Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0521116-183508 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0521116-183508
論文名稱
Title
航空貨運競爭與合作關鍵成功因素之研究
A Study on Successful Key Factor for Competition and Cooperation of Air Cargo Carriers
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
83
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-06-04
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-06-21
關鍵字
Keywords
競爭優勢、競合理論、層級分析、策略聯盟、航空貨運
AHP, strategic alliance, co-opetition, competitive advantage, aircargo
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5676 次,被下載 81
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5676 times, has been downloaded 81 times.
中文摘要
近30年來亞洲經濟快速成長加以經濟全球化趨勢,國際航空公司面對市場快速轉移變化、油價波動及不同型態航空業者持續加入導致競爭加劇,為避免艙位過剩,造成營業壓力,國際航空公司在激烈競爭環境下,如何運用合縱連橫策略,確保市場競爭優勢,尤其航空貨運產業,各航彼此競爭條件不同狀況下,如何結盟合作創造雙贏,已成為航空貨運業者不可避免的課題。
本研究經由文獻回顧、透過麥克.波特(Michael Porter)五力分析理論對航空貨運現況進行分析,檢視產業內五種壓力的情況,再就麥克.波特鑽石理論研究,進行台灣航空貨運產業國際競爭力強弱分析;接著藉由賽局-競合理論探討透過與其他企業合作來獲得企業競爭優勢或戰略價值的戰略定位,最後則進行產業界專家深度訪談,整理歸納航空貨運策略聯盟之選擇要素並建立層級架構,依據層級程序分析法(AHP法)延請專家依所建立的評估準則進行各層級程序分析求得各評估準則相對權重值與整體權重值。
研究結果發現,傳統企業注重的價值鏈已產生變化,如降低成本、航線艙位使用率、市場佔有率等皆非現代航空貨運產業主要影響要素,取而代之如提昇服務品質、加強航線艙位供給能力及客製化的多元性運價結構等因素顯示為企業在產業供應鏈須相對強化之向量;該結果經訪查分析,主要因為時代科技改變,消費者ㄧ般可容易取得相關資訊,並得自行研判產品偏好,為消費意識普遍提昇所致;另外,操作因素上,兩岸三地航空貨運業者對產業競合領域相對較關切特徵值為「航權」議題,尤其台灣之航空貨運專業人士,導致多數專家對政府政策方針、航權限制與分配及企業航網配置等因素給予高權重。
Abstract
In past 30 years, the economic in Asia continue rapid growth and go toward globalization. The international airlines are facing heavy challenge for market fast-moving change, the fluctuant oil price and many different styles of carriers continue to join market which caused most competitive for aircargo industry. In order to avoid the kind of dilemma on business running from fierce competitive environment and superfluous space that international carriers have to find out a suitable solution and proper strategy to ensure the competitive advantage of enterprise. Esepcially, it is different condition and pattern for each carrier at the aircargo industry, how to cooperate with other carrier or different industry to create a win-win condition is one major topic for aircargo industry.
In this study, through literature review, by Michael Porter’s Five Forces model to analyze the current status of aircargo industry, review the situation within the industry five kinds of pressure, and then also apply Michael Porter another Theory - competitive advantage of nations to conducted competitiveness strength analysis for Taiwan aircargo industry in international. Followed by Game - theory of co-opetition to search for competitive advantage or strategic value of corporate strategic positioning. Finally, we process interviews with experts from aircargo industry to summarize and select features for Air cargo’s Co-opetition and establish hierarchical structure. This study also utilizes the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to set up standard hierarchical structure that sent for experts to assess and weight value for each criteria and overall vector.
The research found that the traditional targets which enterprise focus on have changed gradually, such as cost down, space utilization and market share…etc. which is not major concerning pattern anymore. Replaced as improve service quality, strengthen supply capacity and customize selling rate pattern for different customer. It is different vector and concept which enterprises need to learn. After analyzing, currently, people are easy to search any information from different ways because of the improvement of science technique. Customers will decide and use which they prefer. Another founding, the experts from district of Cross Strait and HongKong all concern the topic for “traffic right”, especially for the experts from Taiwan. It means the policy guidelines of government and dispatch for traffic right are the focus topic for aircargo industry.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
公開授權書 ii
誌 謝 iii
摘 要 iv
Abstract v
目 錄 vii
圖 次 viii
表 次 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究流程 6
第四節 研究範圍與限制 7
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 五力分析 9
第二節 鑽石模型 12
第三節 競合理論 17
第四節 產業現況分析 20
第三章 研究設計 33
第一節 研究架構 33
第二節 研究模式 34
第三節 研究方法 36
第四節 分析方法 44
第四章 實證分析 48
第一節 AHP問卷分析結果 48
第二節 實證結果彙整 51
第五章 結論與建議 59
第一節 結論 59
第二節 建議 62
第三節 未來研究發展建議 65
參考文獻 66
附錄ㄧ 69
參考文獻 References
一、中文
李明軒、邱如美譯,麥可.波特,1996,國家競爭優勢(上),台北:天下文化。
李明軒、邱如美譯,麥可.波特,1996,國家競爭優勢(下),台北:天下文化。
林原宏,1996,集群分析之概念與理論,數理系列。
周旭華譯,麥可.波特,2010,競爭策略,台北:天下文化。
凌鳳儀,2002,航空運輸管理概論(再版),台北:文笙出版社。
黃婉華、馮勃翰譯,亞當‧布蘭登柏格 貝利‧奈勒波夫,1966,競合策略(商業運作的真實力量),台北:雲夢千里文化
陳民哲,2008,動態競爭策略探微:理論、實證與應用,台北:智勝文化。
鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上),中國統計學報,27,13707-13724。
鄧振源、曾國雄,1989,層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下),中國統計學報,27,13767-13870
褚志鵬,2009, Analytic Hierarchy Process Theory 層級分析法(AHP)理論與實作,國立東華大學企業管理學系暨研究所教學講義。
蕭國洲,2011,國際航空貨運業在亞洲市場競爭模式之構建,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所論文。


