Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0211109-152831 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0211109-152831
論文名稱
Title
組織政治知覺對組織公平與組織信任之影響-以瞭解與知覺控制為干擾變項
The Influence of Perceptions of Organizational Politics on Trust and Justice-with Understanding and control as Moderator Variables
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
133
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-07-19
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2009-02-11
關鍵字
Keywords
組織公平、組織政治知覺、組織信任、瞭解、知覺控制
control, understanding, trust, justice, perceptions of organizational politics
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5631 次,被下載 26
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5631 times, has been downloaded 26 times.
中文摘要
本研究的目的為探討組織政治知覺對組織公平與組織信任之影響,並進而深入研究瞭解與知覺控制的干擾效果。本研究以40個組織為研究對象,有效問卷共計1,890份。統計使用方法為描述性統計、項目分析、因素分析、相關分析及層級迴歸分析。本研究將組織政治知覺分為三構面,分別為一般政治行為,保持沉默靜待好處及政策與實務差距,組織公平分為配公平及程序公平,組織信任分為對主管的信任、對組織的信任及對同事的信任。研究結果組織政治知覺三構面對分配公平、程序公平、對主管的信任、對組織的信任及對同事的信任皆具有顯著的負向影響。「瞭解」在「政策與實務差距與分配公平之關係」、「政策與實務差距與分配公平之關係」及「保持沉默靜待好處及政策與實務差距與對組織的信任之關係」具有干擾效果。知覺控制在「政策與實務差距與對分配公平之關係」、「政策與實務差距與對對主管的信任之關係」及「政策與實務差距與對對組織的信任之關係」具有干擾效果。
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to examine the influence of perceptions of organizational politics on justice and trust. This research also deeply investigates the variables that moderate the perceptions of organizational politics-. These variables are understanding and control. This research regards 40 organizations as the research object, the valid questionnaire adds up to 1,890. The data was analyzed by statistical methods are descriptive statistic, item analysis, factor analysis, correlation analysis and hierarchicla regression analysis. The major results of this study are as following: The perceptions of organizational politics were found have a negative relationship with justice and trust. The finding also indicated that understanding and control moderated the relationship among the perceptions of organizational politics, justice and trust.
目次 Table of Contents
表目錄 II
圖目錄 IV
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 5
第三節 研究流程 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 組織政治知覺 7
第二節 組織公平 24
第三節 組織信任 26
第三章 研究方法 34
第一節 研究架構 34
第二節 研究假設 35
第三節 研究變項操作性定義與衡量工具 36
第四節 方法分析 39
第五節 研究對象 39
第六節 樣本描述 42
第七節 量表分析 43
第四章 實證分析結果 53
第一節 研究變項間之關係 53
第二節 組織政治知覺對組織公平之影響—以瞭解與知覺控制為干擾變項 54
第三節 組織政治知覺對組織信任之影響—以瞭解與知覺控制為干擾變項 61
第五章 結論與建議 73
第一節 研究結論 73
第二節 管理對策與後續研究建議 77
第三節研究限制 80
參考書目 81
附錄一 「工作環境氣氛認知及其對工作態度之影響」研究問卷
附錄二 問卷發放與回收情形統計
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
李安民,2002,組織政治知覺對員工工作態度的影響,國立中山大學人力資源研
究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬編譯,2002,組織行為學,華泰文化。
何金銘,2006,統計分析方法-SPSS軟體的輔助分析,台灣復文興業股份有限公
司出版。
何金銘,2003,組織政治知覺的類型及其前因與後果模型之再建,行政院國家科
學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
吳美惠,2004,組織政治知覺後果及相應的管理對策,國立中山大學人力資源管
理研究所碩士論文。
林素華,2004,組織政治知覺的形成因素及其相應的管理對策,國立中山大學人
力資源管理研究所碩士論文
林淑姬,1992,薪酬公平、程序公平與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究,國
立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
林鉦棽 ,1996,「組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究:社會交換理論之觀點」,
管理科學學報,第十三卷,第三期 PP391-415。
洪湘雅,2004,組織公平、組織政治知覺與組織公民行為關係之研究-台電公司
員工之觀點,真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文
陳安瀅,2003,政治知覺對組織負面影響的干擾因素-以工作滿足為例,國立中
山大學人力資源研究所碩士論文。
陳寅清,2007,國民小學兼行政教師工作價值觀與學校組織信任關係之研究-已
嘉義縣國民小學為例,國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所碩士論文。
許道然,2001,組織信任之研究:一個整合性觀點,空大行政學報,11,253-296。
許道然,2002,公部門組織信任與組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學公共
行政學系博士論文。
黃怡姿,1999,員工之組織信任的形成與影響,國立台灣大學心理研究所碩士論
文。
郭莎莉,2004,組織政治知覺不良後果的淡化因素,國立中山大學人力資源研
究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
楊智銘,2007,地方警察人員組織公平知覺對組織信任之影響,銘傳大學公共事
務學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
鄭仁偉、黎士群,2001,組織公平、信任與知識分享行為之關係性研究,人力資
源管理學報2001秋季號第一卷第二期 PP 069-93。
賴志超,1993,程序正義、分配正義與組織成員工作意向之關係,國立台灣大學
心理學研究所碩士論文。
劉麟書,2001,人際信任整合模型之研究,銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文
謝金青,1992,國民小學行政兼職教師角色衝突與工作滿意之研究,國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部份
Adams, J. S., 1965, “Inequityk in Social Exchange.” IN L. Berkowite, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press, 2: 267-299.
