Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0526113-161112 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0526113-161112
論文名稱
Title
政治景氣循環、黨性與國貿以及全球化之研究
Three Essays on Political Business Cycles, Political Ideology and International Trade and Globalization
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
85
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-06-13
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-07-17
關鍵字
Keywords
全球化、追跡資料共整合檢定、政治景氣循環、景氣循環相關性、Hechsher-Ohlin 貿易理 論、政黨黨性
panel cointegration tests, partisan ideology, globalization, Hechsher-Ohlin theory, political business cycle, business cycle correlations
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5746 次,被下載 92
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5746 times, has been downloaded 92 times.
中文摘要
本論文中其三篇論文分別探討下列議題:美國政治黨性與景氣循環之關係、
經濟合作暨發展組織之政治黨性與國際貿易、東協國家全球化探討。第一篇論文
發現美國政黨之黨性對於美國跨州之景氣循環,扮演極為重要的角色。本論文提
出政治黨性可視為對景氣循環的新類別衝擊,本論文在資料選取上,有其優勢與
特質,因為美國為一單一整合市場,並無語言與移民上的限制,在於從事政治景
氣循環議題探討上,已經自然地排除了可能隱藏偏誤估計。
第二篇論文探討著名的議題「是否左翼政黨比右翼政黨在國際貿易政策上更
為保守」,本論文使用OECD 13 國數據,左翼政黨在1980-2011 年之間,在國際
貿易政策上,的確更採取保護主義。但是此保守態度,僅存在於當國內每人平均
資本存量未超過「門檻值」之際。本篇論文有別於現存論文,政黨黨性之於國際
貿易並不是亙久不變,而是視情況而定。
論文第三篇在於東協國家之全球化調查,全球化是一涵蓋資本、人力、資訊
跨國移動之議題。為了更為聚焦,本論文分解全球化中之政治全球化對經濟全球
化的影響,本文發現當東協國家之民主化越高之際,經濟全球化程度也隨之提
高。
Abstract
This dissertation contains three essays involving the issues of political ideology on
business cycles on the state level of the United States, political ideology on trade policy
for developed countries, and the determinants of globalization in ASEAN countries. The
first essay finds that political ideology has played a vital role explaining output
fluctuation or synchronization of states of the US. The findings of this essay provide
new perspective of shocks – political ideology into the field of international business
cycles. The origin of this essay using state level data has an advantage, since the United
States is an integrated market without language and immigration barriers. It is naturally
isolated all hidden biases between determinants and disturbances for political business
cycles research.
The second essay extends the popular study “left wing parties tend to be more
protective than right wing parties in trade.” In thirteen OECD countries from 1980 to
2011, we found that left wing parties tend to be more protective than right wing parties
on the condition of capital per capita. Moreover, the ideology of political parties is
contingently changeable not fixed permanently. This essay provides relatively clear
answers of threshold values of capitals per capita for possible changing ideology in
developed countries.
The third essay investigates the determinants of globalization. Since globalization
is an opened realm including movements between capitals, labors and information. To
be more precise, we decompose the relationship between political and social
globalization on economic globalization for ASEAN countries in a relative more focal
angle. Using data for ASEAN countries from 1970 to 2008, panel co-integration
indicates that political globalization does positively influences economic globalization.
目次 Table of Contents
Contents
Chapter 1 The Impact of State Politics on Business Cycle
Correlations Across U.S. States
1.1 Abstract………………………………………………………..…………….…1
1.2 Introduction………………………………………………………………...….2
1.3 Methodology and Data………………………………………………………..6
1.3.1 The Econometric Model……………………………………..…….…..6
1.3.2 Explanatory Variables………...…………………………...…………...7
1.3.3 Data………………………………………………………………...…11
1.4 Results and Implications…………………………………………………….12
1.5 Conclusions……………………………………………………………...........17
1.6 References…………………………………………………………………….18
Chapter 2 Do Political Ideologies Promote or Suppress
International Trade?
2.1 Abstract………………………………………………………………...……26
2.2 Introduction…………………………………………………………...…….27
2.3 Data Descriptions……………………………………………………………31
2.4 Economic Methodology and Applications………………………….……...32
2.4.1 Construction of The Dependent Variables for Trade Policy………....32
2.4.2 Determinants to Trade Policy and Independent Variables………..….32
2.4.3 Estimation Strategy…………………………………………….……..37
2.5 Empirical Results…………………………………………….……………...39
2.6 Conclusions and Remarks………………………………..…………………43
2.7 References…………………………………………………..………………..48
Chapter 3 Impact of Political and Social Globalization on
Economic Globalization
3.1 Abstract…………………………………………………………..………….53
3.2 Introduction………………………………………………………...………..54
3.3 Data………………………………………………………………..…………55
3.4 Methodology and Empirical Results……………….………….……..…….58
3.4.1 Individual and Panel Unit Root Tests…………………………..…….58
3.4.2 Panel Cointegration Tests………………………………..…………...62
3.4.3 Results of Panel Cointegration Tests……….…………………..……66
3.4.4 Results of Panel FMOLS and Panel DOLS Tests……………….…...67
3.5 Conclusions……………………………………………….………..………..70
3.6 References……………………………………………………...……………71
參考文獻 References
Alesina, A. (1987). Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated Game.
