Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0424109-142711 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0424109-142711
論文名稱
Title
組織政治知覺對組織政治行為之影響-以瞭解、知覺控制與人格特質因素為干擾變項
The effect of perceptions of organizational politics and organization politics behavior - The moderator of understanding , perceived control and personal characteristics
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
114
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2009-04-19
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2009-04-24
關鍵字
Keywords
人格特質、知覺控制、瞭解、組織政治行為、組織政治知覺
perceptions of organizational politics, organization politics behavior, understanding, perceived control, personal characteristics
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5642 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5642 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究依循Ferris et al.(2002)所提出的組織政治知覺修正模型,探討「組織政治知覺」對「組織政治行為」之影響,並進一步驗證「瞭解」、「知覺控制」及「內外控人格特質」、「A型人格特質」、「一般自我效能」與「工作自我效能」等人格特質對「組織政治知覺與組織政治行為關係」之干擾效果。
本研究共發放2,133份問卷,回收1,940份問卷,有效問卷為1,890份,研究結果發現:
1.組織政治知覺對組織政治行為無顯著相關影響。
2.「瞭解」、「知覺控制」及「內外控人格特質」、「A型人格特質」、「一般自我效能」與「工作自我效能」等人格特質對「組織政治知覺與政治行為」部份呈顯著干擾。
3.薪資升遷政策與實際施行的差距太大強化了組織政治知覺的存在,是產生組織政治知覺的重要成分,進而導致組織成員運用政治行為謀取更大好處。
Abstract
This research relies on Ferris et al.(2002) perceptions of organizational politics revision model, discussion “perceptions of organizational politics” right “organization politics behavior” influence, and further confirms “understanding”, “perceived control” and “locus of control”, “type A personality”, “general self-efficacy” and “job self-efficacy” and so on personal characteristics to be right “perceptions of organizational politics and the organization politics behavior relations” the disturbance effect.
This research altogether provides 2,133 questionnaire, recycles 1,940 questionnaire, the effective questionnaire is 1,890, the findings discovered:
1.Perceptions of organizational politics is not remarkable to the organization politics behavior is related.
2.“understanding”, “perceived control” and “locus of control”, “type A personality”, “general self-efficacy” and “job self-efficacy” and so on personal characteristics to be right “perceptions of organizational politics and the political behavior” the part assumes the remarkable disturbance.
3.The salary is promoted the policy and the actual execution disparity too big strengthening perceptions of organizational politics existence, produces the perceptions of organizational politics important ingredient, then causes the organization members to seek a bigger advantage using the political behavior.
目次 Table of Contents
中文摘要.................................................................................................... I
英文摘要.................................................................................................. II
目錄......................................................................................................... III
表目錄...................................................................................................... V
圖目錄................................................................................................... VII
第一章 緒論........................................................................................... 1
第一節 研究動機....................................................................................... 1
第二節 研究目的....................................................................................... 2
第三節 研究流程....................................................................................... 3
第二章 文獻探討..................................................................................... 4
第一節 組織政治知覺之相關研究........................................................... 4
第二節 組織政治行為之相關研究..........................................................11
第三節 組織政治知覺與政治行為關係之干擾研究..............................16
第三章 研究方法................................................................................... 20
第一節 研究架構..................................................................................... 20
第二節 研究假設..................................................................................... 21
第三節 操件性定義與測量工具............................................................. 22
第四節 資料蒐集方法及樣本特性分析................................................. 27
第五節 資料分析方法............................................................................. 32
第六節 變項測量工具............................................................................. 34
第七節 量表信度與因素分析................................................................. 41
第四章 實證分析................................................................................... 47
第一節 研究變項間之關係..................................................................... 47
第二節 組織政治知覺對組織政治行為之影響..................................... 48

