本研究蒐集歷年針對高雄市大坪頂特定區的非法棄置廢棄物場址調查計畫成果，以高 71 線道兩旁非法棄置事業廢棄物場址為對象，探討傳統以系統性挖掘鑽 探法進行採樣調查、地球物理方法探測與航空影像紀錄輔助調查的方法差異。其 中對廢棄物棄置量體估算，以航空影像紀錄所建立三維的高程數值模型可以掌握 廢棄物棄置時間、數量及逐年棄置區域的分佈。而地球物理方法探測也可快速了 解分佈範圍與深度，但若要掌握廢棄物類別與有害特性分佈，則傳統以系統性挖 掘鑽探法進行採樣調查仍是不可免的方法。本研究同時也建議應結合上述三種方 法對非法棄置廢棄物場址進行調查，依序先就場址建立三維的高程數值模型後再 進行實質調查工作。
本研究篩選 4 處場址進行二維航空照片紀錄比對(2D)，將地形地貌變異較大的 區域予以框選。藉由現場廢棄物調查工作結果，在地形地貌變異較大的區域，確 實可發現分布較為密集廢棄物存在；另以三維航空照片紀錄比對(3D)，建立場址高 程數值模型，瞭解場址歷年高程變化，再將現場廢棄物調查工作成果與場址高程 數值模型進行比對。依據本研究比對結果，模型高程變化與廢棄物鑽探成果相似 度甚高。
上述二維或三維航空照片紀錄比對，確實能有效判釋範圍與推估棄置數量， 然棄置之廢棄物類別、廢棄物特性、填埋情形，仍須藉由現場調查工作及檢測分 析方能得知，亦即利用地球物理方法以非破壞性方式探測場址掩埋廢棄物範圍與 深度分佈，整體數量需配合密集的測線與挖掘鑽探。研究結果顯示，4 處場址沿高 71 線道填埋，大量填埋廢棄物時間在 1993 年~1995 年間，有共通的一致性。廢棄 物最大量來自鋼鐵冶煉業廢棄物。

This study collected the information from the investigation projects focusing on the illegal dumping site of the Dapingding Area in the past.The study objectives are the comparisons among the investigations carried out by traditional excavation, resistivity image profiling method, and the aerial photographic record around the sites next to Kao- Road 71. For estimating the amount of the wastes,the 3-dimentional elevation data obtained from the aerial photographic record can be used to identify the time of the dumping, the amount estimation, and the dumping location from year to year.The resistivity image profiling method can be used to quickly assess the distribution and the depth of the dumping, but the traditional excavation is best to be used to understand the kinds and the hazard characteristics of the wastes. This study also recommends to establish the 3-dimentional elevation data prior to the on-site investigation as a good practice of the site investigation procedure.

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 V
表目錄 vii
第一章 前言 1
1.1 研究緣起 1
1.2 研究目的 1
第二章 文獻蒐集 3
2.1 大坪頂特定區與高 71 線道路 3
2.2 歷年發現大坪頂非法棄置事業廢棄物場址 4
第三章 實驗設備與方法 7
3.1 航空影像紀錄比對 8
3.1.1 基本原理 8
3.1.2 空中三角測量解算 10
3.1.3 數值高程模型建置與編修 12
3.2 實場調查方法 13
3.2.1 場址採樣調查 13
3.2.2 實驗室分析 14
3.2.3 場址資訊研判 15
第四章 結果與討論 16
4.1 二維航空照片紀錄地貌變化比對 16
4.1.1 大寮區潭平場址 16
4.1.2 明善段場址 17
4.1.3 坪北段場址 18
4.1.4 新庄段場址 19
4.2 實場調查與廢棄物特性 20
4.2.1 潭平段場址 20
4.2.2 明善段場址 24
4.2.3 坪北段場址 26
4.2.4 新庄段場址 20
4.3 三維航空紀錄資訊分析 34
4.3.1 潭平段場址廢棄物案例探討 34
4.3.2 明善段場址案例探討 47
4.3.3 新庄段場址案例探討 53
4.4 方法比較與探討 57
第五章 結論與建議 58
5.1 結論 58
5.2 建議 59
參考文獻 60

