Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0220105-011609 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0220105-011609
論文名稱
Title
反全球化論述:對現代性與實證國際關係理論之反思
Anti-Globalization Discourses: Reflections on Modernity and Positivist International Relations Theories
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
170
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2005-01-18
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2005-02-20
關鍵字
Keywords
後實證國際關係理論、現代性、實證國際關係理論、全球化、反全球化
anti-globalization, modernity, positivist international relations theory, globalization, post-positivist international relations theory
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5666 次,被下載 10448
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5666 times, has been downloaded 10448 times.
中文摘要
當代關於全球化的討論,無論是嘗試羅列出一切說明它確實發生的經驗證據者也好,或是系統地透過知識的推演而形成理論論述者也罷,其目的不外乎是企圖去弄清楚這個外在世界究竟是變成了怎樣的一個面貌,以及我們應該如何去描述、闡釋和看待它。正因如此,「全球化」掛在每個人的嘴上,不僅成為當下最時髦的一個流行語,更已經是一種政治正確,一種理所當然。然而,在語多紛雜的全球化論述底下,往往有許多「真實」或「現實」被輕易地掩蓋掉或忽略掉,從未被認真考慮過。所謂的「反全球化論述」,乃是針對當下的這個全球化的歷史新階段所進行的知識批判,而本文的主要目的,即是嘗試在業已氾濫的主流全球化論述中探尋一個反思與自省的契機。
準此,第二章將先行指出全球化於經驗現實上的特殊性,並針對當代有關全球化的一般性通俗論述進行概要式的勾勒,如此鋪陳的主要用意除了在強調全球化的概念與現實之間應該互相參照、互為佐證之外,更是在對於一般作為時尚流行用語的全球化與有著較為深厚的理論基礎的「現代性—全球化」觀點進行區別。此處並不準備提出嶄新的論點,也不會涉及有關全球化的歷史考察工作,而是針對現代性,以及現代性與全球化之間的關係做進一步的扣連。
在第三章中,筆者將根據本文的問題意識分別從「現代性問題」以及「國際關係理論」兩條知識脈絡進行討論。第三章的討論焦點將分別從現代性的理性概念、現代資本主義—消費主義之社會組成,以及作為一種西方中心的文化想像之現代性進行批判性反思,最後嘗試鋪陳出「反全球化」的批判現代性根源。
第四章處理國際關係理論脈絡中的反全球化論述,首節概述國際關係理論的實證主義傳統從何而來?又對國際關係學科的理論發展造成什麼影響?接著則從一個後實證主義的理論視角切入,針對實證國際關係理論在認識論、本體論與方法論上提出批評,而新現實主義和新自由主義之全球化表述,以及後實證國際關係理論對其所進行之反思則是本章的重點所在。
第五章為結論,總結本文的寫作立場和研究旨趣之外,並對本文進行一個自身的反省和檢視,最末則提出本研究的可能貢獻。
Abstract
(none)
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 導論…………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究緣起……………………………………………………1
第二節 問題意識……………………………………………………7
第三節 研究策略與章節安排………………………………………11
第二章 現代性的全球化……………………………………………15
第一節 全球化的經驗現實與通俗論述……………………………17
第一項、全球化在經驗現實上的特殊性………………………17
第二項、全球化的一般性通俗論述……………………………20
第二節 呼喚現代性…………………………………………………26
第一項、現代性的核心價值……………………………………27
第二項、現代性的主要面向……………………………………32
第三項、現代性的全球化………………………………………39
第三章 反全球化的批判現代性根源………………………………49
第一節 對現代理性概念之反思……………………………………49
第一項、科學主義與啟蒙理性的偏斜…………………………50
第二項、現代性的主體性危機…………………………………55
第三項、理性的非理性…………………………………………59
第二節 對資本主義消費社會之反思………………………………65
第一項、資本—消費主義的現代性……………………………66
第二項、消費異化與資本主義的鐵籠…………………………71
第三項、對全球資本主義—消費主義之批判…………………75
第三節 對西方中心的文化想像之反思……………………………81
第一項、「西方」vs. 「他者」之論述生產…………………82
第二項、「統一性」vs. 「差異性」之文化思………………87
第三項、「全球化」vs. 「在地化」之文化反思……………94
第四章 反思國際關係理論的全球化表述…………………………99
第一節 國際關係理論之理性主義傳統及其反思………………100
第一項、 國際關係理論的實證傳統…………………………100
第二項、 對理性主義知識觀之質疑…………………………107
第二節 新自由主義之全球化論述及其反思……………………114
第一項、 新自由主義之全球化表述…………………………115
第二項、 對新自由主義全球化表述之反思…………………126
第三節 新現實主義之全球化論述及其反思……………………140
第一項、 現實主義之全球化表述……………………………141
第二項、 對「國家中心論」之批判…………………………143