第三節 瞭解、知覺控制與人格特質對「組織政治知覺與組織政治行為關係」
之干擾效果............................................................... 50
第五章 結論與建議............................................................................... 61
第一節 研究結論..................................................................................... 61
第二節 管理實務上的意涵..................................................................... 66
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議......................................................... 68
參考文獻..................................................................................................69
附錄一 研究問卷....................................................................................77
附錄二 研究問卷樣本描述....................................................................85
參考文獻 References
中文部份
王滿宜,2006,組織政治知覺對知識分享之影響-以組織變革滿意度為仲介變項,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
何金銘,2003,組織政治知覺研究現況的缺憾,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所課程講義。
何金銘,2006,統計分析方法,台南:台灣復文興業股份有限公司。
何金銘、李安民著,組織政治知覺與工作滿足及工作壓力之影響,人力資源管理學報,第2卷,第4期,頁81-106,2002。
吳姍瑾,2005,企業文化、組織政治知覺和激勵因素對學習型組織、專業承諾與員工工作績效之關聯性研究—以高雄港務局為例,南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
李青芬,李雅婷,趙慕芬合譯,1994,組織行為學,臺北,華泰書局
谷蘭馨,2006,員工向上影響行為的類型及其與薪資所得之關係,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
易義勝,2002,公部門員工向上政治行為與工作滿足感之關係-以高雄市政府公車處為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
林世娟,2005,工作動機與自我效能之研究-以市立醫院員工與志工為例,世新大學行政管理學系研究所碩士論文。
林逸峰,2004,工作投入與工作行為之關聯性研究-以台南縣基層農會為例,南華大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
林寶生,2004,組織氣候、工作特性、內外控人格、自我效能與工作績效之關係研究-以陸軍某基地進訓基層單位為例,大葉大學國際企業管理學系碩士論文。
郭莎莉,2004,組織政治知覺不良後果的淡化因素,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳火坤,1996,預算目標困難度、預算回饋、預算參與、內外控人格特質和績效的相關研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳序維,2002,組織政治知覺與組織公平對組織承諾之關係研究-以某公營銀行為例,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳威琦,2006,員工組織文化的類型及其對員工向上影響行為之影響,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳英吟,2007,銀行人員的組織政治知覺對工作態度的影響,國立東華大學管理學院高階經營管理碩士論文。
陳素子,2002,從自我效能與工作控制的觀點探討情緒智力與組織承諾影響關係之研究,國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。
陳景堂,2004,統計分析SPSS for Windows 入門與應用 第五版,台北:儒林圖書
蔡昆憲,2007,以正向觀點探討資訊人員職場幸福感之研究:擴展­-建立理論觀點,國立高雄大學經濟管理研究所碩士論文。
謝哲豪,2006,組織政治知覺、信任與知識分享關係的研究,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
羅世輝、湯雅云,內外控人格特質與授權賦能認知對工作滿足之影響-以金融保險業為例,人力資源管理學報,第3卷,第1期,頁1-19,2003。
蘇文郁,2005,人格特質、印象管理與組織公民行為關係之探討,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。


英文部份:
Allen, R.W., Madison,D.L., Porter,L.W., Renwick,P.A. & Mayes,B.T., 1980, Organizational Politics: An Exploration of Managers Perceptions. Human Relations. Vol.33, No.2, 79-100.
Bandura,A..1977, Self-Efficacy: Towards a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. 1982. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency . American Psychologist , 37, 122-147.
Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New Youk: W. H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. 1998. Self-Efficacy:the exercise of control. New York:Oxford University.
Caplan, R.D., & Jones, K.W. 1975. Effect of working load, role ambiguity, and type A personality on anxiety, depression, and heart Rate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(6): 713-719
Cropanzano, Russel S., John C. Howes, Alicia A. Grandey and Paul Toth, 1997, “The Relationship of Organizational Politics and Support to Work Behaviors, Attitudes and Stress, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol.18, 159-180.
Cropanzano, Russel S., K. Michele Kacmar, D. P. Bozeman, 1995, Organizational Politics, Justice and Support: Their differences and similarities P.1-18, in R.S. Cropanzano and K. M. Kacmar (Eds.). Organizational Politics, Justice and Support: Managing Social Climate at Work, Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Deci, C.L. 1975. Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
Drory, A. & Romm, T. 1988. Politics in organization and its perception in the organization. Organizational Studies, 9: 165-179.
Drory, A. & Romm, T. 1990. The definition of organizational politics: A review. Human Relations, 43: 1133-1154.
Drucker, P. (1973). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices. New York: Harper &Row.
Eden, Dov and Yaakov Zuk (1995), “Seasickness as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Raising Self-Efficacy to Boost Performance at Sea,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 80 (5), 628-3559.
Fandt, P. M.. & Ferris, G. R. 1990. The management of information and impressions: When employees behave opportunistically. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45:140-158.
Ferris, Frank, Kacmar and Gilmore., 1994, “Understanding as an Antidote for the Dysfunctional Consequences of Organizational Politics as a Stressor”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24,13: 1204-1220.
