Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0518113-233902 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0518113-233902
論文名稱
Title
制度化升遷及組織公平對組織公民行為的影響:多層次研究
The Influence of Promotion System Characteristics and Organizational Justice on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Multilevel Research
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
152
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-05-27
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-06-18
關鍵字
Keywords
制度化升遷、組織公平、組織公民行為、多層次研究
Promotion System Characteristics, Organizational Justice, Multilevel Research, Organizational Citizenship Behavior
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5729 次,被下載 873
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5729 times, has been downloaded 873 times.
中文摘要
個體長期生活在組織中,對工作付出時間、心力與勞務,自然也希望獲得組織的報償;而升遷機會是組織最難得的報償資源之一,組織內的個體無不希望能獲得升遷機會,藉此以獲得組織的肯定,並藉由升遷得到身份的表徵與自我的實現。然而,組織透過制度進行各種管理措施的運作與實行,而升遷機會在實務界的組織中也多半透由制度進行分配,是故制度化升遷將深刻影響組織成員的公平知覺,更直接導引個體組織公民行為的發生。

  過去少有研究探討制度化升遷對組織公民行為的影響。雖分別有文獻探討升遷制度與員工公平認知的關係、及組織公平對組織公民行為的影響,但未有研究一貫化地從制度化升遷到組織公民行為之間的關係進行探討;而該段關係之所以能夠發生,可能是因為有組織公平的中介歷程強化了顯著性。故本研究除深入探討制度化升遷對組織公民行為的關係外,更進一步探討組織公平的中介效果,藉由組織層次與個體層次分別探討各變項在其中的影響作用,並透過多層次分析與迴歸分析進行統計實證。

  本研究以組織中的員工為研究母體,以立意抽樣的方式收集了包含科技製造業、其他製造業、科技服務業、金融服務業及其他服務業等不同產業的樣本,期望樣本的多樣性使研究結果更具類推性。問卷調查方式以紙本問卷進行填答,同時為避免同源量測所造成的共同方法變異(CMV)問題,依據研究變項的特性將問卷分別由企業人資及一般成員填答,並進行相互配對。本研究共計發出48組,共528份問卷,總回收份數共427份,回收率80.87%;在扣除漏答過多及無法辨識的9份問卷後,最後獲得有效人資問卷40份(有效回收率83.33%),同仁問卷378份(有效回收率78.75%)。

  研究結果顯示,制度化升遷與組織公民行為呈現正向關係,同時制度化升遷也將顯著影響組織公平;另外,組織公平對組織公民行為的正面影響亦獲得支持。故組織公平對制度化升遷與組織公民行為間關係的中介效果,獲得顯著的證實。
Abstract
An individual worker spends his/her time, effort, and emotional labor in the organization everyday, wishing to get reasonable rewaords from the organization to compensate his/her work. Since promotion is one of the best scarce rescorces for the organization to pay back its excellent employee, and accompanied promotions come with better organizational identification and sel-realization of employees, every individual in the organization is looking forward to get the chance to be promoted. However, the chances for promotion are like other resources in the organization, are usually allotted by certain rules or regulations in business practice, so promotion results influenced by the promotion system will affect perceived organizational justice, or even further, affect organizational citizenship behavior afterwards.

In the review of the past literature, although a few scholars who researched on the relationship between promotion system and organizational justice had proved the relationship, and lots of researches had proven that organizational justice has a strong and stable influence on organizational citizenship behavior, any research discovering the relationship between promotion system characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior is not found. So we hypothesize that organizational citizenship behavior will happen when individuals in the organization have strong perception of organizational justice, and promotion system characteristics might be the cause to lead to perceived organizational justice; so organizational justice might be the mediator in the relationship between promotion system characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior.

Also, we regard organizational justice as a organizational level of variable, rather than an individual level one, so HLM method is applied in this research to discover the relationship between some variables in organizational level and some in the individual level, to check the cross-level influence in the organization from the top to the buttom. And since we try to gather data from diiferent sources in the 40 companies we chose, an HR who’s in charge of promotion management or have more than two years of seniority was picked to answer the HR questionnaire; and ten random sample who’s in certain professional positon were picked to answer the staff questionnaires. With the dual sources to get the datas in each company for the resourch, we may successfully avoid the problem of CMV (Common Method Varience).

