此文以國際關係理論學科發展初期最負盛名的學者艾德華．卡爾(E. H. Carr)為討論的中心。試圖避免以往華語學界各種對於卡爾思想過於狹隘而單一的解釋，將卡爾思想具多樣性內涵的原貌，重新展現在世人的面前。首先、理解卡爾生平對其思想的形塑，分析實踐與理論間之互動對於卡爾的意義，並論證其歷史哲學與國際關係理論研究之學術意義，更大於其蘇聯史的研究；其次、以國際關係理論第一次大辯論為基礎，探討卡爾有關於烏托邦主義與現實主義的經典詮釋；最後、對卡爾具歷史哲學特色的國際關係方法論進行完整的討論與分析。以上述三大主軸串連起卡爾對於：理論與現實、烏托邦主義與現實主義，以及主觀與客觀等觀念的看法。藉由上述的討論，理解卡爾思想當中的多元面向，並討論這種多元面向對於當代國際關係理論的啟示以及發展上的多元影響。

none

艾德華．卡爾對國際關係理論之多元影響

第一章 緒論 1
第一節　研究動機 1
第二節　研究目的 11
第三節　文獻回顧 24
第四節　研究方法與章節安排 27
第五節　研究範圍與研究限制 28
第二章 卡爾思想脈絡源流 30
第一節　卡爾的人生際遇 32
第二節　卡爾的著述與思想 37
第三節　小結：卡爾思想真正的核心－歷史哲學與國際關係理論 46
第三章 卡爾國際關係理論中的烏托邦主義與現實主義 49
第一節　大辯論的迷思 52
第二節　被忽略的烏托邦主義 63
第三節　被誤解的現實主義 78
第四節　小結：無法被歸類的巨人 85
第四章 卡爾的歷史哲學式國際關係方法論 86
第一節　歷史懷疑主義認識論 90
第二節　人、國家與國際關係 102
第三節　歷史進步主義本體論 114
第四節　小結：方法論上的內在矛盾 125
第五章、結論 129
參考文獻 137

參考文獻

王逸舟，2006，《西方國際政治學：歷史與理論》，第二版，上海：人民。
江金太，1981，《歷史與政治》，台北，桂冠。
李濱，2000年1月，「國際政治經濟學的葛蘭西學派」，《歐洲》。
李永熾，1991，〈近現代的烏托邦世界〉，收錄於《當代：烏托邦專輯》，期61。
22-31。
李奭學，1991，〈追尋烏托邦的履痕：西洋上古史文裡的烏托邦思想〉，收錄於《當
　　代：烏托邦專輯》，期61。32-42。
宋美璍，2003，〈湯馬斯•摩爾的世界與視界〉，收錄於Thomas Moore著，宋美璍譯，《烏托邦》，台北：聯經。
余意，2006，「愛德華．H．卡爾的國際政治思想研究」，《中國人民大學國際關
係學院院報》，期3，9-13。
林淑慈，2006年12月，「柏林與史家論「道德判斷」-- 兼談二十世紀英國史學　　
　　的若干發展」，《台大歷史學報》，期38，219-270。
林啟屏，2005，「疑古與信古之間：以古代中國的思想為例」，收錄於，葉國良、
　　鄭吉雄、徐富昌編，《出土文獻硏究方法論文集，初集》，(台北：台灣大學
　　出版中心)，69-89。
周梁楷，1990，《近代歐洲史家及史學思想》，台北：唐山。
周梁楷，1991，〈激進壯美的烏托邦：摩爾與湯姆森的職志〉，收錄於《當代：烏
　　托邦專輯》，期61。22-31。45-55
周樑楷，2006，「歷史意識是種思維的方法」，收錄於，思想委員會編，《思想：
　　歷史與現實》，台北：聯經。125-162。
黃進興，1992，《歷史主義與歷史理論》，台北：允晨。
馮紹雷，2004，「關於國際關係研究學科性的若干構想」，收錄於，「國際關係
　　研究方法論筆談特輯」，《中國社會科學》，期1，78-95。
游佳萍、陳妍伶，2006，「虛擬社群中的組織公民行為之研究：以線上遊戲為例」，收錄於，《資訊社會研究》，期11，115-144。
許慧琦，1996，「戰前英國姑息政策理念的形成原因」，《問題與研究》，卷35，
　　期6，35-67。
曾國祥，2002，「現代歷史理論的自然主義假設：一個批判性的回顧」，《歐美研
究》，卷32，期3，567-620。
張錫模，2002，《莫斯科不相信眼淚》，台北：玉山社。
嚴建強、王淵明，2001，《西方歷史哲學》，臺北：慧明。
顧昕，1991，〈烏托邦與極權主義〉，收錄於《當代：烏托邦專輯》，期61。22-31。57-64。
蕭高彥，2002年6月，「共和主義與現代政治」，《政治與社會哲學評論》，期1，
　　85-116。
Armesto, Felipe. Fernandez，2008，「跋：今日，何謂歷史？」，收錄於《今日，何謂歷史？》，David Cannadine編，梁永安譯，台北：立緒。
Ashley, Richard. 1986. “The Poverty of Neorealism,” in Keohane, Robert.(ed.),
Neorealism and Its Critics. New York : Columbia University Press. 255-300.
