Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0217105-005036 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0217105-005036
論文名稱
Title
組織政治知覺的形成因素-外商與本土公司的比較分析
The Antecedents of Organizational Politics Perceptions -- A Study of Western and Chinese Organization in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
90
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-01-19
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-02-17
關鍵字
Keywords
個人因素、組織因素、組織政治知覺、工作環境因素
organization factor, personal factor, factor, perceptions of organizational politics, work environment
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5665 次,被下載 2617
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5665 times, has been downloaded 2617 times.
中文摘要
論文摘要
論文名稱:組織政治知覺的形成因素-外商與本土公司的比較分析
院校系所:國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所頁數:83
畢業時間及提要別:九十三學年度第一學期碩士論文摘要
研究生:李鈴蘭(Ling-Ling Lee) 指導教授:何金銘博士(Chin-Ming Ho)
本研究依循Ferris et al. (1989) 所提出之組織政治知覺模型,討論組織政治知覺的形成因素,並以模型中之前因變項比較分析外商與本土公司員工對組織政治知覺的差異性。
本研究以國.之外商及本土公司為研究對象,有效問卷總數633,包括外商公司196,本土公司437。樣本資料分別以因素分析、信度分析、相關性迴歸及複迴歸等統計方法進行資料分析。
研究結果可證,前因變項對外商與本土公司知覺組織政治行為各有差異性存在,茲歸納結論如下:
1. 個人因素中,本土公司員工在年齡、性別及A 型人格對組織政治知覺及各分構面有顯著相關性,外商公司則無相關性
2. 工作環境中,外商公司員工在工作自主性及工作回饋性對組織政治知覺及各分構面有顯著負相關性,本土公司則無相關性
3. 組織因素中,外商公司員工在組織民主化對組織政治知覺及各分構面有顯著負相關性,本土公司則無相關性
Abstract
Abstract
The Antecedents of Organizational Politics Perceptions
-- A Study of Western and Chinese Organization in Taiwan
The purpose of this investigation is based on the model proposed by Ferris et al. (1989)to explore the influence factors of perceptions of organizational politics,including personal influences, work environment influences and organizational influences, and to examine if the perceptions of organizational politics is significant different between western and Chinese
organizations in Taiwan.
The sample consisted of 196 from western organization and 437 from Chinese organization. The data was analyzed by applying statistical methods, i.e., descriptive statistics analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis, correlation analysis and regression analysis.
Results showed that significant influences were observed for both western and Chinese organization to perceive organizational politics.
1. In personal factors, age, sex and type A behavior demonstrate significant influence to perceptions of organizational politics in Chinese organization but not in western organization
2. In work environment factors, automomy and feedback were found significant negative influence to perceptions of organizational politics in western organization but not in Chinese organization
3. In organization facors, democratization was found significant negative influence to perceptions of organizational politics in western organization but not in Chinese organization
目次 Table of Contents
目錄............................................................................I
圖目錄.........................................................................II
表目錄........................................................................ III
第一章動機與目的....................................................... 1
第一節研究動機........................................................... 1
第二節研究目的........................................................... 2
第三節研究流程............................................................ 3
第二章文獻探討............................................................ 4
第一節組織政治的定義.................................................. 4
第二節組織政治知覺的理論與研究................................. 6
第三節組織政治知覺模型之研究..................................... 7
第四節組織政治知覺測量構面分析................................. 8
第五節組織政治知覺的形成因素..................................... 11
第六節組織政治的跨文化研究.......................................... 21
第三章研究方法................................................................ 24
第一節研究架構................................................................. 24
第二節研究假設................................................................. 25
第三節研究對象及分析方法............................................... 26
第四節研究變項之操作性定義............................................ 29
第五節量表信度分析........................................................... 32
第六節組織政治知覺量表之因素分析................................ 33
第四章實證分析................................................................. 36
第一節組織政治知覺在個人變項上之差異.......................... 36
一、合併樣本...................................................................... 36
二、外商與本土公司的比較分析.......................................... 37
第二節與組織政治知覺顯著相關之前因變項......................... 39
一、合併樣本........................................................................ 39
二、外商與本土公司的比較分析............................................ 43
第三節組織政治知覺的主要形成因素..................................... 51
一、合併樣本......................................................................... 51
二、外商與本土公司的比較分析............................................. 55
第五章結論與建議................................................................... 58
第一節研究結論....................................................................... 58
第二節研究建議....................................................................... 62
第三節研究限制........................................................................ 63
中文參考書目............................................................................ 64
英文參考書目............................................................................ 65
附錄一抽樣組織描述..................................................................69
附錄二本研究問卷…………………………………………………74
圖目錄.
