論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available
論文名稱 Title |
台灣產大蓑蛾屬(鱗翅目:蕈蛾總科,蓑蛾科,Eumeta 屬)之系統分類檢討及雄蟲形態變異性與不對稱性之觀察 A taxonomic revision of the Eumeta bagworms (Lepidoptera: Tineioidea, Psychidae) of Taiwan, with special reference to the variation and asymmetry in male morphology |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
73 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2010-01-23 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2010-02-04 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
形態保守、生命條碼、生殖腹片、複合種群、大蓑蛾屬 species-complex, conservative morphological character, barcode of life, Eumeta, pregenital abdomen |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5757 次,被下載 0 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5757 times, has been downloaded 0 times. |
中文摘要 |
高度發展的性別二型性與極為保守的成蟲形態特徵使得蓑蛾科種級分類處理一直是形態學上的大挑戰。其中大蓑蛾屬(Eumeta)為一群廣泛分布於亞、澳、非洲大陸,成員外觀上極為相似的分類群,歷史上的混淆始於本屬模式種的錯誤鑑定及標本考證的困難性。早期台灣蓑蛾的分類文獻亦有大蓑蛾屬的紀錄,但實際分布的種數以及其分類地位曖昧不明。本研究大量採集飼養台灣產大蓑蛾屬幼蟲,以獲得包含成蟲雙性別形態、幼蟲發育階段與蓑巢形式的完整資訊,並採用初步的生命條碼相互佐證,確定台灣產有微型大蓑蛾(Eumeta minuscula)與多樣大蓑蛾(E. variegata)兩個種類。同時觀察到多樣大蓑蛾雄蟲普遍具有外部與生殖器形態的高度變異性與不對稱性,其第8 腹節的背、腹片反而是本屬最具有種級鑑定價值的形態特徵。接著檢視本屬的模式標本群與原始文獻,將過去已描述廣泛分布於南亞至東亞陸塊邊緣與島嶼的13 個形態種歸納為東洋種群。除微型大蓑蛾與E. crameri 相對小型且形態穩定可鑑種,其他外觀混亂的種類包含: E.variegata、E. maxima、E. layardi、E. japonica、E. pryeri、E. sikkima、E. wallacei、E. javanica、E. wallacei var. bougainvillea、E. formosicola 以及E. kiushiuana 共11種在此定義為多樣大蓑蛾複合種群(species-complex),以台灣島內的樣本為主要,檢討其分類地位。結果除E. japonica、E. javanica 以及E. kiushiuana 未檢視模式,其餘9 種形態差異符合台灣島內族群的變異程度,因此合併為多樣大蓑蛾。分子證據亦初步支持,然國外鄰近地區的樣本尚不足以代表本種的所有族群遺傳結構。產於中國雲南的例外個體有較高遺傳變異可能為一隱蔽種,其生殖器差異亦較其他個體獨特,因未有保留第8 腹節背、腹片,資料不足而暫處理為存疑種。 |
Abstract |
There is a great challenge to deal with psychid taxonomy due to the sexual dimorphism and conservative morphology of male. The genus Eumeta is widely distributed among Asia, Australia and Africa, with taxa resembling each other in morphological aspects. This historical confusion was originated from misidentification of type specimen and difficulty of specimen vouchering. Previous studies also recorded Eumeta of Taiwan, but taxa still uncertain actually. In present study, reared specimens were used to acquire morphology of different development and larval case style, and corroborated each other with barcode of life. As the results, Eumeta minuscula and E. variegata were confirmed in Taiwan. A highly variation of male morphology with genitalia asymmetry were described. Additionally, the male 8th tergite and sternite were suggested valuable for species identification. Having examined the type series specimen and original description, 13 species distributed in orient were grouping. Except E. minuscula and E. crameri were smaller and identifiable, a mass of ambiguous species included E. variegata, E. maxima, E. layardi, E. japonica, E. pryeri, E. sikkima, E. wallacei, E. javanica, E. wallacei var. bougainvillea, E. formosicola and E. kiushiuana were defined as E. variegata species-complex, and then revised this complex mainly with Taiwanese specimens. Due to the morphological variety of whole examination involving with those of Taiwan, 8 species were treated as junior synonym of E. variegata, excluding E. japonica, E. javanica and E. kiushiuana that remain undetermined because the types have not examined. Preliminary result of molecular work also supported this treatment as well, except an individual of China (Yunnan) that more information is needed. |
目次 Table of Contents |
List of Tables..............................................................................................II List of Figures ...........................................................................................III Abstract in Chinese………………………………………..……………IV Abstract in English.....................................................................................V Introduction.................................................................................................1 Materials & Methods ..................................................................................8 Results.......................................................................................................12 Discussion .................................................................................................32 References.................................................................................................38 |