二、英文
Bowen, J. T. and Leinbanch, T. R. (2004) & “Market concentration in air freight forwarding industry”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en sociale Geografie. 95(2).
International Air Transport Association WATS, World Air Transport Statistics, July, 2015.
International Air Transport Association, Airline Industry Freight Forecast, Oct, 2015.
Porter, Michael E., “what is Strategy”, HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW. Nover-December, 1996.
Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. NY: The Free Press.
Porter, M.E. 1998. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior
performance. NY: The Free Press.


Saaty, T. L., 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Saaty, T. L. ,1996, The analytic network process. RWS Publications, Expert Choice, Inc.

Senguttuvan, P. S. 2006, “Air Cargo: Engine for Economic Growth and Development – A Case Study of Asian Region”, Presented at the National Urban Freight Conference, Los Angeles, February 2006.
Zhang, A., Zhang, Y. 2002b, “A model of air cargo liberalization: passenger vs. all-cargo carriers”, Transportation Research Part E, 38, pp. 175-191.

三、網路
Ascend, Flightgolbal consultancy, 2015, http://www.ascendworldwide.com/。
Drewry, Shipping Consultants Limited,2015, www.drewry.co.uk/。
Netherlands CPB, Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis , 2015, https://www.researchgate.net/institution/CPB_Netherlands_Bureau_for_Economic_Policy_Analysis/。
IATA, International Air Transport Association, 2015, http://www.iata.org/Pages/default.aspx/。
IATA CASS, Cargo Account Settlement Systems, 2015, https://casslink.iata.org/。
ICAO, International Civil Aviation Organization, 2015, http://www.icao.int/Pages/default.aspx/。
Platts, Oil Market data Pricing Products, 2015, http://www.platts.com/product-list/oil/all/。
維基百科網站,2015,https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/。
臺灣經濟部能源局,2016,http://web3.moeaboe.gov.tw/oil102/。
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code