Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0513114-221846 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0513114-221846
論文名稱
Title
食品安全議題與消費者網路購買食品行為之研究-以安心買為例
The Study of Food Safety Issues and Consumer in Online Food Shopping Behavior– Golmart as an Example
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
147
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2014-06-14
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2014-06-17
關鍵字
Keywords
網路購物、知覺風險、購買意願、食品安全、購買行為
Food Safety, Perceived Risk, Online Shopping, Purchase Intention, Consumer Behavior
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5754 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5754 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
近幾年,社會不斷爆發食品安全議題的負面新聞,間接讓消費者的食品安全意識抬頭。面對此情況,食品零售業面臨很大的挑戰,尤其在虛擬通路中,消費者無法看到商品的實體,僅能夠依照網路店家的環境與敘述作為判斷,使得消費者更加無所適從。本研究個案公司-安心買,基於這樣的環境,將自身定位為一個資訊透明的食品網路購物平台,主打網路食品安全性,讓消費者能安心選購。因此,在本研究中將探討研究個案-安心買,在網路購物市場中採取的定位與網購策略是否可行?並了解消費者於網路購物市場中,對於食品安全的敏感度,檢視安心買定位的是否超之過急?以及了解知覺風險與不同人口統計變項在安心買平台中對購買意願與購買行為的影響。
  本研究整理安心買的定位與策略,並以研究目的發展其問卷,透過網路問卷並與波仕特網路市調公司合作進行發放與蒐集,針對有意願或是曾經利用網路進行購物,年齡限制為20歲以上的消費者進行研究。藉由統計軟體SPSS執行統計分析,藉此了解消費者在網路購買食品的知覺風險,並且對於安心買網路購物平台的購買意願與行為的態度。
  本研究共蒐集424份有效樣本,經由統整後,本研究獲得以下結論:
1. 針對研究個案-安心買,所採取在網路購物市場中的定位是可行的。
2. 針對研究個案-安心買,所採取在網路購物市場中的策略是可行的。
3. 安心買的定位是符合現代人所需求的。
4. 越高知覺風險的消費者,在安心買平台中的購買意願也會越高。
5. 不同的消費者人口統計變項於安心買平台的購買意願與購買行為有不同的態度。
Abstract
With negative news about food safety emerging in an endless stream recently in Taiwan, it is observed that food safety has become a greatly concerned issue during the decade. This has panicked the whole society and drawn consumer’s more atten-tion on food safety when making purchase of food grocery. Under such circumstance, food retailers bear the brunt. In physical channels, consumers are able to tell food safety by directly seeing the product conditions, while through virtual channels it is not available to touch product itself in person so consumers can only make decisions based on own perception of an online store’s overall environment and image instead.

Golmart – the selected case study company in this research has positioned itself as a food grocery online shopping platform featured with information transparency and food safety which enable consumers to purchase at ease. Through a clear review of Golmart, this research aims at identifying consumers’ perceived risks toward food online shopping and viewing whether the positioning of Golmart can well meet pub-lic’s expectation, thereby concluding a constructive research result.

Based on the above assumptions, the main research objectives are addressed as fol-lows.
1) To study if the positioning of Golmart is workable in the online shopping mar-ket.
2) To examine if the strategy of Golmart is workable in the online shopping market.
3) To understand consumer’s sensitivity and perception on food safety so as to ex-amine the adequacy of Golmart’s positioning.
4) To realize how perceived risks may influence consumer’s purchase intention.
5) To explore how demographic variables relates to consumer’s purchase intention and consumer behavior on Golmart online shopping platform.

In order to edit a proper questionnaire for this research, the positioning and market-ing strategies of Golmart have been well-organized and adopted as research objec-tives.
Questionnaires are issued and collected by means of cooperation with Pollster Technology Marketing Ltd. This research has targeted a group of consumers aged 20 years old up who have shopped online or intend to do online shopping as question-naire participants. Then SPSS is employed to conduct statistical analysis for col-lected data in the questionnaire, thereby understanding consumer’s perceived risks upon food online shopping and realizing consumer’s purchase intention, consumer behavior, and attitudes toward Golmart online shopping platform.

With the support of 424 valid samples as quantitative data being analyzed by SPSS, research results can be concluded as below.