Alexander, S. & Ruderman, M., 1987, “The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior.” Social Justice Research, 1:177-198.
Allen, R. W., Madison, D. L., Porter, L. W., Renwick, P. A., & Mayes, B. T., 1979, “Organizational Politics: Tactics and characteristics of its actors.” California Management Review, 22, 77-83.
Andrews, M. C. & K. M. Kacmar,2001,”Discrimination among organization politics, justice, and support.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22:347-366.
Ashford & Taylor,1990,” Adptation to work transitions:An integrative approach”. Greenwich, CT.
Beccerra, M. & Gupta, A. K., 1999,”Trust within the Organization: Integrating the Trust Literature with Agency Theory and Transaction Cost Economics.” Public Administration Quarterly, Summer, pp. 177-203.
Beeman, D. R. & Sharkey, T. W., 1987, “The Use and Abuse of Corporate Politics.” Businesss Horizons, March-April, pp.26-30.
Blau, P. ,1964,Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley, New Youk.
Costign, R. D., S. S. Itler, & J. J. Berman, 1998, “ A multi-dimension of trust in organization.” Journal of Managerial Issue, 5(3), 303-317.
Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P., 1997, “The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behavior, attitudes, and stress.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 159-180.
Crosby, F., 1976, “ A model of egoistical relative deprivation.” Psychological Review, 83: 85-113
Deutsch, M., 1975, “Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?.” Journal of Social Issues, 31: 137-149.
Ferris, G. R., Frink, D. D., Beehr, T. A., & Gilmore, D. C. , 1995, ” Political fairness and fair politics: The conceptual integration of divergent constructs.” In R. S. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational Politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace ,pp: 21-36. Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books.
Ferris, Geral R., Dwight D. Frink, Maria Carment Galang, Jing Zhon, K. Michele Kacmar, and Jack L. Howard, 1996, “Perception of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, and Outcomes.” Human Relations, 49 (2): 233-266
Ferris, G R., Russ, G R., Fandt, P. M., 1989, “Politics in organizations, Hillsdale.” NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ferris, G R. & K. Michele Kacmar, 1992, “Perceptions of Organizational Politics (study 1).” Journal of Management, 18, Nol, 93-116
Ferris, M. K. & Carlson, D. S., 1997,”Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale(POPS): a multiple sample investigation.” Journal of Management, 23(5), 627-658.
Folger, R. & J. Greenberg, 1985, “Procedural justice: An interpretative analysis of personnel systems.” Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 13: 141-183.
Folger, R. & Konovsky, M., 1989, “Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reaction to Pay Raise Decisions.” Academy of Management Journal, 32(1): 115-130
Gandz, J., & Murray, V., 1980, “The experience of workplace politics.” Academy of Management Journal, 23, 237-251
Gilliland, S. W., 1994, “Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 691-701.
Greenberg, J., 1987a, “A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories.” Academy of Management Review, 12: 9-12.
Greenberg, J., 1987b, “Using Diaries to Promote Procedural Justice in Performance Evaluations.” Social Justice Research, 1:219-234.
Greenberg, J., 1990, “Organizational Justice: Yesterday, today, and Tomorrow.” Journal of Management, 16:399-432.
Hackman, J.R.,Oldham, G.R.,1980,”Work redesign”,MA:Addison-Wesley.
Homons, GC., 1961, “Social Behavior:Its Elementary Forms, Harcourt, Brace and World.” New York.