第五章 結論………………….……………………………………151
參考資料………………………………………………………………157
參考文獻 References
大前研一,1996,李宛蓉 譯,《民族國家的終結:區域經濟的興起》。台北:立緒。
王逸舟,1999,《國際政治學——歷史與理論》。台北:五南。
中國時報,2002,「紐約世界經濟論壇揭幕 巴西社會論壇打對台」,2月2日,版10。
石之瑜,2001,《政治學的知識脈絡》。台北:五南。
金耀基,1999,「全球化、現代性與世界秩序」。《二十一世紀》,第51期。http://www.cuhk.edu.hk/ics/21c/issue/article/990133.htm(2003/6/17)。
李俠、邢潤川,2003,「論科學主義與現代性認同的危機」。《東南學術》,第4期,145-156。
李東燕,2003a,「反全球化運動的性質與特點」。http://202.130.245.40/gate/big5/www.china.com.cn/chinese/zhuanti/263751.htm(2003/10/17)。
———,2003b,「當代反全球化現象的背景及根源」。http://202.130.245.40/gate/big5/www.china.com.cn/chinese/zhuanti/263776.htm(2003/10/17)。
阮新邦,1996,「理性、實踐與現代社會困境」,收於《香港社會科學學報》,第8期,19-36。
沈清松,1993,「從現代到後現代」。《哲學雜誌》,第4期,4-25。
何春蕤,1997,「台灣的麥當勞化——跨國服務業資本的文化邏輯」,收於陳清僑 編,《身份認同與公共文化》。香港:牛津大學出版社,141-160。
房思宏,2002,「關於全球化論述的知識對話」。國立台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
高宣揚,1999,《後現代論》。台北:五南。
唐文明,2000,「何謂現代性?」。《哲學研究》,第8期,44-50。
陸先?琚A2000,「啟蒙辯證與Habermas的批判」。《當代》,第157期,32-41。
張小虹,2003,「假全球化之名:米酒、假米酒、非米酒的冬天」。《當代》,第187期,48-51。
張亞中,2001,「全球治理:主體與權力的解析」,《問題與研究》,第40卷,第4期,1-23。
黃旻華,1998,「國際關係批判理論的重建與評論:科學實存論的觀點」。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
黃瑞祺,2000,《現代與後現代》。台北:巨流。
——— 編,2002,《現代性 後現代性 全球化》。台北:左岸文化。
黃競涓,2002,「經濟全球化之隱喻:台灣與中國之合作與衝突」,收於《第八屆中華經濟協作系統國際研討會——全球化 vs. 區域化:亞洲地區經濟發展的契機與挑戰論文集》。台中:中興大學國際政治研究所,3-1~3-14。
許家豪,2001,「紀登斯論現代性」。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
許寶強、汪暉 編,1999,《發展的迷思》。香港:牛津大學出版社。
許寶強,1999,「前言:發展、知識、權力」,收於許寶強、汪暉 編,《發展的迷思》。香港:牛津大學出版社,vii-xxxiii。
陳清僑 編,1997,《身份認同與公共文化》。香港:牛津大學出版社。
游美惠,2000,「內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用」,《調查研究》,第八期,5-42。
萬胥亭,2002,「『現代性』作為一個『事件』」,收於黃瑞祺 編,《現代性 後現代性 全球化》。台北:左岸文化,13-47。
趙剛,2001,「為什麼反全球化?如何反?——關於全球化的一些問題的思考與對話」。《台灣社會研究季刊》,第四十四期,49-146。
樊明勇,2001,《西方國際政治經濟學》。上海:上海人民出版社。
顏銘宏,2002,「建構人權:歷史脈絡,意義分殊,權力競逐」。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
蕭新煌,2002,「共存與融合——當代台灣的文化全球化與本土化」,收於Peter L. Berger and Samuel P. Huntington 編,《杭廷頓&柏格看全球化大趨勢》。台北:時報文化,38-57。
龐中英,2001,「“反全球化”:另一種全球化——對“反全球化”現象的調查與思考」。http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/jinji/31/181/20010111/376512.html(2003/10/17)。
———,2003,「“華盛頓共識”走入歷史?」。http://www.people.com.cn/BIG5/guandian/183/8456/8457/2005659.html(2003/10/17)。
Albrow, Martin, 1997. The Global Age: state and society beyond modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Amin, Samir, 2001,「資本主義、帝國主義、全球主義」,收於Ronald M. Chilcote 編,《批判的範式:帝國主義政治經濟學》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社,211-226。
Annan, Kofi A., 2000,Millennium Report(聯合國官方中文版本)。http://www.un.org/chinese/aboutun/prinorgs/mshch/docs/2000/s-2000-1.pdf(2003/3/6)。
Appadurai, Arjun, 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy,” in Mike Featherstone ed, Global Culture: Nationalism, globalization and modernity. London: Sage, 295-310.
