Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0326114-003448 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0326114-003448
論文名稱
Title
負向團隊情感氛圍能促進團隊創新嗎?探討創新獎酬、團隊促進型焦點的干擾效果:多重研究與多重來源的檢視
Can Negative Group Affective Tone Facilitate Team Innovation? Exploring the Moderating Roles of Innovation Rewards and Team Promotion Focus: A Multi-Sample and Multi-Source Investigation
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
64
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2014-04-09
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2014-04-26
關鍵字
Keywords
團隊促進型焦點、團隊情感氛圍、創新獎酬、個人-情境交互作用理論、團隊創新、痛苦-相關創新模式
Innovation rewards, Team innovation, Team promotion focus, Distress-Related Innovation Model, Person-Context Interaction Theory, Group affective tone
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5801 次,被下載 669
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5801 times, has been downloaded 669 times.
中文摘要
過去探討團隊情感氛圍的研究,大多聚焦於正向團隊情感氛圍與團隊創新的影響,但亦有學者提出在某些情況下,負向團隊情感氛圍能促進團隊創新(Collins, Lawrence, Troth, & Jordan, 2013; George & King, 2007)。既然研發團隊成員常因急迫的時間與專案壓力而感受到負向團隊情感氛圍,探討「在何種狀況下」能將此負向的氛圍轉化為團隊創新的助力,應有助於團隊應對迅速變化的環境。
本研究以創新文獻中的「痛苦-相關創新模式」(Distress-Related Innovation Model; Anderson, DeDreu, & Nijstad, 2004以及「人格特質-情境交互作用」(Person-Context Interaction; Amabile, 1996)的觀點做為理論基礎,並探討:(1) 若組織提供了充份的創新獎酬時,負向團隊情感氛圍可否提升團隊創新;(2) 當各團隊在促進型焦點程度不同時,是否會強化、或是減弱創新獎酬對負向團隊情感氛圍與團隊創新關係的干擾效果。
本研究進行兩個研究,以回答前述的研究問題。首先,在研究一,本研究以107個研發團隊,共491位團隊成員做為樣本,且由團隊主管評估團隊創新資料。其結果發現,若創新獎酬程度高時,負向團隊情感氛圍有助於提升團隊創新、但創新獎酬程度低時,負向團隊情感氛圍則會降低團隊創新。其次,在研究二中,本研究則以48個研發團隊與246位團隊成員為另一組樣本,除了一樣請團隊主管評估創新資料外,更在多個時間點進行資料收集,以避免共同方法變異問題。研究二的結果除了再次驗證了研究一的發現外,更進一步指出:對於低度促進型焦點的團隊而言,創新獎酬更能強化負向團隊情感氛圍與團隊創新的正向關係;而對於高度促進型焦點的團隊而言,其負向團隊情感氛圍與團隊創新的關係則較不受創新獎酬影響。
Abstract
Past studies have mainly focused on the relationship between positive group affective tone and team innovation. However, some researchers proposed that negative group affective tone (NGAT) might be beneficial for team innovation under some situations (George & King, 2007). Base on the Distress-Relate Innovation Model and the person-context interaction perspective of the creativity, the present study explores: (1) whether innovation rewards moderate the relationship between NGAT and team innovation; and (2) whether team promotion-focus strengthen or attenuate the moderating effect of innovation rewards on the NGAT-team innovation relationship.
In the current paper, two studies were conducted to test the proposed hypotheses. In Study 1, the data was collected from 107 research and development (R&D) teams with 491 team members and from multiple sources. The results showed that NGAT was positively related to team innovation when innovation rewards are high. However, this relationship becomes negative when innovation rewards are low. In Study 2, another independent sample was composed of 48 R&D teams with 246 team members. The data was collected from multiple sources and multiple time points to avoid the common method variance problem. The Study 2 results not only replicated the findings obtained from the Study 1, but also highlighted the importance of team promotion-focus: (1) for low promotion-focus teams, the moderating effects of innovation rewards on the NGAT-team innovation were stronger; (2) for high promotion-focus teams, the relationship between NGAT and team innovation was less likely to be moderated by innovation rewards.
