Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0505113-131738 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0505113-131738
論文名稱
Title
建言或諫言?探討員工正、負向心情與促進性/預防性建言行為的關係:環境知覺與領導風格的干擾效果
Promotive or Prohibitive? Explore the Relationships between Employee Moods and Voice Behaviors: The Moderating Effects of Environmental Perception and Leadership Styles
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
67
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-05-02
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-06-05
關鍵字
Keywords
交易型領導、建言行為、工作心情、心理安全、威脅知覺、轉換型領導
Voice behaviors, Moods at work, Psychological safety, Perceived threat, Transformational leadership, Transactional leadership
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5828 次,被下載 1756
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5828 times, has been downloaded 1756 times.
中文摘要
建言行為意指員工主動地提出與工作相關的意見、想法或建議,以試圖改善組織或單位的運作。研究發現,建言行為能夠顯著提升組織的效率、改善決策的品質,甚至避免潛在危機的發生。因此,探究建言行為的前因變數已成為組織行為界中熱門的研究議題。本研究參考 Morrison (2011)提出的建言理論模式,探討員工於工作時的正、負向心情,與其促進性/預防性建言行為的關係。此外,更進一步探討員工所感受的環境知覺與領導風格,是否會干擾工作心情與建言行為的關係。

本研究以配對問卷的方式,收集自台灣 10 家上市科技公司,共 158 位研發人員作為研究樣本。階層迴歸分析的結果顯示:(1)員工的正向心情與促進性建言呈正向關係,負向心情則與促進性建言呈負向關係;(2)當員工感受的心理安全與轉換型領導皆高時,會強化其正向心情與促進性/預防性建言的正向關係;(3)當員工感受的威脅知覺與交易型領導皆高時,會強化其負向心情與促進性建言的負向關係。根據本研究結果所提出之具體管理意涵為:組織應盡力營造員工的正向心情並且降低負向心情,以促進更多的建言表現。此外,管理者應試著了解員工間的心情狀態與環境知覺,在不同情境中展現合適的領導風格。
Abstract
Voice behavior refers to employees who express their opinions, ideas or suggestions in an attempt to help the organization or work unit. As previous studies show that voice behaviors can enhance organizational efficiency, decision quality, and even avoid potential crisis. Hence, the investigation of voice’s antecedent variables has become a popular research topic. The present study discussed whether positive / negative moods will influence promotive / prohibitive voice based on the voice
behavior model that Morrison (2011) proposed. Moreover, we further investigated whether the relations between moods and voice behaviors are moderated by the interaction of environmental perceptions and leadership styles in order to verify the different effects in various conditions.

The data were collected from 158 R&D employees as paired form in 10 listed technology companies. The results of hierarchical regression showed: (1) employees’ positive moods are positively, while negative moods are negatively related to promotive voice; (2) the positive relations of positive moods and promotive / prohibitive voice are enhanced when employees perceive both high psychological safety and transformational leadership; (3) the negative relation of negative moods and promotive voice is enhanced when employees perceive both high threat and transactional leadership. Practical implications illustrate that organizations should try to strengthen employees' positive moods as well as lower their negative moods in order for more voice behaviors. Furthermore, managers should learn to understand employees' moods states and environmental perception as to apply the appropriate leadership styles in different contexts.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書…………………………………………………….....................………………….….i
誌謝……………………………………………………...........................................................ii
中文摘要………………………………………………………….……....................…………....iii
英文摘要……………………………………………..............................................................iv
第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………………………1
第二章 文獻探討…………………………………………………………………………………..4
第一節、影響員工建言行為的動機、成本與效能………………………………………………..4
第二節、正、負向心情與促進性/預防性建言行為:建言動機的觀點………………………….6
第三節、員工正負向心情與建言行為的關係:知覺建言成本與效能扮演的角色...................9
第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………………………….17
第一節、研究架構與假設………………………………………………………………..............17
第二節、研究對象………………………………………………………………………………….17
第三節、施測程序………………………………………………………………………………….19
第四節、研究工具………………………………………………………………………………….19
第五節、資料分析方法…………………………………………………………………………….23
第四章 研究結果…………………………………………………………………………………..24
第一節、測量模式分析………………………………………………………………..................24
第二節、敘述性統計與變數間分析……………………………………………………………….25
第三節、正、負向心情與建言行為之關係……………………………………………………….26
第四節、正向心情、心理安全與轉換型領導之三階交互作用對於建言行為的影響………….27
第五節、負向心情、威脅知覺與交易型領導之三階交互作用對於建言行為的影響………….30
第五章 討論與建議……………………………………………………………………………….34
第一節、研究主要發現與討論………………………………………………………………........34
第二節、管理實務意涵…………………………………………………………………………….37
第三節、研究限制與未來研究建議……………………………………………………………….39
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………………….41
附錄一 研發部門主管問卷……………………………………………………………….............51
附錄二 研發部門人員問卷…………………………………………………………………………55
參考文獻 References
一、中文部分
李銳,淩文輇,柳士順 (2009)。上司不當督導對下屬建言行為的影響及其作用機制,心理學報,41(12),1189–1202。
段錦雲 (2011)。中國背景下建言行為研究:結構、形成機制及影響,心理科學進展,19(2),185–192。
紀乃文、陳建丞 (2011)。分店服務氣候、正向團隊情感氛圍、服務人員正向情緒表達與顧客購買決策關聯性之探討。組織與管理,4(1),129-162。
蔡維奇、紀乃文 (2008)。團隊情感氛圍形成的前因、情境調節、及個人層次後果變項之研究。組織與管理,1(1),1-37。
