Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0526113-155018 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0526113-155018
論文名稱
Title
以協同精實管理活動對價值鏈績效影響之分析
Performance Investigation and Analysis of Value Chain by Executing Collaborative Lean Management in Yacht Industry
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
99
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-06-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-06-27
關鍵字
Keywords
協同合作、精實管理、遊艇業、價值鏈、績效
value chain, yacht industry, performance, Lean Management, Collaborative production
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5729 次,被下載 3
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5729 times, has been downloaded 3 times.
中文摘要
台灣遊艇產業發展已朝向精緻高值化、大型遊艇為主。在國際市場上,直接與英、美、義大利等歐美遊艇百年大廠競爭。未來除了強化品牌力量外,同時必須發展金字塔頂端客群的行銷策略,才能提升高級遊艇市場市占率,成為遊艇產業未來高度成長的新動能。
協同精實生產源自於豐田管理模式,由James Womack所提出並將之歸納成五項原理,1.確定價值 2.確定價值流 3.使價值流暢流 4.建立後拉生產 5.追求完善
。本研究是以A個案遊艇公司及其兩家供應商,探討透過協同精實的合作機制,來提升整體價值鏈的效能,並期望從協同合作機制、精實方法及對價值鏈績效之影響三項構面進行深度訪談及個案研究,以期找出導入協同精實制度之正確方法及條件。
A個案公司在導入協同精實活動以後,對價值鏈之整合績效有著重大的影響,包含有效的縮短遊艇從訂單至交貨的速度,減少因流程停滯所產生的遺失工時,以價值分析提升流程價值率,建立遊艇連續流程使問題浮現,並解決問題。透過資訊分享、監督、績效評量等機制深化供應鏈協同關係。這除了歸功於協同精實活動一系列的方法及步驟,而領導者有著足夠的信念也是主要原因之一。
雖然在推動的過程中,遇到一些困難,包含遊艇的施工流程複雜度極高,在
進行流程分析時,比起一般製造業要困難很多,導致分析時間過長。少數人員的消極抵抗,而A個案公司隨著推動時間的增長也已慢慢解決這些問題,並且獲得正面的效果。
Abstract
For past several years, market positions of yacht industries in Taiwan have transferring to more exquisite handcraft, high quality and even bigger dimension. The biggest challenges now faced are international competitions coming from famous factories in UK, US or Italy. Yacht industries in Taiwan expect to find an approach to enhance brand value and create a higher additional-value in order to deepen oneself advantages and increase market shares in this field.
James Womack has concluded 5 basic theorems based on lean production derived from TOYOTA management module. They are: 1.Confirm value. 2. Confirm value flow. 3. Make fluent on value flow. 4. Build up pull system. 5. Aspire perfect. This study is focused yacht company A with two subcontracts of supply chain on the performances of value chain to execute collaborative production and lean management’s mechanism. By mean of impact comparisons and systematic analyses while conducting collaborative and lean system, a correct way and condition for promoting the value chain are found and given.
After company A adopts the collaborative activities proposed in this study, the overall performances of the value chain have significant improvements. These improvements include shorten period of a yacht from order to delivery, reduced loss arising from the stalled process, promoted value rate obtaining from the value analysis and found process defects with solution. Through information share, supervision and performance evaluation, supply chain lean and joint relationships are intensified. Except for the abovementioned collaboration modus and steps, a leader with sufficient faith and confidence is also a determinative cause.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
頁數
國立中山大學研究生學位論文審定書 ----------- i

致謝詞 ------------------------------------------------------ ii

中文摘要 ------------------------------------------------------ iii

Abstract ------------------------------------------------------ iv

目錄 ---------------------------------------------------------- v

圖次 ---------------------------------------------------------- vi

表次 ---------------------------------------------------------- vii

第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景與動機 ------------------------------ 1
第二節 研究目的 ------------------------------------------ 3
第三節 研究範圍 ------------------------------------------ 4
第四節 本文結構 ------------------------------------------ 4

第二章 文獻探討
第一節 價值鏈 -------------------------------------------- 6
第二節 協同管理-------------------------------------------- 9
第三節 精實生產-------------------------------------------- 18

第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究方法 ------------------------------------------ 21
第二節 研究流程 ------------------------------------------ 30

第四章 個案公司研究
第一節 全球遊艇產業環境背景 ------------------------------ 31
第二節 台灣遊艇產業概況 ---------------------------------- 36
第三節 A個案公司遊艇公司簡介 ----------------------------- 40
第四節 協同合作管理機制 ---------------------------------- 48
第五節 精實活動過程 -------------------------------------- 50
第六節 協同精實活動績效 ---------------------------------- 74
第七節 研究發現 ------------------------------------------ 76

第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論 ---------------------------------------------- 80
第二節 研究意涵與建議 ------------------------------------ 82
第三節 研究限制 ----------------------------------------- 84