Ashley, Richard K., 1986. “The Poverty of Neorealism,” in Robert O. Keohane ed., Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 255-300.
———, 1995. “The Powers of Anarchy: Theory, Sovereignty, and the Domestication of Global Life (1988),” in Der Derian ed., International Theory: Critical Investigations. New York: New York University Press, 94-128.
Ashley, Richard K. and R. B. J. Walker, 1990. “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 3, 259-268.
Barber, Benjamin R, 2001(1995). Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Ballantine Books.
Baudelaire, Charles, 1995(1964). The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays. Jonathan Mayne trans. and ed. London: Phaidon.
Bauman, Zygmunt, 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity Press.
———, 2001,張君玫 譯,《全球化:對人類的深遠影響》。台北:群學。
Baylis, John, 2001b. “International and global security in the post-cold war era,” in John Baylis and Steve Smith eds., The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 253-276.
Baylis, John and Steve Smith eds., 2001. The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beck, Ulrich, 1999,孫治本 譯,《全球化危機》。台北:台灣商務。
Beck, Ulrich et al. eds., 2003. Global America? The Consequences of Globalization. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Bell, Daniel, 1989,趙一凡、蒲隆、任曉晉 譯,《資本主義的文化矛盾》。台北:桂冠。
Bernstein, Richard J., 1983, Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Berger, Peter L., 2002,「導論 全球化的文化動力」,收於Peter L. Berger and Samuel P. Huntington 編,《杭廷頓&柏格看全球化大趨勢》。台北:時報文化,18-36。
Berger, Peter L. and Samuel P. Huntington 編, 2002,王柏鴻 譯,《杭廷頓&柏格看全球化大趨勢》,台北:時報文化。
Best, Steven and Douglas Kellner, 1994,《後現代理論——批判的質疑》。台北:巨流。
Bocock, Robert, 1995,張君玫、黃鵬仁 譯,《消費》。台北:巨流。
———, 1996. “The Culture Formations of Modern Society, ” in Stuart Hall et al, eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 149-183.
Booth, Ken and Steve Smith eds., 1995. International Relations Theory Today. University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Boyens, Ingeborg, 2001,杜默 譯,《基因騙術》。台北:時報文化。
Bradley, Harriet, 1996. “Changing Social Structure: Class and Gender,” in Stuart Hall et al. eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 122-147.
Brecher, Jeremy, Tim Costello and Brendan Smith, 2000. Globalization from Below: The Power of Solidarity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: South End Press.
Brown, Chris, 1997. Understanding International Relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Brown, Vivienne, 1996. “The Emergence of the Economy,” in Stuart Hall et al. eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 90-121.
Bull, Hedley, 1995. “Society and Anarchy in International Relations (1966),” in James Der Derian ed., International Theory: Critical Investigations. Washington Square: New York University Press, 75-93.
