Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0403108-004544 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0403108-004544
論文名稱
Title
交易透明度改變對投資人下單決策、市場績效及限價簿資訊內涵的影響
The Effect of Pre-Transparency on Order Strategy, Market Performance and Information Content of Limit Order Book
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
84
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-03-29
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-04-03
關鍵字
Keywords
市場績效、限價簿、資訊內涵
none
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5758 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5758 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
台灣證交所自民國91年7月起實施「揭露未成交最佳一檔買賣價量」;並自92年1月起進一步實施「揭露最佳五檔買賣價量資訊」。接續兩次揭示制度變革提供獨特的機會得以探討交易前透明度增加對整體市場之影響。本文主要結合交易前透明度、下單策略、市場績效及限價簿資訊內涵等議題,由實際資料觀察發現,提高交易透明度會加強投資人之間下單的競爭程度,特別是法人,同時亦會使散戶減少極端的下單策略。相較於法人,散戶在委託單資訊更透明時,似乎比法人更具耐心,顯示他們是市場主要的流動性提供者。再者,當市場愈透明,法人的下單張數比例增加,但其在連續交易期間的平均每筆委託規模卻減少;相較於法人,在透明市場,散戶的下單張數比例雖下降,但其在各日內時段的平均每筆委託規模卻顯著增加。市場績效方面,愈高的透明度會增加價格波動性,但並未顯著顯著改善市場流動性與效率性。且進一步探討下單策略與市場績效之間關係發現,兩者為同時決定,並非單向因果關係。另在限價簿資訊內涵方面,大致而言,揭示價的資訊內涵高於揭示量,法人的揭示價量資訊內涵高於散戶、散戶第一檔揭示價量的資訊內涵皆高於第一檔以外的平均揭示價量,但法人第一檔以外平均揭示價量的資訊內涵並不低於第一檔。另亦發現,雖投資人下單決策大多受到最佳一檔揭示資訊影響,新增的第二檔至第五檔揭示資訊仍具部分解釋力。
Abstract
This study examines the impact of increasing pre-trade transparency on the intraday order placement strategies of individual and institutional investors. The effect of pre-trade transparency on market performance and information content of limit order book is also studied. We found that transparency affects order placement strategies. First, greater pre-trade transparency intensifies competition and thus aggressiveness in order placement, especially for institutional investors, and reduces extreme order placement by individual investors as they better know how to place orders. Second, increasing transparency also changes trader order sizes. Institutional investors make smaller orders with increasing transparency, while individual investors make larger orders. Generally, greater transparency increases volatility, but not liquidity and efficiency. Finally, this study shows that the impact of transparency on market performance and the changes in order placement strategies are simultaneously determined. The analytical results are robust to different trading periods. Concerning information content of the limit order book, we evidence several major results. First, the disclosing bid/ask prices have more information content than posted bid/ask volume. Second, institutional traders’ unmatched orders provide more information content than individual traders. Third, the individual traders’ best bid/ask of unexecuted orders always have more information content than the average 2nd to 5th bid/ ask of unexecuted orders, while it is not true for institutional investors, their average 2nd to 5th bid/ ask of unexecuted orders contain the same information as best unexecuted orders at least. Additionally, though most of the explanatory power of the limit order book concentrates on the best quotes, however, the book beyond the best quotes also matters in explaining the order aggressiveness of investors.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
