Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0218113-043355 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0218113-043355
論文名稱
Title
限時限量與熱銷提示對於消費者商品選擇影響之研究
Effect of limited time, limited quantity and hot sales messages on consumer’s choice
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
89
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-06-28
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-02-18
關鍵字
Keywords
消費者偏好、行銷訊息提示、偏好反轉
preference reversal, marketing messages, consumer’s preference
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5762 次,被下載 330
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5762 times, has been downloaded 330 times.
中文摘要
本研究欲探討限時、限量與熱銷等行銷訊息提示對消費者商品選擇之影響。作者根據文獻以及實務中賣方實際提示消費者的ㄧ些行銷訊息,挑選出七種:「限量發行」、「限時搶購」、「會員限定」、「週年慶紀念款」、「熱銷」、「最後10個」、「庫存剩不多」,透過實驗,探討這些行銷訊息提示是否影響消費者的選擇,進而發生偏好反轉現象,以及獨特性需求及自我監控兩種人格特質的調節效果。
主要研究結果如下:
1.「限量發行」、「限時搶購」、「會員限定」、「週年慶紀念款」和「熱銷」行銷訊息提示會增加消費者對商品的偏好,進而影響其選擇,造成偏好反轉現象發生,其中,「熱銷」訊息提示,效果最好。
2.「限量發行」、「限時搶購」、「會員限定」、「週年慶紀念款」訊息提示對高獨特性需求的人之影響大於低獨特性需求人格特質的人,「熱銷」則相反。
3.「限量發行」、「限時搶購」、「會員限定」、「熱銷」訊息提示對低自我監控人格特質的人之影響大於低自我監控人格特質的人,「週年慶紀念款」則差異不大。
Abstract
This study aim to investigate the influence of time-bound, quantity-bound and hot sales commercial messages on consumers’ choice of product. Based on literature and field observation, seven kinds of messages were identified. Experiments were conducted to examine how these messages affect consumers’ choice of product and how individual personality may influence their effects. The major findings are
1. Messages of “limited edition”, “limited time”, “member only”, “anniversary memorial product”, and “hot sales” messages may increases consumers’ preference and influence their choices and yielding preference reversals. Among them, “hot sales” message has the best effect.
2. “Limited edition”, “limited time”, “member only”, and “anniversary memorial product” messages have stronger effect on consumers of high need for uniqueness, while “hot sales” message has stronger effect on consumers of low need for uniqueness.
3. “Limited edition”, “limited time”, “member only” and “hot sales” messages have stronger effect on consumers of low self-monitor than those of high self-monitor, while effect of “anniversary memorial product” message on both are almost the same.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄

摘要…………………………………………………….……..……………….I
Abstract…………………………………………………….………………….II
目錄…………………………………………………….……………………….III
圖目錄…………………………………………………….…………………….V
表目錄…………………………………………………….…………………….VI
第一章 緒論.............................................................................................................1
第一節 研究背景與動機.................................................................................1
第二節 研究問題與目的.................................................................................4
第三節 研究流程.............................................................................................5
第二章 文獻探討.....................................................................................................6
第一節 行銷訊息.............................................................................................6
第二節 人格特質.............................................................................................11
第三節 偏好反轉.............................................................................................14
第三章 研究方法....................................................................................................18
第一節 研究架構.............................................................................................18
第二節 研究變數之定義與衡量.....................................................................19
第三節 研究假設.............................................................................................24
第四節 研究範圍與對象.................................................................................31
第五節 實驗流程.............................................................................................32
第六節 前測.....................................................................................................32
第四章 研究結果分析與討論.................................................................................34
第一節問卷樣本結構分析...............................................................................34
第二節 統計分析.............................................................................................35
第三節 研究結果分析與假設檢定.................................................................39
第五章結論與建議...................................................................................................45
第一節 研究結論.............................................................................................45
第二節 研究貢獻.............................................................................................47
第三節 研究限制.............................................................................................48
第四節 未來研究建議.....................................................................................49
參考文獻...................................................................................................................51
附錄:問卷共8個版本..........................................................................................57



圖目錄
圖1.1 研究流程....................................................................................................5
圖3.1 研究架構....................................................................................................18



表目錄
表3-1 行銷訊息提示情境內容............................................................................20
表3-2 消費者選擇之問項....................................................................................22
表3-3 獨特性需求之問項....................................................................................23
表3-4 自我監控之問項........................................................................................23
表4-1 樣本人口統計資料表................................................................................35
表4-2 人格特質之因素分析結果........................................................................36
表4-3 人格特質之信度分析結果........................................................................37
表4-4 各群人格特質之樣本數............................................................................38
表4-5 七種行銷訊息提示之人格特質樣本數....................................................38
表4-6 沒有行銷訊息提示下受測者對商品A、B選擇的比率.........................39
表4-7 行銷訊息提示下受測者對商品A、B選擇的比率.................................39
表4-8行銷訊息提示下受測者在商品A、B選擇的改變..................................39
表4-9 沒有行銷訊息提示下各群受測者對商品A、B選擇的比率.................41
表4-10 行銷訊息提示下各群受測者對商品A、B選擇的比率.......................41
表4-11在行銷訊息提示下各群受測者對商品A選擇的改變...........................42
表4-12 假設檢定結果彙整表........................ ....................... .............................44
參考文獻 References
Vico, G. 原著,朱光潛譯,<<新科學>> (The new science),北京: 商務印書館,
1989。
童曉君,廣告訴求、廣告代言人、自我監控、消費者與廣告代言人人格一致性程度,
元智大學管理研究所碩士論文,1999 年。
薛求知、黃佩燕、魯直、張曉蓉, 行為經濟學:理論與應用,智勝文化,台北,2005。
Albou, P. (1984) La phychologie Economique, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Arrow, K.J. & G. Debreu (1954) Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy. Econometrica 22 (3): 265-290.