圖1-3-1 研究流程圖………………………………………………3
圖2-3-1 組織政治知覺模.…………………………………………7
圖3-1-1 研究模型架構……………………………………………24
表目錄.
表2-1-1 組織政治相關定義彙整表……………………………4
表2-4-1 1992 年以來組織政治知覺量表使用情形……………8
表2-5-1 組織政治知覺與前因變項之關………………………13
表2-5-2 組織政治知覺與前因變項之關係—以英國與以色列樣本為研究對象………19
表2-6-1 組織政治的跨文化研究及所造成的效應…………………..…………….……22
表3-3-1 研究對象樣本描述分析…………………………………………….…………27
表3-5-1 其它量表之信度分析彙整表…………………………………………………32
表3-6-1 組織政治知覺量表因素分析.分構面信度分析表……………………………34
表4-1-1 組織政治知覺在個人變項上之差異性分析--合併樣本………………………36
表4-1-2 組織政治知覺在個人變項上之差異性分析--外商公司………………………37
表4-1-3 組織政治知覺在個人變項上之差異性分析--本土公司………………………38
表4-2-1 前因變項與組織政治知覺及其構面之PEARSON 相關係數--合併樣本……39
表4-2-2 前因變項與組織政治知覺及其構面之相關性--合併樣本……….………..…43
表4-2-3 個人變項與組織政治知覺及其構面之PEARSON 相關係數-- 外商與本土公司比較分析…44
表4-2-4 個人變項與組織政治知覺及其構面之相關性--外商與本土公司比較分析………………….…46
表4-2-5 工作環境變項與組織政治知覺及其構面之Pearson 相關係數-- 外商與本土公司比較分析…46
表4-2-6 工作環境變項與組織政治知覺及其構面之相關性--外商與本土公司比較分析……………48
表4-2-7 組織變項與組織政治知覺及其構面之Pearson 相關係數--外商與本土公司比較分析……48
表4-2-8 組織變項與組織政治知覺及其構面之相關性--外商與本土公司比較分析.…….……….….50
表4-3-1 前因變項與組織政治知覺及各構面之複迴歸分析表– 合併樣本…………………….……51
表4-3-2 前因變項對組織政治知覺的影響性分析-- 外商及本土公司的比較分析表………...….…55
表5-1-1 研究假設結果驗證表…………………………………………………………………………58
參考文獻 References
參考書目
一、中文部份.
王錫英,2003,組織政治知覺對組織公民行為之影響– 外商組織與本土組織的比較分
析,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
何金銘,2001,統計法輯要,台南:台灣復文公司。
何金銘,2003,組織政治知覺研究現況的缺憾,中山大學人力資源管理研究所課程講義。
.孝慈,2001,組織政治知覺及其對組織承諾之影響—某大學的實證分析,中山大學人
力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
李安民,2002,組織政治知覺對員工工作態度之影響,中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩
士論文。
陳義勝、蘇明琪、劉仲矩,1997,「組織政治知覺與組織承諾關係之研究」,企銀季刊,
22 卷2 期:15~27。
楊思祺,2003,組織政治知覺的類型與各類型組織政治知覺的形成因素,中山大學人力
資源管理研究所碩士論文。
趙必孝,2000,國際化管理-人力資源觀點,台北:華泰書局。
.英忠,2001,現代管理學,台北:華泰書局。
劉超平,2002,組織政治知覺的前因模型之實證研究-以服務業大型組織為例,中山大
學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
蘇明琪,1994,組織政治知覺對組織承諾之影響研究,淡江大學研究所碩士論文。

英文參考書目
二、英文部份.
Amos Drory, 1993, Perceived Political Climate and Job Attitudes. Organization Studies, 14
(1): 59-71.
Carver, C.S., 1980, Perceived coercion, resistance to persuasion and the type A behavior
pattern. Journal of Research in Personality, 14, 467-481.
Chesney, M.A., & Rosenman, R.H., 1980, Type A behavior in thework setting. In C.L.
Cooper & R. Rayne(Eds.), Current concerns in occupational stress. London: Wiley.