目次 Table of Contents
謝 誌 iii
中文摘要 iv
英文摘要 v
目 錄 vi
圖 目 錄 viii
表 目 錄 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 負向團隊情感氛圍與團隊創新:痛苦-相關創新模式的觀點 5
第二節 創新獎酬對於負向團隊情感氛圍與團隊創新的干擾效果 7
第三章 研究一之研究方法與結果 9
第一節 研究架構 9
第二節 研究樣本與施測程序 9
第三節 研究工具與信效度證據 10
第四節 團隊資料整合 12
第五節 資料分析方法 13
第六節 敘述性統計和變數間相關分析 13
第七節 創新獎酬對於負向團隊情感氛圍與團隊創新的干擾效果 13
第八節 研究一之討論 15
第四章 研究二之文獻探討 16
第五章 研究二之研究方法與結果 19
第一節 研究架構 19
第二節 研究樣本與施測程序 19
第三節 研究工具與信效度證據 21
第四節 團隊資料整合 23
第五節 資料分析方法 23
第六節 敘述性統計和變數間相關分析 23
第七節 創新獎酬對於負向團隊情感氛圍與團隊創新的干擾效果 24
第八節 負向團隊情感氛圍與團隊創新:團隊促進型焦點與創新獎酬之三階交互作用 26
第六章 討論與建議 29
第一節 研究發現與理論意涵 29
第二節 管理意涵 31
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 33
參考文獻 35
附錄一 研究一之團隊主管問卷
附錄二 研究一之團隊成員問卷
附錄三 研究二之團隊主管問卷
附錄四 研究二之團隊成員問卷
參考文獻 References
一、中文部分
李弘暉,鐘麗英(1999),團隊運作過程對團隊績效影響之研究,人力資源學報,11,1-30。
紀乃文 (2009),團隊情感氛圍的前因、動態改變及後果變數之研究。國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
陳威禎 (2009)。團隊調節焦點與績效關係之誇層次分析─任務特性之調節效果。東吳大學商學院企業管理研究所碩士論文。
黃家齊、許雅婷 (2006)。團隊成員人格特質對知識分享及創新績效之影響─個人與團隊層次的分析。管理學報,23(2),149-170。
馮斯琪 (2008)。正、負向團隊情感氛圍交互作用對團隊創造力與人際反生產力行為的影響:團隊信任的干擾效果。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
蔡維奇、紀乃文 (2008)。團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節、及個人層次後變項之研究。組織與管理,1(1),1-37。
二、英文部分
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting
Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Amabile, T. (1987). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L.Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Anderson, N., De Drue, C. K. W., & Nijstad., B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147-173.
Anderson, N. & Gasteiger, R.M. (2007). Helping Creativity and Innovation Thrive in Organizations: Functional and Dysfunctional Perspectives. In Langan-Fox, J., Cooper, C. L., & Klimoski, R. J., Research Companion to the Dysfunctional Workplace: Management Challenges and Symptoms. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Baer, M., Oldham, G. r., & Cumming, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: when does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 569-586
Barczak, G., & Wilemon, D. (2003). Team members’ experiences in new product development: views from the trenches. R&D Management, 33, 463-479.
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644-675.
Barsade, S. G. & Gibson, D. E. (2012). Group Affect: Its Influence on Individual and Group Outcomes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 119-123.
Brockner, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2001). Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35-66.
Cabrales, A. L., Medina, C. C., Lavado, A. C., & Cabrera, R. V. (2008). Managing functional diversity, risk taking and incentives for teams to achieve radical innovations. R&D Management, 38(1), 35-50.
Chi, N. W., Chung, Y. Y., & Tsai, W. C. (2011). How do happy leaders enhance team success? The mediating roles of transformational leadership, group affective tone and team processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 1421–1454.
Chi, N. W., Huang, Y. M., & Lin, S. C. (2009). A Double-Edged Sword? Exploring the Curvilinear Relationship between Organizational Tenure Diversityand Team Innovation: The Moderating Role of Team-Oriented HR Practices. Group& Organization Management, 34, 698-726.