1. 高雄縣政府環境保護局，2010，「高雄縣大寮鄉紅蝦山場址非法棄置廢棄物場 址清理計畫顧問、監工暨採樣分析專案工作期末報告」
2. 行政院環境保護署，2012，高雄地區大坪頂特定區計畫土壤及地下水品質整 體評估及後續管制策略研擬計畫期末報告 EPA-99-GA101-03-A206
3. 高雄縣政府環境保護局，2003，「大坪頂特定區計畫(第二次通盤檢討－台灣 省部分)書」。
4. https://rdwrertaiwan.blogspot.tw/2014/11/K71.html
5. 國防部軍備局，2008，「東山訓練場場址廢棄物(土)清理專案管理結案報告」。
6. 原高雄縣政府環境保護局，2006，「高雄縣大寮鄉潭平段非法棄置事業廢棄 物場址緊急調查計畫期末報告」。
7. 高雄市政府環境保護局，2010，「佛濟寺非法棄置事業廢棄物場址緊急調查 計畫，期末報告」。
8. 高雄市政府環境保護局，2011，「高雄市不明廢棄物場址空污潛勢調查及污 染源追蹤管制計畫期末報告」。
9. 原高雄縣政府環境保護局，2010，「大寮鄉新厝路等2處(養鴨場及噴砂場)非 法棄置事業廢棄物場址緊急調查計畫期末報告」。
10. Brian.L.Murphy and Robert D.Morrison (2002) Introduction to Environmental Forensics chap 3, pp43, 2002.
11. 國有財產署台灣南區辦事處，2009，「高雄縣大寮鄉潭平段556與629地號國
有土地高精度高解析數值高程模型資料庫建置計畫」。
12. 行政院環境保護署環境檢驗所，2017，“ 事業廢棄物採樣方法” ,NIEA R118.05B。
13. 高雄市政府環境保護局，2016，「高雄市大坪頂特定區高污染潛勢區補充調
查評估計畫（第1期）」。
14. Arıkan, E., Şimşit-Kalender, Z.T., Vayvay, Ö ., 2017. Solid waste disposal methodology selection using multi-criteria decision making methods and an application in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 403-412.
15. Baek, S.H., Kim, S.S., Kwon, J.S., Um, E.S., 2017. Ground penetrating radar for fracture mapping in underground hazardous waste disposal sites: A case study from an underground research tunnel, South Korea. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 141, 24-33.
16. Baxter, J., Lyng, K.A., Askham, C., Hanssen, O.J., 2016. High-quality collection and disposal of WEEE: Environmental impacts and resultant issues. Waste Management, 57, 17-26.
17. Bong, C.P.C., Ho, W.S., Hashim, H., Lim, J.S., Ho, C.S., Tan, W.S.P., Lee, C.T., 2016. Review on the renewable energy and solid waste management policies towards biogas development in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 988-998.
18. Borthakur, A., Govind, M., 2016. Emerging trends in consumers’ E-waste disposal behaviour and awareness: A worldwide overview with special focus on India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 117, 102-113.
19. Chakraborty, S., Jo, B.W., Jo, J.H., Baloch, Z., 2017. Effectiveness of sewage sludge ash combined with waste pozzolanic minerals in developing sustainable construction material: An alternative approach for waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 253-263.
20. Choi, Y.J., Lee, S.C., Kim, C.L., 2017. Proposal for effective disposal options of very low level decommissioning waste. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 94, 36-45.
21. D’Amato, A., Mazzanti, M., Nicolli, F., 2015. Waste and organized crime in regional environments: How waste tariffs and the mafia affect waste
management and disposal. Resource and Energy Economics, 41, 185-201.
22. Domingo, N., Luo, H., 2017. Canterbury earthquake construction and demolition waste management: issues and improvement suggestions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 130-138.
23. Fagnani, E., Guimarães, J.R., 2017. Waste management plan for higher education institutions in developing countries: The Continuous Improvement Cycle model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 108-118.
24. Kayakutlu, G., Daim, T., Kunt, M., Altay, A., Suharto, Y., 2016. Scenarios for regional waste management. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 1323-1335.
25. Koolivand, A., Mazandaranizadeh, H., Binavapoor, M., Mohammadtaheri, A., & Saeedi, R., 2017. Hazardous and industrial waste composition and associated management activities in Caspian industrial park, Iran. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management, 7, 9-14.
26. Moussiopoulos, N., 2017. Investigation of the occupational health and safety conditions in Hellenic solid waste management facilities and assessment of the in-situ hazard level. Safety Science, 96, 192-197.
27. Oppio, A., Corsi, S., 2017. Territorial vulnerability and local conflicts perspectives for waste disposals siting. A case study in Lombardy region (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1528-1538.
28. Palmer, K., Walls, M., 1997. Optimal policies for solid waste disposal taxes, subsidies, and standards. Journal of Public Economics, 65, 193-205.
29. Pinheiro, C.T., Ascensão, V.R., Cardoso, C.M., Quina, M.J., Gando-Ferreira, L.M., 2017. An overview of waste lubricant oil management system: Physicochemical characterization contribution for its
improvement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 301-308.
30. Plazzotta, S., Manzocco, L., Nicoli, M.C., 2017. Fruit and vegetable waste management and the challenge of fresh-cut salad. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 63, 51-59.
31. Simatele, D.M., Dlamini, S., Kubanza, N.S., 2017. From informality to formality: Perspectives on the challenges of integrating solid waste management into the urban development and planning policy in Johannesburg, South Africa. Habitat International, 63, 122-130.
32. Triassi, M., Alfano, R., Illario, M., Nardone, A., Caporale, O., Montuori, P., 2015. Environmental pollution from illegal waste disposal and health effects: A review on the “Triangle of Death”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 1216-1236.
33. Wichapa, N., Khokhajaikiat, P., 2017. Solving multi-objective facility location problem using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and goal programming: a case study on infectious waste disposal centers. Operations Research Perspectives,4, 39-48.
34. Won, J., Cheng, J.C., 2017. Identifying potential opportunities of building information modeling for construction and demolition waste management and minimization. Automation in Construction, 79, 3-18.