Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0521116-140645 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0521116-140645
論文名稱
Title
制度和聚結對美國内部收入流動的影嚮2004 ~ 2007
The Effects of Institutions and Agglomerations on Interstate Income Flows within the US from 2004 to 2007
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
98
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-06-17
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-06-21
關鍵字
Keywords
創意、州際移民、聚集經濟、經濟與個人自由、制度
Agglomeration economies, creativity, economic and personal freedom, institutions, interstate migration
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5855 次,被下載 492
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5855 times, has been downloaded 492 times.
中文摘要
美國政府的結構導致美國各州彼此競爭,爭相取得流動資本。有立法支援經濟、保障個人自由與經濟聚集發展的州較能吸引移民。本研究使用2004年到2007年的州級資料,採用收入的重力分析,使用多元線性回歸模式衡量移民流。經濟、個人以及整體的自由能吸引移民且提升循環,這意味著低稅收的小政府、較低的干預與較低的家長主義與較高的移民流入以及較高的流動率相關聯。創意可以增長循環,但並不能吸引移民。聚集經濟會鼓勵人才流通,但不會吸引移民,這可能是因為大政府以及高花費的緣故。教育程度亦無法吸引移民或提升循環。較高的人口與較高的跨州產品能提升循環。高犯罪率、較冷的氣候、移民出發地與目的地之距離與移民流皆呈負相關。
Abstract
The governmental structure of the U.S. leads states to compete against each other for mobile capital. Migrants should be attracted to states which have institutions supporting economic and personal freedom and well developed agglomeration economies. This study uses a gravity-type analysis of income weighted migration flows with thirty multivariate linear regression models using 2004 to 2007 state level data. Economic, personal and overall freedom, attract migrants and promote circulation, suggesting that small government with lower taxes, less intervention, fewer regulations and less paternalism are associated with both higher inflows of migrants and higher rates of circulation. Creativity increases circulation but does not attract migrants. Agglomeration economies encourage ‘brain circulation’, but do not attract migrants possibly due to larger governments and higher costs. Education level neither attracts new migrants nor increases circulation. Larger populations and higher Gross State Product increase circulation. Higher crime rates, colder climate, and increasing distance from origin to destination are negatively associated with migration.
目次 Table of Contents
Thesis Approval Sheet i
Acknowledgements ii
Abstract (Mandarin) iii
Abstract (English) iv
Chapter 1: Introduction 1
Chapter 2: Literature Review 7
2.1 Interstate Migration 7
2.2 The Role of Institutions 11
2.3 The Role of Agglomerations 15
Chapter 3: Data, Hypotheses and Models 22
3.1 Dependent Variable – Income flow from State (o) to State (d) (IncMig log) 22
3.2 Independent Variables – Institutions 23
3.2.1 Mercatus Economic Freedom Index (MEFGAIN and MEFPROD) 24
3.2.2 Mercatus Personal Freedom Index (MPFGAIN and MPFPROD) 24
3.2.3 Mercatus Overall Freedom Index (MOFGAIN and MOFPROD) 25
3.2.4 Fraser Economic Freedom Index (FRASERGAIN and FRASERPROD) 25
3.2.5 Fraser/Mercatus Freedom Index (FRASERMPFGAIN and FRASERMPFPROD) 26
3.3 Independent Variables – Agglomerations 27
3.3.1 Creativity Index Variables (CREATEGAIN and CREATEPROD) 28
3.3.2 Education (EDUGAIN and EDUPROD) 28
3.4 Control Variables 29
3.4.1 Gross State Product (STATEPROD) 29
3.4.2 Population Product (POPPROD) 30
3.4.3 Distance (DIST log) 31
3.4.4 Shared Border (BORDER) – Dummy Variable 31
3.4.5 Heating Degree Days (HEATINGGAIN) 32
3.4.6 Homicide Rate (HOMICIDEGAIN) 33
3.5 Models and Equations 33
Chapter 4: Data Analysis and Results 38
4.1 Descriptive Statistics 38
4.2 Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis Reports 40
4.3 Results 41
4.3.1 Institutions Results 41
4.3.2 Agglomerations Results 43
4.4 Pearson Correlation Matrix of the Independent Variables 45
4.5 Discussion 47
4.6 Hypothesis Results Summary 54
Chapter 5: Conclusions, Implications and Suggestions for Research 56
References 62
Appendices 69
參考文獻 References
Andrienko, Y., & Guriev, S. (2004). Determinants of interregional mobility in Russia. The Economics of Transition, 12, 1, 1-27.