1. The current positioning of Golmart in the online shopping market is workable
2. The current strategy of Golmart in the online shopping market is workable.
3. The positioning of Golmart conforms to modern public’s needs.
4. Consumers with high perceived risks may have higher purchase intention in Golmart.
5. Different demographic variables of consumer may hold different attitudes to-ward purchase intention and consumer behavior on Golmart online shopping platform.
目次 Table of Contents
誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章、緒論 1
  第一節、研究背景與動機 1
  第二節、研究目的 4
第二章、文獻探討 5
  第一節、知覺風險 5
  第二節、食品知覺風險相關探討 8
  第三節、網路購物知覺風險 11
  第四節、消費者購買意願 16
  第五節、消費者購買行為 18
  第六節、知覺風險、購買意願與購買行為的關係 21
  第七節、文獻小結與評述 25
第三章、研究方法 27
  第一節、研究架構 27
  第二節、操作性定義 29
  第三節、實證計畫 32
第四章、產業分析與個案公司描述 41
  第一節、網路購物產業分析 41
  第二節、安心買簡介 46
  第三節、安心買經營現況 49
第五章、資料分析與結果 54
  第一節、有效樣本分佈 54
  第二節、有效樣本特徵 55
  第三節、信效度分析 78
  第四節、各變數彼此的相關性 80
  第五節、各個變數的分析討論 82
  第六節、各個變數的關係探討 89
  第七節、不同人口統計變項在各個構面的差異 97
第六章、結論與建議 105
  第一節、研究結論 105
  第二節、研究貢獻 110
  第三節、管理意涵 112
  第四節、研究限制與未來建議 114
參考文獻 116
附錄 123
參考文獻 References
英文部分:
1. Akgüngör, S., B. Miran and C. Abay (2010), “Consumer Willingness to Pay for Organic Food in Urban Turkey,” Journal of International Food and Ag-ribusiness Marketing, Vol. 22(3-4), pp. 299-313.
2. Bauer, R. A. (1960), “Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking,” in R. S. Han-cock (ed.), Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Chicago: America Marketing Association, pp. 389-398.
3. Beck, U. (1992), “Risk society. Towards new modernity,” London: Sage.
4. Beck, U. (1994), “The Reinvention of Politics: Towards a Theory of Re-flexive Modernization. In U. Bech, A. Giddens, and S. Lash (Eds.), Reflex-ive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order,” Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5. Berg, Lisbet, Unni Kjaernes, Elena Ganskau, Vera Minina, Ludmila Voltchkova, Bente Halkier and Lotte Holm (2005), “Trust in Food Safety in Russia, Denmark and Norway,” European Societies, Vol. 7(1), pp. 103-129.
6. Bhatnagar, A. and S. Ghose (2004), “Segmenting Consumers Based on the Benefits and Risks of Internet Shopping,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57(12), pp. 1352–1360.
7. Bhatnagar, A., S. Misra, and H. R. Rao (2000), “On Risk, Convenience, and Internet Shopping Behavior,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 43, No. 11, pp. 98-105.
8. Biswas, Abhijit (1992), “ The Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity in Reference Price Perceptions,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 25(3) , pp. 251–262.
9. Brooker, George (1984), "An Assessment of an Expanded Measure of Per-ceived Risk,” in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Vol. 11, eds. Thomas, C. Kinnear, Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research, pp. 439-441.
10. Buzby, J.C., J.A. Fox, R.C. Ready and S.R. Crutchfield (1998), “Measuring Consumer Benefits of Food Safety Risk Reductions,” Journal of Agricul-tural and Applied Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 69–82.
11. Carmines, E. G. and R.A. Zeller (1991), Reliability and Validity Assess-ment, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
12. Cases, A. S. (2001), “Perceived Risk and Risk-Reduction Strategies in In-ternet Shopping,” The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, Vol. 12, pp. 375-394.
13. Caswell, Julie A., Corinna M. Noelke and Eliza M. Mojduszka (2002),” Unifying Two Frameworks for Analyzing Quality and Quality Assurance for Food Products,” Global Food Trade and Consumer Demand for Quality, pp.43-61.
14. Chen, Mei-Fang (2011), “Food-Related Lifestyle and Trust-in-Food-Safety Typology in Taiwan,” Health, Risk and Society, Vol. 13(6), pp. 503-526.