Ashworth, Lucian. M. 2002. “Did The Realist Great Debate Really Happen? A
Revisionist History of International Relations,”International Relations, Vol. 16,
No. 1, 33-51.
Ashworth, Lucian. M. 2006. “Where The Idealist in Interwar International
Relations,”Review of International Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1, 33-51.
Audi, Robert主編，2002，《劍橋哲學辭典》，王思迅主編譯，台北：貓頭鷹。
Barkin, J. Samuel. 2003. “Realist Constructivism,” International Studies Review, Vol.
　　5, No. 1, 325-342.
Bell, Duncan. S. A. 2002. “International Relations The Dawn of A Historiographical,”
British Journal of Politics International Relations, Vol. 3, No. 1, 115-126.
Booth, Ken. 1991. “Security in Anarchy: Utopia Realism in Theory and Practice,”
International Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 3, 527-545.
Booth, Ken. 1996. “75 Years On: Rewriting The Subjects Past – Reinventing Its
Future,” in Steve Smith. Ken Booth. and Marysia Zalewski. (eds.), International
Theory: Positivism and Beyond, New York: Columbia University Press. 328-339.
Braudel, Fernand，1965，「歷史和社會科學：長時段」，收錄於，《再現過去：
　　社會史的理論視野》，蔡少卿編譯，浙江：人民，48-78。
Bull, Hedlley. 1966(a)/1969.“International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach,”Klaus Knorr. and James N. Rosenau. (eds.), Contending Approaches
to International Politics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 20-38.
Bull, Hedlley. 1966(b).“Society and Anarchy in International Relations,”Herbert
Butterfield. and Martin Wight. (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the
Theory of International Politics. London: Allen & Unwin Press, 35-50.
Bull, Hedlley. 1969/2000.“The Twenty Years’ Crisis. Thirty Years On,”in 　
Hedlley Bull.(ed.), Hedlley Bull on International Society . New York:
Macmillan Press, 125-138.
Bull, Hedlley. 1972. “The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969,”in James Der
Derian. (ed.), International Theory: Critical Investigations, New York:
New York University Press, 181-212.
Butterfiled, Herbert. 1966.“The Balance of Power,”Herbert Butterfield. and
Martin Wight. (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of
International Politics. London: Allen & Unwin Press, 132-148.
Buzan, Barry. 1993.“From International System to International Society: Structural
Realism and Regimes Theory Meet the English School,”International
Organization. Vol. 47, No. 3, 327-352.
Buzan, Barry. Charles Jones. and Richard Little. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy:
Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1944. Conditions of Peace. London: Macmillan Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1945. Nationalism and After. London: Macmillan Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1947. The Soviet Impact on the Western World. New York: The
Macmillan Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1950. The Studies in Revolution. London: Macmillan Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1954. The Interregnum 1923-1924. London: Macmillan Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1957. The New Society. 2nd ed. Boston: Beacon Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1962. What is History? New York: Knopf Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1962. Dostoevsky 1821-1881: A New Biography. New York: 　　
　　Houghton Mifflin Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1968. The Romantic Exiles: A Nineteenth Century Portrait
Gallery. London: Victor Gollancz Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1969-1978. Foundations of A Planned Economy 1926-1929.