Burchill, Scott and Andrew Linklater eds., 1996. Theories of International Relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Castells, Manuel, 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge: Blackwell.
———, 2002,夏鑄九、黃麗玲等 譯,《認同的力量》。台北:唐山。
Chilcote, Ronald M. 編, 2001,施楊 譯,《批判的範式:帝國主義政治經濟學》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。
Chossudovsky, Michel, 2001. “The Quebec Wall: What Lies Behind Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA)?” Online, Available at: http://www.nadir.org/nadir/initiativ/agp/free/chossudovsky/quebec.htm (2002/12/14).
Cox, Robert W., 1986. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,” (with postscript), in Robert O. Keohane ed., Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 204-249.
———, 1992a. “Global Perestroika,” The Social Register 1992, 26-43.
———, 1992b. “Multilateralism and World Order,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 18, 161-180.
———, 1996a, with Timothy J. Sinclair. Approaches to World Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.
———, 1996b. “Influences and Commitments,” in Robert Cox with Timothy J. Sinclair, Approaches to World Order. New York: Cambridge University Press, 19-38.
———, 1996c. “A Perspective on Globalization,” in James H. Mittelman ed, Globalization: Critical Reflections. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc, 21-30.
———, 1997. “Democracy in Hard Times: Economic Globalization and the Limits to Democracy,” in Anthony McGrew ed., The Transformation of Democracy? Globalization and Territorial Democracy, 49-72.
———, 2001. “The Way Ahead: Toward a New Ontology of World Order,” in Richard Wyn Jones ed, Critical Theory and World Politics. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc, 45-59.
Der Derian, James ed., 1995. International Theory: Critical Investigations. New York: New York University Press.
Devetak, Richard, 1996a. “Critical Theory,” in Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater eds., Theories of International Relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 145-178.
———, 1996b. “Postmodernism,” in Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater eds., Theories of International Relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 179-209.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Paul Rabinow eds., 1983. Michel Foucault, Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dunne, Tim, 2001. “Liberalism,” in John Baylis and Steve Smith eds., The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 162-181.
Dunning, John ed., 1997. Governments, Globalizations, and International Business. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dyer, Hugh C. and Leon Mangasarian eds., 1989. The Study of International Relations: the State of the Art. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Ellwood, Wayne, 2002,王柏鴻 譯,《全球化反思——粉碎假面經濟榮景》。台北:書林。
Enloe, Cynthia H., 2000(1989). Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Eschle, Catherine, 2002. “Engendering Global Democracy,” International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol. 4, No. 3, 315-341.
Falk, Richard, 1997. “Resisting ‘Globalisation-from-above’ Through ‘Golbalisation-from-below’,” New Political Economy, Vol. 2, No. 1, 17-24.
Featherstone, Mike ed., 1990. Global Culture: Nationalism, globalization and modernity. London: Sage.
———, 1995. Undoing Culture: Globalization, Postmodernism and Identity. London: Sage.
Featherstone, Mike, Scott Lash and Roland Robertson eds., 1995. Global Modernities. London: Sage.
Ferguson, Yale H. and Richard W. Mansbach, 1991. “Between Celebration and Despair: Constructive Suggestions for Future International Theory,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 35, No. 4, 363-386.
Fotopoulos, Takis, 2001. “Globalisation, the Reformist Left and the Anti-Globalisation ‘Movement’,” Democracy & Nature, Vol. 7, No. 2, 233-280.
Foucault, Michel., 1992a,吳宗寶 譯,「論康德的『何謂啟蒙』」。《當代》,第76期,22-31。
———, 1992b,劉北成、楊遠嬰 譯,《規訓與懲罰——監獄的誕生》。台北:桂冠。
Friedman, Thomas L., 2000,蔡繼光 等譯,《了解全球化:凌志汽車與橄欖樹》。台北:聯經。
Fukuyama, Francis, 1989. “The End of History?” The National Interest Summer, 3-18.
———, 1993,李永熾 譯,《歷史之終結與最後一人》。台北:時報文化。
———, 1999. “The Left Should Love Globalization,” Wall Street Journal, 12/01, Vol. 234 Issue 107, A26. Online, Available at: http://search.epnet.com/direct.asp?an=2568312&db=aph (2003/4/16).