誌謝………………………………………………………………………..…..ii
中文摘要…………………………………………………………………..….iii
英文摘要………………………………………………………………...……iv
目錄……………………………………………………………………………v
表目錄……………………………………………………………………..…vii
圖目錄…………………………………………………………...…………..viii
第壹章 緒論…………………………………………..……………………………1
第貳章 研究動機與文獻回顧……………………………………………………8
第一節 透明度相關研究…………………………………………………………8
第二節 限價簿資訊與投資人下單策略………………………..………………11
第三節 衡量限價簿資訊內涵………………………….……………………….14
第四節 文獻重點彙整…………………………………………………………..17
第參章 研究設計………………………………………………………….……..19
第一節 市場背景與資料描述………………………………………………….19
第二節 研究方法……………………………………………………………….21
(一) 投資人下單策略………………………………………………………...21
(二) 市場績效………………………………………………………………...23
(三) 下單策略與市場績效之間的關係……………………………………...25
(四) 限價簿的資訊內涵……………………………………………………...27
(五) 限價簿資訊與下單策略之間關係……………………………………...32
第肆章 實證結果………………………………………………………………...36
第一節 投資人下單策略……………….………………………………………36
第二節 市場績效…………………………………………………………….…39
第三節 穩健性分析……………………………………………………….……40
第四節 下單策略與市場績效之間的整合性分析………………………….…41
第五節 限價簿的資訊內涵………………………………………………….…42
第六節 限價簿資訊與投資人下單策略……………………………………….44
第伍章 結論與後續研究………………………………………………………..47
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………..50
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
王冠閔, 黃柏農, 2004, 台灣股、匯市與美國股市關聯性探討, 臺灣經濟預測與政策, 34(2), pp. 31-72。
吳懿娟, 2004, 我國貨幣政策傳遞機制之實証分析, 中央銀行季刊, 26(4), pp. 33-68。
洪裕勝, 陳彥志, 2005, 不同國家指數現貨、期貨與指數股票型基金價格關聯性之研究:以台灣、香港、新加坡為例, 2005年台灣財務學術研討會, 高雄。
蔡怡純, 2005, 委託單驅動市場之投單策略與價格形成, 國立中山大學財務管理學系博士論文。
聶建中, 周明智, 2002, 影響來台旅遊人數及觀光外匯收入總體變數決定因素之研究, 管理學報, 19(3), pp. 1-17。
聶建中, 林景春, 詹凱婷, 2004, 兩岸三地股價聯動性研究, 輔仁管理評論, 11(2), pp. 63-82。
聶建中, 林少斌, 莊亨懋, 2005, 台灣半導體上、中、下游產業股價指數之連動性探討, 臺大管理論叢, 15(2), pp. 25-42。
Aksu, C., and E. Gunay, 1995, An Empirical Analysis of the Causal Relationship Between Short Interest and Stock Prices, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 22, pp. 733-749.
Al-Suhaibani, M., and L. Kryzanowski, 2001, Limit vs. Market Order Trading on the Saudi Stock Market, Working paper(EFMA 2001 Lugano Meetings).
Anand, A., S. Chakravarty., and T. Martell, 2005, Empirical Evidence on the Evolution of Liquidity: Choice of Market versus Limit Orders by Informed and Uninformed Traders, Journal of Financial Markets 8, pp. 289-309.
Angle, J., 1994, Market and Limit Orders, Canadian shareowner 8, pp. 18 -20.
Back K., C.H. Cao and G. A. Willard, 2000, Imperfect Competition among Informed Traders, Journal of Finance 55, pp. 2117-2155.
Bae, K.H., H. Jang and K.S. Park, 2003, Traders’ Choice between Limit and Market Orders: Evidence from NYSE Stocks, Journal of Financial Markets 6, pp. 517-538.
Baig, T., 2003, Monetary Policy in a Deflationary Environment, in Japan's Lost Decade: Policies for Economic Revival, edited by Tim Callen and Jonathan D. Ostry, IMF.
Beber, A., and C. Caglio, 2005, Order Submission Strategies and Information: Empirical Evidence from The NYSE, Working paper, University of Lausanne.
Berry, T. D. and K. M. Howe, 1994, Public Information Arrival, Journal of Finance 49, pp. 1331-1346.
Biais, B., P. Hillion and C. Spatt, 1995, An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris Bourse, Journal of Finance 50, pp. 1655-1689.
Bloomfield, R. and M. O'Hara, 2000, Can Transparent Market Survive?, Journal of Financial Economics 55, pp. 425-459.