Chi, N. W., & Tsai, W. C. (2008). A multilevel investigation of mechanisms and boundary conditions of the linkage between positive group affective tone and team creativity. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, USA.
Cole, S. M., Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). Affective Mechanisms Linking Dysfunctional Behavior to Performance in Work Teams: A Moderated Mediation Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 945-958.
Collins, A. L., Lawrence, S. A., Troth, A. C., & Jordan, P. J. (2013). Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 43-62.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117-132.
Drucker, P. F. 2006. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: HarperCollins.
Eisenberger, R., & Aselage, J. (2009). Incremental effects of reward on experienced performance pressure: Positive outcomes for intrinsic interest and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 95-117.
Eisenberger, R., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Incremental effects of rewards on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 728-741.
Eisenbeiss, S. A., Van Kinippenberg, D., & Boerner, S. (2008). Transformational Leadership and Team Innovation: Integrating Team Climate Principles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1438-1446.
Faddegon, K., Ellemers, N., & Scheepers D. (2009). Eager to be the Best, or Vigilant Not to Be the Worst: The Emergence of Regulatory Focus in Disjunctive and Conjunctive Group Tasks. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(5), 653-671.
Fay, D., & Sonnentag, S. (2002). Rethinking the effects of stressors: A longitudinal study on personal initiative. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 221-234.
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013.
Functions and dysfunctions of group affective tone. In E. A. Mannix, M. A.Neale, and C.P. Anderson (Eds.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 10, 97-124, CT: JAI Press.
George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: effects of positive mood on prosocial behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 299-307.
George, J. M. (1996). Group affective tone. In M. A. West (Eds.). Handbook of Work Group Psychology , 77-93. Chicester, UK: Wiley.
George, J. M., & King, E. B. (2007). Potential pitfalls of affect convergence in teams:
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687-697.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity.Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622.
Gilson, R. L., & May, D. R. (2005). Innovation in Work Groups: a Theory of Group Support for Innovation . Paper presented at the 2005 Midwest Academy of Management Conference,Chicago, IL, USA.
Grawitch, M. J., Munz, D. C., Elliott, E. K., & Mathis, A. (2003). Promoting creativity in temporary problem-solving groups: The effects of positive mood and autonomy in problem definition on idea-generating performance. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 7(3), 200-213.
Hart, J. W., Stasson, M. F., Mahoney, J. M., & Story, P. (2007). The Big Five and Achievement Motivation: Exploring the Relationship Between Personality and a Two-Factor Model of Motivation. Individual Differences Research, 5(4), 267-274.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
Hsu Michael, L. A., Hou, S. T., & Fan, H. L. (2011). Creative Self-Efficacy and Innovative Behavior in a Service Setting: Optimism as a Moderator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258-272.
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-Level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128-1145.
Ilies, R., Wagner, D. T., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Explaining affective linkages in teams: Individual differences in susceptibility to contagion and individualism / collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1140-1148.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 287-302.
Janssen, O., van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A Special Issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 129-145.
Johnson, P. D. (2010). Entrepreneurial success: An integrative study of team climate for innovation, group regulatory focus, innovation performance, and success. Degree of doctor of philosophy , US: Oklahoma State University.
Jordan, P . T., Lawrence, S. A., & Troth, A. C. (2006). The impact of negative mood on team performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 12, 131-145.
Klep, A. H. M., Wisse, B., & Van der Flier, H. (2012). When sad groups expect to meet again: Interactive affective sharing and future interaction expectation as determinants of work groups’ analytical and creative task performance. British Journal of Social Psychology. 54(4), 667-685.
Kluger, A., & Ganzach, Y. (2004). Two faces of excellence: Perfection versus eminence. In G.B. Graen (Ed.). New frontiers of leadership, LMX Leadership: The series (Vol. 2). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing Inc.
Kruglanski, A. W., Friedman, I., & Zeevi, G. (1971). The effects of extrinsic incentive on some qualitative aspects of task performance. Journal of Personality, 39, 606-617.
Larsen, R. J. (2000). Toward a science of mood regulation, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 129-141.
Laursen, K. (2002). The importance of sectorial differences in the application of complementary HRM practices for innovation performance. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9, 139-156.
Laursen, K., & Foss, N. (2003). New HRM practices,complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 243-263.
Lawler, E. and Rhodes, G. (1976) Information and Control in Organizations. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear Publishing Co.
Lepak, D., Liao, H., Chung, Y., & Harden, E. (2006). A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 25, 217-271.
Levine, J. M., Higgins, E. T., & Choi, H. S. (2000). Development of Strategic Norms in Groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 88-101.
McDuffie, J.P. (1995) HR bundles and manufacturing performance: organizationallogic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial Labour Relations Review, 48, 197-221.
Nystrom, P., Ramamurthy, K., & Wilson, A. (2002). Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19, 221-247.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.
Pirola-Merlo, A., & Mann, L. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 235-257.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531-544.
Rhee, S. Y. (2007). Shared emotions and group effectiveness the role of broadening-and-building interactions. In E. A. Mannix, M. A.Neale, and C.P. Anderson (Eds.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams (vol.10, pp. 65-95), CT: JAI Press.
Rietzschel, E. F. (2011). Collective regulatory focus predicts specific aspects of team innovation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,14(3), 337-345.
Rank, J., & Frese, M. (2008). The impact of emotions, moods and other affect-related variables on creativity, innovation and initiative in organizations. Research Companion To Emotion In Organizations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in I/O psychology. In M.D. Dunnette & L. Hough (eds.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 428-442). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Sacramento, C. A., Fay, D., & West, M. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121, 141-157.
Sarin, S., & Mahajan, V. (2001) The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross-functional product development teams. Journal of Marketing, 65, 35-53.
Sassenberg, K., & Woltin, K. A. (2009). Group-based self-regulation: The effects of regulatory focus. European Review of Social Psychology, 19(1), 126-164.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607.
Sethi, R., Smith, D.C., & Park, C.W. (2001). Crossfunctional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research, XXXVIII, 73-85.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933-958.
Shin, Y., & Kim, M. (2013). Regulatory Focus in Work Teams: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Prevention and Promotion Foci. Academy of Management Journal, 10, 5465.
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When Is Educational Specialization Heterogeneity Related to Creativity in Research and Development Teams? Transformational Leadership as a Moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (6), 1709-1721.
Siegel, S., & Kaemmerer, W. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 553-562.
Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29-54.
Spreitzer, G. M., Sutcliffe, K. M., Dutton, J. E., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16, 537-549.
Sy, T., Cote, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The Contagious Leader: Impact of the Leader’s Mood on the Mood of Group Members, Group Affective Tone, and Group Processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 295-305.
Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, R. L., & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments, in Kelley K (Ed.) Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology, 82: 117-153, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
Tsai, W. C., Chi, N. W., Grandey, A. A., & Fung, S. C. (2012). Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 638–656.
Tu, C. (2009). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing creativity in NPD teams. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 119-126.
Van Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2011). Task type as a moderator of positive/negative feedback effects on motivation and performance: A regulatory focus perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(8), 1084-1105.
Wallace, J. C., Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G., & Smith, M. B. (2013). A Multilevel Model of Employee Innovation: Understanding the Effects of Regulatory Focus, Thriving, and Employee Involvement Climate. Journal of Management, DOI: 10.1177.
Watson, D. (2000), Mood and temperament. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
West, M. A. & Anderson, N. R. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 680-693.
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(3), 355–387.
West, B. J., Patera, J. L., & Carsten, M. K. (2009). Team level positivity: investigating positive psychological capacities and team level outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 249-267.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.
Zhou, J. & George, J. M. (2001). When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682-692.
Zhou, Q., Hirst, G., & Shipton, H. (2012). Context matters: Combined influence of participation and intellectual stimulation on the promotion focus–employee creativity relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 894-909.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code