Fuss, Diana, 1989. Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature & Difference. New York: Routledge.
George, Jim, 1989. “International Relations and the Search for Thinking Space: Another View of the Third Debate,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, 269-279.
Germain, Randall D. ed., 2000. Globalization and Its Critics. London: Macmillan Press.
Giddens, Anthony, 1990. The Consequence of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
———, 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society In the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilpin, Robert, 1994,楊宇光 等譯,《國際關係的政治經濟分析》。台北:桂冠。
Goldmann, Kjell, 1996. “International Relations: An Overview,” in Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann eds., A New Handbook of Political Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 401-427.
Goodin, Robert E. and Hans-Dieter Klingemann eds., 1996. A New Handbook of Political Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Griffin, David Ray, 1998a,王成兵 譯,《後現代精神》。北京:中央編譯出版社。
———, 1998b,「導言:後現代精神和社會」,收於David Ray Griffin 編,《後現代精神》。北京:中央編譯出版社,1-46。
Habermas, Jürgen, 1993,李世明 譯,「現代性對後現代性」。《炎黃藝術》,第47期,7月,18-28。
———, 2002,曹衛東 譯,《後民族格局:哈伯瑪斯政治論文集》。台北:聯經。
Hall, Stuart et al. eds., 1996. Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hall, Stuart, 1996a. “Introduction,” in Stuart Hall et al., eds. Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 3-18.
———, 1996b. “The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power,” in Stuart Hall et al. eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 184-227.
———, 1996c. ”The Question of Cultural Identity,” in Stuart Hall et al. eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 595-634.
Hamilton, Peter, 1996. “The Enlightenment and the Birth of Social Science,” in Stuart Hall et al. eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell., 19-54.
Harvey, David, 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Held, David, 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: from the modern state to cosmopolitan governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
———, 1996. “The Development of the Modern State,” in Stuart Hall et al. eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 55-89.
Held, David and Anthony McGrew, eds., 2000. The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Cambridge: Polity Press.
———, 2002. Globalization/Anti-Globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Held, David et al., 2004,沈宗瑞 等譯,《全球化衝擊:全球化對政治、經濟與文化的衝擊》。台北:韋伯文化。
Herman, Edward S. and Robert W. McChesney, 1997. The Global Media: the new missionaries of corporate capitalism. London: Cassell.
Hirst, Paul and Grahame Thompson, 2002,朱道凱 譯,《全球化迷思》。台北:群學。
Hobden, Stephen and Richard Wyn Jones, 2001. “Marxist Theories of International Relations,” in John Baylis and Steve Smith eds., The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 200-223.
Hobson, John M., 2003,周劭彥 譯,《國家與國際關係》。台北:弘智。
Hoffman, Mark, 1989. “Critical Theory and the Inter-paradigm Debate,” in Hugh C. Dyer and Leon Mangasarian eds., The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 60-86.
Holland, Joe, 1998,「後現代精神和社會觀」,收於David Ray Griffin 編,《後現代精神》。北京:中央編譯出版社,59-93。
Horkheimer, Max and Theodor Adorno, 1989(1973). Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso.
———, 1989(1973). “The Concept of Enlightenment,” in Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno, Dialectic of Enlightenment. London: Verso, 3-42.
Hurrell, Andrew and Ngaire Woods, 1995. “Globalisation and Inequality,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, 447-470.
Holsti, K. J, 1985. The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Allen and Unwin.
———, 1989. “Mirror, Mirror on the Wall, Which are the Fairest Theories of All?” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, 255-261.
Huntington, Samuel P., 1997,黃裕美 譯,《文明衝突與世界秩序的重建》。台北:聯經。
Jameson, Fredric, 1998,吳美真 譯,《後現代主義或晚期資本主義的文化邏輯》。台北:時報。
Jervis, Robert, 1999. “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate,” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 1(Summer), 42-63.
Jones, Richard Wyn ed, 2001. Critical Theory and World Politics. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
Kant, Immanuel, 1992,吳宗寶 譯,「何謂啟蒙答客問」。《當代》,第76期。14-21。
Keohane, Robert O., 1984. After Hegemony. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
———, 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4, 379-396.
