Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0313107-124916 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0313107-124916
論文名稱
Title
海外上市的資訊內涵與產業內資訊移轉效果之實證研究 -以台灣企業首次發行海外存託憑證為例
The Empirical Research of Information Content and Intra-industry Information Transfers Related to Cross-listing -The Initial GDR Offering of Taiwan Enterprises
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
202
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-03-03
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2007-03-13
關鍵字
Keywords
海外存託憑證、跨國上市、資訊內涵、產業內資訊移轉效果、蔓延效果、競爭效果、同業內對手廠商、事件研究法
Information Content, GDR, Cross-listing, Intra-industry Information Transfers, Global Depositary Receipt, Contagion Effect, Competition Effect, Rivals, Event study method
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5694 次,被下載 1821
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5694 times, has been downloaded 1821 times.
中文摘要
本研究是探討台灣企業首度海外上市對於「發行公司」以及「同業對手廠商」在台灣股市中價格的影響,不過台灣政府對於企業直接至海外市場掛牌其股票仍有不少限制,因此本文採用能表彰公司股票特性的海外存託憑證做為替代之研究標的,分析公司海外存託憑證的首次發行是否具有「資訊內涵」以及「產業內資訊移轉效果」。
相關的國內文獻目前尚缺針對台灣企業發行海外存託憑證是否影響國內其他同業對手廠商股價的研究,於是本文預期能為此議題進行探索性的分析。藉以瞭解台灣的上市(櫃)公司首次發行海外存託憑證時,除了對本身的國內股價產生影響外,應該也會有其他的效果擴散外溢至國內未有此項行動的同業對手廠商之股價。
透過事件研究法以及複迴歸分析的結果發現,「發行公司」的股價會因為海外存託憑證的宣告而有正面的異動效果,特別是產生在宣告之前。本研究認為是因為公司若宣告欲發行海外存託憑證將相較於「對手廠商」具有較高的成長機會預期;「對手廠商」則由於未有宣告行為而無法傳遞高成長機會的資訊內涵。此外本研究也發現當「同業對手廠商」獲利能力越佳,以及營運活動具較低的海外市場關聯程度時,其股價越容易受到「發行公司」的海外存託憑證宣告所影響。 本研究由文獻探討與複迴歸分析的結果中發現「產業別」亦可能支配海外存託憑證的發行效果,因此將樣本分成「高科技產業群組」以及「非高科技產業群組」。
在「產業內資訊移轉效果」的探討上,本研究認為不論是海外存託憑證的宣告或掛牌,在事件發生前主要是具有正面的「蔓延效果」,即「發行公司」與「同業對手廠商」股價因為海外存託憑證發行而一起受益;但在事件發生之後,卻轉為「負面」的蔓延效果,代表在海外存託憑證的宣告與掛牌之後,「發行公司」與「同業對手廠商」的股價可能共同產生不利的情況。至於由產業面的分析上來看,「高科技產業群組」不管在宣告還是掛牌時期產生的影響,仍與全體樣本的結果相似以「競爭效果」支配;不過「非高科技產業群組」卻在宣告時期以「負面的蔓延效果」為主。反映出海外存託憑證的宣告在「非高科技產業群組」中其實屬於一項不利的資訊內涵,但在海外存託憑證實際掛牌時,對「非高科技產業群組」的公司股價影響則轉成以「競爭效果」來主導,隱含當海外存託憑證實際掛牌,在「非高科技產業群組」中帶來的資訊移轉效果是出現「發行公司」股價受益,而「同業對手廠商」的股價反應卻因相同事件而受害。
本研究的樣本顯示有四個主要的交易地點,分別是倫敦、盧森堡、紐約以及那斯達克,但本文分析結果卻發現不管在哪一個交易地點,對「發行公司」的標準化平均累積異常報酬率主要為負向的變動關係,而與「對手廠商」的標準化平均累積異常報酬率多呈正向變動關係。本研究認為海外存託憑證的交易地點選擇是屬「公司特性」的決策因素,而公司因發行海外存託憑證產生市場調整股票評價的效果則是「投資人特性」的認知觀點。於是推論台股投資人在獲知公司發行海外存託憑證資訊時,大多僅解讀為公司將至海外市場發行存託憑證,至於是到哪一個交易地點掛牌則不太在意或不清楚其中差異,而產生一個結果是「發行公司」不論宣告至哪一個交易所掛牌,都可能不利於其股價反應。
最後本研究的結論是台灣企業發行海外存託憑證的確具有資訊內涵,會造成其台股股票價格的異動。另亦有「產業內資訊移轉效果」,即此事件對「發行公司」股價於事件發生前較為有利,但在事件發生後卻易使「同業對手廠商」股價明顯受害。雖然台灣企業發行海外存託憑證的決策並非主要是參考同業中其他公司的行為,但在現實情況中以及賽局理論的應用上,其他與公司具有密切關連者的行為,亦相當有可能決定公司決策績效的成敗優劣。就本研究之結果顯示,當產業中與自身關係密切的公司發行海外存託憑證時,廠商須有所因應作法以降低他公司的發行資訊對自身廠商股價的損害。
Abstract
The study aims to detect the influence of the initial cross-listing of Taiwanese enterprises on the variety of the stock price of the listing company and its rival firms. However, the limitations from the Taiwanese authorities on the local company’s direct listing in the oversea market are not a few. Accordingly, I employ GDR instead of direct international listing to delve the phenomenon of information content and intra-industry transfer derived from a company’s initial GDR offering.