In this research, all the qustionaires are answered with hard copies and we chose 48 companies with various backgrounds in both manufacturing industry and service industry as our organizational samples. And we totally sent out 528 questionaires including 48 HR questionaires matching up 480 staff questionaires in different companies; as a result we received 40 HR questionaires (83.33%) and 387 staff questionaires (80.63%) with 9 having obvious problems caused by severe unanswered items or rackless answering, so we got 378 useful staff questionaires (78.75%) in the end.

Our results in the research show that promotion system characteristics have an obvious positive influence on organizational justice, and the same have a positive influence on organizational citizenship behavior. As well organizational justice has a positive relationship with organizational citizenship behavior and is proved to be the mediator between promotion system characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior. So all the major hypotheses are supported in the conclusion of our research.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論......................................................... 1
第一節 研究背景與動機......................................... 1
第二節 研究目的.................................................. 4
第三節 研究流程.................................................. 5
第二章 文獻回顧................. ................................ 6
第一節 制度化升遷............................................... 6
第二節 組織公民行為............................................ 15
第三節 組織公平.................................................. 23
第三章 研究方法................. ................................ 43
第一節 研究架構與研究假設.................................. 43
第二節 研究變項的操作型定義............................... 47
第三節 研究對象與施測方式.................................. 57
第四節 分析方法.................................................. 59
第四章 資料分析與研究結果.................................. 61
第一節 樣本特性及描述性統計分析........................ 61
第二節 相關分析.................................................. 66
第三節 制度化升遷與組織公平的關聯性.................. 70
第四節 組織公平與組織公民行為的關聯性............... 84
第五節 制度化升遷與組織公民行為的關聯性........... 96
第六節 組織公平的中介效果.................................. 101
第五章 結論與建議............. ................................. 106
第一節 研究結論.................................................. 106
第二節 管理意涵與建議........................................ 112
第三節 研究限制與研究建議.................................. 116
參考文獻 ............................................................... 120
附錄一 採用量表.................................................. 129
附錄二 研究問卷.................................................. 137
參考文獻 References
一、中文部分
林淑姬 (1992),薪酬公平、程序公正與組織承諾、組織公民行為關係之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
林鉦棽 (1992),組織公正、信任、組織公民行為之研究:社會交換理論之觀點,管科學報,第3卷第3期:391-415。
林鉦棽 (1999),組織承諾、工作滿足與組織公民行為之研究:各種不同理論模式之比較,中山管理評論,第7卷第4期:1049-1073。
黃家齊 (2002),組織公正與組織公民行為-認知型與情感型信任的中介效果,台大管理論叢,第12卷第2期:107-141。
陳建丞 (2008),員工知覺的組織支持與工作績效間的中介模型研究,管理學報,第25 卷第3 期:309-331。
陳曦、馬劍虹、時勘 (2007),績效、能力、職位對組織分配公平觀的影響,心理學報,39:901-908。
廖國鋒、范淼、許世卿 (2001),組織結構特性對組織公正與組織公民行為關係影響之研究,中華管理學報,第2卷第2期:43-58。
鄭清揚 (2005),組織公平與職場偏差行為關係之研究,文大商管學報,第10卷第1期:75-99。