Kacmar, K. M., Bozeman, D. P., Carlson, D. S., & Anthony, W. P., 1999, “A partial test of the perceptions of organizational politics model.” Human Relations, 52, 383-416.
Kim, W. C. & Mauborgne, R. A., 1997, “Fair Process: Managing in the Knowledge Economy.” Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 65-75
Leventhal, G. S., 1980, “What Should be Done With Equity Theory?.”, In K. J. Gergen, M. S., Greenberg, & R. W., Willis(Eds.). Social Exchange: Advances in Equity and Research, New York: Plenum, 27-55.
Lewin, K., 1936,”Principles of topological psychology.” New York: McGraw-Hill
Lewis, J.D. & Weigert, A.,1985,”Trust as a Social Reality.” Social Force, 63(4), 967-985.
Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R., 1988, “The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice” Plenum Press, New York.
Lodahl, T. M. & Kejner, M., 1965, “The Definition and Measurement of Job Involvement.” Journal of Applip Psychology, 49(1):pp.24-33.
Lois E. Tetrick, James M. LaRocco, 1987, “Understanding, Prediction, and
Moderators of the Relationships Between Perceived Stress, Satisfaction, and
Psychological Well-Being.” Journal of Applied Psychology, , 72, 538-543.
Madison, D., Allen, R., Porter, L. W., Renwick, P., & Mayes, B., 1980, “Organizational politics: An exploration of managers’ perceptions.” Human Relations, 33, 79-100.
Niehoff, B. P. & Moorman, R. H., 1993, “Justice as a mediator of the relationship
between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior.”
Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
McCauley, D. P. & K. W. Kuhnert,. 1992,” A theoretical review and empirical investigation of employee trust in management.” Public Aministration Quarterly, 16: 265-283.
Nyhan, R. C.. “The interrelationship organizational commitment, trust, and participatory decision making : practices in public organization.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton : Florida.
Nyhan, R. C., 2000,”Changing the Paradigm: Trust and Its Role in Public Sector Organizations.” American Review of Public Administration, 30(1):87-109.
Pfeffer, J. & Davis-Blake, A., 1992, “Salary Dispersion, Location in the Salary Distribution, and Turnover Among College Administrators.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45:753-763.
Pfeffer, J. & Langton, N., 1993, “The Effects of Wage Dispersion on Satisfaction, Productivity, and Working Collaboratively: Evidence From College and University Faculty.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 38:382-407.
Porter.Allen.&Angle,1981, “The politics of upward influence in organization.” Administrative Science Quarterly
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. & Camerer, C., 1998, “ Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 393-404.
Sutton & kahn, 1986,” Prediction, understanding, and as antidotes to organization stress, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Sweeney, P. D. & D. B. McFarlin, 1993, “Workers’ evaluations of the “ends” and “means”: an examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55:23-40
Tsui, A. S., Pearce, J. L., Porter, L. W., & Tripoli A. M., 1997, “Alternative approaches to the employee-organization relationship : does investment in employees pay off ?.” Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1089-1121.
Tyler, T. R. & Griffin, E., 1989,” Managing the Allocation of Scarce Resource: Using Procedures to Justify Outcomes.” Northwestern University.
Van Avermaet, E., McClintack, C. & Moskowitz, J., 1978, “Alternative Approaches to Equity:Dissonance Reduction, Pro-social Motivation and Strategies Accommodation.” European Journal of Social Psychology, 8:419-437.
Vigoda, E & Cohen, A., 2002,” Influence tactics and perceptions of organizational politics: A longitudinal study.” Journal of business Research, 55: 311-324

Vigoda, Eran., 2000, “Organizational Politics, Job Attitudes, and Work Outcomes: Exploration and Implications for the Public Sector.” Journal of Vocational Behavio, Vol. 57: 326-347
Vigoda, Eran., 2002, “Stress-Related Aftermaths to Workplace Politics:the Relationships Among Politics, Job Distress, and Aggressive Behavior in Organizations.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 23:571-591.
Walker, L., Lind, E. A. & Thibaut, J., 1979, “The Relation Between Procedural Justice and Distributive Justice.” Virginia Law Review, 65: 1401-1420.
Yochi & Spector, P. E., 2001, “The role of justice in organizational a meta-analysis.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 86 (2), 278-321.
Zohar, D., 1995, “The Justice Perspective of Job Stress.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16:487-495.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內公開,校外永不公開 restricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.218.61.16
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.218.61.16
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code