Chesney, M.A., Frautschi, N.M., & Rosenman, R.H., 1985, Modifying Type A behavior. In
J.C.Rosen & L.J. Solomon (Eds.), Prevention in health psychology.
Christopher P. Parker, Robert L. Dipboye, Stacy L. Jackson, 1995, Perceptions of
organizational politics: An investigation of antecedents and consequences. Journal
of Management, Vol.21 (5): 891-912.
David C. Gilmore, Gerald R. Ferris, James H. Dulesohn, Gloria Harrell-Cook, 1996,
Organizational Politics and Employee Attendance. Group & Organization
Management, Vol.21 (4): 481-494.
Eran Vigoda, 2000, Internal Politics in Public Administration Systems: An empirical
examination of its relationship with job congruence, organizational citizenship
behavior, and in-role performance. Public Personnel Management, Vol.29 (2):
185~26p.
Eran Vigoda, 2000, Organizational Politics, Job Attitudes, and Work Outcomes: Exploration
and Implications for the Public Sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.57:
326-347.
Eran Vigoda, 2001, Reactions to organizational politics: A cross-cultural examination in
Israel and Britain, Human Relations, Vol.54 (11): 1483.
Eran Vigoda, 2002, Stress-Related Aftermaths to Workplace Politics: the Relationships
Among Politics, Job Distress, and Aggressive Behavior in Organizations. Journal
of Organizational Behavior, Vol.23: 571-591.
Eran Vigoda, Aaron Cohen, 2002, Influence tactics and perceptions of organizational politics:
A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Research, 55 (2002): 311-324.
Ferris & Kacmar, 1992, Perceptions of Organizational Politics (Study1)
Ferris, Frink, Gilmore, Kacmar, 1994, Understanding as an Antidote for the Dysfunctional
66 Ⅰ
Consequences of Organizational Politics as a Stressor. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, 24, 13: 1204-1220.
Friedman, M. Ulmer, D., 1984, Treating Type A behavior and your heart. New York: Fawcett
Crest.
Friedman, M.D., & Rosenman, R.H., 1974, Type A behavior and your Heart. New York:
Knopt.
Gerald R. Ferris, 1995, The Dimensions and Consequences of Organizational Politics: A
Confirmatory Analysis, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(19): 1747-1764.
Gerald R. Ferris, Dwight D. Frink, 1996, Reactions of Diverse Groups to Politics in the
Workplace. Journal of Management, Vol.22 (1): 23-44
Gerald R. Ferris, Dwight D. Frink, Maria Carment Galang, Jing Zhou, K. Michele Kacmar,
and Jack L. Howard, 1996, Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction,
Stress-Related Implications, and Outcomes. Human Relations, Vol.49 (2): 233-266.
Harrell-Cook, Ferris, Dulebohn, 1999, Political Behaviors as Moderators of the Perceptions
of Organizational Politics -- Work Outcomes Relationships. Journal of
Organizational Behavior, Vol.20: 1093-1105.
Hochwarter, Perrewe, Ferris, Guercio, 1999, Commitment as an Antidote to the Tension and
Turnover Consequences of Organizational Politics. Journal of Vocational Behavior,
Vol.55: 277-297.
Ing-Chung Huang, Chih-Hsun Jason Chuang, Hao-Chieh Lin, 2003, The Role of Burnout in
the Relationship Between Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Turnover
Intentions, Public Personnel Management, Vol.32 (4): 519.
Iso-Ahola, S.E. & Weissinger, E., 1985, Relationship between Type A coronary-prone
behavior and leisure patterns. 1985 NRPA Leisure Reassure Symposium, USA,
Dallas, Tx.
John M. Ford, 2002, Organizational politics and multi-source feedback, M.A., California
State University, Bakersfield,
June M L Poon, 2003, Situational antecedents and outcomes of organizational politics
perceptions, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol.18 (Iss 1/2): 138.
K.Michele Kacmar, Dennis P. Bozeman, Dawn S. Carison, William P. Anthony, 1999, An
Examination of Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and
Extension. Human Relations, 135(3): 301-312.
Kiewitz, Christian, Ferris, Gerald R., Hochwarter, Wayne A., 2002, The role of psychological
climate in Neutralizing the effects of organizational politics on work outcomes,
67 Ⅰ
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol.32 (6): 1189.
L A Witt, K Michele Kacmar, Dawn S Carlson, Suzanne Zivnuska, 2002, Interactive effects
of personality and organizational politics on contextual performance, Journal of
Organizational Behavior, Vol.23 (8): 911.
L. A Witt, Martha C Andrews, K Michele Kacmar, 2000, The Role of Participation in
Decision - Making in the Organizational Politics--Job Satisfaction Relationship.
Human Relations, Vol.53 (3): 341-358.
L. A. Witt, 1998, Enhancing Organizational Goal Congruence: A Solution to Organizational
Politics, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.83 (4): 666-674.
Laurie Larwood, Thomas A Wright, Stephan Desrochers, Veronica Dahir, 1998, Extending
latent role and psychological contract theories to predict intent to turnover and
politics in business organizations. Group & Organization Management, Vol. 23:
100-123.
Marjorie L. Randall, Russell Cropanzano, Carol A. Bormann, Andrej Birjulin, 1999,
Organizational Politics and Organizational Support as Predictors of Work Attitudes,
Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Journal of
Organizational Behavior, Vol.20: 159-174.
Martha C. Adnres, L.A. Witt & K. Michele Kacmar, 2001, The interactive effect of
organizational politics and exchange ideology manager ratings of retention. Journal
of Vocational Behavior, 62(2003): 357-369.
Martha C. Andrews, K. Michele Kacmar, 2001, Discriminating Among Organizational
Politics, Justice, and Support, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.22: 347-366.
Maslyn, Fedor, 1998, Research Reports Perceptions of Politics: Does Measuring Different
Foci Matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.83 (4): 645-653.
Matthew Valle & L.A. Witt, 2001, The Moderating Effect of Teamwork Perceptions on the
Organizational Politics -- Job Satisfaction Relationship. The Journal of Social
Psychology, 141(3): 379-388.
Matthew Valle, K. Michele Kacmar, Suzanne Zivnuska, 2003, Self-Efficacy, Outcome
Expectations and Organizational Politics Perceptions. Journal of Behavioral and
Applied Management, Vol. 5 (1): 13.
Matthew Valle, Pamela L Perrewe, 2000, Do Politics Perceptions Relate to Political
Behaviors? Tests of an Implicit Assumption and Expand Model. Human Relations,
Vol.53 (3): 359-386.
McCrae R.R., Costa P.T., Busch CM., 1986, Evaluating Comprehensiveness in Personality
68 Ⅰ
Systems: The California Q-set and the Five-factor Model, Journal of Personality, 54,
pp430-446.
Nye, Lendell G., Wittl.Alan, 1993, Dimensionality and Construct Validity of The POPS.
Educational & Psychological Measurement, Vol.53 (3): 821.
Price, V.A., 1982, Type Abehavior pattern: A model for research and practice. New York:
Academic press.
Strube, M.J., Boland, S.M., Manfredo, P.A., & Al-Falaij, A., 1989, Type A behavior pattern
and the self-evaluation of abilities: Empirical tests of the self-apprasial model.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (5),956-974.
Tallmer, J., Scherwitz, L., Chesney, M., Hecker, M., Hunkeler, E., Serwitz, J., & Hughes, G.,
1990, Selection, training, and quality control of Type A interviewer in a prospective
study of young adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13, 449-466.
Thoresen, C.E., & Pattillo, J.R., 1988, Exploring the Type A Behavior Pattern in children and
adolescents. In B.K. Houston & C.R. Snyder (Eds.), Type A behavior
pattern-research, theory, & intervention (pp. 98-145). New York: John Wiley &
Sons.
Valle Matthew, 1997, Perceptions of Organizational Politics An Subsequent Behaviors.
Psychological Reports, Vol.81: 945-946.
Wayne A. Hochwarter & K. Michele Kacmar, 2000, Research Reports Perceptions of
Organizational Politics as a Moderator of the Relationship Between
Conscientiousness and Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.85 (3):
472-478.
Wayne A. Hochwarter, Charles Kacmar, Pamela L. Perrewe & Diane Johnson, 2003,
Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relationship between politics
perceptions and work outcomes, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63: 438-456.
Wendy E. O'Connor, 2001, A Comparison of Situational and Dispositional Predictors of
Perceptions of Organizational Politics, The Journal of Psychology, 135(3):
301-312.
Witt, L.A. Patti, Anthony L., Farmer, William L., 2002, Organizational politics and work
identity as predictors of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Social
Psychology, Vol.32 (3): 486.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code