Anderson, J. E., & National Bureau of Economic Research. (2010). The gravity model. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Andersson, A. E., & Andersson, D. E. (2006). The economics of experiences, the arts and entertainment. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Andersson, D. E. (2008). Property rights, consumption and the market process. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Andersson, A. E. (2011). Creative people need creative cities. In Andersson, D. E., Andersson, A. E., & Mellander, C. (2011). Handbook of creative cities (pp. 14-55). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
Andersson, D.E., & Hoeltschi, K. (2011). Freedom, Creativity, and Interjurisdictional Competition: American Interstate Migration, 2004-2008. (Unpublished paper). National Sun-Yat Sen University.
Anjomani, A. (2002). Regional growth and interstate migration. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 36, 4, 239-265.
Apergis, N., Dincer, O. C., & Payne, J. E. (2012). Live free or bribe: On the causal dynamics between economic freedom and corruption in U.S. states. European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 2, 215-226.
Ashby, N. J. (2007). Economic freedom and migration flows between U.S. states. Southern Economic Journal, 73: 677-697.
Ashby, N. J., & Fraser Institute (Vancouver, B.C.). (2010). Economic freedom of North America 2010. Vancouver, B.C: Fraser Institute.
Bacolod, M., Blum, B. S., & Strange, W. C. (2009). Skills in the city. Journal of Urban Economics, 65, 2, 136.
Bernholz, P. (2008). Instituional competition: international environment, levels and consequences. In Bergh, A., & Höijer, R. (2008). Institutional competition (pp. 90-112). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. (2008). Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence. Public Choice, 134, 3-4.
Borjas, G. J., & Freeman, R. B. (1992). Immigration and the work force: Economic consequences for the United States and source areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Borjas, G. J. (2000). Issues in the economics of immigration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Borjas, G. J., Bronars, S. G., & Trejo, S. J. (1990). Self-selection and internal migration in the United States. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Casetti, E. (1984). Manufacturing productivity and snowbelt-sunbelt shifts. Economic Geography.
Cebula, R. J. (2014). The Impact of Economic Freedom and Personal Freedom on Net In-Migration in the U.S.: A State-Level Empirical Analysis, 2000 to 2010. Journal of Labor Research, 35, 1, 88-103.
Cebula, R.J. and Alexander, G.M. (2006), Determinants of Net Interstate Migration, 2000-2004, Regional Analysis & Policy 36(2): 116-123.
Clark, T. N., Lloyd, R., Wong, K. K., & Jain, P. (2002). Amenities Drive Urban Growth. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, 5, 493-515.
Davies, P. S., Greenwood, M. J., & Li, H. (2001). A conditional logit approach to U.S. state-to-state migration. Journal of Planning Literature, 16, 2, 236-319.
Desrochers, P. (2001). Geographical Proximity and the Transmission of Tacit Knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics, 14, 1, 25-46.
DiZerega, G. (2000). Persuasion, power, and polity: A theory of democratic self-organization. Cresskill, N.J: Hampton Press.
Dorigo, G., & Tobler, W. (1983). Push-Pull Migration Laws. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73, 1, 1-17.
Drucker, P. F. (1969). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York: Harper & Row.
Eastwood, B. M. (2009). Creative class vs. social capital vs. economic freedom: U.S. economic growth. Applied Research in Economic Development, 6: 14-24.
Epstein, R. A. (1995). Simple rules for a complex world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Faggian, A., Comunian, R., & Li, Q. C. (2014). Interregional migration of human creative capital: The case of “Bohemian graduates”. Geoforum, 55, 2, 33-42
Fan, C. C. (2005). Interprovincial Migration, Population Redistribution, and Regional Development in China: 1990 and 2000 Census Comparisons. The Professional Geographer, 57, 2, 295-311.
Florida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Florida, R. L. (2005). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. New York: HarperBusiness.
Florida, R. L. (2008). Who's your city?: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York: Basic Books.