二、英文部分
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology(2), New York: Academic Press.
Alexander, S. & Ruderman, M. (1987). The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior. Social Justice Research, 1(2): 177-198.
Allen, G. M. (1997). Antecedents and outcomes of promotion systems. Human Resource Management, 36(2): 251-259, New York.
Allen, T. D. & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: A field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2): 247-260.
Anderson, J., Milkovich, G. & Tsui, A. (1981). A model of intraorganizational mobility. Academy of Management Review, 58(6): 529-539.
Ariga, K., Ohkusa, Y. & Brunello, G. (1999). Fast track: Is it in the genes? The promotion policy of a large Japanese firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 38: 385-402.
Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S. & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 267-285.
Baker, G., M. Gibbs & B. Holmstorm (1994). The internal economics of a firm: Evidence from personal data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109:881-919.
Bateman, T. S. & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship”. Academy of Management Journal, 26: 587-595.
Beehr, T. A. & Juntunen, D. L. (1990). Promotions and employees’ perceived mobility channels: The effects of employee sex, employee group, and initial placement. Human Relations, 43(5): 455-472.
Beehr, T. A., Nair, V. N., Gudanowski, D. M. & Such, M. (2004). Perceptions of reasons for promotion of self and others. Human Relations, 57(4): 413.
Bettencourt, L. A., Gwinner, K. P. & Meuter, M. L. (2001). A comparison of attitude, personality, and knowledge predictors of service-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1): 29-41.
Bies, R. J. & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1: 43-55.
Blakely, G. L., Andrews, M. C. & Moorman, R. H. (2005). The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2): 259.
Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life, New York: John Wiley, and Sons.
Blau, G. J. (1989). Testing the generalizability of a career commitment measure and its impact on employee turnover. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42: 298-314.
Blodgett, J. G., Granbois, D. H. & Walters, R. G. (1993). The effects of perceived justice on complainants’ negative word-of-mouth behavior and repatronage intentions. Journal of Retailing, 69: 399-428.
Bognanno, M. L. (1999). Corporate tournament. Journal of Labor Economics, 19: 290- 315.
Burton, J. P., Sablynski, C. J. & Sekiguchi, T. (2008). Linking justice, performance, and citizenship via leader-member exchange. Journal of Business and Psychology, 23(1): 51-61.
Crampton, S. & Wagner, J. (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 79: 67-76.
Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A. & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group & Organization Management, 27(3): 324-351.
Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31(3): 137-149.
Erdogan, B. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals. Human Resource Management Review, 12(4): 555-578.
Eriksson, T. (1999). Executive compensation and tournament theory: Empirical test on Danish data. Journal of Labor Economics, 17: 262-280.
Farth, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M. & Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction. Journal of Management, 16: 705-721.
Feather, N. T. & Rauter, K. A. (2004). Organizational citizenship behaviors in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77: 81-94.
Ferris, G. R., Buckley, M. R. & Allen, G. M. (1992). Promotion systems in organizations. Human Resource Planning, 15: 47-68.
Ferris, G. R. & Buckley, M. R. (1990) Performance evaluation in high technology firms: Process and politics. In L. T. Gomez-Mejia and M. W. Lawless (Eds.), Organizational Issues in High Technology Management, 243-263.
Folger, G. R. & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretative analysis of personnel systems. Research in Personne1 and Human Resource Management, 3: 141-183.
Folger, R. & Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 2(2): 79-90.
Fox, S., Spector, P. E. & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3): 291-309.
Gemmill, G. & DeSalvia, D. (1997). The promotion beliefs of managers as a factor in career progress: An exploratory study. Sloan Management Review (pre-1986), 18 (winter): 2.
Gibbons, R. & M. Waldman (1999). A theory of wage and promotion dynamics inside firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 1321-1358.
Go, I. G. & Kleiner, B. H. (2001). How to manage promotion decisions effectively. Management Research News, 24(3/4): 109.
Graham, J. W. (1991). An essay on organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4:249-270.
Green, J. & N. Stokey (1983). A comparison of tournaments and contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 91: 349-364.
Greenberg J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1):10.
Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 55-71.
Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54: 81–103.
Hall, D. (1971). A theoretical model of career sub-identity development in organizational settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6: 50-76.
Harring, J. J. & G. D. Hess (1996). A spatial theory of positive and negative campaigning. Games and Economic Behavior, 17: 209-229.
Homans, G. G. (1961). Social behavior: It’s elementary forms, New York: Harcourt Brace.
Hvide, H. K. (2002) Tournament and risk taking. Journal of Labor Economics, 20: 877- 898.
James L.R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2): 219-229.
James, L.R., R.G. Demaree & G. Wolf (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2): 306-309.
Kerr, C. (1954). The balkanization of labor markets. In E. W. Bakke et. Al. (Eds.) Labor mobility and economic opportunity, 92-10. New York: Wiley.