———, 2000. “Sovereignty in International Society,” in David Held and Anthony McGrew eds., The Global Transformations Reader: An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Cambridge: Polity Press. 109-123.
Keohane, Robert O. and Lisa L. Martin, 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1(Summer), 39-51.
Klein, Naomi, 2002. Fences and Windows: Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Globalization Debate. New York: Picador USA.
———, 2003,徐詩思 譯,《NO LOGO》。台北:時報。
Kofman, Eleonore and Gillian Youngs eds., 1996. Globalization: Theory and Practice. New York: Painter.
Kobrin, Stephen, 1997. “The architecture of globalization: state sovereignty in a networked global economy,” in John Dunning ed., Governments, Globalizations, and International Business. New York: Oxford University Press, 146-171.
Kolakowski, Leszek, 1978. Main Currents of Marxism, Vol. 3: The Breakdown. New York: Oxford University.
———, 1988,高俊一 譯,《理性的異化:實證主義思想史》。台北:聯經。
Korten, David C., 1995. When Corporations Rule the World. London: Earthscan Publications Limited.
Krasner, Stephen D. ed., 1983a. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
———, 1983b. “Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables,” in Stephen Krasner ed., International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1-22.
Lamy, Steven L., 2001. “Contemporary mainstream approaches: neo-realism and neo-liberalism,” in John Baylis and Steve Smith eds., The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 182-199.
Lapid, Yosef, 1989. “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, 235-254.
Lebow, Richard Ned and Thomas Risse-Kappen eds., 1995a. International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press.
———, 1995b. “Introduction: International Relations Theory and The End of the Cold War,” in Richard Ned Lebow and Thomas Risse-Kappen eds., International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold War. New York: Columbia University Press, 1-22.
Lefebvre, Henri, 1995. John Moore trans. Introduction to Modernity: twelve preludes, September 1959-May 1961. New York: Verso.
Linklater, Andrew, 1996. “The Achievements of Critical Theory,” in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski eds., International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 279-298.
Little, Richard, 1995. “International Relations and the Triumph of Capitalism,” in Ken Booth and Steve Smith eds., International Relations Theory Today. University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 62-89.
Lyotard, Jean-Francois, 1993. Julian Pefanis and Morgan Thomas trans. The Postmodern Explained: correspondence, 1982-1985. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
———, 1995,黃宗慧 譯,「後現代狀況」,《中外文學》,第24卷,第7期,5-18。
MacKinnon, Catharine A., 1989. Toward A Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
MacLean, John, 2000. “Philosophical Roots of Globalization and Philosophical Routes to Globalization,” in Randall D. Germain ed, Globalization and Its Critics: perspectives from political economy. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 3-66.
Mann, Michael, 1995,李少軍、劉北成 譯,《社會權力的來源:自源起到西元1760年的權力史》(第一冊)。台北:桂冠。
Marcuse, Herbert,1990,劉繼 譯,《單向度的人:發達工業社會意識型態研究》。台北:桂冠。
McChesney, Robert W., 1997. “The Global Media Giants: the nine firms that dominate the world,” Extra! (November/December), Online, Available at: http://www.fair.org/extra/9711/gmg.html(2003/10/17)。
McGrew, Anthony, 1996. “A Global Society?” in Stuart Hall et al. eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 466-503.
——— ed., 1997. The Transformation of Democracy? Globalization and Territorial Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
McLennan, Gregor, 1996. “The Enlightenment Project Revisited,” in Stuart Hall et al. eds., Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 635-663.
Meyer, John W. et al., 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103, No. 1, 144-181.
Mittelman, James H. ed, 1996. Globalization: Critical Reflections. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
Neufeld, Mark, 1994. “Reflexivity and International Relations Theory,” in Claire Turenne Sjolander and Wayne S. Cox eds., Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 11-35.
Patnaik, Prabhat, 2001,「關於資產階級國際主義的陷阱」,收於Ronald M. Chilcote 編,《批判的範式:帝國主義政治經濟學》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社,227-242。
Peterson, V. Spike, 1992. “Transgressing Boundaries: Theories of Knowledge, Gender and International Relations,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, 183-206.