Quarterly Journal of Economics, Aug., 102 (3), 651–678.
Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. (1997). Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy,
MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Arouba, S. B., F. X. Diebold, M. A. Kose, M. e. & Terrones (2010). Globalization, the
Business Cycle, and Macroeconomic Monitoring. NBER working paper,No.16264.
Asdrubali, P. & Kim, S. (2004). Dynamic risksharing in the United States and Europe.
Journal of Monetary Economics, May, 51 (4), 809-836.
Baxter, M., & Koupartitas, MA., (2005). Determinants of Business Cycle Comovement :
A Robust Analysis. Journal of Monetary Economics (52), 113-157.
Becker, S. O. & Hoffmann, M. (2006). Intra- and international risk-sharing in the short
run and the long run. European Economic Review, Apr, 50 (3), 777-806.
Canova, F. & Dellas, H. (1993). Trade Interdependence and the International Business
Cycle. Journal of International Economics, 34, 23−47.
Canova, F. & Marrinan, J. (1998). Sources of Propagation of International Output
Cycle:common Shocks or Transmission. Journal of international Economics, 46,
133-166.
Clark, T. & van Wincoop, E. (2001). Borders and Business Cycles. Journal of
International Economics, 55 (1), 59–85.
Crihfield, J. B., J. F. Giertz, and S. Mehta. (1995) Economic Growth in the American
States: The End of Convergence? Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,
35, 551 – 77.
Cukierman, Alex., & Melterzer, Allan H., (1986). A Theory of Ambiguity, Credibility,
and Inflation under Discretion and Asymmetric Information. Econometrica, sep.,
54(5), 1099-1128.
De Grauwe, P. (1997). The Economics of Monetary Integration, third edition, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Doyle, B. M., Faust, J., & Halket, J. R. (2002). An Investigation of Co-Movements
Among the Growth Rates of the G-7 Countries. Federal Reserve Bulletin, Oct., 88
(10), 427-437.
Frankel, J. A. & Rose, A. K. (1998). The Endogeneity of the Optimum Currency Area
Criteria. Economic Journal, Jul., 108 (449), 1009–1025.
Head, A. C. (1995). Country Size, Aggregate Fluctuations, and International Risk
Sharing. Canadian Journal of Economics, Nov., 28 (4b), 1096-1119.
Heckelman, J. (2002). Flexibility and Job Creation: Lessons for Germany. NBER
Working Paper: 9194.
Hibbs, D. A. (1977). Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy. American Political
Science Review, Dec., 7, 1467–1487.
Hibbs, D. A. (1987). The American Political Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press.
Imbs, J. (2004). Trade, Finance, Specialization, and Synchronization. Review of
Economics and Statistics, Oct., 86 (3), 723-734.
Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Sorensen, B. E., & Yosha, O. (2001). Economic integration,
industrial specialization, and the asymmetry of macroeconomic fluctuations.
Journal of International Economics, Oct., 55 (1), 107-137.
Kose, M. A. & Yi, K-M. (2006). Can the standard international business cycle model
explain the relation between trade and comovement? Journal of International
Economics, 68 (2), 267-295.
Lindebeck, A. (1976). Stablization Policy in Open Economy with Endogenous
Politicans. American Economic Review, 66 (3), 782-794.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies.
Apr., 42 (2), 169-90.
Otto, G., Voss, G., & Willard, L. (2001). Understanding OECD Output Correlations.
Reserve Bank of Australia research paper: 2001-05.
Persson, Torsten. & Tabellini, Guido. (1992). The Politics of 1992: Fiscal Policy and
European Integration. Review of Economic Studies. Oct., 59(4), 689-701.
Rogoff, K. & Sibert, A. (1998). Elections and Macroeconomic Policy Cycles. Review of
Economic Studies, Dec., 55(1), 1-16.
Stein, R. M. & Bickers, K. N. (1990). Economic voting for governor and US senator:
The electoral consequences of federalism. Journal of Politics, May, 52, 29-53.
Tomljanovich, M. (2004) The Role of State Fiscal Policy in State Economic Growth.
Contemporary Economic Policy 22, 318 – 330.
Veldkamp, L. & Wolfers, J. (2007). Aggregate Shocks or Aggregate Information?