參考文獻 References |
Ball, S.L. & Armstrong, K.F. 2006. DNA barcodes for insect pest identification: a test case with tussock moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 337-350. Ball, S.L., Hebert, P.D.N., Burian, S.K. & Webb, J.M. 2009. Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24(3): 508-524. Barcenas, N.M., Unruh, T.R. & Neven, L.G. 2009. DNA Diagnostics to identify internal feeders (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) of pome fruits of quarantine importance. Journal of Economic Entomology 98(2): 299-306. Beccaloni, G.W., Scoble, M.J., Robinson, G.S. & Pitkin, B. (Eds). 2003. The Global Lepidoptera Names Index (LepIndex). World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/entomology/lepindex [accessed 8 January 2010] Bengtsson, B. Å. & Palmqvist, G. 2008. Familj Psychidae, pp. 492-557, Fjärilar: Käkmalar - säckspinnare: Lepidoptera: Micropterigidae Psychidae. ArtDatabanken, Uppsala, Sverige. Brower, A.V.Z. 2006. Problems with DNA barcodes for species delimitation: of Astraptes fulgerator reassessed (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Systematics and Biodiversity 4(2): 127-132. Butler, A.G. 1881. Descriptions of new genera and species of Heterocerous Lepidoptera from Japan. The Transactions of the Entomological Society of London: 1-23. Butler, A.G. 1882. Descriptions of new species of Lepidoptera, chiefly from Duke-of-York Island and New Britain. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 5(10): 226-238. 39 Carew, M.E., Pettigrove, V. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2003. Identifying chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) for biological monitoring with PCR-RFLPchironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) for biological monitoring with PCR-RFLP. Bulletin of Entemological Research 8: 287-293. Caterino, M.S. & Tishechkin, A.K. 2006. DNA identification and morphological description of the first confirmed larvae of Hetaeriinae (Coleoptera: Histeridae). Systematic Entomology 31: 405-418. Chiù, S.-C., Lo, K.-C., Chien, C.-C., Chen, C.-C. & Chen, C.-F. 1985. Biological Control of the Citrus of Taiwan, pp. 1-8. In Chiu, S.C. [ed.], A Review of the Biological Control of Crop Pests in Taiwan (1981-1984), Special Publication No. 19. Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute, Taichung, Taiwan. Common, I.F.B. 1990. Superfamily Tineoidea, pp. 174-180. In Common, I.F.B. [ed.], Moths of Australia. Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia. Cooper, P.D. 2001. What physiological processes permit insects to eat Eucalyptus leaves? Austral Ecology 26(5): 556-562. Davis, D.R. & Robinson, G.S. 1998. The Tineoidea and Gracillarioidea, pp. 91-107. In Kristensen, N.P. [ed.], Handbook of Zoology, Band IV, Arthropoda: Insecta, Teilband 35, Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, Vol.1: Evolution, Systematics, and Biogeography. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co., Berlin. Davis, D.R. 1964. Bagworm moths of the western Hemisphere (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). United States National Museum Bulletin 244: 53-56. Davis, D.R. 1975a. A review of the West Indian moths of the family Psychidae with descriptions of new taxa and immature stages. Smithsonian Contributions to zoology 188: 1-66. Davis, D.R. 1975b. Two new species of bagworm moths from Venezuela with special remarks on reproductive morphology in Psychidae (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 77(1): 66-77. Davis, D.R. 1992. Checklist, pp. 65. In Heppner, J.B. & Inoue, H. [eds.], Lepidoptera 40 of Taiwan. Association for Tropical Lepidoptera and Scientific Publishers, Florida, USA. Decaëns, T. & Rougerie, R. 2008. Descriptions of two new species of Hemileucinae (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) from the region of Muzo in Colombia—evidence from morphology and DNA barcodes. Zootaxa 1944: 34-52. DeSalle, R., Egan, M.G. & Siddall, M. 2005. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 1905-1916. Dierl, W. 1965. Festlegung eines lectotypus von Eumeta variegata (Snellen) (Lepidoptera, Psychidae). Zoologische Mededekingen 40(29): 277-279. Ebach, M.C. & Holdrege, C. 2005. DNA barcoding is no substitute for taxonomy. Nature 434(7034): 697-697. Fleck, G., Brenk, M. & Misof, B. 2006. DNA taxonomy and the identification of immature insect stages: the true larva of Tauriphila argo (Hagen 1869) (Odonata: Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France (Nouvelle série) 42(1): 91-98. Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular marine biology and biotechnology 3(5): 294-299. Funakoshi, S. & Tanaka, H. 2003. Aerial dispersal behavior and positive phototropism of hatched larvae of bagworm moth, Eumeta minuscula (Lepidoptera, Psychidae). Transaction of the Lepidopterological Society of Japan 54(2): 125-130. Grapputo, A., Kumpulainen, T., Mappes, J. & Parri, S. 2005a. Genetic diversity in populations of asexual and sexual bag worm moths (Lepidoptera: 41 Psychidae). BMC Ecology 5(1): 5. Grapputo, A., Kumpulainen, T. & Mappes, J. 2005b. Phylogeny and evolution of parthenogenesis in Finnish bagworm moth species (Lepidoptera: Psychidae: Naryciinae) based on mtDNA-markers. Annales zoologici Fennici 42: 141-160. Guilding, L. 1827. The natural history of Oiketicus. Transactions of the Linnaean Society of London 15: 373-380. Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52(5): 696-704. Hajibabaei, M., Janzen, D.H., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W. & Hebert, P.D.N. 2006. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103(4): 968-971. Hampson, G.F. 1892. Family Psychidae, pp. 291-292. In Blanford, W.T. [ed.], The Fauna of British India, Moths, Vol. 1. Taylor and Francis, London, UK. Hasenfuss, I. & Kristensen, N.P. 1998. Skeleton and muscles: immatures, pp. 133-164. In Kristensen, N.P. [ed.], Handbook of Zoology, Band IV, Arthropoda: Insecta, Teilband 36, Lepidoptera, Moths and Butterflies, Vol.2: Morphology, Physiolog and Development. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co., Berlin. Hättenschwiler, P. 1989. Genus Scoriodyta Meyrick, 1888, a new subfamily and descripition of new species and forms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 16: 51-63. Hättenschwiler, P. 1992. Megalophanes turatii (Staudinger, 1877) neu für die Schweiz (Lep. Psychidae). Mitteilungen der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel 42(2): 40-45. 42 Hättenschwiler, P. 1994. Die mittel- und westeuropäischen Arten der Gattung Pseudobankesia mit Beschreigung von zwei neuen Arten (Lep. Psychidae). Mitteilungen der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel 44(3/4): 109-121. Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L. & deWaard, J.R. 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270: 313-321. Hebert, P.D.N., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H. & Hallwachs, W. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(41): 14812-14817. Heppner, J.B. 1991. Faunal regions and the diversity of Lepidoptera. Tropical Lepidoptera 2(Supplement 1): 1-85. Heylaerts, F.J.M. 1884. On the exotic psychids in the Leyden museum. Notes from the Leyden Museum 6: 129-133. Hulcr, J., Miller, S.E., Setliff, G.P., Darrow, K., Mueller, N.D., Hebert, P.D.N. & Weiblen, G.D. 2007. DNA barcoding confirms polyphagy in a generalist moth, Homona mermerodes (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 549-557. Inoue, H. 1954. Check list of the Lepidoptera of Japan, Part 1: Micropterigidae - Phaloniidae. Rikusuisha, Tokyo, Japan. Inoue, H. 1982. Psychidae, pp. 160-164, pl. 4. In Inoue, H. [ed.], Moth of Japan. Kodansha, Tokyo, Japan. Janzen, D. H., Hajibabaei, M., Burns, J.M., Hallwachs, W., Remigio, E. & Hebert, P.D.N. 2005. Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 1835-1845. 