Recent studies focusing on the same issue rarely inspect the situation of Taiwanese industries. Thus, the research intends to excavate the effect and the aftermath of a Taiwanese firm’s initial GDR offering on its local market price as well as on the one of its rival company that concurrently does not have GDR offering.
To delineate the complication of the issue, the study develop three trajectories mainly based on various approaches, including reference review, event study method, and multi-regression analysis. The first aspect attends to the research result of event study method and multi-regression analysis that exposes the stock price of the GDR offering company has abnormally positive rise accompanying with the announcement of its GDR offerings, particularly in the period before the announcement. That reflects the investors regard the GDR offering as a positive news for a company while the situation turns out to be the opposite for the rival firms.
The research also finds that industry differences might dominate the consequence of the GDR offering. Hence, the exemplary simples are divided into the “hi-tech” industry group and the “non hi-tech” industry group. Based on the reference review of Melvin and Valero-Tonone(2005) and the outcome of the multi-regression analysis, the influence of GDR offering on both industry group will be carefully scrutinized.
In addition, the study places another attention on the discussion of intra-industry transferring and the contagion effect of the GDR offering on the offering company and its rival firm. Although Taiwanese enterprises offer GDR mainly in four main trade locations from London, Luxembourg, New York, and NASDAQ, the study exposes that the trade location has less influence on a company’s and its rival firm’s SCAR variation. That implies that Taiwanese investors might recognize the fact of a company’s GDR offering in the oversea market, whereas, they seldom be aware of the trivial differentiation of the disparate trade location.
In conclusion, the GDR offering of Taiwanese enterprises indeed encompasses information content that might motivate the alteration of the stock price in Taiwan stock market. Besides, the action of GDR offering supplies intra-industry information transferring effect. Even though the strategy of offering GDR of a Taiwanese company does not rely on consulting the action of its rival firms, in reality and according to the application of game theory, the implementing efficiency of a company’s strategies might probably be impinged by its opponents’ behavior. In other words, while a company offers GDR, its rival firms should propose expedients to reduce the damage that might be caused by the issue information.