Ferris, G.R., Adams,G.,Kolodinsky,R.W.,Wayne A.Hochwarter and Anthony P. Ammeter, 2002.” Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Theory and Research Directions” Research In Multi-Level Issue Volume 1,pages 179-254.
Ferris, Gerald R. and T. R. King, 1991, “Politics in Human Resource Decisions: A Walk on the dark side”, Organizational Dynamics. 20: 59-71.
Ferris, G.R., et al.,1996, “Perceptions of Organizational Politics: Prediction, Stress-Related Implications, and Outcomes”, Human Relations, Vol.49,No2, 233-266.
Ferris, G. R. & Kacmar, K. M. 1992. Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18(1): 93-116.
Ferris, G. R., Russ, G.S., & Fandt, P. M. 1989. Politics in organizations. In R.A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfield (Eds). Impression Management in the Organization: 143-170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fitzgerald (1996), The New Public Management in Action,NY.:Oxford University Press Inc.Francison:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Friedman. M & Rosenman . R.M. 1974. Type A Behavior and Your Heart. New York: Knopf.
Friedman, M., Roseman, R.H., & Carrol, V.C. 1958. Cha nges in the serum cholesterol and blood clotting time in men subjected to cyclic variation in occupational stress. Circulation, 17: 852-861.
Frost , T.F. & Wilson, H.G. 1983. Effect of locus of ccontrol and A-B personality type on job satisfaction within the health care field. Psychological Reports, 53: 399-405.
Gardner, W. L. & Martinko, M.J. 1988. Impression Management in Organizations. Journal of Management, 14 (2), 321-338.
Harrell-Cook G., Ferris G. R., Dulebohn J. H.,1999, Political Behaviors as Moderators of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics--Work Outcomes Relationships, Journal of Organizational Behavior,Vol.20, 1093-1105.
Hochwarter, Wayne A., Pamela L. Perrewe, Gerald R. Ferris and Rachel Guercio, 1999, “Commitment as an Antidote to the Tension and Turnover Consequences of Organizational Politics”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.55: 277-297.
James, L. A. and L. R. James, 1989, “Integrating Work Environmnt Perceptions: Explorations into the Measurement of Meansing”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74, 739-751.
James, L. R., L. A. James and D. K. Ashe, 1990, “The Meaning of Organizations: The Role of Cognition and Values”, In B. Schneider(Ed.), Organizational Climate and Culture , San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 40-84.
Jones, E.E. 1965, Ingratiation: A Social-Psychological Analysis, New York: AAppelton-Century-Crofts.( http://faculty.babson.edu/krollag/org_site/soc_psych/jones_ingrat.html).
Jones, E. E., Pittman, T. S., 1982, Toward a general theory of strategic self presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 231–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Judge, T. A., E. A. Locke, and C. C. Durham(1997), “The dispositional causes of job satisfaction:A core evaluations approach,”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151-188.
Kacmar K.M., & Baron R.A., 1999, Organizational Politics: The State of Field, Links to Related Processes, and an Agenda for Future Research, Research in Personnel and Human Resources management, Vol. 17, 1-39.
Kacmar K.M., & Carlson D., 1997, Further Validation of the Percetions of Politics Scale (POPS): A Multiple Sample Investigation, Journal of Management, Vol.23, No5, 627-658.
Kacmar, K. Michele, Dennis P. Bozeman, Dawn S. Carlson and William P. Anthony, 1999, “An Examination of Perceptions of Organizational Politics Model: Replication and Extension”, Human Relations, New York; Mar. Vol. 52,(3): 383-416.
Kacmar K.M., & Ferris G. R., 1991, Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale (POPS): Development and Vonstruct Validation, Educational & Psychological Measurement, Vol.51, No1, 193-205.
Kacmar, K.M. & Ferris, G.R. 1993. Politics at work: Sharpening the focus of political behavior in organizations. Business Horizons, 36: 70-74.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., 1988, Upward-influence Style : Relationship with Performance Evaluations, Salary, and Stress, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 33., 528-542.
Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., Wilkinson, I., 1980, Intraorganizational Influence Tactics:Explorations in Getting One’s Way, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65, No. 4, 440-452.
Lewin, Kurt, 1936, Principles of Topological Psychology, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Liden, R. C. and T. R. Mitchell, 1988, “Ingratiatory Behaviors in Organizational Settings”, Academy of Management Review, 13, 572-587.
Madison, D. L., Allen, R. W., Porter, L. W., Renwick, P. A., & Mayes, B. T., 1980 Organizational Politics: An Exploration of manager’s Perceptions, Human Relations, 33, No.2, 79-100.
