在美國，員工認股權是存在於各企業一種相當普遍的員工激勵制度。台灣企業在民國八十九年以前主要的獎酬激勵制度為員工分紅配股，直到民國八十九年七月證交法增修第二十八條之二以及之三，引進員工認股權後，民國九十年二月才由世界先進積體電路公司首先開始正式實施認股權制度，許多企業在此之後也陸續引進。
認股權是一種激勵制度，但企業經營者可能因為自身利益，利用盈餘管理行為來提升其認股權價值，此時認股權的發放不但無法提升企業績效，反而成為企業內部管理者操弄盈餘的動機。本研究主要探討民國九十年至九十四年間，台灣上市上櫃電子業公司，發放高階主管認股權與盈餘管理的三個主題，首先是探討企業發放高階主管認股權，是否會因為閉鎖期的結束而產生比發行當年度多的盈餘管理；二是在閉鎖期結束時，有發放高階主管認股權的企業，是否會比未發放高階主管認股權的企業，產生較多的盈餘管理行為；最後則探討認股權股數是否會影響企業的盈餘管理。
本研究實證結果顯示，我國有發放高階主管認股權的上市櫃電子業，在發放認股權的閉鎖期間內，發放當年度的盈餘管理程度最低，閉鎖期結束年度時的盈餘管理程度最高。在比較有無發放高階主管認股權的企業之後，有發放認股權的企業，比未發放的企業從事較多的盈餘管理。最後本研究實證結果顯示，高階主管認股權發放的股數，與盈餘管理程度高低無顯著的影響。

Executive Stock Option (ESOs) is the most prevailing encouragement system in the United States. Until the amended Securities Law ξ28-Ⅱ and III in July, 2000, the most popular encouragement system in Taiwan is Employee Stock Bonus (ESBs). After introducing the ESOs in 2000, Vanguard International Semiconductor Corporation (VIS) is the first company to implement the ESOs in February, 2001. Taiwan’s Companies start to implement the ESOs one after another after VIS’s adoption.

ESOs are an encouragement system for companies. However, the company management might use earnings management on account of self-interests to increase the value of stock options they owned. The issuance of ESOs can’t increase the profit of the corporate in this situation. On the contrary, it becomes a motivation of the management to manipulate the earnings. This research is about three topics between ESOs and earnings management and the targets are the Taiwan listed electronic companies from year 2001 to year 2005. This study is mainly about three issues of the relations about ESOs and Earnings Management in Taiwan listed companies in the time between 2001 and 2005. First, if companies that grant ESOs would come up more earnings management over time in the lock-up period. Second, if companies that grant ESOs would come up more earnings management than those that don’t grant ESOs when the lock-up period ends. Finally, this study is about the relations between the volume of ESOs and the earnings management.

The experiment findings conclude that companies that issue ESOs have the lowest earnings management level at the year of issuance and the highest level at the year of the end of the lock-up period. Comparing with the companies that don’t issue ESOs, companies that issue ESOs have higher earnings management level. Finally, this study concludes that the amount of the ESOs doesn’t affect the earnings management significantly.

壹 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究流程 5
第三節 論文架構 6
貳 文獻探討與假說發展 7
第一節 文獻探討 7
第二節 假說發展 11
參 研究設計 16
第一節 各變數內涵 16
第二節 資料來源與樣本選取 21
第三節 驗證方式 23
肆 實證結果分析 24
第一節 樣本敘述性統計值 24
第二節 相關性分析 27
第三節 高階主管認股權發放對盈餘管理行為影響分析 29
伍 結論 34
第一節 研究結論 34
第二節 研究限制 36
第三節 研究建議 37
參考文獻 39

劉其昌(1988)，投資學，台北，華泰
楊朝旭與吳幸蓁，2003，總經理薪酬績效敏感性、績效門檻與盈餘管理關聯性之研究，會計評論，36，55-87
韓志翔，2003，分紅入股的經濟效果：台灣高科技公司的經驗，台灣管理學刊，3(1)，1-22
Aboody, D. and R. Kasznik, 2000. CEO stock option awards and the timing of corporate voluntary disclosures, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29(1), 73-100.
Anderson, M.C., R.D. Banker and S. Ravindran, 2000. Executive compensation in the information technology industry, Management Science, 46(4), 530-547.
Atiase, R.K., 1985. Predisclosure information, firm capitalization and security price behavior around earnings announcements, Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 21-36.
Ball, R. and P. Brown, 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers, Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159-178.
Beaver, W., R. Clarke and W. Wright, 1979. The association between unsystematic security returns and the magnitude of earnings forecast errors, Journal of Accounting Research, 17(2), 316-340.
Blasi, J., M. Conte and D. Kruse, 1996. Employee stock ownership and corporate performance among public companies, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 50(1), 60-79.
Brickley, J.A., S. Bhagat and R.C. Lease, 1985. The impact of long-range managerial compensation plans on shareholder wealth, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 115-129.
Burgstahler, D. and I. Dichev, 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1997), 99-126.
Chen, C.R., J.W. Lin and D.A. Sauer, 1997. Earnings announcements, quality and quantity of information, and stock price change, Journal of Financial Research, 20(4), 483-502.
DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and D.J. Skinner, 1994. Accounting choice in troubled companies, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1-2), 113-143.
Dechow, P.M., R.G. Sloan and A.P. Sweeney, 1995. Detecting earnings management, The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193-225.
DeFusco, R.A., R.R. Johnson and T.S. Zorn, 1990. The effect of executive stock option plans on stockholders and bondholders, The Journal of Finance, 45(2), 617-627.
Friedlan, J., 1994. Accounting choices by issuers of initial public offerings, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(1), 1-31.
Gaver, J.J., K.M. Gaver and J.R. Austin, 1995. Additional evidence on bonus plans and income management, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(1), 3-28.
Guay, W.R., S.P. Kothari and R.L. Watts, 1996. A market-based evaluation of discretionary accrual models, Journal of Accounting Research, 34(3), 83-105.
Hall, B.J. and J.B. Liebman, 1998. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 653-691.
Haugen, R.A. and L.W. Senbet, 1981. Resolving the agency problems of external capital through options, The Journal of Finance, 36(3), 629-647.
Healy, P.M., 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 85-107.
Iqbal, Z. and S.A. Hamid, 2000. Stock price and operating performance of ESOP firms a time series analysis, Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 39(3), 25-47.
Jesen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling, 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jensen, M.C. and R.S. Ruback, 1983. The market for corporate control: the scientific evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
Jensen, M.C. and K.J. Murphy, 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives, Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225-264.
Kothari, S.P., A.J. Leone and C.E. Wasley, 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163-197.

Mehran, H., 1995. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance, Jounal of Financial Economics, 38(2), 163-184.
Pugh, W.N., S.L. Oswald and J.S. Jahera Jr., 2000. The effect of ESOP adoptions on corporate performance: are there really performance changes, Managerial and Decision Economics, 21(5), 167-180.
Ruland, W., S. Tung and N.E. George, 1990. Factors Associated with the Disclosure of Managers' Forecasts, The Accounting Review, 65(3), 710-721.
Teoh, S.H., I, Welch, and T.J. Wong, 1998a. Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings, The Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1935-1974.
Teoh, S.H., I. Welch and T.J. Wong, 1998b. Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings, Journal of Financial Economics, 50(1), 63-99.
Watts, R.L. and J.L. Zimmerman, 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards, The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134.
Yeo, G..H., S.S. Chen, K.W. Ho and C.F. Lee, 1999. Effects of executive share option plans on shareholder wealth and firm performance: The Singapore evidence, The Financial Review, 34 (2), 1–20.