Florida, R. L., Mellander, C., & Adler, P. (2011) In Andersson, D. E., Andersson, A. E., & Mellander, C. (2011). Handbook of creative cities (pp. 56-71). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fujita, M., & Thisse, J.-F. (2002). Economics of agglomeration: Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gabe, T. M. (2011). The value of creativity. In Andersson, D. E., Andersson, A. E., & Mellander, C. (2011). Handbook of creative cities (pp. 128-145). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
Gabriel, S. A., Mattey, J. P., & Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. (1996). Leaving Los Angeles: Migration, economic opportunity, and the quality-of-life. San Francisco, Calif.: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
Glaeser, E. (2005). Edward L. Glaeser, Review of Richard Florida's The Rise of the Creative Class. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 5, 593-596.
Glaeser, E. L., Kolko, J. D., Saiz, A., & National Bureau of Economic Research. (2000). Consumer city. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Glaeser, E. L., Gottlieb, J. D., & National Bureau of Economic Research. (2009). The wealth of cities: Agglomeration economies and spatial equilibrium in the United States. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Glaeser, E. L., Tobio, K., & National Bureau of Economic Research. (2007). The rise of the sunbelt. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Goetz, S. J., Partridge, M. D., Majumdar, S., & Rickman, D. S. (2011). Sharing the gains of local economic growth: Race-to-the-top versus race-to-the-bottom economic development. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 3, 428-456.
Greenwood, M. J. (1997). Internal migration in developed countries. In Handbook of Population and Family Economics, ed. Mark R. Rosenzweid and Oded Stark, 647-720.
Grigg, D.B. (1977). E.G. Ravenstein and the “laws of migration”. Journal of Historical Geography, 3, 1, 41-54.
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., & Gartzke, E. (2005). Economic freedom of the world: 2005 Annual Report. Vancouver, B.C: The Fraser Institute.
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, Vol. XXXV, No. 4: 519-530.
Hayek, F. A. (1960). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hernandez-Murillo, R., Owyang, M. T., Ott, L. S., & Whalen, D. (2011). Patterns of interstate migration in the united states from the survey of income and program participation. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 93, 3, 169-185.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Hodgson, G.M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues. Volume XL No. 1 March 2006 (pp. 1-25).
Hoeltschi, K. Freedom, creativity and institutional selection via migration in the 50 United States of America. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Sun Yat-sen University.
Höijer, R. (2008). The concept of institutional competition. In Bergh, A., & Höijer, R. (2008). Institutional competition (pp. 1-28). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Holcombe, R.G. (2012). The rise and fall of agglomeration economies. In The Spatial Market Process. (2012). Bingley: Emerald Books.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.
Johansson, B. & Klaesson, J. (2011). Creative milieus in the Stockholm region. In Andersson, D. E., Andersson, A. E., & Mellander, C. (2011). Handbook of creative cities (pp. 456-481). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
Jokela, M. (2009). Personality predicts migration within and between U.S. states. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1, 79-83.
Jones, E. L. (1981). The European miracle: Environments, economies, and geopolitics in the history of Europe and Asia. Cambridge [Eng.: Cambridge University Press.
Katseli, L.T. (2004). Immigrants and EU Labor Markets, OECD Development Center. Retrieved from http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?ID=274
King, K. M. (2011). Technology, talent and tolerance and inter-regional migration in Canada. In Andersson, D. E., Andersson, A. E., & Mellander, C. (2011). Handbook of creative cities (pp. 169-186). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
Koser, K., & Salt, J. (1997). The geography of highly skilled international migration. International Journal of Population Geography : Ijpg, 3, 4, 285-303.
Kuznets, S. and Thomas, D. S. (1957). Introduction, in: E.S. Lee, A.R. Miller, C.P. Brainerd and R.A. Easterlin, eds., Population redistribution and economic growth: United States, 1870-1950, Vol. I, Methodological considerations and reference tables (American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA).
Long, Larry. (1991). "Residential mobility differences among developed countries". International Regional Science Review.
Lowry, I. S. (1966). Migration and metropolitan growth: two analytical models. San Francisco: Chandler.
Malamud, O., Wozniak, A., & National Bureau of Economic Research. (2010). The impact of college education on geographic mobility: Identifying education using multiple components of Vietnam draft risk. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics: An introductory volume. London: Macmillan.
Meyer, J.-B., Brown, M., & World Conference on Science. (1999). Scientific diasporas: A new approach to the brain drain. Paris: Management of Social Transformations (MOST) Programme.