目次 Table of Contents
第壹章 緒論1-17
第一節 研究背景與動機1-5
第二節 發行海外存託憑證的優點與成本5-12
第三節 研究目的與預期結果12-16
第四節 研究架構設計16-17

第貳章 文獻探討與研究假說設計18-58
第一節 海外融資相關文獻18-22
第二節 權益融資相關文獻22-27
第三節 資訊內涵與過度反應相關文獻27-28
第四節 產業內資訊移轉與產業效果相關文獻28-33
第五節 海外存託憑證發行效果的相關實證文獻33-40
第六節 影響海外存託憑證訊息效果的相關實證文獻40-47
第七節 海外融資/跨國上市/的價格傳遞與波動外溢效果47-52
第八節 不同融資工具所造成的影響效果52-54
第九節 研究假說設計54-58

第參章 研究設計與樣本資料說明59-80
第一節 研究方法59-63
第二節 異常報酬率與統計量63-69
第三節 資料來源、樣本描述與統計分析方法69-80

第肆章 實證研究結果81-116
第一節 海外存託憑證的宣告效果(Announcement Effect)
-「發行公司」與「對手廠商」的影響81-94
第二節 宣告海外存託憑證的產業內資訊移轉效果94-97
第三節 海外存託憑證的掛牌效果(Listing Effect)
-「發行公司」與「對手廠商」的影響97-113
第四節 掛牌海外存託憑證的產業內資訊移轉效果113-116

第伍章 海外存託憑證發行效果的產業別差異117-148
第一節 分屬不同產業群組間的發行公司之海外存託憑證宣告效果
-「高科技」與「非高科技」的產業差異119-125
第二節 分屬不同產業群組間的發行公司之海外存託憑證掛牌效果
-「高科技」與「非高科技」的產業差異125-131
第三節 分屬不同產業群組間的對手廠商之海外存託憑證宣告效果
-「高科技」與「非高科技」的產業差異132-136
第四節 分屬不同產業群組間的對手廠商之海外存託憑證掛牌效果
-「高科技」與「非高科技」的產業差異137-142
第五節 同一產業群組內海外存託憑證「宣告」及「掛牌」的擴散影響效果143-148

第陸章 影響發行效果的橫斷面因素149-160
第一節 股票特性變數的迴歸分析149-151
第二節 公司特性變數的迴歸分析152-155
第三節 總體因素特性變數的迴歸分析155-158
第四節 海外存託憑證發行本身特性變數的迴歸分析158-160

第柒章 橫斷面因素的穩健性161-168
第一節 股票特性變數的迴歸分析161-162
第二節 公司特性變數的迴歸分析162-164
第三節 總體因素特性變數的迴歸分析164-165
第四節 海外存託憑證發行本身特性變數的迴歸分析166-168

第捌章 研究限制、本文結論與建議169-174
第一節 研究限制169-169
第二節 結論與管理意涵170-176
第三節 後續研究之建議177-182

參考文獻183-188
參考文獻 References
王嘉雯(2002),「台灣上市公司海內外有價證券融資方式對其股價影響之研究」,國立東華大學國際企業研究所未出版碩士論文。
朱宜珊(2003),「廣告效果之市場價值研究─以超級盃廣告為例」,成功大學國際企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
江志豪(1999),「企業海外集資雙法寶-GDR、ECB」,實用稅務月刊,第300期,頁22-27。
吳淑媜(2004),「發行海外存託憑證的資訊內含之研究」,朝陽科技大學財務金融系未出版碩士論文。
吳雅惠(1998),「跨國上市對股價報酬及波動性的影響」,中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
吳禮祥(2000),「美國存託憑證的套利交易與價差交易」,台灣大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
沈中華(1998),「海外存託憑證與普通股之間價格傳遞關係-臺灣之實驗研究」,證券市場發展,10:2,頁37-62。
沈中華,李建然(2000),《事件研究法-財務與會計實證研究必備》,華泰文化事業出版。
沈文和(2000),「台灣上市電子公司赴海外市場募集資金之研究」,高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
周介華(1993),「海外存託憑證之制度與實證-中鋼GDR之個案分析」,中央大學 財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林楚雄(1998),「不對稱GARCH模型之建立:我國股票市場之實證研究」,國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
施懿宸(2001),「美國上市公司資本支出宣告對同產業競爭者股價影響之研究」,元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
洪慶鴻(2002),「美國存託憑證之外溢效果與動態反應分析-以總體經濟變數為實證」,中原大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
胡高銘(2001),「台灣上市公司首次發行存託憑證之股價長期績效研究」,高雄第一科技大學財務管理系未出版碩士論文。
翁鶯娟(2002),「購併宣告對產業內競爭對手公司股價影響之研究—以台灣上市公司為例」,成功大學企業管理學系(EMBA)專班未出版碩士論文。
馬君梅、吳敏娟、柯柏成(2002),「探討企業發行海外存託憑證之資訊內涵」,會計研究月刊,194,頁139-144及195,頁116-124。
張憶如(2003),「公司特性對首次海外存託憑證發行宣告效果影響之研究」,朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
許神扶(2004),「庫藏股買回宣告之資訊移轉效果」,南台科技大學會計資訊學系未出版碩士論文。
許智強(2000),「跨國上市公司特性及其對風險報酬之影響-亞太地區之實證」,淡江大學財務金融學系未出版碩士論文。
陳高商(2002),「海外存託憑證定價與套利實證研究」,中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳隆麒、李文雄、李俊明(2001),「我國高科技公司融資行為宣告對股價影響之研究」,2001年科技與管理學術研討會論文集。
曾昭玲、張美媛(2003),「影響企業海外融資工具發行條件及其發行前後財務變化之研究」,產業金融季刊,118,頁30-53。
游千慧(2001),「國際資本市場整合度之研究-以台灣上市公司海外發行ADR探討」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
程南生(1997),「海外籌資方式對公司價值之影響」,淡江大學國際貿易學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃冠仁(2002),「我國上市公司股票購回宣告與同業股價關聯性之研究」,中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃建勳(2001),「ADR 及其價格因素間資訊傳遞效率性-台灣之實證研究」,台北大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
黃嘉威(2002),「美國上市公司融資撤銷宣告對同產業競爭者影響之研究」,元智大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃營杉、李銘章(2005),「台灣母公司股票報酬與其ADR報酬間資訊傳遞之研究」,東吳經濟商學學報, 48,頁1-32。
廖峰儀(2002),「發行海外存託憑證對臺灣上市公司價值之影響」,朝陽科技大學財務金融系未出版碩士論文。
廖清芳(1996),「上市公司現金增資與發行海外存託憑證對股價影響之實證研究」,臺灣大學企業研究所未出版碩士論文。
劉仲宙(1995),「台灣地區發行海外存託憑證對標的股票價格變動之研究」,政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
蔡璧徽、黃志典(2003),「區隔市場下存託憑證與原股折溢價關係之研究-以臺灣企業發行之海外存託憑證為例」,管理與系統,10:3,頁263-283。
黎珈瑋(2002),「我國資訊電子業發行海外有價證券之公司特性與決策研究-以海外存託憑證與海外可轉換公司債為例」,國立東華大學國際企業研究所未出版碩士論文。
鍾惠民(2001),「亞洲金融風暴對新興國家跨國上市證券的傳染效應」,貨幣市場,5:6,頁11-28。
魏妁瑩(1998),「我國企業發行海外存託憑證相關法令之分析」,證交資料,435,頁1-10。


Adler, M and B. Dumas (1983), “International Portfolio Choice and Corporation Finance:A Synthesis,” Journal of Finance, 38(3), 925-984.
Alexander, G. J., C. S. Eun and S. Janakiramanan (1988), “International Listing and Stock Returns: Some Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23(2), 135-151.
Ambarish, R., K. John and J. Williams (1987), “Efficient Signalling with Dividends and Investments,” Journal of Finance, 42(2), 321-343.
Amihud, Y. and H. Mendelson (1986), “Asset Pricing and the Bid–Ask Spread,” Journal of Financial Economics, 17, 223–249
Bailey, W. and Y. P. Chung (1995), “Exchange Rate Fluctuations, Political Risk, and Stock Returns: Some Evidence from and Emerging Market,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 30(4), 541-561.
Baker M. and J. Wurgler (2002), “Market Timing and Capital Structure,” Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1-32.
Beaver, W. (1986), “The information content of annual earnings announcements,” Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 67-92.