Boulding, W. & Kirmani, A. (1993) A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: Do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality? The Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (1): 111-123.
Brannon, L. A. & Brock, T. C. (2001) Limiting time for responding enhances behavior corresponding to the merits of compliance appeals: Refutations of heuristic-cue theory in service and consumer settings. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3): 135-146.
Brannon, L. A. & McCabe, A.E. (2001) Time-restricted sales appeals: The importance of offering real value. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 42 (4): 47-52.
Brock, T. C.(1968) Implication of Commodity Theory for Value Change, New York: Academic Press.
Burns, D. J. & Krampf, R. F. (1991) A semiotic perspective on innovative behavior. In R. King. (Ed.), Developments in Marketing Science, Academy of Marketing Science.
Camerer, C. F. & Loewenstein, G. (2002) Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future (book draft).
Cate, Rodney M., Sally A. Lloyd, June M. Henton & Jeffry H. Larson (1982) Fairness and Reward Level as Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction, Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(3): 177-181.
Cialdini, R. B. (1985) Influence: Science and Practice, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R.(1992) Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4: 5-13.
Davis, S. (1989) The role of price as an indicator of product quality in monopolistic markets. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.
Festinger, L. (1954) A Theory of Social Comparison Processes, Human relations, 7(2): 117-40.
Friedman, M. & Savage, L. J. (1948) The Utility Analysis of Choice Involving Risk, J. polit Econ., 56: 279-304.
Fromkin, H. L. (1968) Reinforcement and effort expenditure: Predictions of reinforcement theory versus predictions of dissonance theory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9 (4): 347-352.
Fromkin, H. L. (1971) A Social Psychological Analysis of the Adoption and Diffusion of New Products and Practices from a Uniqueness Motivation Perspective, in David, M. G. (eds.). Ann Arbor, 464–469. Michigan: Association for Consumer Research.
Gierl, H., Plantsch, M. & Schweidler, J. (2008) Scarcity effects on sales volume in retail. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(1): 45-61.
Gould, S, J. (1993) Assessing self-concept discrepancy in consumer behavior: The joint effect of private self-consciousness and self-monitoring. Advances in Consumer Research, 20: 419-424.
Grossman, S. J. (1981) The information role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality, Journal of Law and Economics, 24 (3): 461-483.
Heil, O. & Robertson, T. S. (1991) Toward a theory of competitive market signaling: A research agenda, Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6): 403-418.
Herbig, P. & Milewicz, J. (1993) The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 10 (3): 18-24.
Herpen, E.V., Pieters, R. & Zeelenberg, M. (2005) How product scarcity impacts on choice: Snob and bandwagon effects. Advances in Consumer Research, 32: 623-624.
Hsee, C. K., Blount, S., Loewenstein, G. F. & Bazerman, M. H. (1999) Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A review and theoretical analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 125( 5): 576-590.
Jhang, J.H. & Kim, J. (2009) Payment Frequency Discount vs. Payment Amount Discount: The Framing Effect on Preference Reversal, Advances in Consumer Research, 36: 1021-1023.
Jung, J. M. & Kellaris, J. J. (2004) Cross-national differences in proneness to scarcity effects: The moderating roles of familiarity, uncertainty avoidance, and need for cognitive closure. Psychology & Marketing, 21(9): 739-753.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica, 47(2): 263-291.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1974) Judgment under uncertainly: Heuristics And Biases, Science, 185: 1124-1131.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica, 47(2): 263-291.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1984) Choices, values, and frames, American Psychologist, 39: 341.