Boehmer, E., G. Saar, and L. Yu, 2005, Lifting the Veil: An Analysis of Pre-Trade Transparency at the NYSE, Journal of Finance 60, pp. 783 - 815.
Cao, C., O. Hansch and X. Wang, 2005, The Informational Content of an Open Limit Order Book, Working paper (Pennsylvania State University).
Chan, K., and W. M. Fong, 2000, Trade Size, Order Imbalance, and the Volatility-Volume Relation, Journal of Financial Economics 57, pp. 247-273.
Chow, K.V. and K. Denning, 1993, A Simple Multiple Variance Ratio Test, Journal of Econometrics 58, pp. 385-401.
Ciner, C., 2002, The Stock Price-Volume Linkage on the Toronto Stock Exchange : Before and After Automation, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 19, pp. 335-349.
Coppejans, M. and I. Domowitz, 2002, An Empirical Analysis of Trades, Orders, and Cancellations in a Limit Order Market, Working paper(Duke University).
Flood, M. D., R. Huisman, K.G.. Koedijk and R. J. Mahieu, 1999, Quote Disclosure and Price Discovery in Multiple-Dealer Financial Markets, Review of Financial Studies 12, pp. 37-59.
Foster, F. Douglas, and S. Viswanathan, 1994, Strategic Trading with Asymmetrically Informed Traders and Long-Lived Information, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 29, pp. 499-518.
Foster, F. Douglas, and S. Viswanathan, 1996, Strategic Trading When Agents Forecast the Forecasts of Others, Journal of Finance 51, pp. 1437-1478.
Foucault, T., 1999, Order Flow Composition and Trading Costs in a Dynamic Limit Order Market, Journal of Financial Markets 2, pp. 99-134.
Foucault, T., O. Kadan and E. Kandel, 2003, Limit Order Book as a Market for Liquidity, Review of Financial Studies 18, pp. 1171-1217.
French, K.R., and R. Roll, 1986, Stock Return Variances: The Arrival of Information and the Reaction of Traders, Journal of Financial Economics 17, pp. 5-26.
Friedman, D., 1993, Privileged Traders and Asset Market Efficiency: A laboratory Study, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28, pp. 515-534.
Gerke, W., S. Arneth, R. Bosch and C. Syha, 1997, Open and Closed Order Book and Its Effect on Liquidity and Volatility – Market Microstructure of Stock Exchanges in Experiments and in the Neuer Market, Working paper(Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg).
Glosten, L., 1994, Is the Electronic Limit Open Book Inevitable?, The Journal of Finance 49, pp. 1127-1161.
Glosten, L.R., 1999, Introductory comments: Bloomfield and O’Hara, and Flood, Huisman, Koedijk, and Mahieu, Review of Financial Studies 12, pp. 1–3.
Gonzalo, J., and C. Granger, 1995, Estimation of common long-memory components in cointegrated systems, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13, pp. 27-36.
Gopinath, S., and C. Krishnamurti, 2001, Number of Transactions and Volatility: An Empirical Study Using High-Frequency Data from Nasdaq Stocks, The Journal of Financial Research 24, pp. 205-218.
Griffiths, M., B. Smith, D. Turnbull and R.W. White, 2000, The Costs and the Determinants of Order Aggressiveness, Journal of Financial Economics 56, pp. 65-88.
Handa, P., and R. A. Schwartz, 1996, Limit order trading, Journal of Finance 51, pp. 1835–1861.
Handa, P., R. Schwartz and A. Tiwari., 2003, Quote Setting and Price Formation in an Order Driven Market, Journal of Financial Markets 6, pp. 461-489.
Harris, L., and J. Hasbrouck, 1996, Market versus Limit Orders: the SuperDOT Evidence on Order Submission Strategy, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, pp. 213-231.
Harris, L., and V. Panchapagesan, 2005, The Information-Content of the Limit Order Book: Evidence from NYSE Specialist Trading Decisions, Journal of Financial Market 8, pp. 25-68.