Costly Information and Business Cycle Comovement. Journal of Monetary
Economics 54, 37-55.
Yung-Hsiang Ying, Chung-Ming Kuan, Chris Y. Tung, Koyin Chang.(2013). Capital
mobility in East Asian Countries is not so high: Examining the impact of
sterilization on capital flows. China Economic Review, Mar., 24, 55-64.
Alesina, A. & Ardagna, S. & Perotti, R. & Schiantarelli, F. (2002). Fiscal Policy, Profits,
and Investment. American Economic Review, Jun., 92(3), 571-589.
Alesina, A. & Sachs, J. (1988). Political Parties and the Business Cycle in the United
States, 1948-1984. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Feb., 20(1), 63-82.
Alesina, A. and Roubini, N., (1992), “Political Cycles in OECD Economies,” Riview of
Economic Studies 59, 663-688.
Alesina, A., (1987). “Macroeconomic Policy in a Two Party System as a Repeated
Game,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 102, 651-678.
Alesina, A., Roubini, N., & Cohen, G. (1997). Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy,
MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Belloc, Filippo and Antonio Nicita (2010) The Political Determinants of Liberalization:
Do Ideological Cleavages Still Matter? International Review of Economics, 58(2):
121-145.
Belloc, Fillppo & Antonio Nicita (2010). Partisan Liberalizations. A New Puzzle from
OECD Network Industries? Department of Economics University of Siena 588,
Department of Economics, University of Siena.
Berlemann, Michael & Markwardt, Gunther. (2006). Variable Rational Partisan Cycles
and Electoral Uncertainty. European Journal of Political Economy, Dec., 22(4),
874-886.
Boix, C. (2000) Partisan Government, International Economy and Macroeconomic
Policies. World Politics 53(1): 38-73.
Caves, R. (1976) Economic Models of Political Choice, Canadian Journal of Economics
9: 278-300.
Chang Koyin & Yoonbai Kim & Marc Tomljanovich & Yung-Hsiang Ying (2013). Do
Political Parties Foster Business Cycles? An Examination of Developed
Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, Feb., 41(1), 212-226.
Christian Bjørnskov. (2012) Can bribes buy protection against international
competition?. Review of World Economics 148:4, 751-775
Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Doyle, B. M., Faust, J., & Halket, J. R. (2002). An Investigation of Co-movements
Among the Growth Rates of the G-7 Countries. Federal Reserve Bulletin, Oct.,
88(10), 427-437.
Dreher, A. (2006). ‘Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from A New Index of
Globalization’, Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110.
Dreher, A., Gaston, N. and Martens, P. (2008), Measuring Globalization - Gauging its
Consequence, New York: Springer.
Dutt, Pushan and Devashish Mitra. (2005), “Political Ideology and Endogenous trade
Policy: An Empirical Investigation, Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1):
59-72.
Garrett, Geoffrey. (1998). Global Markets and National Politics: Collision Course or
Virtuous Circle? International Organization, 52, 787-824.
Grossman, G . M. & Helpman, E. (1994). Protectionf or Sale. American Economic
Review, 84, 833- 850.
Heckelman, C. Jac (2002). Electoral uncertainty and the macroeconomic: the Evidence
from Canada. Public Choice, 113, 179-189
Hibbs, D. A., (1987). The American Political Economy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard
University Press.
Hibbs, D., 1977, Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy, The American Politcal
Science Review 7, 1467-1487.
Hiscox. M. 2002, “International Trade and Political Conflict; Commerce, Coalitions and
Mobility, “ Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Huber, J. & Gabel, M. J. (2000). Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party
Left-right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data. American Journal
of Political Science, 44(1), 94-103.
Imbs, J. (2004). Trade, Finance, Specialization, and Synchronization. Review of
Economics and Statistics, Oct., 86(3), 723-734.
Iversen, T. (1999) Contested Economic Institutions. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
Keohane, R., and H, Milner, eds. (1996) Internationalization and Domestic Politics. Nw
York: Cambridge University Press.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, & Andrei Shleifer (1999). Corporate
Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance 54, 471-518.
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Florencio, Shleifer, Shleifer, Andrei,
(1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.
Lane, P. R. & Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. (2001). The External Wealth of Nations: Measures
of Foreign Assets and Liabilities for Industrial and Developing Countries. Journal
of International Economics, Dec., 55(2), 263-294.
Lavergne, R. (1983) The Poltical Economy of US Tariffs. Toronto: Academic Press.
Magee, S., W. Brock, and L. Young (1989) Black Hole Tariffs and Endogenous Policy
Theory, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Milner, Helen and Benjamin Judkins. 2005, “Partisanship, Trade Policy, and
Globalization: Is There a Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy?” International
Studies Quarterly, 48: 95-119.
