Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0522118-000331 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0522118-000331
論文名稱
Title
預先持股策略之個案研究
Do you really need a Toehold? A Case Study
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
66
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2018-06-15
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2018-06-22
關鍵字
Keywords
建立溝通橋樑、個案研究、企業併購、收購、預先持股策略
Case Study, Mergers and Acquisitions, Building a communication bridge, Toehold Strategy, Takeover
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5729 次,被下載 64
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5729 times, has been downloaded 64 times.
中文摘要
由於預先持股策略( Toehold Strategy )有著財務與資訊上的優勢特性,可進而提升併購成功機率,故此策略常用於企業併購之中。惟近年此策略之使用率下降,故本研究以個案研究與半結構式訪談之方式,探討此策略於實務運用時,應給予之特別注意有何。有別於過往文獻,本研究發現「建立溝通橋樑」亦為企業採用預先持股策略的動機之一;此外,我們提出了在「取得優勢資訊」、「降低收購成本」及「建立溝通橋樑」三種不同策略使用動機之下,企業可參照之基本使用準則,協助其在收購過程中能對此策略有更為全面之掌握。
Abstract
We use case study method with the semi-structure interview method to study Toehold, a strategy with numerous benefits and it can increase the probability of completing a successful M&A deal. Different from the literature, we found that “Building a communication bridge” could also be the reasons that acquirers conducting the Toehold strategy. We further propose three basic guidelines to the companies which are willing to adapt the Toehold strategy to help them better understand the comprehensive consideration while engaging in M&A deals.
目次 Table of Contents
Contents
I. Introduction 1
1-1. Research background 1
1-2. Research motivation 3
1-3. Research purpose 5
II. Literature review 6
2-1. Benefits of using Toehold strategy 6
2-2. Concerns of using Toehold strategy 11
2-3. Others related field 12
2-4. A Completed Toehold Case 14
III. Research Design and Methodology 15
3-1. Case study method 15
3-2. Research design 16
3-3. Methodology 19
IV. Results 21
4-1. Research execution 21
4-2. Details of the deal 24
4-3. Questions replied and discussion 27
4-4. Basic guidelines for Toehold strategy 35
V. Conclusion 39
5-1. Conclusions 39
5-2. Suggestions 40
References 42
Appendices 44
Appendix A - Invitation letters and interview guides 44
Appendix B – Financial Statement 46
Appendix C - Transcript of the interview 48
Appendix C - Follow-up email 58
Figure Index
Figure 1 10-year global deal volume & value trend 1
Figure 2 the using rate of Toehold strategy 4
Figure 3 case selection in sample period 22
Figure 4 the transaction structure of deal 25
Table Index
Table 1 the details of interview 23
參考文獻 References
Bates, T.W., Lemmon, M.L., 2003. Breaking up is hard to do? An analysis of termination fee provisions and merger outcomes. Journal of Financial Economics 69, 469-504
Bengtsson, L., Larsson, R., 2012. Researching Mergers & Acquisitions with the Case Study Method: Idiographic Understanding of Longitudinal Integration Processes.
Bessler, W., Schneck, C., 2015. Excess premium offers and bidder success in European takeovers. Eurasian Economic Review 5, 23-62
Betton, S., Eckbo, B.E., 2000. Toeholds, bid jumps, and expected payoffs in takeovers. The Review of Financial Studies 13, 841-882
Betton, S., Eckbo, B.E., Thorburn, K.S., 2009. Merger negotiations and the toehold puzzle. Journal of Financial Economics 91, 158-178
Betton, S., Thorburn, K.S., Eckbo, B.E., 2005. The toehold puzzle.
Bris, A., 1998. When do bidders purchase a toehold? Theory and tests.
Bris, A., 2002. Toeholds, takeover premium, and the probability of being acquired. Journal of Corporate Finance 8, 227-253
Brooks, C., Chen, Z., Zeng, Y., 2018. Institutional cross-ownership and corporate strategy: The case of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance 48, 187-216
Bulow, J., Huang, M., Klemperer, P., 1999. Toeholds and takeovers. Journal of Political Economy 107, 427-454
Cai, Y., Sevilir, M., 2012. Board connections and M&A transactions. Journal of Financial Economics 103, 327-349
Capen, E.C., Clapp, R.V., Campbell, W.M., 1971. Competitive bidding in high-risk situations. Journal of petroleum technology 23, 641-653
Chowdhry, B., Jegadeesh, N., 1994. Pre-tender offer share acquisition strategy in takeovers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 29, 117-129
Flanagan, D.J., D'Mello, J.P., O'Shaughnessy, K., 1998. Completing the deal: Determinants of successful tender offers. Journal of Applied Business Research 14, 21
Ghauri, P., 2004. Designing and conducting case studies in international business research. Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business, 109-124
Goldman, E., Qian, J., 2005. Optimal toeholds in takeover contests. Journal of Financial Economics 77, 321-346
Grossman, S.J., Hart, O.D., 1980. Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics, 42-64
Higgins, M.J., Rodriguez, D., 2006. The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of financial economics 80, 351-383
Hirshleifer, D., Titman, S., 1990. Share tendering strategies and the success of hostile takeover bids. Journal of Political Economy 98, 295-324
Jennings, R.H., Mazzeo, M.A., 1993. Competing bids, target management resistance, and the structure of takeover bids. The Review of Financial Studies 6, 883-909
Kyle, A.S., Vila, J.-L., 1991. Noise trading and takeovers. The RAND Journal of Economics, 54-71
Officer, M.S., 2003. Termination fees in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial economics 69, 431-467
Porta, R.L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1998. Law and finance. Journal of political economy 106, 1113-1155
Povel, P., Sertsios, G., 2014. Getting to know each other: The role of toeholds in acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance 26, 201-224
Ravid, S.A., Spiegel, M., 1999. Toehold strategies, takeover laws and rival bidders. Journal of Banking & Finance 23, 1219-1242
Schneck, C., Bessler, W., Zimmermann, J., 2014. Bidder Contests in International Mergers and Acquisitions: The Impact of Toeholds, Preemptive Bidding, and Termination Fees.
Schwert, G.W., 1996. Markup pricing in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial economics 41, 153-192
Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of political economy 94, 461-488
Singh, R., 1998. Takeover bidding with toeholds: The case of the owner's curse. The Review of Financial Studies 11, 679-704
Strickland, D., Martin, D.R., Cotter, J.F., 2010. Toeholds as an M&A strategy? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 21, 57-61
Thaler, R.H., 1988. Anomalies: The winner's curse. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, 191-202
Walkling, R.A., 1985. Predicting tender offer success: A logistic analysis. Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis 20, 461-478
Yin, R.K., 1984. Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications.
KPMG Report(2018). M&A Predictor: 2018 Annual Report + 2018 Q1 Update. Retrieved May. 13, 2018, from
https://home.kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2018/04/m-and-a-predictor-2018-annual-report.html
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code