Kelley, H. H. (1952) Two Functions of Reference Groups. In Swanson, G. E., Newcomb, T. M. & Hartley, E. L., Readings in Social Psychology, 410-414. New York: Holt.
Kihlstrom, R. E. & Riordan, M. H. (1984) Advertising as a signal, Journal of Political Economy, 92 (3): 427-450.

Kirmani, A. (1990) The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions, Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (2): 160-171.
Koestner, R., Bernire, F., & Zuckerman, M. (1992). Self-regulation and consistency between attitudes, traits, and behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1): 52-59.
Koford, K. & Tschoegl, A. E. (1998) The market value of rarity, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 34(3): 45.
Kreps, D. M. & Wilson, R. (1982) Reputation and imperfect information, Journal of Economic Theory, 27 (2): 253-279.
Lennox, R. D. & Wolfe, R. N. (1984) Revision of the self-monitoring scale, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6): 1349-1364.
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971) Reversals of preference between bids and Choices in gambling decisions, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89: 46.
Lichtenstein, S. & Slovic, P. (1973) Response-induced Reversals of Preference in Gambling: An Extended Replication in Las Vegas, Joumat of Experimental Psychology, 101: 16-20.
Lynn, M. (1991) Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature, Psychology & Marketing, 8(1): 43-57.
Lynn, M. & Bogert, P. (1996) The Effect of Scarcity on Anticipated Price Appreciation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26(22): 1978-1984.
Maslach, C., Stapp, J. & Santee, R. T. (1985) Individuation: Conceptual analysis and assessment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3): 729-738.
Michaels, James W., John N. Edwards & Alan C. Acock (1984) Satisfaction in Intimate Relationships as a Function of Inequality, Inequity, and Outcomes, Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(4): 347-357.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1986) Prices and advertising signals of product quality, Journal of Political Economy, 94 (4):796-821.
Nelson, P. (1974) Advertising as information, Journal of Political Economy, 82 (4): 729-754.
Parker, J. R. (2011) When Shelf-based Scarcity Impacts Consumer Preferences, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Columbia University.
Porter, M. E. (1980) Competitive strategy, New York: The Free Press.
Robertson, T. S. & Gatignon, H. (1986) Competitive effects on technology diffusion, Journal of Marketing, 50 (3): 1-12.
Ruvio, A., Shoham, A. & Brencic, Maja M. (2008) Consumers’ need for uniqueness: short-form scale development and cross-cultural validation, International Marketing Review, 25(1): 33-53.
Shavitt, S. (1990) The role of attitude objects in attitude functions, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26(2): 124-148.
Simon, H. (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment, Psychological Review, 63: 129-138.
Simon, H. A. (1978) Rationality as process and as product of thought, American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 68: 1-6.
Simonson, I. (1989) Choice based on reasons: The case of attraction and compromise effects, Journal of Consumer Research, 16: 158.
Slovic, P. (1991) The Construction of Preferences, American Psychologist, 5 (5): 364-371.
Snyder, C. R. & Fromkin H. C. (1980) Uniqueness: the Human Pursuit of Difference, New York: Plenum.
Snyder, C. R. (1992) Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13 (1): 9-24.
Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980) Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference, New York: Plenum.
Snyder, M. (1974) Self-monitoring of expressive behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4): 526-537.
Snyder, M. (1979) Self-monitoring processes, In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press.
Snyder, M., & Debono, K. G. (1985) Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3): 586-597.
Spence, M. (1973) Job Market Signaling, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83(3): 355-377.
Spence, M. (1974) Market signaling, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stock, A. & Balachander, S. (2005) The marketing of a “hot product”: A signaling explanation of marketers’ scarcity strategy, Management Science, 51(8): 1181-1192.
Suri, R., Kohli, C. & Monroe, K. B. (2007) The effects of perceived scarcity on consumers' processing of price information, Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1): 89-100.
Tepper, K. & McKenzie, K. (2001) The long-term predictive validity of the consumers’ need for uniqueness scale, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3): 171-193.
Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001) Consumers’ need for uniqueness: scarcity development and validation, Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1): 50-66.
Tversky, A. & Thaler, R. H. (1990) Anomalies: Preference Reversals, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(2): 201-211.
Verhallen, T. M. M. & Robben, H. S. J. (1994) Scarcity and preference-an experiment on unavailability and product evaluation, Journal of Economic Psychology, 15(2): 315-331.
Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1947) Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wu, C., & Hsing, S. S. (2006) Less is more: How scarcity influences consumers’ value perceptions and purchase intents through mediating variables, Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 9 (2): 125-132.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code