, S.E. 1978. On the systematic position of the genus Eriocottis Zeller, 1847,
with remarks on the phylogeny of primitive Tineoidea (Lepidoptera). Insect
Systematics & Evolution 9: 279-296.
Pfenninger, M., Nowak, C., Kley, C., Steinke, D. & Streit, B. 2007. Utility of DNA
taxonomy and barcoding for the inference of larval community structure in
morphologically cryptic Chironomus (Diptera) species. Molecular Ecology
16(9): 1957-1968.
45
Rao, S., Liston, A., Crampton, L. & Takeyasu, J. 2009. Identification of larvae of
exotic Tipula paludosa (Diptera: Tipulidae) and T. oleracea in North America
using mitochondrial cytB sequences. Annals of the Entomological Society of
America 99(1): 33-40.
Rhainds, M., Davis, D.R. & Price, P.W. 2009. Bionomics of bagworms
(Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Annual Review of Entomology 54: 209-226.
Rhainds, M., Gries, G., Ho, C.T., & Chew, P.S. 2002. Dispersal by bagworm larvae,
Metisa plana: Effects of population density, larval sex, and host plant
attributes. Ecological Entomology 27: 204-212.
Robinson, G.S. 1989. A phylogeny for the Tineoidea (Lepidoptera). Insect
Systematics & Evolution 19(9): 117-129.
Roe, A.D., Stein, J.D., Gillette, N.E. & Sperling, F.A.H. 2009. Identification of
Dioryctria (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in a seed orchard at Chico, California.
Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99(3): 433-448.
Sattler, K. 1991. A review of wing reduction in Lepidoptera. Bulletin of the British
Museum of Natural History (Entomology) 60(2): 243-288.
Sauter, W. & Hättenschwiler, P. 1991. Zum system der palaearktischen psychiden
(Lep. Psychidae) 1. Teil: Liste der palaearktischen Arten. Nota
lepidopterologica 14(1): 69-89.
Seino, A. 1980. Redescription of Chalioides kondonis Kondo and description of a
new allied species from Taiwan. Tinea 10(31): 309-314.
Smith, D., & Peña, J.E. 2002. Tropical Citrus Pests, pp. 72. In Peña, J.E., Sharp, J.L.
& Wysoki, M. [eds.], Tropical Fruit Pests and Pollinators: Biology, Economic
Importance, Natural Enemies and Control. CABI, Oxon.
Snellen, P.C.T. 1879. Lepidoptera van Celebes. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 22:
114-117.
46
Sonan, J. 1935. Psychidae of Formosa. Transactions of the Natural History society of
Formosa 25: 448-455.
Strand, E. 1912. Psychidae, pp. 351-370. In Seitz, A. [ed.], Die Gross-Schmetterlinge
des Palaearktischen Faunengebietes. Verlag des Seitz'schen Werkes, Stuggart,
Germany.
Strand, E. 1914. Psychidae. Lepidoptera Niepeltiana (1): 21, t.11.
Strand, E. 1915. H. Sauter's Formosa-Ausbeute. Supplementa Entomologica 4:
12-13.
Strand, E. 1929. Cryptothelea Duncan, pp. 187-191. In Strand, E. [ed.],
Lepidopterum Catalogus. Pars 34: Psychidae. W. Junk, Berlin.
Sugimoto, M., & Saigusa, T. 2001a. A new genus of the subfamily Oiketicinae from
Asia (Lepidoptera, Psychidae). Tinea 16(5): 327-336.
Sugimoto, M., & Saigusa, T. 2001b. The systematic position, morphology and
bionomics of Acanthopsyche (Eumetisa) taiwana Sonan, 1935, newly recorded
from the Ryukyus, Japan (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Entomological Science
4(4): 407-430.
Sugimoto, M., & Saigusa, T. 2002. Bacotia-like new genus of the family Psychidae
(Lepidoptera) from Taiwan, with a disscusion on its systematic position.
Transaction of the Lepidopterological Society of Japan 53(4): 215-224.
Swinhoe, C.C. 1892. Psychidae, pp. 224-228, Catalogue of eastern and Australian
Lepidoptera Heterocera in the collection of the Oxford University Museum.
Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular
Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular
Biology and Evolution 24: 1596-1599.
Vaglia, T., Haxaire, J., Kitching, I.J., Meusnier, I. & Rougerie, R. 2008.
47
Morphology and DNA barcoding reveal three cryptic species within the
Xylophanes neoptolemus and loelia species-groups (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae).
Zootaxa 1923: 18-36.
van Velzen, R., Larsen, T.B. & Bakker, F.T. 2009. A new hidden species of the
Cymothoe caenis-complex (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) from western Africa.
Zootaxa 2197: 53-63.
Walker, F. 1855. Psychidae, pp. 926-976, List of the Specimens of Lepidopterous
Insects in the Collection of the British Museum. Edward Newman, London,
UK.
Westwood, J.O. 1854. Descriptions of some species of Lepidopterous insects
belonging to the genus Oiketicus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of
London. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1854: 219-243, pl.
37.
Wiemers, M., & Fiedler, K. 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? - a case study
in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Frontiers in Zoology 4(1): 8.
Wileman, A.E., & South, R. 1917. New species of Lepidoptera from Japan and
Formosa. The Entomologist 50(650): 145-148.
Will, K.W., & Rubinoff, D. 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species
cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics
20(1): 47-55.
Yazaki, M. 1926. Note on the Classification of Gen. Clania together with new Genus
and a new species of Psychinae (Psychidae, Lepidoptera.). Bulletin of the
Kagoshima Imperial College of Agriculture and Forestry 6: 163-182.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.143.4.181
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.143.4.181
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code