15. Cox, D. F. (1967), “Risk Handling in Consumer Behavior-An Intensive Study of Two Cases,” Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Boston : Harvard University Press, pp. 34-81.
16. Cunningham, S. M. (1967), “The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk, in D. F. Cox ed.,” Risk-Taking and Information-Handle in Consumer Behav-ior, Boston: Harvard University Press, pp. 82-108
17. Devellis, R.F. (1991), “Scale development: Theory and applications,” Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Dholakia Utpal, M. (1997). “An Investigation of the Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Product Involvement,” Advances in Consumer Re-search, Vol. 24, pp. 159–167.
19. Dodds, B. W., K. B. Monroe and D. Grewal (1991), “Effect of Price, Band, and Store Information on Buybers Product Evaluation,” Journal of Market-ing, Research , Vol. 28(3), pp. 307-319.
20. Dosman, Donna M., Wiktor L. Adamowicz and Steve E. Hrudey (2001), “Socioeconomic Determinants of Health- and Food Safety-Related Risk Perceptions,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 21(2), pp. 307-318.
21. Engle, J. E., R. D. Blackwell, and P. W. Miniard (1993), Consumer Behav-ior, 7th ed., Chicago, IL: the Dryden Press.
22. Engle, J. F., D. T. Kollat, and R. D. B. Blackwell (1973), Consumer Behav-ior, 2nd ed., New York, NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
23. FAO and WHO (1997). “Application of risk management to food safety matters,” Report of the joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation.
24. Farag, S., J. Weltevrenden, T. Van Rietbergen, M. Dijst and F. Van Oort (2006), “E-shopping in the Netherlands: Does Geography Matter?,” Envi-ronment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 33, pp. 59–74.
25. George, J.F. (2004), “The theory of planned behavior and internet purchas-ing,” Internet Research, Vol. 14(3), pp. 198-212
26. Ghani, E. K., J. Said and N. Nasir (2001), “Cross Sectional Studies on On-Line Shopping Among Malaysian Employees,” Unpublished Disserta-tion, University Technology MARA.
27. Green, Judith, Alizon Draper and Elizabeth Dowler (2003), “Short Cuts to Safety: Risk and 'Rules of Thumb' in Accounts of Food Choice,” Health, Risk and Society, Vol. 5(1), pp. 33-52.
28. Gupta, S., J. Pitkow and M. Recker (1995), “Consumer Survey of WWW Users,” http://www.umich.edu/~sgupta/hermes.htm.
29. Haque, A and A. Khatibi (2005), ”E-Shopping: Current Practices and Fu-ture Opportunities Towards Malaysian Customer Perspective,” Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 1(1), pp. 41-46.
30. Haque, A, J. Sadeghzadeh and A. Khatibi (2006), “Identifying Potentially Online Sales in Malaysia: A Study on Customer Relationships Online Shopping,” Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 22(4), pp. 119-131.
31. Haque, H., A.K. Tarofder, S.A. Mahmud and A.Z. Ismail (2007), “Internet Advertisement in Malaysia: A Study on Attitudinal Differences,” The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, Vol. 31(9), pp. 1-15.
32. Harn, A.C.P., A. Khatibi and H. Ismail (2006), “E-Commerce: A Study on Online Shopping in Malaysia,” Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 15(5), pp. 232-242.
33. Hashim, Afizah, Erlane K Ghani and Jamaliah Said (2009), “Does Con-sumers’ Demographic Profile Influence Online Shopping? : An Examina-tion Using Fishbein’s Theory,” Canadian Social Science, Vol. 5(6), pp. 19-31.
34. Huang, C. L., K. Kan, and T. Fu (1999), “Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Food Safety in Taiwan: A Binary-Ordinal Probit Model of Analysis.” Journal of Consumer Affairs, vol. 33(1), pp. 76-91.
35. Jacoby, J. and L. Kaplan (1972), “The Components of Perceived Risk,” Proceedings of 3rd Annual Conference, Association for Consumer Re-search, pp. 382-393.
36. Jamieson, F. Linda and M. Bass Frank (1989), “Adjusting Stated Intention Measures to Predict Trial Purchase of New Products: A Comparison of Models and Methods,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.26 (3), pp. 336-345.