43 Kawada, A. 1932. Psychidae, pp. 1317-1318. In Uchida, S. [ed.], Iconographia Insectorum Japonicorum. Hokuryukan, Tokyo. Kirby, W.F. 1892. Psychidae. A Synonymic Catalogue of Lepidoptera Heterocera (Moths) 1: 500-524. Klots, A.B. 1970. Lepidoptera, pp. 115. In Tuxen, S.L. [ed.], Taxonomists's glossary of genitalia in insects, 2 ed. Scandinavian university, Copenhagen, Danmark. Kozhanchikov, I.V. 1956. Psychidae, pp. 393-395. In Pavlovskii, E.N. [ed.], Fauna of the U.S.S.R. Lepidoptera, Vol. III, No. 2. Zoologicheskii Institut Akademii Nauk SSSR, moskva. Landry, J.F. 2007. Taxonomic review of the leek moth genus Acrolepiopsis (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) in North America. The Canadian Entomologist 139(3): 319-353. Leech, J.H. 1888. On the Lepidoptera of Japan and Corea - Part II. Heterocera, Sect. I. Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London: 580-654. Leonhardt, B.A., Neal, J.W., Klun, J.A., Schwarz, M. & Plimmer, J.R. 1983. An unusual lepidopteran sex pheromone system in the bagworm moth. Science 219(4582): 314-316. Mathew, G. 1985. Variations in the wing venation of Ptroma plagiophleps Hampson (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). The Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 24(4): 359-363. Matsumura, S. 1931. Psychidae, pp. 1009-1010. In Matsumura, S. [ed.], 6000 illustrated insects of the Japan-Empire. Tôko Shoin, Tokyo. McDonogh, R.S. 1939. The habitat distribution and dispersal of the psychid moth, Luffia ferchaultella, in England and Wales. The Journal of Animal Ecology 44 8(1): 10-28. Meyer, C.P. & Paulay, G. 2005. DNA barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology 3(12): e422. Meyrick, E. & Lower, O.B. 1907. Revision of the Australian Psychidae. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 31: 196-199. Moore, F. 1883. Family Psychidae, pp. 102, The Lepidoptera of Ceylon Vol. II. L. Reeve & Co., London, UK. Moore, F. 1891. A new psychid injurious to sâl. Indian Museum Notes on Economic Entomology 2: 63-67. Moore, R.G., & Hanks, L.M. 2004. Aerial dispersal and host plant selection by neonate Thyridopteryx ephemeraeformis (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Ecological Entomology 29: 327-335. Mutanen, M., Ruotsalainen, H. & Kaila, L. 2009. Variation in larval chaetotaxy in Orthosia gothica (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): effects of mother, sex and side, and implications for systematics. Systematic Entomology 34(4): 712-723. Nair, K.S.S. 2000. General scenario of pests and diseases in natural forests and plantation of Indonesia, pp. 15-44. In Nair, K.S.S. [ed.], Insect pests and diseases in Indonesian forests: An assessment of the major threats, research efforts and literature. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesian. Nielsen, S.E. 1978. On the systematic position of the genus Eriocottis Zeller, 1847, with remarks on the phylogeny of primitive Tineoidea (Lepidoptera). Insect Systematics & Evolution 9: 279-296. Pfenninger, M., Nowak, C., Kley, C., Steinke, D. & Streit, B. 2007. Utility of DNA taxonomy and barcoding for the inference of larval community structure in morphologically cryptic Chironomus (Diptera) species. Molecular Ecology 16(9): 1957-1968. 45 Rao, S., Liston, A., Crampton, L. & Takeyasu, J. 2009. Identification of larvae of exotic Tipula paludosa (Diptera: Tipulidae) and T. oleracea in North America using mitochondrial cytB sequences. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99(1): 33-40. Rhainds, M., Davis, D.R. & Price, P.W. 2009. Bionomics of bagworms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Annual Review of Entomology 54: 209-226. Rhainds, M., Gries, G., Ho, C.T., & Chew, P.S. 2002. Dispersal by bagworm larvae, Metisa plana: Effects of population density, larval sex, and host plant attributes. Ecological Entomology 27: 204-212. Robinson, G.S. 1989. A phylogeny for the Tineoidea (Lepidoptera). Insect Systematics & Evolution 19(9): 117-129. Roe, A.D., Stein, J.D., Gillette, N.E. & Sperling, F.A.H. 2009. Identification of Dioryctria (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in a seed orchard at Chico, California. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99(3): 433-448. Sattler, K. 1991. A review of wing reduction in Lepidoptera. Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History (Entomology) 60(2): 243-288. Sauter, W. & Hättenschwiler, P. 1991. Zum system der palaearktischen psychiden (Lep. Psychidae) 1. Teil: Liste der palaearktischen Arten. Nota lepidopterologica 14(1): 69-89. Seino, A. 1980. Redescription of Chalioides kondonis Kondo and description of a new allied species from Taiwan. Tinea 10(31): 309-314. Smith, D., & Peña, J.E. 2002. Tropical Citrus Pests, pp. 72. In Peña, J.E., Sharp, J.L. & Wysoki, M. [eds.], Tropical Fruit Pests and Pollinators: Biology, Economic Importance, Natural Enemies and Control. CABI, Oxon. Snellen, P.C.T. 1879. Lepidoptera van Celebes. Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 22: 114-117. 46 Sonan, J. 1935. Psychidae of Formosa. Transactions of the Natural History society of Formosa 25: 448-455. Strand, E. 1912. Psychidae, pp. 351-370. In Seitz, A. [ed.], Die Gross-Schmetterlinge des Palaearktischen Faunengebietes. Verlag des Seitz'schen Werkes, Stuggart, Germany. Strand, E. 1914. Psychidae. Lepidoptera Niepeltiana (1): 21, t.11. Strand, E. 1915. H. Sauter's Formosa-Ausbeute. Supplementa Entomologica 4: 12-13. Strand, E. 1929. Cryptothelea Duncan, pp. 187-191. In Strand, E. [ed.], Lepidopterum Catalogus. Pars 34: Psychidae. W. Junk, Berlin. Sugimoto, M., & Saigusa, T. 2001a. A new genus of the subfamily Oiketicinae from Asia (Lepidoptera, Psychidae). Tinea 16(5): 327-336. Sugimoto, M., & Saigusa, T. 2001b. The systematic position, morphology and bionomics of Acanthopsyche (Eumetisa) taiwana Sonan, 1935, newly recorded from the Ryukyus, Japan (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Entomological Science 4(4): 407-430. Sugimoto, M., & Saigusa, T. 2002. Bacotia-like new genus of the family Psychidae (Lepidoptera) from Taiwan, with a disscusion on its systematic position. Transaction of the Lepidopterological Society of Japan 53(4): 215-224. Swinhoe, C.C. 1892. Psychidae, pp. 224-228, Catalogue of eastern and Australian Lepidoptera Heterocera in the collection of the Oxford University Museum. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK. Tamura, K., Dudley, J., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596-1599. Vaglia, T., Haxaire, J., Kitching, I.J., Meusnier, I. & Rougerie, R. 2008. 47 Morphology and DNA barcoding reveal three cryptic species within the Xylophanes neoptolemus and loelia species-groups (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Zootaxa 1923: 18-36. van Velzen, R., Larsen, T.B. & Bakker, F.T. 2009. A new hidden species of the Cymothoe caenis-complex (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) from western Africa. Zootaxa 2197: 53-63. Walker, F. 1855. Psychidae, pp. 926-976, List of the Specimens of Lepidopterous Insects in the Collection of the British Museum. Edward Newman, London, UK. Westwood, J.O. 1854. Descriptions of some species of Lepidopterous insects belonging to the genus Oiketicus. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1854: 219-243, pl. 37. Wiemers, M., & Fiedler, K. 2007. Does the DNA barcoding gap exist? - a case study in blue butterflies (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Frontiers in Zoology 4(1): 8. Wileman, A.E., & South, R. 1917. New species of Lepidoptera from Japan and Formosa. The Entomologist 50(650): 145-148. Will, K.W., & Rubinoff, D. 2004. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20(1): 47-55. Yazaki, M. 1926. Note on the Classification of Gen. Clania together with new Genus and a new species of Psychinae (Psychidae, Lepidoptera.). Bulletin of the Kagoshima Imperial College of Agriculture and Forestry 6: 163-182. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus:永不公開 not available 校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available 您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.143.4.181 論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開 Your IP address is 3.143.4.181 This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available. |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |