台灣的網際網路環境已臻成熟，行動載具的普及以及無線網路的發達，使青少年曾上網的比例高達100%，網路已是生活的一部分。多數的青少年會使用網路媒介進行社交行為，然而這些社交行為卻可能產生風險。尤其，近年來交友軟體興起，其使用特點為：於行動載具使用、匿名性、私訊互動、地點配對，其特性使使用交友軟體的風險較高，近來常常有關於青少年使用交友軟體結交網友，卻遇到騷擾甚至延伸成現實犯罪的新聞，因此本研究欲探討青少年使用交友軟體的社交風險行為及其決定因素。

　　過去使用與滿足理論常被應用在各式網路媒介上，本研究亦將使用與滿足理論應用於交友軟體，以使用與滿足理論探討青少年交友軟體使用動機如何影響使用頻率，進而對社交風險造成影響。並將過去相關研究中重要的影響因素：性別、年齡、自戀程度、家長介入行為，置入研究中成為調節變項，探討這些因素對這個過程所產生的調節作用。

　　本研究使用問卷調查法，研究對象為曾使用過Goodnight、BeeTalk、Pairs、JustDating、Paktor、緣圈、Skout、Wootalk之中任意交友軟體的15-17歲青少年，以線上發放作為問卷蒐集方法，將問卷連結與QR code分享至高中生熱門社群網站與論壇，以便利抽樣法收集樣本，並提供獎品增加填答意願。

本研究發現：1. 多數的青少年不常使用交友軟體，但有少數青少年天天使用。2. 青少年使用交友軟體主要動機為打發時間、好奇與交友。3.社交風險中，青少年較不注重隱私，過半青少年會與網友見面。4.生理需求、社交需求會影提高使用頻率。5.指導型家長介入行為會降低其他社會心理需求對使用頻率的影響，間接減少因交友軟體使用造成的社交風險。6.使用動機除了可以直接影響，還會透過使用頻率會影響社交風險。7.男性的使用頻率、社交風險較女性高，並且男性的使用動機對使用頻率的影響較大。8.青少年年齡越大，使用頻率越高，其社交需求對使用頻率的影響越大。9.青少年自戀程度越高，其社交風險越高，並且自戀程度越高其使用頻率對社交風險的影響越大。

With the fast development of Internet technologies, mobile phones and wifi devices are widely adopted in Taiwan. Now almost all Taiwanese adolescents have access to the Internet, and the internet has become essential to their socializing practices. At the same time, mobile dating applications have increased in popularity among adolescents in recent years, which exposed them to various types of social risks. These mobile apps are featured with functions as anonymity, real-time-private-message communication, and location-based matching, which intensified risk behaviors. In recent years, there are many news stories reporting on how adolescents met strangers from online to offline via mobile dating apps, but then they were harassed or even became crime victims. Therefore, this research aims to investigate the moderators of the impacts of adolescents’ motivations for using mobile dating apps on their social risks.

Based on the Uses and gratifications theory, this study focused on the adolescents’ motives of using the mobile dating apps, and how these motivations influenced social risks directly and indirectly through the mobile dating app usage. Besides, gender, age, narcissism and parental mediation are tested as moderators relevant to the above relationships.

An online questionnaire survey was conducted with 473 adolescents who were 15-17 years old and used one of the mobile dating apps --Goodnight, BeeTalk, Pairs, JustDating, Paktor, 緣圈, Skout, Wootalk. The hyperlink of the questionnaire was shared on popular website among adolescents and small gifts are offered to increase the participation rate.

The survey results show that most adolescents do not often use mobile dating apps. Only 16.5% use them daily. Killing times, curiosity and making new friends are the strongest motivations. Among various types of social risks, adolescents most often give out their personal information. More than half of the respondents had met their online friends face to face. Both physical and social needs directly enhances social risks; however, only physical motivation indirectly influence social risks through the usage of mobile dating apps. Although instructive parental mediation can decrease the usage of mobile dating apps in specific situations, it did not moderate the relationship between motivation and use. Moreover, adolescents’ use of mobile dating apps is affected by their gender (male), age (older) and the personality traits of narcissism. Gender and age can also moderate the relationship between social needs and use, while narcissism can moderate the relationship between use and social risk.

論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iv
圖目錄 ix
表目錄 x
第一章 緒論 1
一、 研究背景 1
二、 研究動機 3
三、 研究問題 4
四、 預期研究貢獻 5
（一） 學術貢獻 5
（二） 實務貢獻 6
第二章 文獻探討 7
一、 使用與滿足理論概述 7
二、 交友軟體使用動機 8
（一） 交友軟體的特點 8
（二） 交友軟體使用動機 9
三、 風險行為 12
（一） 網路風險行為 12
（二） 社交風險行為 13
四、 交友軟體使用頻率 15
五、 家長介入行為 16
六、 性別與年齡 18
七、 自戀程度 19
八、 控制變項 20
第三章 研究方法 21
一、 研究架構與假設 21
二、 研究對象 22
三、 問卷變項定義及測量題項說明 23
（一） 交友軟體使用動機 23
（二） 社交風險行為 24
（三） 交友軟體使用頻率 25
（四） 家長介入行為 25
（五） 性別 26
（六） 年齡 26
（七） 自戀程度 26
（八） 家長收入 27
（九） 家長教育程度 27
（十） 家庭結構 27
四、 研究流程 28
第四章 資料分析 28
一、 樣本統計 28
二、 描述性統計 29
（一） 青少年個人因素與自戀程度 29
（二） 家庭因素與家長介入行為 32
（三） 交友軟體使用動機 37
（四） 使用頻率與社交風險 41
三、 資料分析 43
（一） 信效度分析 43
（二） 驗證性因素分析 48
（三） 相關分析 50
（四） 直接效果和間接效果 51
（五） 調節變項 56
（六） 假說檢定結果 59
第五章 結論與建議 62
一、 研究結論 62
（一） 多數的青少年不常使用交友軟體，但有少數青少年天天使用 62
（二） 使用交友軟體主要動機為打發時間、好奇與交友 62
（三） 社交風險中，青少年較不注重隱私，過半青少年會與網友見面 63
（四） 生理需求、社交需求會影響使用頻率 63
（五） 指導型家長介入行為會降低動機為其他社會心理需求的使用頻率 63
（六） 使用動機會透過使用頻率影響社交風險 65
（七） 性別會影響使用頻率、社交風險，並調節使用動機對使用頻率的影響 65
（八） 年齡會影響使用頻率並調節因社交需求使用的青少年的使用頻率 65
（九） 青少年自戀程度越高，其社交風險越高，並且自戀程度會調節使用頻率與社交風險的關係 66
二、 研究貢獻 66
（一） 學術貢獻 66
（二） 實務貢獻 67
三、 研究限制與建議 68
（一） 樣本年齡限制 68
（二） 限制使用頻率 68
（三） 加入其餘個人特質 68
參考文獻 69
附錄一：問卷 77

王嵩音（2007）。網路使用之態度、動機與影響。資訊社會研究，12，57-85
王嵩音（2016）。家長介入行為影響青少年網路正負面使用行為之研究。中華傳播學刊，30，31-59。
行政院性別平等會。2016年家庭組織型態。取自https://www.gec.ey.gov.tw/
社會中心（2014年12月24日）。就是要破處！15歲少女約炮3男　被抓後辯說：不會拒絕。ETtoday。取自https://www.ettoday.net/
社會中心（2015年8月27日）。遭破處問母「啥是砲友」　少女beetalk床戰真相曝光了。ETtoday。取自https://www.ettoday.net/
林近（2014）。社群媒體的沉默螺旋現象－以臉書為例（碩士論文）。取自http://hdl.handle.net/11296/99v888
林淑芳（2016）。青少年網路素養、家長介入、 與網路使用經驗。中華傳播學刊，30，3-29。
林漢唐，陳慧娟（2016）。家長網路中介、學校投入與青少年危險網路行為之關係：家庭凝聚力之調節效果分析。教育科學研究期刊，61(4)，205-242。
郭美瑜、陳凱晴（2016年7月20日）。網路交友APP盛行　北市統計網友性侵數攀升。蘋果即時新聞。取自https://tw.appledaily.com/new/
侯崇文，2011。家庭結構、家庭關係與青少年偏差行為探討。應用心理研究，11，25-43。
柯慧貞（2015）。104年學生網路使用情形調查報告。教育部全球資訊網。取自https://www.edu.tw/Default.aspx
翁秀琪（1998）。《大眾傳播理論與實證》。台北，三民。
財團法人台灣網路資訊中心。「2016年台灣無線網路使用調查」報告書。取自http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/20170109e.pdf
許敏溶（2016年8月11日）。大叔別來 高校交友App下載破10萬。蘋果即時新聞。取自https://tw.appledaily.com/new/
資策會FIND。2014年3月底止台灣上網人口。取自https://www.twnic.net.tw/doc/twrp/201711c.pdf
臺灣傳播調查資料庫。2014 年第一期第三次調查計畫：媒體的娛樂與社交功能。取自： http://www.crctaiwan.nctu.edu.tw/index.asp
蔡明樺（2016年2月14日）。青少年「愛愛」　16％完全不避孕。蘋果即時新聞。取自https://tw.appledaily.com/new/
錢利忠（2015年3月3日）。貌似郭雪芙接外拍 少女遭「色」影師奪初夜。自由時報。取自http://www.ltn.com.tw/
蘇怡綾（2016年10月13日）。它曾是「電愛緋聞」的主角！語音APP「Goodnight」陪你晚上10點聊到嗨。數位時代。取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/
蘇郁涵、黎佩芬（2002）。Facebook 之使用者人格特質、自戀行為暨涉入程度對使用者忠誠度影響之研究。廣告學研究，38，51-75
Albert, D., & Steinberg, L. (2011). Judgment and Decision Making in Adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 211-224. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00724
Bartsch, A. (2012). Emotional Gratification in Entertainment Experience. Why Viewers of Movies and Television Series Find it Rewarding to Experience Emotions. Media Psychology, 15(3), 267-302. doi:10.1080/15213269.2012.693811
Baumgartner, S., Sumter, S., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2012). Identifying Teens at Risk: Developmental Pathways of Online and Offline sexual Risk Behavior 130(6),1489-1496. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0842.
Bergman, S. M., Fearrington, M. E., Davenport, S. W., & Bergman, J. Z. (2011). Millennials, narcissism, and social networking: What narcissists do on social networking sites and why. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(5), 706-711. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.022
Branley, D. B., & Covey, J. (2018). Risky behavior via social media: The role of reasoned and social reactive pathways. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 183-191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.036
Carpenter, C., & McEwan, B. (2016). The players of micro-dating: Individual and gender differences in goal orientations toward micro-dating apps . First Monday, [S.l.], apr. 2016. ISSN 13960466. Available at: <http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6187/5469>. Date accessed: 22 june 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i5.6187.
Chen, V. H. H., & Chng, G. S. (2016). Active and restrictive parental mediation over time: Effects on youths’ self-regulatory competencies and impulsivity. Computers & Education, 98, 206-212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.012
Cheng-Yu, L., & Heng-Li, Y. (2014). Determinants and consequences of Facebook feature use. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1310-1330. doi:10.1177/1461444814555959
Choukas-Bradley, S., Goldberg, S. K., Widman, L., Reese, B. M., & Halpern, C. T. (2015). Demographic and developmental differences in the content and sequence of adolescents' ideal romantic relationship behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 45, 112-126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.019
Constantinos, K. C., & Jieun, S. (2012). Antecedents and consequents of a mobile website’s interactivity. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1128-1146. doi:10.1177/1461444812439552
Cookingham, L. M., & Ryan, G. L. (2015). The Impact of Social Media on the 性別ual and Social Wellness of Adolescents. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 28(1), 2-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2014.03.001
Courtney, B., Jeremy, B., & Charles, A. (2014). Seeing and being seen: Co-situation and impression formation using Grindr, a location-aware gay dating app. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1117-1136. doi:10.1177/1461444814521595
Davenport, S. W., Bergman, S. M., Bergman, J. Z., & Fearrington, M. E. (2014). Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 212-220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.011
David, W. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research, 16(4), 362. doi:10.1108/qmr-06-2013-0041
Dienlin, T., & Trepte, S. (2015). Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 285-297. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2049
E. Maccoby, E. (1992). The Role of Parents in the Socialization of Children: An Historical Overview 28(6),1006-1017.
Fornell, C. R. & Larcker, F. F. (1981), “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp.39-51.
Gatter, K., & Hodkinson, K. (2016). On the differences between Tinder™ versus online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1162414. doi:10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414
Giulia, R., & Christoph, L. (2016). Love at first swipe? Explaining Tinder self-presentation and motives. Mobile Media & Communication, 5(1), 80-101. doi:10.1177/2050157916664559
Grant, R. A. (1989), “Building and Testing a Causal Models of an Information Technology’s Impact,” Proceeding of the Tenth ICIS, Boston, MA, pp.173.
Grusec, J. E., & Davidov, M. (2007). Socialization in the family: The roles of parents.
Guosong, S. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user‐generated media: a uses and gratification perspective. Internet Research, 19(1), 7-25. doi:10.1108/10662240910927795
Helen, K. (2006). Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research. New Media & Society, 8(6), 859-876. doi:10.1177/1461444806069641
Hu, Y., Wood, J.F., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the Relationship between Instant Messaging and Intimacy. J. Computer-Mediated Communication, 10.
Andrew J. Flanagin (2006) IM Online: Instant Messaging Use Among College Students, Communication Research Reports, 22:3, 175-187, DOI: 10.1080/00036810500206966
Joo-Young, J., Yong-Chan, K., Wan-Ying, L., & Pauline Hope, C. (2005). The influence of social environment on internet connectedness of adolescents in Seoul, Singapore and Taipei. New Media & Society, 7(1), 64-88. doi:10.1177/1461444805049145
Kabasakal, Z. (2015). Life satisfaction and family functions as-predictors of problematic Internet use in university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 294-304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.019
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
Kapidzic, S. (2012). Narcissism as a Predictor of Motivations Behind Facebook Profile Picture Selection. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(1), 14-19. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0143
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). USES AND GRATIFICATIONS RESEARCH. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523. doi:10.1086/268109
Kim, H.-S. (2016). What drives you to check in on Facebook? Motivations, privacy concerns, and mobile phone involvement for location-based information sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 397-406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.016
Kim, J. W., & Chock, T. M. (2017). Personality traits and psychological motivations predicting selfie posting behaviors on social networking sites. Telematics and Informatics, 34(5), 560-571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.006
Koutamanis, M., Vossen, H. G. M., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Adolescents’ comments in social media: Why do adolescents receive negative feedback and who is most at risk? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 486-494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.016
Lampe, C. A. C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2007). A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA.
Laura, E. B., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1303-1314. doi:10.1177/0146167208320061
Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, Privacy and Online Social Networks.How Teens Manage Their Online Identities and Personal Information in the age of MySpace., from Pew Research Center.
Leung, L. (2013). Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 997-1006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.028
Liu, C., Ang, R. P., & Lwin, M. O. (2016). Influences of narcissism and parental mediation on adolescents' textual and visual personal information disclosure in Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 82-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.060
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2012). Risks and safety on the internet: the perspective of European children: full findings and policy implications from the EU Kids Online survey of 9-16 year olds and their parents in 25 countries. from Deliverable D4, EU Kids Online.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Taking risks when communicating on the Internet: the role of offline social-psychological factors in young people's vulnerability to online risks. Information, Communication & Society, 10(5), 619-644. doi:10.1080/13691180701657998
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental Mediation of Children's Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599. doi:10.1080/08838150802437396
Louis, L. (2001). College Student Motives for Chatting on ICQ. New Media & Society, 3(4), 483-500. doi:10.1177/14614440122226209
Lwin, M. O., Stanaland, A. J. S., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2008). Protecting children's privacy online: How parental mediation strategies affect website safeguard effectiveness. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 205-217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.04.004
M. Moscardelli, D., & Divine, R. (2007). Adolescents' Concern for Privacy When Using the Internet: An Empirical Analysis of Predictors and Relationships With Privacy‐Protecting Behaviors , 35(3), 232-252.
Mason, C. L. (2016). Tinder and humanitarian hook-ups: the erotics of social media racism. Feminist Media Studies, 16(5), 822-837. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1137339
Mesch, G. S. (2009). Parental Mediation, Online Activities, and Cyberbullying. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 387-393. doi:10.1089/cpb.2009.0068
Natascha, N., & Peter, N. (2014). Boys and girls taking risks online: A gendered perspective on social context and adolescents’ risky online behavior. New Media & Society, 18(6), 966-988. doi:10.1177/1461444814552379
Nunnally, J.C., (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Patti, M. V., Alexander, P. S., & Jochen, P. (2005). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet. New Media & Society, 7(3), 383-402. doi:10.1177/1461444805052282
Powers, S., T. Hauser, S., M. Schwartz, J., G. Noam, G., & M. Jacobson, A. (1983). Adolescent ego development and family interaction: A structural-developmental perspective,1983(22), 5-25.
Rodríguez-de-Dios, I., van Oosten, J. M. F., & Igartua, J.-J. (2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186-198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.012
Rubin, A. M. (2002). The Uses-and-Gratifications Perspective of Media Effects. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media Effects. Advances in Theory and Research (2. ed., pp. 525-548). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3-37. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0301_02
Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32-38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.025
Shin, W., Huh, J., & Faber, R. J. (2012). Tweens' Online Privacy Risks and the Role of Parental Mediation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 632-649. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.732135
Shin, W., & Kang, H. (2016). Adolescents' privacy concerns and information disclosure online: The role of parents and the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 114-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.062
Sindy, R. S., Patti, M. V., & Jochen, P. (2013). Perceptions of love across the lifespan: Differences in passion, intimacy, and commitment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(5), 417-427. doi:10.1177/0165025413492486
Sonia, L. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teen年齡rs' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393-411. doi:10.1177/1461444808089415
Steinberg, L. (2005). Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 69-74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.005
Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67-78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.009
Sweetser, K. D., & Kelleher, T. (2011). A survey of social media use, motivation and leadership among public relations practitioners. Public Relations Review, 37(4), 425-428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.08.010
Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2017). A qualitative study into parental mediation of adolescents' internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 423-432. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.004
Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that's the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74-79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.026
Tong, S., & Van De Wiele, C. (2014). Breaking Boundaries: The Uses & Gratifications of Grindr.
Urista, M. A., Dong, Q., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory . Human Communication, 12(2), 215–229.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. Online Communication Among Adolescents: An Integrated Model of Its Attraction, Opportunities, and Risks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121-127. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.08.020
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Who Visits Online Dating Sites? Exploring Some Characteristics of Online Daters. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 849-852. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9941
Van Gool, E., Van Ouytsel, J., Ponnet, K., & Walrave, M. (2015). To share or not to share? Adolescents’ self-disclosure about peer relationships on Facebook: An application of the Prototype Willingness Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 230-239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.036
Walsh W.A., Wolak J., Mitchell K.J. (2013). Close relationships with people met online in a national U.S. sample of adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 7(3), 1-10.
Ward, J. (2017). What are you doing on Tinder? Impression management on a matchmaking mobile app. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1644-1659. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1252412
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2003). Escaping or Connecting? Characteristics of Youth Who Form Close Online Relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 105–119.