Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0503113-223057 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0503113-223057
論文名稱
Title
社會創業教育課程之永續議題研究-以亞洲地區高等教育為例
A Study of Social Entrepreneurship Education Curriculum on Sustainability Issues based on Asian Higher Education
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
107
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-05-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-07-17
關鍵字
Keywords
社會創業教育、亞洲、永續教育、高等教育、網頁內容分析法
Higher education, Web-based content analysis, Asia, Sustainability education, Social entrepreneurship education
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5790 次,被下載 102
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5790 times, has been downloaded 102 times.
中文摘要
社會創業是以滿足未被滿足的社會需求或解決政府無力改善的社會問題;社會創業的轉換過程,亦需被賦予創新活動以達成目標。社會企業有別於一般企業,它必須包含一般創業的特性及改善社會問題的目的。在社會創業的架構下, 管理責任是社會企業在經營上的挑戰,經營的基本底線(double bottom line)是必須兼顧社會與營利目的或再加上保護環境的目標 (triple bottom line: financial, social and environmental)。
就社會創業的特性,可知道社會創業教育的重要,又社會創業的經營目標與永續議題(社會創業與永續發展,皆須兼顧社會、經濟與環境)密不可分, 且亞洲永續教育課程的相關研究甚少及亞洲地區不論在人口、經濟與環境問題,對於全球皆具有舉足輕重影響。故本文將以亞洲地區高等教育的永續教育課程為研究標的,以經濟與學術指標,篩選出12個國家,再以這些國家重點發展的大學為對象,利用內容分析法對這些大學所開設的永續發展中心、 課程、課綱、教學方法、教師背景進行調查與編碼,再與永續的三構面 (社會、經濟、環境) 進行資料的交叉比對,最後與相關文獻的調查資料比較。
研究結果發現,亞洲地區大學的永續教育發展方向為教學跨領域、發展國際化、永續概念的推廣。課程安排以永續議題、企業社會責任、綠能與環保科技為主;教學方法以討論、個案與實作,使學生能深入了解永續概念。除此,在資料的交叉比對,以永續三構面探討亞洲各國的國內生產毛額與其大學院校安排永續課程的關係,發現並無相關;最後與歐美國家的大學永續課程安排相較, 大致相符。另在資料蒐集的過程,亦發現亞洲地區大學在永續教育資源分配集中於理工學院,且在國際的推廣與曝光程度不足,但此亦為亞洲地區大學永續教育的跨領域整合與發展的機會。
Abstract
Social entrepreneurship satisfies unmet social needs, that is, the problems in society that the government is powerless to solve and the process of social entrepreneurship refers to innovation activities with a social objective in the for-profit sector. Social enterprise is unlike conventional enterprise, it has to contain characters of general entrepreneurship and mission of achieve a specific social objective. Under the structure of social entrepreneurship, these characteristics of social entrepreneurship, a social enterprise has the challenges of management accountability, double bottom line (social and commercial objective), and triple bottom line (financial, social, and environmental). As the characteristics of social entrepreneurship, we can infer the important of social entrepreneurship education and its mission is inseparable from sustainability (triple bottom line). In this study, we not only find Asia plays an influential role with respect to the world population, economy, and environment, but also there is rare research on Asian social entrepreneurship and sustainability education. For these reasons, this article will discuss our research findings on Asian sustainability education. We selected 12 countries with the most advanced economic development in Asia, and within these twelve economies, and identified 136 universities that were designated as the leading institutions for their countries’ economic and academic development. Using web-based content analysis, we investigated and quantified the sustainability development centers in these universities or schools, the programs, syllabi, teaching methods, and instructors’ educational backgrounds. Data were cross-referenced with three sustainability dimensions (social, economic, environmental).
The research showed that sustainability education in Asia focuses on interdisciplinary instruction, developing global sustainability, and promoting the concept of sustainability. The most taught courses are sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), green energy and eco-engineering techniques. The most mentioned teaching methods are discussion, case studies and internship to help students understand the concept of sustainability. There is no relationship between the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Asian countries and the arrangements of sustainability education based on the three dimensions of sustainability. The arrangements of curricula generally match those of European and American. During data collecting, we not only found that Asian sustainability education lacks an international connection and active promotion, but also a high proportion of sustainability curricular available in institute of technology in Asian universities. This presents an opportunity to develop sustainability education in Asia and interdisciplinary integration in Asian sustainability education.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書……………………………………………………………………………..i
中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………… ii
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………………….iii
目錄…………………………………………………………………………..………...v
圖次………………………………………………………………………………..…..vii
表次…………………………………………………………………………………...viii

第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………… 1
第一節研究背景與動機………………………………………………………….. 1
一. 社會創業……………………………………………………………….. 1
二. 社會創業教育………………………………………………………….. 2
三. 社會創業教育與永續議題…………………………………………….. 4
四. 亞洲社會創業概況與永續問題……………………………………….. 5
第二節 研究問題與目的………………………………………………………… 7
第三節 研究策略與流程……………………………………………..…………... 8
一. 研究策略……………………………………………………………….. 8
二. 研究流程……………………………………………………………… 11

第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………..13
第一節 社會創業………………………………………………………..……... 13
一. 社會創業………………………………………………………………. 13
二. 亞洲社會創業發展……………………………………………………. 17
第二節 社會創業教育………………………………………………………….. 20
一. 社會創業教育………………………………………………………… 20
二. 社會創業課程………………………………………………………… 23
三. 永續議題………………………………………………………….……. 26

第三章 研究方法…………………………………………………………………31
第一節 質性研究方法概述……………………………………………………… 31
一. 質性研究方法…………………………………………………………… 31
二. 內容分析法 …………………………………………………………….. 34
第二節 網頁內容分析法………………………………………………………… 46
一. 網頁內容分析法的採用………………………………………………… 46
第三節 抽樣計劃………………………………………………………………… 49
第四節 研究流程………………………………………………………………… 51
第四章 資料分析與討論……………………………………………………… 58
第五章 結論與建議………………………………………………………………69
第一節 亞洲地區高等教育--社會創業與永續教育………………………….... 69
第一節 永續課程安排 …………………………………………………………. 71
第二節 未來發展方向…………………………………………………………... 72
第三節 研究結論………………………………………………………………... 73
第四節 研究貢獻………………………………………………………………... 76

參考文獻………………………………………………………………………………78

附錄………………………………………………………………………………...... 93
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
中文文獻
王石番(民78) 。傳播內容分析法:理論與實證。台北市:幼獅文化事業
公司。
彭增軍(2012)。媒介內容分析法。北京: 中國人民大學出版社。
英文文獻
Arnove, R. & Christina, R. (1998). NGO-state relations: An argument in favor of the
state and complementarity of efforts. Current Issues in Comparative Education
[Online], 1 (1). Available at: http://www.tc.edu/cice/articles/ra111.htm
[November 28, 2005]
Alvord, S. H., Brown, D. L., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and
societal transformation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3): 260–282.
Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit Organizations: Theory, Management, Policy
(Routledge, London).
Austin, J., H. Stevenson and J. Wei-Skillern. (2006). Social and Commercial
Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?. Entrepreneurship Theory and
Practice 30(1), 1–22.
Austin, J., Gutierrez, R. and Ogliastri, E. (2006). Effective Management of Social
Enterprises: Lessons from Businesses and Civil Society in Iberoamerica,
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Alter, K. (2007). Social Enterprise Typology, Virtue Ventures LLC., Version dated Nov
7(27), available at www.virtueventures.com
Alcaraz, J. M., Thiruvattal, E., & Escudero, M. (2010). An interview with Manuel
Escudero The United Nations' Principles for responsible management education:
A global call for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
9(3): 542-550.
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York: Free
Press.
Bates, M. J., & Lu, S. J. (1997). An exploratory profile of personal home pages:
Content, design, metaphors. Online & Cdrom Review, 21(6), 331–340.
Bhandari, B B., & Osamu, A. (2000). Environmental education in the Asia-Pacific
region: Some problems and prospects. International Review for Environmental
Strategies, 1(1): 57-77.
Beyond grey pinstripes: Preparing MBAs for social and environmental stewardship.
(2001). World Resources Institute and the Aspen Institute Initiative for Social
Innovation Through Business.
Baran, S. J. (2002). Introduction to mass communication. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cartwright, Dorwin, P. (1953). Analysis of qualitative material. In Leon Festinger &
Daniel Katz (Eds.). Research methods in the behavioral sciences. New York: Holt,
Rinehart & Winston.
Cobanoglu, C., Warde, B., & Moreo, P. J. (2001). A comparison of mail, fax and
Webbased survey methods. International Journal of Market Research, 43(4),
405–410.
Bornstein, D. (2004). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of
new ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bonnet H., Quist J., Hoogwater D., Spaans J. and Wehrman C. (2006). Teaching
sustainable entrepreneurship to engineering student: the case of Delft University
of Technology, European Journal of engineering Education, 31(2), 155-167.
Benn, S., & Dunphy, D. (2009). Action research as an approach to integrating
sustainability into MBA programs: An exploratory study. Journal of
Management Education, 33(3):276-295.
Benn, S., & Martin, A. (2010). Learning and change for sustainability reconsidered: A
role for boundary objects. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3):
397-412.
Cobanoglu, C., & Cobanoglu, N. (2003). The effect of incentives in Web surveys:
Application and ethical considerations. International Journal of Market Research,
45(4), 14.
Christensen, L. J., Peirce, E., Hartman, L. P., Hoffman, W. M., & Carrier, J. (2007).
Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the Financial times top 50 global
business schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of
Business Ethics, 73(4): 347-368.
Chell, E. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship. International Small Business
Journal, (25): 5–26.
Clemens, B., & Hamakawa, C. (2010). Classroom as Cinema: Using film to teach
sustainability. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3): 561-563.
Collins, E. M., & Kearins, K. (2010). Delivering on sustainability's global and local
orientation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3): 499-506.
Cukier, W., Trenholm, S., Carl, D., & Gekas, G. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A
content analysis. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7(1),
99–118.
Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper and Row.
Dees, J. G. (1998a). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76(1): 54–65.
Dees, J. G. (1998b). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Kaufman Center for
Entrepreneurial Leadership, Graduate School of Business, Stanford: Stanford
University.
Dees, J.G., Emerson, J. and Economy, P. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for
social entrepreneurs. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Dees, J.G. & Anderson, B.B. (2003). For-profit social ventures. International Journal of
Entrepreneurship Education (special issue on social entrepreneurship), 2, 1–26.
Dees, J.G. (2005). Social entrepreneurship and education, Current Issue in Comparative
Education, Vol. 8(1): 51-55.
Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2005) ‘Preface’, in N. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (eds),
The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, pp. ix–xix.
Dumont, K., & Frindte, W. (2005). Content analysis of the homepages of academic
psychologists. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 73–83.
Dees, J.G. (2006). A closer look at business education: Social entrepreneurship/ Social
enterprise, report of Beyond Grey Pinstripes.
Doherty, B. and Thompson, J. (2006). The diverse world of social enterprise.
International Journal of Social Economics, (33): 361–375.
Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. 2011. The social dimension of
sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable
Development, 19: 289-300.
Edwards, M. & Hulme, D. (1998). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on
nongovernmental organizations. Current Issues in Comparative Education 1(1).
[Online], Available at: http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/articles/medh111.htm
[November 28,2005]
Evans, F., & Marcal, L. (2005). Educating for ethics: Business dean’s perspectives.
Business and Society Review, 110: 233–248.
Fan, W., & Yan, Z. (2010). Factors affecting response rates of the Web survey: A
systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 132–139.
Flick, U. (2006) An Introduction to Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Flick, U. (2007) Designing Qualitative Research . London: Sage.
Gartner, W. B. (1988). Who is an entrepreneur? is the wrong question. American
Journal of Small Business, 12(4): 11-32.
Gilbert, R. (2003). Ecotourism and education for sustainability: A critical approach.
International Review for Environmental Strategies, 4(1): 75-83.
Holsti, ole R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities, Reading,
MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Hammersley, M. (1996). The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research:
paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism, in J.T.E. Richardson (ed.),
Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social
Sciences. Leicester: BPS Books, pp. 159–74.
Hitzler, R. and Eberle, T.S. (2004). Phenomenological analysis of lifeworlds, in U.