Petras, James, 2001,「全球化:一個批判性的分析」,收於Ronald M. Chilcote 編,《批判的範式:帝國主義政治經濟學》。北京:社會科學文獻出版社,243-291。
Pieterse, Jan Nederveen, 1995. “Globalization as Hybridization,” in Mike Featherstone, Scott Lash and Roland Robertson eds., Global Modernities. London: SAGE Publications Ltd., 25-44.
Poggi, Gianfranco, 1999. “The Nature of the Modern State,” in Malcolm Waters ed., Modernity: critical concept, vol.Ⅲ: Modern Systems. London: Routledge, 265-278.
Postman, David, 1999. “WTO in Seattle: Everyone has an agenda, including the turtles,” Seattle Times, November 28th. Online, Available at: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/home/ (2002/11/23).
Powell, Robert, 1994. “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate,” International Organization, Vol. 48, No. 2, 313-344.
Ransom, David, 2002,劉奇峰 譯,《公平貿易——吶喊國際商場正義》。台北:書林。
Ritzer, George, 2002,林佑聖、葉欣怡 譯,《社會的麥當勞化》。台北:弘智。
Robertson, Roland, 1992. Globalization: social theory and global culture. London: Sage.
———, 1995. “Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity,” in Mike Featherstone, Scott Lash and Roland Robertson eds., Global Modernities. London: Sage, 25-44.
Robinet, Michael, 2003. “Global/North American Production Outlook,” Online, Available at: http://www.mbs2003.org/Pres2003/Robinetppt.pdf (2003/10/23).
Rorty, Richard, 1994a,李幼蒸 譯,《哲學和自然之鏡》。台北:桂冠。
———, 1994b,《哲學和自然之鏡》「中譯本作者序」,收於Richard Rorty,《哲學和自然之鏡》。台北:桂冠,1-7。
Said, Edward W., 2002,王淑燕 等譯,《東方主義》。台北:立緒。
Schmitt, Richard, 1987. Introduction to Marx and Engels: A Critical Reconstruction. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Sim, Stuart, 2002,蔡偉鼎 譯,《德希達與歷史終結》。台北:貓頭鷹出版社。
Slater, Don, 2003,林佑聖、葉欣怡 譯,《消費文化與現代性》。台北:弘智。
Stiglitz, Joseph E., 2002,李明 譯,《全球化的許諾與失落》。台北:大塊文化。
Roudometof, Victor, 2003. “Glocalization, Space, and Modernity,” The European Legacy, Vol. 8, No. 1, 37-60.
Scholte, Jan Aart, 1996. “Beyond the Buzzword: Towards a Critical Theory of Globalization,” in Eleonore Kofman and Gillian Youngs eds., Globalization: Theory and Practice. New York: Painter, 43-57.
———, 2001. “The globalization of world politics,” in John Baylis and Steve Smith eds., The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 13-32.
Sen, Amartya, 2001. “If It’s Fair. It’s Good: 10 Truths About Globalizations,” International Herald Tribune, July 14. Online, Available at: http://www.iht.com/ihtsearch.php?id=26042&owner=&date=20010714010000 (2003/2/25).
Sim, Stuart, 2002,蔡偉鼎 譯,《德希達與歷史終結》。台北:貓頭鷹。
Sjolander, Claire Turenne and Wayne S. Cox eds., 1994. Beyond Positivism: Critical Reflections on International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Sklair, Leslie, 1997. “Social Movements for Global Capitalism: the transnational capitalist class in action,” Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 4, No. 3, Autumn, 514-538.
———, 1999. “Competing Conceptions of Globalization,” Journal of World-System Research, Vol. 2, Spring, 143-163.
———, 2001. “The Transnational Capitalist Class and the Discourse of Globalization,” Global Dimensions, LSE Center for the Study of global Governance. Online, Available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/globalDimensions/globalisation/theTransnationalCapitalistClassAndTheDiscourseOfGlobalization/Default.htm (2004/3/27).
Smart, Barry, 1993. Postmodernity. New York: Routledge.