Nordhaus, W. D. (1975). The Political Business Cycle. Review of Economic Studies.
Apr., 42 (2), 169-90.
Pincus. J. (1975) Pressure Groups and the Pattern of Tariffs. Journal of Political
Economy 83: 757 – 778.
Quinn, Dennis, (1997). The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation.
American Political Science Review, 91, 531–551.
Rogowsk. R. (1989) Commerce and Coalitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press.
Roy, R. K., Denzau, A. T. and Willett, T. D. (Eds) (2006) Neoliberalism: National and
Regional Experiments with Global Ideas, Routledge, New York.
Swank, Otto H. (2002). Budgetary Devices for Curbing Spending Prone Ministers and
Bureaucrats. Public Choice, Jun., 111(3-4), 237-57.
Trefler, Daniel. (1993). Trade Liberalization and the Theory of Endogenous Protection:
An Econometric Study of U.S. Import Policy. Journal of Political Economy, Feb.,
101(1), 138-60.
Vardier. D. (1994) Democracy and International Trade. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Bai, J. and Ng, S. (2004). ‘A PANIC attack on unit roots and cointegration’,
Econometrica, 72(4), pp. 1127–1177.
Chang, Y. (2002). ‘Nonlinear IV unit root tests in panels with cross sectional
dependency’, Journal of Econometrics, 110(2), pp. 261–92.
Choi, I. (2002). ‘Combination unit root tests for cross-sectionally correlated panels’,
Mimeo, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
Clark, W. C. (2000). Environmental Globalization, in: Joseph S. Nye and John D.
Donahue (eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World, Brookings Institution Press,
Washington, D.C.
Dreher, A. (2006). ‘Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of
globalization’, Applied Economics, 38(10), pp. 1091–1110.
Dreher, A., Gaston, N. and Martens, P. (2008), Measuring Globalization - Gauging its
Consequence, New York: Springer.
Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J. (1987). ‘Co-integration and error correction:
representation, estimation, and testing’, Econometrica, 55, pp. 251–276.
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. and Shin, Y. (2003). ‘Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous
panels’, Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), pp. 53–74.
Johansen, S. (1991). ‘Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegrating vectors in
gaussian vector autoregressive models’, Econometrica, 59, pp. 1551–1580.
Kao, C. (1999). ‘Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel
data’, Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), pp. 1–44.
Kao, C. and Chiang, M. H. (2001). ‘On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated
regression in panel data’, Advances in Econometrics, 15, pp. 179–222.
Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (2000). Introduction, in: Joseph S. Nye and John D.
Donahue (eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World, Brookings Institution Press,
Washington, D.C.
Levin, A., Lin, C. F. Lin. and Chu, C. S. J. (2002). ‘Unit root in panel data: Asymptotic
and Finite-Sample Properties’, Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), pp. 1–24.
Maddala, G. S. and Wu, S. (1999). ‘A comparative study of unit root tests with panel
data and a new simple test’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, pp.
631–652.
Mark, N. C. and Sul, D. (2003). ‘Cointegration vector estimation by panel dynamic
OLS and long-run money demand’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,
65, pp. 655–680.
Moon. H. R. & Perron. B. (2004). Testing for A Unit Root in Panels with Dynamic
Factors. Journal of Econometrics, Sep., 122(1), 81-126.
Norris, P. (2000). Global Governance and Cosmopolitan Citizens, in: Joseph S. Nye and
John D. Donahue (eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World, Brookings
Institution Press, Washington, D.C..
Pedroni, P. (1999). ‘Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with
multiple regressors’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653–670.
Pedroni, P. (2000). ‘Fully modified ols for heterogeneous cointegrated panels’,
Advances in Econometrics, 15, pp. 93–130.
Pedroni, P. (2004). ‘Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of
pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis’, Econometric
Theory, 20, pp. 597–625.
Phillips, P. C. B. and Hansen, B. E. (1990). ‘Statistical inference in instrumental
variables regression with I(1) processes’, Review of Economic Studies, 57, pp.
99-125.
Phillips, P. C. B. and Ouliaris, S. (1990). ‘Asymptotic properties of residual based tests
for cointegration’, Econometrica, 58(1), pp. 165–193.
Phillips, P. C. B. and Perron, P., 1988, Testing for a unit root in time series regression,
Biometrika, 75, 335–346.
Saich, T. (2000). ‘Globalization, Governance, and the Authoritarian State: China’, in:
Joseph S. Nye and John D. Donahue (eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World,
Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
Taylor, A. M. and Taylor, M. P. (2004). ‘The purchasing power parity debate’, The
Journal of Economic Perspectives: A Journal of the American Economic
Association, 18(4), pp. 135–158.
Yu, M. (2010). ‘Trade, democracy, and the gravity equation’, Journal of Development
Economics, 91, pp. 289–300
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code