Flick, E. von Kardorff and I. Steinke (eds), A Companion to Qualitative
Research. London: Sage, pp. 67–71.
Herring, S. C. (2010). Web content analysis: Expanding the paradigm. In J.
Hunsinger, M. Allen, & L. Klastrup (Eds.), The International Handbook of
Internet Research.
Jed E. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns.
California Management Review, 45 (4), 35-5
Kerling, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research (2nd ed.) New York: Holt
Rinehart & Winston.
Kidd, C. V. (1992). The evolution of sustainability. Journal of Agricultural &
Environmental Ethics, 5(1), 1-26.
Klees, S. (1998). NGOs: Progressive force or neo-liberal tool? Current Issues in
Comparative Education [Online], 1 (1). Available at:
http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/articles/sjk111.htm [November 28, 2005]
Krippendroff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.).
Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development,
trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (29): 577–597.
Kirby, D. A., & Ibrahim, N. (2011). The case for (social) entrepreneurship education
in Egyptian universities. Education + Training, 35(5), 403–415.
Lippman, W. (1992). Public opinion. New York: Free Press.
Landis, J.R.; & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for
categorical data. Biometrics, 33 (1): 159–174
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J. &Bracken, C.C.(2002). Content analysis in mass
communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human
Communication Research, 28:587-604.
Light, P. C. (2006). Reshaping social entrepreneurship. Stanford Social Innovation
Review, 4(3), 46-51.
Leadbeater, C. (2007). Social enterprise and social innovation: Strategies for the
next 10 years. Cabinet Office, Office of Third Sector, 1–17.
Mintzberg, H. (1991). The effective organisation: Forces and forms. Sloan Management
Journal, 32(2): 54-67.
Manning, P.K. & Cullum-Swan (1994). Narrative, content and semiotic analysis. In
Mathews, Baron C.A study of new York daily. Independent, 68:82-86.
Mort, G. S., Weerawardena, J., & Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship:
Towards conceptualisation. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary
Sector Marketing, 8(1): 76-89.
Markham, A. (2004). Representation in online ethnographies: A matter of context
sensitivity. In Chen, S. L. S., G. J. Hall and M. D. Johns (Eds.). Online Social
Research: Methods, Issues, and Ethics. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility education in Europe.
Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4): 323-337.
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation,
prediction and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 36-44.
Martin, R. L. & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition.
Stanford Social Innovation Review, 5(2), 28-39.
Murphy, P. J. & Coombes, S. M. (2009). A model of social entrepreneurial discovery.
Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 325-336.
Mottner, S., & Wymer, W. (2011). Nonprofit education: Course offerings and
perceptions in accredited US business schools. Journal of Nonprofit & Public
Sector Marketing, 23, 1–19.
Nguyen, N., Graham, D., Ross, H., Kambiz, M., & Ockie, B. (2012). Educating systems
thinking for sustainability: Experience with a Developing Country. Systems
Research & Behavioral Science, 29(1): 14-29.
Navarro, P. (2008). The MBA core curricula of top-ranked U.S. business schools: A
study in failure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7: 108–123.
Owens, D. (1998). From the business ethics course to the sustainable curriculum.
Journal of Business Ethics, 17(15): 1765-1777.
Pradhan, M. (2003). Promoting regional cooperation on environmental education and
training in the Asia-Pacific: The role and contributions of the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP). International Review for Environmental
Strategies 4(1): 45-58.
Pearce, J. (2003). Social enterprise in anytown. London: Calouste Gulbenkian
Foundation.
Peredo, A.M. and M. McLean. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: a critical review of the
concept, Journal of World Business 41, 56-65.
Porter, T., & Cordoba, J. (2009). Three views of systems theories and their implications
for sustainability education. Journal of Management Education, 33(3): 323-347.
Riffe, Daniel, Aust, Charles F. & Lacy, Stephen R. (1993). The effectiveness of random,
consecutive day and constructed week samplings in newspaper content analysis.
Journalism Quarterly, 70:133-139.
Riffe, Daniel, Lacy, Stephen & Drager, Micheal W. (1996). Sample size in content
analysis of weekly news magazines. Journalism & Mass Communication
Quarterly, 73(3):635-644.