37. Jarvenpaa, S. L. and P. A. Todd (1996-1997), “Consumer Reactions to Electronic Shopping on the Word Wide Web,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 1(2), pp. 59-88.
38. Khatibi, A., P. Haque and K. Karim (2006), “E-Commerce: A study on In-ternet Shopping in Malaysia,” Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 6, pp. 696-705.
39. Kim, I. (2010), “Consumers’ Rankings of Risk Reduction Strategies in E-Shopping,” International Journal of Business Research, Vol. 10(3), pp. 143-148.
40. Kotler, Philip (1984), Marketing management: Analysis, planning, and control, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc..
41. Kotler, Philip (2000), Marketing Management, 10th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc..
42. Kotler, Philip (2003), Marketing Management, 11th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
43. Krewskiab, Daniel, Paul Slovicc, Sheryl Bartletta, James Flynnc and C.K. Mertzc (1995), “Health Risk Perception in Canada II: Worldviews, Atti-tudes and Opinions,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An Interna-tional Journal, vol. 1, pp. 231-248.
44. Kwak, Hall., Hyokjin, Richard J. Fox, and George M. Zinkhan (2002), “What Products Can Be Successfully Promoted and Sold via the Internet?,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 42, pp. 23-38.
45. Lee, S and R. Steven (2004) “Evaluation of the Will of Consumers to Buy,” Marketing Management, pp. 205-216
46. Marie, Cannière, Pelsmacker Patrick, Geuens Maggie (2010), “Relation-ship Quality and Purchase Intention and Behavior: The Moderating Impact of Relationship Strength,” Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 25(1), pp. 87-98.
47. McCarthy, Matthew D., Ronald Benner, Cindy Lee and Marilyn L. Fogel (2007), “Amino Acid Nitrogen Isotopic Fractionation Patterns as Indicators of Heterotrophy in Plankton, Particulate, and Dissolved Organic Matter,” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 71(19), pp. 4727-4744.
48. McCarthy, M., and J. Barton (1998). “Beef Consumption, Risk Perception and Consumer Demand for Traceability Along the Beef Chain,” Depart-ment of Food Economics agribusiness discussion series, Paper no. 21.
49. McCorkle, D. E. (1990), “The Role of Perceived Risk in Mail Order Cata-log Shopping,” Journal of Direct Marketing, Vol. 4(4), pp. 26–35.
50. Mitchell, V. W. (1999), “Consumer Perceived Risk: Conceptualisations and Models.” European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 33(1/2), pp. 163-195.
51. Miyazaki, A.D. and A. Fernandez (2001), “Consumer Perceptions of Pri-vacy and Security Risks for Online Shopping”, The Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 35(1), pp. 27-44.
52. Modi, Hetvi, Shivangi Lakhani, Nimesh Patel and Vaishali Patel (2013), “Fraud Detection in Credit Card System Using Web Mining,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engi-neering, Vol. 1(2), pp. 175-179.
53. Mohd Suki, N., T. Ramayah and N. Mohd Suki (2008), “Internet Shopping Acceptance Examining the Influence of Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Motiva-tions,” Direct Marketing: An International Journal, Vol. 2(2), pp. 97-110.
54. Murray, K.B. and J.L. Schlacter (1990), “The Impact of Services versus Goods on Consumers: Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 18, pp. 51-65.
55. Noort, G.V., P. Kerkhof and B.M. Fennis (2007), “Online versus Conven-tional Shopping: Consumers’ Risk Perception and Regulatory Focus,” Cyber psychology and behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society ,Vol. 10(5), pp. 731-733.
56. Pavlou, P.A. (2003), “Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: In-tegrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model,” Interna-tional Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 7(3), pp. 101-134.
57. Peter, J. P. and L. X. Tarpey (1975), “A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 2(1), pp.29-37.
58. Peter, J.P. and L. Tarpey (1975), “A Comparative Analysis of Three Con-sumer Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 2, pp. 29-37.
59. Riethmuller, P. and J. Morison (1995). “A Comparative Survey of Beef Consumption Behaviour in Australia, Japan and the United States,” Agri-cultural and Resource Management Services Pty Ltd, Parkside.
60. Rohm, A. J. and V. Swaminathan (2004), “A Typology of Online Shoppers Based on Shopping Motivations,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57(7), pp. 748-758.