Smith, Anthony D., 1990. “Towards a Global Culture?” in Mike Featherstone ed., Global Culture: Nationalism, globalization and modernity. London: Sage, 171-191.
Smith, Steve, 1989. “Paradigm Dominance in International Relations: The Development of International Relations as a Social Science,” in Hugh C. Dyer and Leon Mangasarian eds., The Study of International Relations: the State of the Art. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 3-27.
———, 1995. “The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory,” in Ken Booth and Steve Smith eds., International Relations Theory Today. University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1-37.
———, 1996. “Positivism and Beyond,” in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski eds., International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11-44.
———, 2001. “Reflectivist and Constructivist Approaches to International Theory,” in John Baylis and Steve Smith eds., The Globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 224-249.
———, 2004. “Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 48, Issue 3, 499-515.
Smith, Steve, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski eds., 1996. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strange, Susan, 1996. The Retreat of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles, 1997,董之林、陳燕谷 譯,「承認的政治」,收於陳清僑 編,《身份認同與公共文化》。香港:牛津大學出版社,3-46。
Thompson, Kenneth, 1996. “Social Pluralism and Post-Modernity,” in Stuart Hall et al., eds. Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. Oxford: Blackwell, 564-594.
Tickner, J. Ann, 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global security. New York: Columbia University Press.
———, 2001. Gendering World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Tomlinson, John, 1994,馮建三 譯,《文化帝國主義》。台北:時報。
———, 2003,鄭棨元、陳慧慈 譯,《文化全球化》。台北:韋伯文化。
True, Jacqui, 1996. “Feminism,” in Scott Burchill and Andrew Linklater eds., Theories of International Relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 210-251.
Turner, Bryan S., 1992. Max Weber: From History to Modernity. London: Routledge.
UNDP, 1999. Human Development Report 1999. Online, Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/1999/en/pdf/hdr_1999_full.pdf (2003/2/28).
———, 2001. Human Development Report 2001. Online, Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2001/en/pdf/completenew.pdf (2003/2/28).
Vasquez, John A., 1995. “The Post-Positivist Debate: Reconstructing Scientific Enquiry and International Relations Theory After Enlightenment’s Fall,” in Ken Booth and Steve Smith eds., International Relations Theory Today. University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 217-240.
Wagner, Peter, 1994. A Sociology of Modernity: liberty and discipline. New York: Routledge.
Walker, R. B. J., 2002. “International/Inequality,” International Studies Review, Vol. 4, Issue 2, 7-24.
Wallerstein, Immanuel, 1979. The Capitalist World-economy: essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N., 1986. “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics,” in Robert O. Keohane ed., Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 322-345.
———, 1997,胡祖慶 譯,《國際政治體系理論解析》。台北:五南。
———, 2000. “Globalization and American Power,” The National Interest, Spring, 46-56.
Waters, Malcolm ed., 1999. Modernity: critical concept, vol.Ⅲ: Modern Systems. London: Routledge.
Weber, Cynthia, 2001. International Relations Theory: a critical introduction. New York: Routledge.
Wendt, Alexander, 1995. “Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” in James Der Derian ed., International Theory: Critical Investigations. Washington Square: New York University Press, 129-177.
Wood, Ellen Meiksins, 1998,寧躍 譯,「現代性、後現代性或者資本主義?」,《國外社會科學》,第三期,34-39。
World Bank, 2001. World Development Report 2000/2001. Online, Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/wdrpoverty/report/index.htm (2003/2/28).
WTO, 2002. International Trade Statistics 2002. Online, Available at: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2002_e/its02_toc_e.htm (2003/2/28).
———, 2004. “10 Common Misunderstandings About the WTO, “Online, Available at: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/doload_e/10mis_e.pdf (2004/5/11).
Youngs, Gillian, 1996. “Dangers of Discourse: The Case of Globalization,” in Eleonore Kofman and Gillian Youngs eds., Globalization: Theory and Practice. New York: Pinter, 58- 71.
———, 2001,黃競涓、郭進成、黃肇輝 譯,《全球時代的國際關係》。台北:韋伯文化。
Zalewski, Marysia, 1996. “’All these theories yet the bodies keep pulling up’: theory, theorists, theorizing,” in Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski eds., International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 340-353.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code