London: Macmillan Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1980.“An Autobiography,”Cox, Michael. (ed.), 2000. E. H.
　　Carr : A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave Press. xiii-xxii.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 1983. What is History?, 2nded. New York: Macmillan Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett，1995，《歷史論集》，王任光譯，台北：幼獅。
Carr, Edward Hallett. 2001. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939 : An Introduction to
　　The Study of International Relations, Cox, Michael et al., 2nded. New York: St.
Martin's Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 2001.“Index,”in The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939: An
Introduction to The Study of International Relations, Cox, Michael et al., 2nd ed.
New York: St. Martin's Press, 221-233.
Carr, Edward Hallett. 2003. From Napoleon to Stalin and Other Essays, 2nded. New
York: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett，2007，《歷史是什麼》，陳恆譯，北京：商務。
Cox, Michael.“Introduction,”in Carr, E. H. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939 :
　　an introduction to the study of international relations, 2nd ed. New York: St.
　　Martin's Press, xii.
Cox, Michael. 2000.“Introduction: E. H. Carr – A Critical Appraisal,”Michael Cox. (ed.), E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave Press, 1-18.
Cox, Michael. 2000.“E. H. Carr Chronology of His Life and Work,”Michael Cox.
(ed.), E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave Press, 339-343.
Cox, Michael. 2001.“Introduction,”in Carr, Edward Hallett. The Twenty Years'
Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to The Study of International Relations, Cox,
Michael et al., 2nded. New York: St. Martin's Press, ix-lviii.
Cox, Robert. 1986.“Social Force, States and World Orders: Beyond International
Relations,”in Keohane, Robert. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics. New
York: Columbia University Press, 204-254.
Cozette, Murielle. 2008. “Reclaiming The Critical Dimension of Realism: Hans J.
Morgenthau on The Ethics of Scholarship,”Review of International Studies.
Vol. 34, No. 1, 5-27.
Crane, Gregory. 1998. Thucydides and the Ancient Simplicity: The Limits of Political
　　Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Davies, R. W. 2001.“Preface to The Second Edition,”in Carr, Edward Hallett.
What is History?, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan Press, xlvii-xciii.
Derian, James. Der. 1995. “The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969,”in James
Der Derian. (ed.), International Theory: Critical Investigations, New York:
New York University Press, 1-14.
Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1961. Pattern and Meaning in History. London: Harper Collins
Publishers Press.
Dougherty, James. E. and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff，2002，《爭論中的國際關係理
論》，第五版，閻學通譯，北京：世界知識。
Duke, David. Freeland. 1993.“Edward Hallet Carr: Historical Realism and the
Liberal Tradition,”Past Imperfect. Vol. 2, 123-136.
Dunne, Timothy. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English
　　School. London: Oxford University Press.
Dunne, Timothy. 2000.“Theories as Weapons: E. H. Carr and International
Relations,”Michael Cox.(ed.), E. H .Carr: A Critical Appraisal.
New York: Palgrave Press, 217-233.
Dunne, Timothy. Michael Cox and Ken Booth. 1998.“Introduction:
　　The Eighty Years' Crisis,”in Timothy Dunne. Michael Cox. and Ken
　　Booth.(eds.), The Eighty Years' Crisis: International Relations 1919-1999,
　　London: Cambridge University Press, i-xi.
Durkheim, Emile. 1938. The Rules of Sociological Method. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Evans, Richard，2007，「導言」，收錄於《歷史是什麼？》，E. H. Carr著，陳恆譯，
北京：商務印書，1-47。
Evans, Richard，2008，「前言：今日，何謂歷史?」，收錄於《今日，何謂歷史?》，
David Cannadine編，梁永安譯，台北：立緒，23-56。
Fukuyama, Francis，1983，《歷史之終結與最後一人》，李永熾譯，台北：時報。
George, Jim. 1994. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical Reintroduction to
International Relations. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers Press.
Giddens, Anthony，2007，《社會的構成 : 結構化理論大綱》，李康、李猛譯，
　　台北：左岸。
Giddens, Anthony. 1974. Positivism and Sociology. London: Henemman Press.