徐芝君 (2010)。心情與創意思考關係的多成份模式:調整焦點、向性、激發心情對創意思考的影響暨中介變項之探討。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文。
傅強,段錦雲,田曉明 (2012)。員工建言行為的情緒機制:一個新的探索視角,心理科學進展,20(2),274–282。
鄭仁偉 (2009)。解構建言行為的中介效果:以個人與群體配適、心理安全機制來預測建言行為,國立台灣科技大學企業管理研究所。
二、英文部分
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Argote, L. & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82: 150-169.
Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Reexamining the components of transformational and transactional leadership nursing the multifactor leadership
questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441-462.
Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45-68.
Bartholomew, D. J. and Knott, M. & Moustaki, I. (2011) Latent variable models and factor analysis: A unified approach. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 9–32.
Bass, B.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1997) Full range leadership development manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. California Mind Garden, 43-4.
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Apply Psychology. 88:207–18.
Baumgardner, S. R., & Crothers, M. K. (2009). Positive psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Bless, H., Bohner, G., Schwarz, N., & Strack, F. (1990). Mood and persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 331–345.
Botero, I. C., & Van Dyne, L. (2009). Employee voice behavior interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 84-104.
Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review Of Psychology, 53: 279-307.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162).
Burris, E.R., Detert, J.R., & Chiaburu, D.S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 912–922.
Chiaburu, D.S., Marinova, S.V., & Van Dyne, L. (2008). Should I do it or not? An initial model of cognitive processes predicting voice behaviors. In L.T. Kane and M.R. Poweller (Eds.), New York: Nova Science Publishers, 127-153.
Clark, M. S. and Isen, A. M. (1982). Toward understanding the relationship between feeling states and social behavior. In: Hastorf, A. and Isen, A. M. (Eds) Cognitive Social Psychology, Elsevier, New York, pp. 73-108.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1988). Mood and the mundane: Relations between daily life events and self-reported mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 296-308.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869-884.
Dooley, R. S. & Fryxell, G. E. (1999). Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision making-teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 389-402.
Dutton, J.E., Ashford, S.J., O’Neill, R.M., Hayes, E., & Wierba, E.E. (1997). Reading the wind: How middle managers assess the context for selling issues to top managers. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 407–425.
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 350-383.
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42–51.
Farrell, D., & Rusbult, C. (1985). Understanding the retention function: A model of the causes of exit, voice, loyalty and neglect behaviors. The Personnel Administrator, 30(4), 129−136.
Fong, C. T. (2006). The effects of emotional ambivalence on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5): 1016-1030.
Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
Friedman, R. S., Förster, J., & Denzler, M. (2007). Interactive effects of mood and task framing on creative generation. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 141-162.
Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. D. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of giving suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 1139-1155.
George, J. M. (1991). State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2): 299-307.
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work—organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 310–329.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don't: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4): 687-697.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622.
Gillespie, N. A., & Mann, L. (2004), Transformational Leadership and Shared Values - The Building Blocks of Trust, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(6), 588-607.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading. New York: Macmillan.
Hirt, E. R., Devers, E. E., & McCrea, S. M. (2008). I want to be creative: Exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood? Cognitive flexibility link. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 214
Hofmann, D. A. (1997). An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREAL 7: A Guide to the program and application. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
Judge, T.A. & Piccolo, R.F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89/5, pp. 755-768.