Kim, S. W., Price, J. L., Mueller, C. W. & Watson, T. W. (1996). The determinants of career intent among physicians at a U.S. Air Force hospital. Human Relations, 49(7): 947-976.
Konovsky, M. A. & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 656-669.
Krull, J.L. & MacKinnon, D.P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(2): 249-277.
Lazear, E.P. & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5): 841-864.
Lee, C., Law, K. S. & Bobko, P. (1999). The importance of justice perceptions on skill-based pay effectiveness: A two-year study. Journal of Management. 25: 851-873.
Lind, E. A. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R. & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and non-instrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes, 59(5): 952-959.
London, M. (1985). Developing managers: A guide to motivating and preparing people for successful managerial careers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Malcomson, J. (1984). Work incentives, hierarchy, and internal labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 89: 841-864.
Martin, C. L. & Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group Organization Management, 21(1): 84-104.
McEnrue, M. P. (1989). The perceived fairness of managerial promotion practices. Human Relations, 42(9): 815-827.
McFarlin, D. B. & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3): 626-637.
Morrison, E. W. (1994). Role definitions and organizational citizenship behavior: The importance of the employee’s perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1543-1567.
Moore, M. L. (1974). Predictors of managerial career expectations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(1): 90-92.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors; Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76( 6): 845-855.
Moorman, R. H., Niehoff, B. P. & Organ, D. W. (1993). Treating employee fairly and organizational citizenship behavior: Sorting the effects of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and procedural justice. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6(3): 209-225.
Niehoff, B. P. & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 527-556.
Norrnan, W. T. (1963). Toward and adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66: 574-583.
Nurse, L. (2005). Performance appraisal, employee development and organizational justice: Exploring the linkages. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(7): 1176-1194.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The ‘‘good soldier’’ syndrome, Lexington: Lexington Books.
Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2: 43–72.
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10: 85-97.
Peter, L. J. & Raymond H. (1969). The Peter Principle, New York: W. Morrow.
Phelan, S. E. & Lin, Z. (2001). Promotion systems and organizational performance: A contingency model. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 7: 207-232.
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Paine, J. & Bachrach, D. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3): 513.
Prendergast, C. (1993). The role of promotion in including specific human capital. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 528-534.
Randall, M. L., Cropanzano, R., Bormann, C. A. & Birjulin, A. (1999). Organizational politics and organizational support as predictors of work attitudes, job performance, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20: 159-174.
Saal, F. E. & Moore, S. C. (1993). Perceptions of promotion fairness and promotion candidates' qualifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1): 105-110.
Saunders, M. N. K. & Thornhill, A. (2003). Organizational justice, trust and the management of change: An exploration. Personnel Review, 32(2): 360-375.
Simons, T. & Roberson, Q. (2003). Why managers should care about fairness: The effects of aggregate justice perceptions on organizational outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3): 432-443.
Skaperdas, S. & B. Grofman (1995). Modeling negative campaigning. American Political Science Review, 89: 49-61.
Skarlicki, D. P. & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3): 434-443.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W. & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its Nature and Antecedent. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4): 653-663.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 22:45-56.
Steven, E. Phelan & Zhiang, Lin (2001). Promotion systems and organizational performance: A contingency model. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 7: 207–232.
Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., Henle, C. A. & Lambert, L. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59: 101-123.
Thibaut, J. & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Tyler, T. R. (1987). Conditions leading to value-expressive effects in judgments of procedural justice: A test of four models. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 52(2): 333-344.
Wagner, S. L., & Rush, M. C. (2000). Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior: Context, dispersion, and age. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(3): 379-391.
Williams, L. J. & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17: 601-617.
Williams, S. (2002). Justice and organizational citizenship behavior intentions: Fair rewards versus fair treatment. The Journal of Social Psychology: 258-267, Washington.
Williams, S., Pitre, R. & Zainuba, M. (2002). Justice and organizational citizenship behavior intentions: Fair rewards versus fair treatment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 142(1): 33-44.
Zabojnik, J. & D. Bernhardt (2001). Corporate tournaments, human capital acquisition, and the firm size-wage relation. Review of Economic Studies, 68: 693-716.
Zohar, D. (1995). The justice perspective of job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16: 487-495.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code