参考文獻 ------------------------------------------------- 85
附錄一 訪視問題 ------------------------------------------ 90
參考文獻 References
参考文獻
一、 中文部分
5S研究小組譯(1990),目視的JIT生產方式,平野裕之著,先鋒企業管理發展中心。
王派榮(2002),豐田生產方式運作之研究-台灣國瑞汽車公司及其協力廠之成功案例,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
王聖凱(2007),我國遊艇產業經營模式之研究,國立台灣海洋大學商船學系
研究所碩士論文。
李芳齡譯(2008) ,豐田文化,Jeffery K. Liker & Michael Hoseus,麥格羅希爾。
李芳齡譯(2006) ,實踐豐田模式,Jeffrey K. Liker & David Meier,實踐豐田模式,麥格羅‧希爾。
李明軒、邱如美譯(1990),競爭優勢, Porter(1985),天下遠見出版。
邱五岳(2006),供應鏈協同價值創新合作程度與績效的關係研究-指標與衡量,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
武萌譯(2007),創建連續流,Mike Rother & Rick Harris,精益企業管理諮詢有限公司。
林建銘譯(2003),綜觀全局,Dan Jones & Jim Womack,財團法人中衛發展中心。
尚榮安譯(2001),個案研究法,Yin, R. K.,弘智。
洪明洲譯(2004),協同優勢,Dyer, J.H,財團法人中衛發展中心。
陳琇玲譯(2005),供應鏈策略管理五大修煉,Cohen, S and Roussel, J,麥格羅‧希爾。
陳崇志(2005),跨國光學企業導入精實生產績效差異之分析,東海大學管理碩士研究所論文。
陳柄滄(2003),歐美遊艇市場消費者基本評選之研究,義守大學管理研究所碩士論文。
陳世佳(2008),以創新價值鏈為基礎探討企業創新策略-以J公司為例,東海大學管理碩士研究所論文。
郭方宜(2010),供應鏈協同價值創新合作程度、供應鏈能力、與企業績效關聯性之研究-以台灣TFT LCD 產業為例,淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
郭登山(2007),「知識管理在協同商務領域應用探討」,協同商務管理電子報,經濟部工業局。
曹嬿恆譯(2010),豐田形學,Rother, M ,麥格羅‧希爾。
楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢和李亦園主編(1969),社會及行為科學研究法,東華書局。
趙克強譯(2006),學習觀察,Mike Rother & John Shook,財團法人中衛發展中心。
魏嘉宏(2003),應用XML技術建置遊艇業供應鏈管理系統之研究,國立成功大學造船及船舶機械工程研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部份
Anderson, J. C. And Gerbing, D.W., (1998), “Structure Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommend Two- Step Approach.” Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411-423.
Burdick, D., Bond, B., Miklovic, D., Pond, K., and Eschinger, C., (1999),“C-Commerce: The New Arena for Business Applications.” Research Note, Gartner Group.
Carter, J. R. & Ferrin, B. G., (1995), “The Impact of Transportation Costs on Supply Chain Management.” Journal of Business Logistics, 16(1), pp. 189-212.
Coughlan, P., Coghlan, D., Lombard, F., Brennan, L., McNichols, T. & Nolan, R., (2003), “Managing Collaborative Relationships in a Period of Discontinuity.” International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23(10), 1249-1259.
Cross, J., M. J. Eral, and J. L. Sampler, (1997), “Transformation of the IT Function at British Petroleum, MIS Quarterly.” Vol. 21:401-423.
Edwards, D. K., (1996), “Practical Guidelines for Lean Manufacturing Equipment.” Production and Inventory Management Journal 37, No. 2, 51-55.
Gajda, R., (2004), “Utilizing Collaboration Theory to Evaluate Strategic Alliances.” American Journal of Evaluation, 25(1), 65-77.
Ghausi, N., (2002), “Trends in Outsourced Manufacturing-Reducing Risk and Maintaining Flexibility When Moving to an Outsourced Model.” Assembly Automation, 22, 1, 21-25.
Goldman, S. L., R. N. Nagel, & K. Preiss, (1995), “Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer.” New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 27.
Huang, G. Q. & Mak, K. L., (2000), “WebBid: A Web-Based Framework to Support Early Supplier Involvement in New Product Development.” Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 16, 169-179.
Lyu, J., Fu, H. P. & Lin, Y., (2002), “Business Excellence through Collaborative Management.” Proceeding of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Systems. Taipei, Taiwan, December 18-20.
Roulae, S. E., (1999), “Real estate Value Chain Connections: Tangible and Transparent.” The Journal of Real Estate Research, Sacramento, 387-404.
Sahin, F. & Robinson, E.P., (2002), “Flow Coordination and Information Sharing in Supply Chains: Review, Implications, and Directions for Future Research.” Decision Sciences, 35(4), pp 505-536.
Seidmann, A. & Sundararajan, A., (1998), “Sharing Logistics Information Across Organizations : Technology, Competition & Contracting.” Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 107-136.
Sheu, C., H. R. Yen and B. Chae , (2006), “Determinants of Supplier-Retailer Collaboration: Evidence From an International Study.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(1): 24-49.
Simatupang, T. M, and Sridharan, R., (2005), “The Collaboration Index: A Measure for Supply Chain Management.” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 35(1). pp. 44-62.
Stafford, R. E., (1994), “using Co-operative Strategies to Make Alliance Work,” Long Range Planning, 27(3), pp.64-74.
Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., & Daugherty, P. J., (2001), “Supply Chain Collaboration and Logistics Service Performance.” Journal of Business Logistics, 22(1), 29-48.
Venkatraman, N. And Ramanujan,V., (1986), “Measuremet of business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches.” Academy of Management Review, 1(4): 801- 814.
Womack, J., Jones D., & Ross, D., (1990), “The machine that Changed the World,” MIT, 147.
Womack, J. P. & D. T. Jones., (1996), “Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation,” New York: Simon & Schuster.
Zeithaml, V. A., (1988), “Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.145.130.31
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.145.130.31
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code