Maslyn, Fedor., 1998, “Research Reports Perceptions of Politics: Does Measuring Different Foci Matter?”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.83 (4): 645-653.
Mayes, Bronston T. and Robert W. Allen, 1977, “Toward a Definition of Organizational Politics”, Academy of Management Review, October, 672-678.
McGrath, J. E. 1976, “Stress and Behavior in Organizations. “ in M. d. dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago: Rand-McNally, 390-419.
Mintzberg, H. 1985. The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies, 22: 133-154.
Nunnally, J., 1978, Psychometrics Methods. New York; McGraw-Hill.
Nye, Lendell G.., and .Alan Wittl, 1993, “Dimensionality and Construct Validity of The POPS”, Educational & Psychological Measurement, Vol.53 (3): 821.
Pajares, F. 1996. Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
Pfeffer J., 1981. Power of Organizations. Marshfield, Mass, Pitman Publishing.
Pfeffer, J., 1992, “Manager with Power”, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Porter, L.W., Allen, R.W. & Angle, H.L. 1981. The politics of upward influence in organizations, in L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior vol. 3:109-149. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Randall, Marjorie L., R. Cropanzano, C. Bormann and A. Birjulin, 1994, “The Relationship of Organizational Politics and Organizational Support to Employee attitudes and Behavior”, Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Dallas, TX.
Randall M. L., Cropanzano R., Bormann Carol A., Birjulin Andrej,1999, Organizational Politics and Organizational Support as Predictors of Work Attitudes, Job Performance, and Organizational Citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 159-174.
Robert, J. and Tommy, F. 2001, “Home sales approach records despite recession,” American Banker, Vo1. 167, No. 248, 15 (1 page).
Robbins, S.P. 1990. Organization theory:Structure, Design and a pplications (5th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 51.
Rotter, J. B., 1966. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement, Psychological Monograph, 12, 48-80.
Schein, V.E. 1977. Individual power and political behaviors in organizations: An inadequately explored reality. Academy of Management Review. 2: 64-72.
Schuler, R. S., 1980, “Definition and Conceptualizatioin of Stress in Organizations”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 25, 184-215.
Sherer, M. & Maddux, J.E. 1982. The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation, Psychological Reports, 51, 663-671.
Sigler, T. H., & Pearson, C. M. (2000), Creating an Empowering Culture: Examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5:27-52
Stephen P, Robbins 1993. Organizational Behaviov, 6th Edition, U.S.A, Prentice-Hall, 424.
Sutton, R. I. and R. L. Kahn, 1986, “Prediction, Understanding and Control as Antidotes to Organizational Stress.” In J. W.. Lorsch ( Ed.) , Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Englewood cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall, 272-285.
Tetrick, L.E. and J. M. LaRocco, 1987, “Understanding, Prediction and Control as Moderators of the Relationship Between Perceived Stress, Satisfacton and Psychological Well-eing”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 538-543.
Tushman, M.E. 1977. A political approach to organization: A review and rationale. Academy of Management Review, 2: 206-216
Valle M., Pamela L P.,2000, Do Politics Perceptions Relate to Political Behaviors? Tests of an Implicit Assumption and Expand Model, Human Relations, Vol.53,No3, 359-386.
Vigoda, Eran, 2000, “Internal Politics in Public Administration Systems: An Empirical Examination of its Relationship with Job Congruence, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and In-Role Performance”, Public Personnel Management, Vol.29 (2): 185-26.
Vigoda, Eran, 2000, “Organizational Politics, Job Attitudes, and Work Outcomes: Exploration and Implications for the Public Sector”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol.57: 326-347.
Wanger III, J. R., 1992. Management of Organizational Behavior, Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Witt, L. Alan, Martha C. Andrews and K. Michele Kacmar, 2000, “The Role of Participation in Decision–making in the Organizational Politics – Job Satisfaction Relationship”, Human Relations, Vol.53 (3): 341-358.
Yukl, G., Falbe, C. M., 1990, Influence Tactics and Objectives in Upward, Downward and Lateral Influence Attempts, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 75, No. 2, 132-140.
Zaleznik, A., M. F. R. Kets de Vries and J. Howard, 1977, “Stress Reactions in Organizations: Syndromes, Causes and Consequences”, Behavioral Science, 22, 151-162.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.235.251.99
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.235.251.99
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code