Hasbrouck, J., 1991a, Measuring the information content of stock trades, Journal of Finance 46, pp. 179-207 .
Hasbrouck, J., 1991b, The summary informativeness of stock trades: An econometric analysis, Review of Financial Studies 4, pp. 571-95.
Hasbrouck, J., 1995, One security, many markets: Determining the contributions to price discovery, The Journal of Finance 50, pp. 1175-1199.
Hasbrouck, J., and R.A. Schwartz, 1988, Liquidity and Execution Costs Inequity Markets, Journal of Portfolio Management 14, pp. 10-16.
Hollifield, B., R. Miller and P. Sandas, 2004, Empirical analysis of limit order markets, Review of Economic Studies 71, pp. 1027-1063.
Irvine, P., G. Benston and E. Kandel, 2000, Liquidity Beyond the Inside Spread: Measuring and Using Information in the Limit Order Book, Working paper (Emory University).
Jain, P. and G. Joh, 1988, The Dependence between Hourly Prices and Trading Volume, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, pp. 269- 283.
Kaniel, R. and H. Liu, 2006, So What Orders do Informed Traders Use?, Journal of Business 79, pp. 1867-1914.
Lakonishok, J. and S. Smidt, 1989, Past Price Changes and Current Trading Volume, The Journal of. Portfolio Management 15, pp. 18-24.
L'horty, Y. and C. Rault, 2004, Inflation, Minimum Wage and Other Wages: an Econometric Study on French Macroeconomic Data, Applied Economics 36, pp. 277-290.
Lo, A. W. and C. MacKinlay, 1988, Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test, Review of Financial Studies 1, pp. 41-66.
Ma, T., and I.C. Tsai, 2004, A Dynamic Model of Order Execution and the Intraday Cost of Limit Orders, Working paper(The 12th SFM Conference, National Sun-Yat-sen University, Taiwan).
Madhavan, A., 1996, Security Prices and Market Transparency, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 5, pp. 255-283.
Madhavan, A., 2000, Market Microstructure: A Survey, Journal of Financial Markets 3, pp. 205-258.
Madhavan, A., Porter, D., and D. Weaver, 2005, Should Securities Markets be Transparent?, Journal of Financial Markets 8, pp. 265-287.
Menkhoff, L., and M. Schmeling, 2005, Informed Trading in Limit Order Markets: Evidence on Trinary Order Choice, Working paper, University of Hannover.
Pagno, M., and A. Röell, 1996, Transparency and Liquidity: A Comparison of Auction and Dealer Markets with Informed Trading, Journal of Finance 51, pp. 579-611.
Parlour, C., 1998, Price dynamics in limit order markets, Review of Financial Studies 11, pp. 789–816.
Pascual, R., and D. Veredas, 2006, What Pieces of Limit Order Book Information Matter in Explaining the Behavior of Aggressive and Patient Traders?, Working paper(Universidad de las Islas Baleares).
Ranaldo, R., 2004, Order Aggressiveness in Limit Order Book Markets, Journal of Financial Market 7, pp. 53-74.
Schwartz, R., 1991, Reshaping the Equity Markets: A Guide for the 1990s, Harper Business, USA.
Tahir, R., and A. A. Ghani, 2005, Modelling Bahrain’s Economy: a Vector Autoregression (VAR) Approach, EcoMod2005 International Conference on Policy Modeling, Istanbul.
Tauchen, G. E., Gallant, A. R. and P. E. Rossi, 1992, Stock Prices and Volume, The Review of Financial Studies 5, pp. 199-242.
Wright, J.H, 2000, Alternative Variance-Ratio Tests Using Ranks and Signs, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 18, pp. 1-9
Ying, C.C., 1966, Stock Market Prices and Volumes of Sales, Ecomometrica 34, pp. 676-686.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.226.251.68
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.226.251.68
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code