Riffe, Daniel, Lacy, Stephen, Nagovan, Jason & Burkum, Larry. (1996). The
effectiveness of simple and stratified random sampling in broadcast news
content analysis. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(1):159-168.
Riffe, Daniel & Freitag, Alan. (1997). A content analysis of content analyses:
Twenty-five years of Journalism Quarterly. Journalism & Mass Communication
Quarterly, 74(4):873-822.
Riffe, Daniel, Lacy, Stephen & Fico, F. (1998). Analyzing media messages: Using
quantitative content analysis in research. New York: Rontledge.
Riffe, Daniel, Lacy, Stephen & Fico, F. (2005). Analyzing media messages: Using
quantitative content analysis in research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roome, N. (2005). Teaching sustainability in a global MBA: Insights from the One
MBA. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(12): 160-171.
Rowe, A. L., Wehrmeyer, W. (2010). Education for sustainability: Developing MBA
students’ critical reflective and action learning in their work context. Review of
Business Research, 10(2): 145-149.
Rands, G. P. (2009). A principle-attribute matrix for sustainable management education
and its application: The case for change-oriented service-learning projects.
Journal of Management Education 33(3): 296-322.
Rusinko, C. A. (2010). Integrating sustainability in management and business education:
A Matrix Approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(3):
507-519.
Stevenson, H. H., Roberts, M. J., & Grousbeck, H. I. (1989). New business ventures and
the entrepreneur. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, C. J. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship:
Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 1l(Special
Summer Issue): 17-28.
Speed, G.J. (1893). Do newspapers now give the news? Forum, 15:705-711.
Schoenfeldt, L. F., McDonald, D. M., & Youngblood, S. A. (1991). The teaching of
business ethics: A survey of AACSB member schools. Journal of Business
Ethics, 10: 237–241.
Singletary, M.W. (1993). Mass communication research: Contemporary methods and
applications. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Singh, R. P. (2001). A comment on developing the field of entrepreneurship through the
study of opportunity recognition and exploitation. Academy of Management
Review, 26(1): 10-12.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change.
Darlington, U.K.: Green Books.
Sliverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analyzing talk, text and
interaction (3rd). London: Sage.
Smith, B.R., Barr, T.F., Barbosa, S.D. & Kickul, J.R. (2008) Social Entrepreneurship: a
Grounded Learning Approach to Social Value Creation”, Journal of Enterprising
Culture, 16 (4), 339-362.
Shahnaz, Durreen and Tan, Patricia Shu Ming, Social Enterprise in Asia: Context and
Opportunities (2009). Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper
No. LKYSPP09-018-CAG006. Available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1546253 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1546253
Timmons, J. A., & Bygrave, W. D. (1986). Venture capital's role in financing
innovation for economic growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(2), 161-176.
Thomson, J., Alvy, G. & Lees, A. (2002). Social entrepreneurship--A new look at the
people and the potential. Management Design, 38(5), 328.
Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (eds) (2003) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and
Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. (2007). The distinctive challenge of educating social
entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on
entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education,
16(2), 264–271.
Willey, Malcolm M. (1926). The country newspaper: A study of socialization and
newspaper content. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Weare, C., & Lin, W. Y. (2000). Content analysis of the World Wide Web—
Opportunities and challenges. Social Science Computer Review, 18(3),
272–292.
Wong, L. and J. Tang. (2007). Dilemmas Confronting Social Entrepreneurs: Care
Homes for Elderly People in Chinese Cities, Pacific Affairs 79(4), 623–637.
Wu, Y. C. (2007). Contemporary logistics education: An international perspective.
International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 37:
504–528.
Walker, H. L., Gough, S., Bakker, E., Knight, L., & McBain, D. (2009). Greening
operations management: An online sustainable procurement course for
practitioners. Journal of Management Education 33(3): 348-371.
Wu, Y. C. J., Huang, S., Kuo, L., & Wu, W. H. (2010). Management education for
sustainability: A Web-Based content analysis. The Academy of Management
Learning and Education 9(3): 520-531.
Wu, Y.C. J., Kuo, T., & Shen, J.P. (2013). Exploring social entrepreneurship education
from a Web-based pedagogical perspective, Computers in Human Behavior, 29,
329–334.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code