Gilpin, Robert. 1986.“The Richness of The Tradition of Political Realism,”in
Keohane, Robert. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia
University Press, 301-321.
Gilpin, Robert. 2001.“Reception and Praise For The Twenty Years’ Crisis,”in Carr,
E. H. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to The Study of
International Relations, 2nd ed. New York: St. Martin's Press, i.
Goldfischer, David. 2002.“E. H. Carr: A Historical Realist Approach for The
Globalisation Era,”Review of International Studies. Vol. 28, 697-717.
Guzzini, Stefano，2000，《國際關係與國際政治經濟學》，鄭又平、黃烈修譯，
　　台北：韋伯。
Haslam, Jonathan. 2000(a). The Vices of Integrity: E. H. Carr 1892-1982. New York:
Verso Press.
Haslam, Jonathan. 2000(b).“E. H. Carr Search for Meaning,”Cox, Michael. (ed.),
　　E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave Press. 2000. 21-35.
Hall, Ian. 2001.“Still The English Patient? Closures and Inventions in The English
School,”International Affairs. Vol. 77, No. 23, 931-942.
Herodotus，1997，《希羅多德歷史 : 希臘波斯戰爭史》，王以鑄譯，台北：台灣
　　商務。
Herst, Paul. 1998.“The Eighty Years' Crisis, 1919-1999 - Power,”in Timothy
Dunne. Michael Cox. and Ken Booth.(eds.), The Eighty Years' Crisis:
International Relations 1919-1999, London: Cambridge University Press,
133-148.
Hoffman, Stanley. 1960. Contemporary Theory in International Relations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Press.
Hoffman, Stanley. 1977/1995.“An American Social Science: International Relations,”in James Der Derian. (ed.), International Theory: Critical Investigations, New York: New York University Press, 212-241.
Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith. 1990. Explaining and Understanding International
　　Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Howe, Paul. 1994.“The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr,”Review of International
Studies. Vol. 20, No. 3, 277-297.
Hume, David，1994，《人性論》，關文運譯，北京：商務印書館。
Iggers, Georg. G. 1968. The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of
Historical Thought From Herder to The Present. Conn Middle Town: Wesleyan
University Press.
Jenkins, Keith，2000，《後現代歷史學 : 從卡耳和艾爾頓到羅逖與懷特》，江政
寬譯，台北：麥田。
Johnston, Whittle. 1967.“E. H. Carr Theory of International Relations: A Critique,”
　　The Journal of Politics. Vol. 29, No. 4, 861-884.
Jones, Charles. 1997. “Carr, Mannheim, and a Post Positivist Science of International
　　Relation,” Political Studies, XLV, 232-246.
Jones, Charles. 2000.“An Active Danger’: E. H. Carr at The Times,
1940-46 , Michael Cox (ed.), 2000. E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York:
Palgrave Press, 339-343.
Jones, Charles. 2001. E. H. Carr and International relations:Ａ Duty to Lie. London:
　　Cambridge University Press.
Kratochwil, Friedrich. V. 1998. “Politics, Norm and Peaceful Change,”in Timothy
Dunne. Michael Cox. and Ken Booth.(eds.), The Eighty Years' Crisis:
International Relations 1919-1999, London: Cambridge University Press,
193-218.
Keohane, Robert. O. 1988/1995.“International Institutions: Two Approaches,”in James Der Derian. (ed.), International Theory: Critical Investigations. Washington Square: New York University Press, 279-307.
Kubálková, Vendulka. 1998. “The Twenty Years’ Catharsis: E. H, Carr and IR,”in
Vendulka Kubálková. Paul Kowert. and Nicholas Greenwood Onuf.(eds.),
International Relations in A Constructed World. New York: M. E. Sharpe Press,
25-57.
Lamy, Steven L. 2001.“Contemporary Mainstream Approaches: Neo-Realism and
Neo-Liberalism,”in John Baylis and Steve Smith(eds.), The Globalization of
World Politics (second edition.). London: Oxford Press, 182-199.