Bekaert G. and C.R. Harvey (1995), “Time-Varying World Market Integration,” Journal of Finance, 50(2), 403-444.
Biddle, G. C., and S. M. Saudagaran (1991), “Foreign stock listings: Benefits, costs, and the accounting policy dilemma,” Accounting Horizons, 5(3), 69-80.
Campbell J. Y. and Y. Hamao (1992), “Predictable Stock Returns in the United States and Japan: A Study of Long-Term Capital Market Integration,” Journal of Finance, 47(1), 43-69.
Cantale, S. (1998), “The choice of a foreign market as a signal,” unpublished Working Paper, A.B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.
Chan, K.C., G. A. Karolyi, and R. M. Stulz (1992), “Global financial markets and the risk premium on U.S. equity,” Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 137-167.
Chi, C. H. (1988), “American depositary receipts (ADR) issued by Japanese corporation,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23, 45-54.
Dharan B. G. and D. L. Ikenberry (1995), “The Long-Run Negative Drift of Post-Listing Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1547-1574.
Domowitz, I., J. Glen, and A. Madhavan (1998), “International cross-listing and order flow migration: Evidence from an emerging market,” Journal of Finance, 53, 2001-2028.
Errunza, V. and E. Losq (1985), “International Asset Pricing Under Mild Segmentation: Theory And Test,” Journal of Finance, 40, 105-124.
Erwin, G. R. and J. M. Miller (1998), “The liquidity effects associated with addition of a stock to the S&P 500 index: evidence from bid/ask spreads,” Financial Review, 33:1, 131-175
Fama, E. F., L. Fishe, M. C. Jensen and R. Roll (1969), “The adjustment of stock prices to new information,” International Economic Review, 10, 1-21.
Fernandes, N. (2003), “Market Liberalization: Spillover From ADRs and Implications for Local Markets,” Working paper.
Foerster S. R. and G. A. Karolyi (1999), “The Effects of Market Segmentation and Investor Recognition on Asset Prices: Evidence from Foreign Stocks Listing in the United States,” Journal of Finance, 54(3), 981-1013.
Foster, G. (1981), “Intra-industry Information Transfers Associated with Earnings Releases.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3, 201-232.
Fuerst, O. (1998), “A Theoretical Analysis of the Investor Protection Regulations Argument for Global Listing of Stocks,” unpublished Yale University working paper.
Gelb, D. S. and P. Zarowin (2000), “Corporate Disclosure Policy and the Informativeness of Stock Prices,” New York University, Stern School of Business.
Gultekin M. N., B. Gultekin and A. Penati (1989), “Capital Controls and International Capital Market Segmentation: The Evidence from the Japanese and American Stock Markets,” Journal of Finance, 44(4), 849-869.
Healy, P. M., A. Hutton and K. G. Palepu (1999), “Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure Conteporary” Accounting Research, 16, 485-520.
Howe, J. S., and K. Kelm (1987), “The Stock Price Impacts of Overseas Listings,” Financial Management, 16, 51-56.
Hubbard S. T. (1999), “The impact of overseas listing on shareholder wealth: The case of Dow Jones stock exchange,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 18, 111-120.
Huddart, S., J. S. Hughes and M. Brunnermeier (1999), “Disclosure Requirements And Stock Exchange Listing Choice In An International Context,” Journal of Accounting and Economics 26, 237-269.
Ibbotson, R. G., J. L. Sindelar and J. R. Ritter (1988), “Initial Public Offerings,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1(1), 37-45.
Jayaraman, N., K. Shastri and K. Tandon (1993), “The impact of international crosslistings on risk and return: The evidence from American Depository Receipts.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 91-103.
Kadlec, B. G., and J. J. McConnell (1994), “The effects of market segmentation and illiquidity on asset prices: Evidence from exchange listings,” Journal of Finance, 49, 611-636.
Karolyi, G. A. (1993), “A Bayesian Approach to Modeling Stock Return Volatility for Option Valuation,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(4), 579-594.
Karolyi, G. A., (2003), “The Role of ADRs in the Development of Emerging Equity Markets,” Forthcoming in the Review of Economics and Statistics.