Kaufmann, G., & Vosburg, S. K. (1997). “Paradoxical”mood effects on creative problem-solving. Cognition and Emotion, 11: 151–170.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692-724.
LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868.
Liang, J., Farh, C., & Farh, J. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal.
Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 489-202.
Lowe, K.B., Kroeck, K.G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425.
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.
Martin, L. L., & Clore, G. L. (2001). Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Martin, L. L., & Stoner, P. (1996). Mood as input: What we think about how we feel determines how we think. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds., Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect, and self-regulation: 279–301.
Miceli, M.P., & Near, J.P. (1992). Blowing the whistle. New York: Lexington Books.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1998). Reconciling processing dynamics and personality
dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 229-258.
Milliken, F.J., Morrison, E.W., & Hewlin, P. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1453–1476.
Morrison (2011): Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research, The Academy of Management Annals, 5:1, 373-412
Morrison, E. W. & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review.
Morrison, E.W., & Rothman, N.B. (2009). Silence and the dynamics of power. In J. Greenberg & M. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations. 175–202.
Morrison, K. R., Fast, N. J., & Ybarra, O. (2009). Group status, perceptions of threat, and support for social inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 204-210.
Parkinson, B., Briner, R. B., Reynolds, S., & Totterdell, P. (1995). Time frames for mood: Relations between momentary and generalized ratings of affect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 331-339.
Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2004). Return to sender: Improving response rates for questionnaires and surveys. Performance Improvement, 43, 40–44.
Pinder, C.C., & Harlos, K.P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331–369.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 69–82.
Raghunathan, Rajagopal and Michel Tuan Pham (1999), “All Negative Moods Are Not Equal: Motivational Influences of Anxiety and Sadness on Decision Making,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 56-77.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 198–215.
Rothbard, R. L., & Wilk (2011), Waking up on the right or wrong side of the bed: Start-of-workday mood, work events, employee affect, and performance, Academy of Management Journal, 54 (5), 959 - 980
Rusbult, C. E., & Lowery, D. (1985). When bureaucrats get the blues: Responses to dissatisfaction among federal employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15: 80-103.
Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R. (1990). Research strategies and actics in I/O psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. 428-442.

Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior Vol. 2, pp. 527-561. New York: Guilford Press
Schwarz, N. (2000). Emotion, cognition, and decision making. Cognition and Emotion, 14: 433–440.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information. Psychological Inquiry, 14: 296–303.
Seo, M., Barrett, L., & Bartunek, J. M. (2004). The role of affective experience in work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 423–439.
Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership. Organizational Science, 4, 577–594
Shanock, S. & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisors feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 689-695
Schwarz, N., & Skurnik, I. (2003). Feeling and thinking: Implications for problem solving. In J. Davidson & R. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of problem solving (pp.263-292). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Staw, Barry M., Lance E. Sanderlands, and Jane E. Dutton (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: a multi-level analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26:501-524.
Stoker,J.I., Looise,JC.,Fisscher,O.A.M. and Jong, R.D. (2001).” Leadership and Innovation: Relations Between Leadership ,Individual Chacteristics and the Functioning of R and D Teams” International Journal of Human Resource Management 12:7 Nov. pp1141-1151.
Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring non-linearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 1189-1203.
Tsai, C. Y., Lin, J. L., Fang, S. H. (2008), The Paradox of Threat and Organizational Inertia, International Conference on Business and Information (BAI2008), July 7-9, 2008, Seoul Korea.
Tsai, W. C., Chen, C. C., & Liu, H. L. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology.
Tsai, W. C., Chi, N. W., Grandey, A. A., & Fung, S. C. (2012). Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 1359-1392.
Vecchio, R., Justin, J., & Pearce, C. (2008). The utility of transactional and transformational leadership for predicting performance and satisfaction within a path-goal theory framework. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81 (1), pp. 71–82.
Vosburg, S. K. (1998). The effects of positive and negative mood on divergent thinking performance. Creativity Research Journal, 11: 165–172. Vosburg, S. K. 1998b. Mood and the quantity and quality of ideas. Creativity Research Journal, 11: 315–324.
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., & Zhu, W. (2008). How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: The role of identification and efficacy beliefs. Personnel Psychology, 61, 793-825.
Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1275-7286.
Wang, G., Oh, I, S., Courtright, S., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36, 223-270.
Watson, D, Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The Panas scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York: Guildford Press.
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code