Linklater, Andrew. 1997.“The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr,
Critical Theory and International Relations,”Review of International Studies
Vol. 23, No. 3, 321-328.
Linklater, Andrew. 2000.“E. H. Carr, Nationalism and the Future of the Sovereign
State,”Michael Cox. (ed.), E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York:
Palgrave Press, 236-247.
Little, Richard. 1996. “The Growing Relevance of Pluralism,” in Steve Smith.
Ken Booth. and Marysia Zalewski.(eds.), International Theory: Positivism and
Beyond, New York: Columbia University Press, 66-86.
Machiavelli, Niccolò，1998，《君王論》，閻克文譯，台北：商務。
MacMillan, Margaret，2006，《大國的博奕：改變世界的一百八十天》，榮慧、劉
　　彥汝譯，重慶：重慶出版。
Mannheim, Karl，2006，《意識型態與烏托邦》，張明貴譯，台北：桂冠。.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2005.“E. H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On,”
　　International Relations. Vol. 19, No. 2, 139-152.
Michael Cox. (ed.), 2000. E.H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave
　　Press.
Murray, A. J. H. 1996.“The Moral Politics of Hans Morgenthau,”The Review of
Politics, Vol. 58, No. 1, 81-107.
Molloy, Sean. 2001.“The Dialectics of The Twenty Years’ Crisis,”in the 4th
Pan-European IR Conference. at Canterbury: Kent University.
Molloy, Sean. 2003. winter.“Dialectics and Transformation: Exploring The
International Theory of E. H. Carr,”International Journal of Politics, Culture
and Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, 279-306.
Molloy, Sean. 2006. The Hidden History of Realism: A Genealogy of Power Politics.
　　New York: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
Morgenthau, Hans. 1948.“The Political Science of E. H. Carr,”World Politics.
Vol. 1, No. 1, 127-134.
Morgenthau, Hans. 1952.“Another Great Debate: The National Interest of The
United States,”American Political Science Review. Vol. 46, No. 1, 961-978.
Morgenthau, Hans. 1970/1995. “The Intellectual and Political Functions of Theory,”
in James Der Derian. (ed.), International Theory: Critical Investigations, New
York: New York University Press, 197-227.
Morgenthau, Hans. 2006. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle For Power And
Peace, Thompson, Kenneth. W. and W. David Clinton et al., 7th ed. Boston:
McGraw-Hill Higher Education Press.
Nicholson, Michael. 1998.“Realism and Utopianism Revisited,”in Timothy Dunne.
Michael Cox. and Ken Booth.(eds.), The Eighty Years' Crisis:
International Relations 1919-1999, London: Cambridge University Press,
65-82.
Osterud, Ovyind. 1996.“Antinomies of Postmodernism International Studies,”
　　Journal of Peace Search, Vol. 33, No. 4, 385-290.
Patomaki, Heikki. and Colin Wight. 2000. “After Postpositivism? The Promises of
Critical Realism,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44 , No. 1, 213-237.
Pichler, Hans, Karl. 1998. “The Godfather of Truth: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in
Morgenthau’s Theory of Power Politics,” Review of International Studies, Vol.
24, No. 1, 185-200.
Pocock, J. G. A. 2003. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and 　　
　　the Atlantic Republican Tradition / with a New After word by the Author. New
　　Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Popper，1981，《歷史定論主義的窮困》，李豐斌譯，台北：聯經。
Porter, Brian. 2000.“E. H. Carr – The Aberystwyth Years, 1936-1947,”Michael
Cox (ed.), 2000. E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave Press.
2000. 339-343.
Quirk, Joel, and Darshan Vigneswaran. 2005. “The Construction of An Edifice: The
　　Story of a First Great Debate,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1,
　　89-107.
Ranke, Leopold. Von，1991，「列強」(Die Grossen Machte)，收錄於《西洋史集刊》，
胡昌志譯，期3，167-194。
Rickert, H，1987，《文化科學和自然科學》，涂紀亮譯，台北：谷風。
Rosenberg, Justin，2002，《市民社會的帝國－現實主義國際關係理論批判》，洪郵
　　生譯，江蘇：人民。
Schmidt, Brian. C. 2002. “Anarchy, World Politics and The British of a Discipline:
　　American International Rations, Pluralist Theory and The Myth of International
　　Idealism,” International Relations, Vol. 16, No. 1, 9-31.
