Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0520114-083445 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0520114-083445
論文名稱
Title
石黑一雄小說《別讓我走》中的身份建構
Identity Construction in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
103
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2014-06-16
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2014-06-20
關鍵字
Keywords
複製人、差異、身份建構、劃界
identity construction, difference, clone, mark out
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5737 次,被下載 1721
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5737 times, has been downloaded 1721 times.
中文摘要
在石黑一雄小說《別讓我走》(Never Let Me Go) 中所虛構的英國社會裡,儘管小說人物的形象與一般人大體上無異,命運卻極為不同,他們遭受不人道的待遇。這一群透過人工基因複製而生產之人造物,他們別無選擇,只能生存在權力結構的底層和社會的邊緣。就生存目的而言,小說主角被人類視為不過是身體的器官備胎,而非一個完整的人,自然沒有必要給予這些「器官」文明化教育、或者培養其藝術氣質,而被當作用完即棄的物品。然而,有一小部分人不認同大眾的看法,這一股微小的聲音認為複製人應該享有更人道的待遇,於是創立了海爾森,以教育並激發他們的創造力,使他們變得更有教養,他們想藉此證明這一群「學生」也有靈魂,不比人類卑劣。
本論文以石黑一雄這部小說為研究對象,從三方面探究小說人物如何建構身份認同:(一)對差異的認知、(二)海爾森之意義、(三)面對不同價值矛盾下的認同衝突。首先,我將從小說中的敘事觀點來觀察主角們認同建構的過程,探究他們如何在劃界(mark out)的過程中透過辨別自我與他人的差異,建立自我認同,以及學習如何定位自己,詮釋他我之間的關係。再者,我欲檢視這些沒有傳統家庭與父母的海爾森學生,將海爾森視為提供意義的中心時,如何建構其身份認同。這些學生將情感依附於海爾森,依賴它所提供的知識來建構一套關於外界和自我之間的知識系譜。海爾森所教授的內容,一半刻意強化「學生」的創意能力與價值,另一半是為了協助學生離開海爾森之後的社會適應,使發展到一定認知能力的學生,學習一套只被允許一知半解,且規條間彼此衝突的社會規範。學生離開海爾森之後,面對的是另一套更為強大且全面的社會規範時,兩套互相牴觸的價值觀在心中拉扯,因此在認同上的碰撞與衝擊帶給小說人物莫大的痛苦。
Abstract
Although the clone characters in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go (2005) share identical genes with human beings, they are not treated equally as “normal” human beings. Men are created by God, but these protagonists are “artificially reproduced” by men. The way they enter the world has become the reason or excuse for their being treated differently from human beings. In Never Let Me Go, the characters share a specific purpose of life: to provide organs for the “originals.” To fulfill their purpose, they are inevitably objectified inhumanely as soulless beings or spare organs, which are not considered to have the necessity of having an identity. Nor are they considered to be entitled to any civilized education since men want no transgression or revolution against themselves. The characters are utilized and then casted aside after being exploited thoroughly. The founders of Hailsham where the students are kept, and which represents a voice different from those of the public, do not regard the clones as machines but living beings that deserve to be treated in a relatively humane way. Even so, the clones encounter identity problems as they grow up and learn more and more about themselves.
This thesis explores the protagonists’ identity construction in Never Let Me Go from three dimensions. Chapter 1 observes the characters’ construction of identity through the process of marking out the differences. By recognizing the differences between themselves and men, the students gradually learn their position in the communities. Chapter 2 examines the meaning of Hailsham and how the students’ attachment to Hailsham affects the students’ establishment of identity because they take Hailsham as the center of meanings. Chapter 3 analyzes the conflicting value systems of Hailsham and of society that are internalized in the students which inevitably result into unresolved identity problems.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 ………………………………………………………………………..i
誌謝..............................................................................................................ii
摘要..............................................................................................................iii
Abstract........................................................................................................iv
Introduction………………………………………………………………..….…..1

Chapter 1
Identity Construction of the Students………………………………………….…19

Chapter 2
The Meaning of Hailsham to the Homeless Strangers…………………………....43

Chapter 3
Confronting the Frontiers between Hailsham and the Society…………………....63

