Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0417116-012416 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0417116-012416
論文名稱
Title
雙佔市場下引進廣告代言人之福利分析
The Welfare Analysis of Advertising Endorser in Duopoly Markets
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
35
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-06-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-07-07
關鍵字
Keywords
最低品質標準、誤導性廣告、垂直差異化、廣告代言人
vertical differentiation, minimum quality standards, advertising endorser, misleading advertising
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5777 次,被下載 19
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5777 times, has been downloaded 19 times.
中文摘要
本文主要探討在垂直差異化的雙佔市場下,若廠商使用誤導性廣告並透過廣告代言人效果使消費者對產品品質產生誤解時,社會福利將如何變動。另外同時分析廣告代言人收取額外費用以及政府實行最低品質標準時,廠商行為的改變如何影響社會福利。我們發現當廠商的廣告水準提升時,一般來說將會造成社會福利的損失,而廣告代言人收取額外費用會間接增進社會福利。最後若政府進行最低品質標準管制時,只有在消費者對高、低品質產品主觀品質的感受差異足夠大的情況下才會改善社會福利。
Abstract
In a duopoly model with vertical differentiation, the firms want to mislead the consumer’s awareness of the product quality by the effect that advertising endorser manufacturing, and this paper mainly discusses such this misleading advertising how to impacts social welfare. We also analyze when the advertising endorser charges an extra fee or government implements the minimum quality standards, what will happen on the firm’s behavior. We find that when the firm increases the level of advertising, social welfare will lose generally. The advertising endorser charges an extra fee will lead to an improvement on social welfare indirectly. And if government implements the minimum quality standards, only when the consumer’s awareness of the quality between high quality and low quality is large enough that will improve social welfare.
目次 Table of Contents
謝辭 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究方法與架構 2
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第三章 理論模型 7
第一節 模型假設 7
第二節 均衡分析 9
第四章 福利分析 12
第一節 政府未管制下之社會福利 12
第二節 代言人參數分析 16
第三節 政府管制下之社會福利 19
第五章 結論與建議 23
第一節 結論 23
第二節 未來研究建議與方向 24
參考文獻 25
附錄 27
參考文獻 References
一、 中文部分
1. 陳玉晏(2015),「產品品質管制政策分析」,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所博士論文。
2. 簡志憲(2006),「廣告效果與產品品質」,國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。

二、 英文部分
1. Bloch, F. and Manceau, D. (1999). “Persuasive advertising in Hotelling's model of product differentiation.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, pp.557-574.
2. Von der Fehr, NHM. and Stevik, K. (1998), “Persuasive Advertising and Product Differentiation.” Southern Economic Journal, 65, pp.113-126.
3. Grossman, GM. and Shapiro, C. (1984). “Informative advertising with differentiated products.” Review of Economic Studies, 51, pp.63-81.
4. Hattori, K and Higashida, K. (2012). “Misleading advertising in duopoly.” Canadian Journal of Economics, 45, pp.1154-1187.
5. Hamilton, SF. (2009). “Informative advertising in differentiated oligopoly markets.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27, pp.60-69.
6. LeBlanc, G. (1998). “Informative advertising competition.” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, pp.63-77.
7. Moraga-González, J.L. (2000). “Quality uncertainty and informative advertising.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, pp.615-640.
8. Motta, M. (1993). “Endogenous quality choice: price vs. quantity competition.” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 41, pp.113-131.
9. Nelson, P. (1974). “Advertising as Information. ”Journal of Political Economy, 82, pp.729-754.
10. Schmalensee, R. (1978). “A model of advertising and product quality. ”Journal of Political Economy, 86, pp.485-503.
11. Valletti, TM. (2000). “Minimum quality standards under Cournot competition.” Journal of Regulatory Economics, 18, pp.235-245.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code