Smith, Michael. Joseph. 1986. Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. Louisiana: Louisiana State University Press.
Scruton, Roger，1984，《康德》，蔡英文譯，台北：聯經。
Skinner, Quentin，1983，《馬基維利》，蔡英文譯，台北：聯經。
Spykman, Nicholas John. 1942. America's Strategy in World Politics: The United
　　States and The Balance of Power. New York: Harcourt Press.
Strauss, Leo. 1988. What is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies. Chicago:
Chicago University Press.
Stephanson, Steve. 2000.“The Lessons of What is History,”Michael Cox. (ed.),
E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave Press, 283-303.
Suganami, Hidemi. 1989. The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Timothy Dunne. Michael Cox. and Ken Booth.(eds.), 1998. The Eighty Years' Crisis:
　　International Relations 1919-1999, London: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, E. P. 1956. “Toynbee and Theory of International Politics,” Political
Science Quarterly, Vol. 77, No. 3, 356-386.
Thucydides，2004，《伯羅奔尼薩戰爭史》，徐松岩譯，桂林 : 廣西師大。
Vasquez, John. A. 1983. The Power of Power Politics: A Critique. London: Francis
Printer Press.
Walker, R. B. J. 1989.“History and Structure in The Theory of International
Relations,”James Der Derian. (ed.), International Theory: Critical
Investigations. Washington Square: New York University Press, 1995. 308-339.
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/outside: International Relations as Political Theory.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Walsh, W. H.，1988，《歷史哲學》，王任光譯，台北：幼獅。
Waltz, Kenneth. 1986.“Reflection on Theory of International Politics: A Response
to My Critics,”in Keohane, Robert. (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics. New
York: Columbia University Press. 322-345.
Wight, Martin. 1966(a)/ 1995.“Why is There no International Theory?,”James Der
Derian. (ed.), International Theory: Critical Investigations. Washington Square:
New York University Press, 15-35.
Wight, Martin. 1966(b).“Western Value in International Relations,”Herbert
Butterfield and Martin Wight.(eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the
Theory of International Politics. London: Allen & Unwin Press, 89-131.
Wight, Martin. 1969/1991.“The Three Tradition of International Theory,”Gabriele
Wight and Brian Porter.(eds.), International Theory The Three Traditions.
London: Leicester University Press, 7-24.
Wight, Martin. 1978. Power politics. New York: Holmes & Meier Press.
Wilson, Peter. 1995.“Introduction: The Twenty Years’ Crisis and The Category of
　　Idealism in International Relations,”David Long. and Peter Wilson.(eds.),
　 Thinkers of The Twenty Year' Crisis: Inter-War Idealism Reassessed. New York: Clarendon Press, 1-24.
Wilson, Peter. 1998.“The Myth of The First Great Debate,” Review of International
Studies, Vol. 24, No. 5, 1-15.
Wilson, Peter. 2000(a).“Carr and His Early Critics: Responses to The Twenty Years’
Crisis, 1939-1946,”Michael Cox. (ed.), E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal.
New York: Palgrave Press, 165-195.
Wilson, Peter. 2000(b). “E. H. Carr: The Revolutionist Realist,” the global site
- Critical gateway to world politics, society and culture, 1-16.
http://www.theglobalsite.ac.uk/.
Wilson, Peter. 2001.“Radicalism for a Conservative Purpose: The Peculiar Realism 　
　　of E. H. Carr,”Millennium, Vol. 30, No. 1, 123-136.
Wilson, Peter. 2003. The International Theory of Leonard Woolf. New York: Palgrave
Macmillan Press.
Wendt, Alexander. 1992.“Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social
Construction of Power Politics,”James Der Derian. (ed.), International
Theory: Critical Investigations. Washington Square: New York University Press,
1995, 129-165.
Wendt, Alexander. 2004.《國際政治的社會理論》，秦亞青譯，上海：人民。
White, Stephen. 2000.“The Soviet Carr,”Michael Cox. (ed.), E. H. Carr: A
　　Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave Press, 109-124.