Conclusion………………………………………………………………………...87

Works Cited…………………………………………………….…………………93
參考文獻 References
Bates, Karen Grigsby. “Interview with Kazuo Ishiguro.” Conversations with Kazuo Ishiguro. Ed. Brian W. Shaffer and Cynthia F. Wong. Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 2008. 199-203.
Black, Shameem. “Ishiguro's Inhuman Aesthetics.” Modern Fiction Studies 55.4 (2009): 785-807. PROJECT MUSE. 31 May 2010.
Bloom, Harold. “Introduction.”Mary Shelley. New York: Chelsea House, 1985. 1-10.
Britzman, Deborah P. “On Being a Slow Reader: Psychoanalytic Reading Problems in Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education. 13.3(2006): 307-18. Taylor & Francis Online. 30 Apr 2014.
Cerulo, Karen A. “Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions.” Annual Review of Sociology 23 (1997): 385-409. JSTOR. 12 Jan 2010.
Childs, Peter. “Kazuo Ishiguro: Remain in Dreams.” Contemporary Novelists: British Fiction since 1970. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 123-40.
“Civic Education.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.2013.Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Online. 20 March 2014.
Danaher, Geoff, Tony Schirato and Jen Webb. “Glossary.” Understanding Foucault. London: Sage, 2000. ix-xv.
Derrida, Jacque. “Différance.” Identity: a Reader. Ed. Pauldu Gay, Jessica Evans and Peter Redman. London: Sage, 2000. 87-93.
de Saussure, Ferdinand.“Linguistic Value.”Course in General Linguistics. Ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. Trans. Wade Baskin. New York: Philosophical Library, 1959. 111-22.
du Gay, Paul. “General Introduction.” Identity: A Reader. Ed. Pauldu Gay, Jessica Evans and Peter Redman. London: Sage, 2000. 1-5.
Driscoll, Lawrence. “Introduction: Questions of Class in the Contemporary British Novel.” Evading Class in Contemporary British Literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.1-28.
---. “‘Unworkable Subjects’: Middle-Class Narratives in Pat Barker, Ian McEwan, and Kazuo Ishiguro.” Evading Class in Contemporary British Literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 29-60.
Fluet, Lisa. “Immaterial Labors: Ishiguro, Class, and Affect.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 40.3 (2007):265-88. MAS Ultra-School Ed. EBSCO. Web. 11 July 2010.
Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: the Birth of Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan.
New York: Vintage, 1977. 135-69.
---. The History of Sexuality. Volume 1: An Introduction. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage, 1990. 1-14.
---. “What is an Author?” The Foucault Reader. Ed. Paul Rabinow. Trans. Josué V. Harari. New York: Pantheon, 1984. 101-20.
Freeman, John. “Never Let Me Go: A Profile of Kazuo Ishiguro.”Conversations with Kazuo Ishiguro. Ed. Brian W. Shaffer and Cynthia F. Wong. Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 2008. 194-8.
George, Rosemary Marangoly. “Prologue. All Fiction is Homesickness.” The Politics of Home: Postcolonial Relocations and Twentieth-Century Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996. 1-10.
Guignery, Vanessa. “Kazuo Ishiguro.” Novelists in the New Millennium: Conversations with Writers. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 44-64.
Hall, Stuart. “Cultural Identity and Diaspora.” Theorizing Diaspora. Ed. Jana Braziel and Anita Mannur. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. 233-46.
---. “Who Needs Identity?” Identity: A Reader. London: Sage, 2000.15-30.
Ishiguro, Kazuo. Never Let Me Go. New York: Knopf, 2005.
King, Bruce. “The New Internationalism: Shiva Naipual, Salman Rushdie, BuchiEmecheta, Timothy Mo and Kazuo Ishiguro.” The British and Irish Novel Since 1960. Ed. James Acheson. London: Macmillan, 1991. 192-211.
Kirby, Kathleen M. “Lost in Space: Establishing the Limits of Identity.” Indifferent Boundaries: Spatial Concepts of Human Subjectivity. London: Guilford, 1996. 37-67.
Ledbetter, Mark. “Preface.” Victims and the Postmodern Narrative, or Doing Violence to the Body: An Ethic of Reading and Writing. New York: St. Martin’s, 1996. ix-xii.
Lewis, Barry. “The Concertina Effect: Unfolding Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.” Kazuo Ishiguro: New Critical Visions of the Novel. Ed. Sebastian Groes and Barry Lewis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 199-210.
Lochner, Liani. “‘This is What We’re Supposed to Be Doing, Isn’t It?’: Scientific Discourse in Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go.”Kazuo Ishiguro: New Critical Visions of the Novels. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. 225-35.
Radhakrishnan, Rajagopalan. “Introduction.” Diasporic Mediations: Between Home and Location. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1996. xiii-xxix.
Robbins, Bruce. “Cruelty is Bad: Banality and Proximity in Never Let Me Go.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 40.3 (2007): 289-302. MAS Ultra - School Edition. EBSCO. 16 Dec. 2009.
Shaffer, Brian W. “Understanding Kazuo Ishiguro.” Understanding Kazuo Ishiguro. Columbia: U of South Carolina P, 2008. 1-11.
Shaw, Andrea Elizabeth. “Introduction: Fatness and Blackness: A Compelling Coincidence of Erasure.” The Embodiment of Disobedience: Fat Black Women’s Unruly Political Bodies. New York: Lexington, 2006. 1-18.
Stanton, Katherine. “Introduction: Contemporary Cosmopolitan Fictions.” Cosmopolitan Fictions: Ethics, Politics, and Global Change in the Works of Kazuo Ishiguro, Michael Ondaatje, Jamaica Kincaid, and J. M. Coetzee. New York: Routledge, 2006. 1-8.
Snyder, Charles Richard and Howard L. Fromkin. “Preface.” Uniqueness: the Human Pursuit Difference. New York: Plenum, 1980. xiii-xv.
Wang, Ching-chih. “Introduction: Homeward Bound.” Homeless Strangers in the Novels of Kazuo Ishiguro: Floating Characters in a Floating World. Lewiston: Mellen, 2008. 1-30.
Wong, Cynthia F. and Grace Crummett. “A Conversation about Life and Art with Kazuo Ishiguro.”Conversations with Kazuo Ishiguro. Ed. Brian W. Shaffer and Cynthia F. Wong. Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 2008. 204-20.
Woodward, Kathryn. “Introduction.” Identity and Difference. Ed. Kathryn Woodward. London: Sage, 1997.1-6
---. “Concepts of Identity and Difference.”Identity and Difference. Ed. Kathryn Woodward. London: Sage, 1997. 7-62.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code