Molloy, R., Smith, C. L., & Wozniak, A. K. (2011). Internal Migration in the United States. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Partridge, M. D. (2010), The duelling models: NEG vs amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth. Papers in Regional Science, 89: 513–536.
Mulholland, S. E., & Hernandez-Julian, R. (2013). Does economic freedom lead to selective migration by education?. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 43, 1, 65-87.
Partridge, M. D. (2010). The Duelling Models: NEG vs Amenity Migration in Explaining U.S. Engines of Growth. Papers in Regional Science 89, 3, 513-536.
Pejovich, S., & Colombatto, E. (2008). Law, informal rules and economic performance: The case for common law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ravenstein, E.G. (1885). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 48, No. 1: 167-235
Ravenstein, E.G. (1889). The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52, No.2: 241-305
Rentfrow, P. J. (2011). The open city. In Andersson, D. E., Andersson, A. E., & Mellander, C. (2011). Handbook of creative cities (pp. 117-127). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenbloom, J. L., Sundstrom, W. A., & National Bureau of Economic Research. (2003). The decline and rise of interstate migration in the United States: Evidence from the IPUMS, 1850-1990. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move: A study in the social psychology of urban residential mobility. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Ruger, W. P., Sorens, J., & Mercatus Center. (2009). Freedom in the 50 states: An index of personal and economic freedom. Arlington, Va: Mercatus Center, George Mason University.
Saxenian, A. L. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Saxenian, A. L. (2006). The new argonauts: Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Saxenian, A. L. (1999). Silicon Valley's new immigrant entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Saxenian, A., & Hsu, J. (2001). The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu Connection: Technical Communities and Industrial Upgrading. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 4, 893.
Simonton, D. K. (2011). Big-C creativity in the big city. In Andersson, D. E., Andersson, A. E., & Mellander, C. (2011). Handbook of creative cities (pp. 72-84). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Pub.
Sjaastad, L.A. (1962). The Costs and Returns of Human Migration. Journal of Political Economy 70, 5, 80-93
Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2009). Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 2, 147-167.
Taylor, J.A. (2011). Institutions, Agglomeration Economies and Interstate Migration in the United States. (Unpublished Master’s thesis). National Sun Yat-Sen University.
Todaro, M. P., & International Labour Office. (1976). Internal migration in developing countries: A review of theory, evidence, methodology and research priorities. Geneva: International Labour Office.
United States Census. (2004). Available from http://www.census.gov/
United States Internal Revenue Service. (2011). State to state migration data, migration data by individual state (2004-2008). Available from http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/article/0,,id=212718,00.html
Vanberg, V. J. (2008). Can competition between governments enhance democracy?. In Bergh, A., & Höijer, R. (2008). Institutional competition (pp. 113-128). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Vanberg, V., & Kerber, W. (1994). Institutional competition among jurisdictions: An evolutionary approach. Constitutional Political Economy, 5, 2, 193-219.
Vasileva, K. (2011). 6.5% of the EU population are foreigners and 9.4% are born abroad. Population and Social Conditions Eurostat Statistics in Focus, 34/2011. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-SF-11-034/EN/KS-SF-11-034-EN.PDF
Vaubel, R. (2008). A history of thought on institutional competition. In Bergh, A., & Höijer, R. (2008). Institutional competition (pp. 29-66). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Vertovec, S. (2002). Transnational networks and skilled labour migration. Oxford: University of Oxford. Transnational Communities Programme.
Wall, H. J., & Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (1999). Voting with your feet in the United Kingdom: Using cross-migration rates to estimate relative living standards. Saint Louis, Mo.: Research Dept., Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Watkins, T., & Yandle, B. (2010). Can freedom and knowledge economy indexes explain Go-Getter migration patterns?. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 40, 2, 104-115.
Weingast, B. R. (1995). The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 11, 1, 1-31.
Whisler, R. L., Waldorf, B. S., Mulligan, G. F., & Plane, D. A. (2008). Quality of Life and the Migration of the College-Educated: A Life-Course Approach. Growth and Change, 39, 1, 58-94
Wohlgemuth, M. (2008). Learning through institutional competition. In Bergh, A., & Höijer, R. (2008). Institutional competition (pp. 67-89). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Wozniak, A. (2010). Are college graduates more responsive to distant labor market opportunities?. Journal of Human Resources, 45, 4, 944-970.
Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review, 61(2): 219-49.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code