61. Rungtusanatham, M. (1998), “Let’s not overlook content validity,” Deci-sion Line, Vol.29, pp.10–13.
62. Salisbury, W.D., R.A. Pearson, A.W. Pearson and D.W. Miller (2001), “Perceived Security and World Wide Web Purchase Intention. Industrial Management and Data Systems,” Vol. 101(4), pp. 165-177.
63. Samadi, M. and A. Yaghoob-Najadi (2009), “A Survey of the Effect of Consumers’ Perceived Risk on Purchase Intention in E-Shopping,” Busi-ness Intelligence Journal, Vol. 2(2), pp. 261-275.
64. Saputra, Ruswiati Surya, Ari Warokka and Nanchaya Naruephai (2012), “The Key Drivers of Online Consumers’ Intention to Purchase in an Online Auction: A Reference from Southeast Emerging Market,” Journal of Inter-net and e-Business Studies, Vol. 2012, pp. 1-7.
65. Schlundt, Jùrgen (1999), “Principles of Food Safety Risk Management,” Food Control, Vol. 10, pp. 299-302.
66. Shapiro, S. P. (1987), “The Social Control of Impersonal Trust,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 93, pp. 623-658.
67. Stafford, T. F., A. Turan and M.S. Raisinghani (2004), “International and Cross-Cultural Influences on Online Shopping Behavior,” Journal of Glob-al Information Management, Vol. 7(2), pp. 70-87.
68. Stapel, J. (1971), “Sales Effect of Print Ads,” Journal of Advertising Re-search, Vol. 1(3), pp.32-36.
69. Stone, R.N. and K. Gronhaug (1993), “Percevied risk: futher considerations for the marketing discipline,” European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 27, pp. 39-50.
70. Sulaiman, A. Ng, J and S. Mohezar (2008), “E-Ticketing as A New Way of Buying Tickets: Malaysian perceptions,” Journal of Social Science, Vol. 17(2), pp. 149-157.
71. Tan, S. J. (1999), “Strategies for Reducing Consumers’ Risk Aversion in Internet Shopping,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 16(2), pp. 163-180.
72. Van Slyke, Craig, Christie L. Comunale and France Belanger (2002), “Gender Differences in Perceptions of Web-Based Shopping,” Communi-cations of the ACM - Evolving data mining into solutions for insights, Vol. 45(8), pp. 82-86.
73. Van Noort, S.P., M. Muehlen, H.R. de Andrade, C. Koppeschaar, J.M.L. Lourenco, M.G.M. Gomes, (2007), “Gripenet: an Internet-Based System to Monitor Influenza-Like Illness Uniformly across Europe.” Euro Surveill, Vol. 12(7), pp. 229-233.
74. Wilson, Pan and Schumsky (2012), “Recalculation of the Critical Values for Lawshe’s Content Validity Ratio,” Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, Vol. 45(3), pp. 197-210.
75. Worsley, A. and V. Scott (2000), “Consumers’ Concerns about Food and Health in Australia and New Zealand,” Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nu-trition, Vol. 9(1), pp. 24-32.
76. Wu, Wann-Yih and Man-Ling Chang (2007), ”The Role of Risk Attitude On Online Shopping: Experience, Customer Satisfaction, and Repurchase Intention,” Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 35(4), pp. 453-468.
77. Yeung Ruth, M.W. and Joe Morris (2001), “Consumer Perception of Food Risk in Chicken Meat,” Nutrition and Food Science, Vol. 31(6), pp. 270-279.
78. Yeung Ruth, M.W. and Wallace M.S. Yee (2003), “Risk Reduction: an In-sight From the UK Poultry Industry,” Nutrition and Food Science, Vol. 33(5), pp. 219 – 229.
79. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988), “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Val-ue: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, pp. 2-22.


中文部分:
1. 台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫,2013,2013年度綜合商品零售業調查,台灣經濟研究院產經資料庫。
2. 汪倩如,2013/08/17,“10%業績轉「網購」 量販店搏週末”,TVBS. http://news.tvbs.com.tw/entry/226321
3. 陳政忻,2011,全球食品安全發展趨勢,第三十四期,第24-29頁。
4. 黃俊英,行銷學的世界,天下文化,2005
5. 資策會,2013,2013年台灣B2C網路商店經營及調查報告,資策會。
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.225.255.134
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.225.255.134
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code