Kato, K., S. Linn and J. Schallheim (1992), “Are there arbitrage opportunities in the market for American Depositary Receipts?” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 1: 73–89.
Kim, O., and R. E. Verrecchia (1991a), “Trading volume and price reactions to public announcements,” Journal of Accounting Research 29, 302-321.
Lang, L., and R. Stulz (1992), “Contagion and competitive intra-industry effects of bankruptcy announcements,” Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 45–60.
Lau, S., D. Diltz and V. Apilado (1994), “Valuation effects of international stock exchange listings,” Journal of Banking and Finance 18, 743-755.
Lelnad H. E. and D. H. Pyle (1977), “Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation,” Journal of Finance, 32(2), 371-387.
Lee, D. W. (2002), “Why do ADR Program Announcements Increase Shareholder Wealth?” Working Paper, Ohio State University.
Levine, R., and S. Schmuker (2003), “Migration, Spillovers, and Trade Diversion: The Impact of Internationalization on Stock Market Liquidity,” NBER Working paper.
McConnell, J. and G. Sanger (1984), “A trading strategy for new listings on the NYSE,” Financial Analyst Journal,40, 34-48.
Merton, R.C. (1987), “A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information,” Journal of Finance, 42(3), 483-510.
Melvin M. and M. Valero-Tonone (2005), “The Dark Side of International Cross-listing,” Working Paper, Arizona State University.
Melvin M. and M. Valero-Tonone (2003), “The effects of international cross-listing on rival firms,” Working Paper, Arizona State University.
Miller, D. P. (1999), “The market reaction to international cross-listing: Evidence from Depositary Receipts.” Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 103-124.
Moel, A. (1998), “The Role of Information Disclosure on Stock Market Listing Decisions,” unpublished Harvard University working paper.
Nelson, P. (1974), "Advertising as Information", Journal of Political Econcmy, 82, 729-54.
Pagano, M., (1993), “Financial markets and growth,” Europea Economics Review, 37, 613-632
Pattel, J. M. (1976), “Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical tests.” Journal of Accounting Research, 14, 246-276.
Pettit, R. R. (1972), “Dividend Announcements, Security Performance, and Capital Market Efficiency,” Journal of Finance, 27(5), 993-1007.
Ramchand, S. and L. Sethapakdi (2000), “The Impact of Global Equity Offerings,” Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2767-2789.
Reilly, F., Wright D. and Wagasuki T. (1990), “A dual overseas listing: The impact on returns, risk and trading volume,” University of Notre Dame Working paper.
Reese, W. and M. Weisbach (2001), “Protection of minority shareholder interests, cross-listings in the United States, and subsequent equity offerings,” unpublished NBER working paper.
Ross, S. A. (1977), “Informational Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation: Discussion,” Journal of Finance, 32(2), 412-415.
Sanger, G. C. and J. J. McConnell (1986), “Stock Exchange Listing, Firm Value, and Security Market Efficiency: The Impact of NASDAQ,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21(1), 1-25.
Saudagaran, S. M. (1988), “An Empirical Study of Selected Factors Influencing the Decision to List on Foreign Stock Exchanges,” Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 101-127.
Spence, M. A. (1973), “Job Market Singnaling,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355-374.
Stulz, R. M. (1997), “International portfolio flows and securities markets,” unpublished working paper, Dice Center for Financial Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Wahab, M., and A. Khandwala (1993), “Why not diversify internationally with ADRs?” Journal of Portfolio Management, 20, 75–82.
Werner, I., and A. Kleidon(1996), “U.S. and U.K. trading of British cross-listed stocks: An intraday analysis of market integration,” Review of Financial Studies, 9, 619–664.
Wu, C., and C. Kwok (2002), “Why Do U.S. Firms Issue Global Equity Offerings?” Financial Management, 31(2): 47-65.
Ying L. K. W., W. G. Lewellen, G. G. Schlarbaum and R. C. Lease (1977), “Stock Exchange Listings and Securities Returns,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 12(3), 415-432.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內外都一年後公開 withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code