Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0602117-232438 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0602117-232438
論文名稱
Title
氣喘醫療給付改善方案試辦計畫政策評估
Evaluation of Asthma Pay-for-performance Program
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
68
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2017-08-22
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2017-08-31
關鍵字
Keywords
口服類固醇、氣喘、論質計酬、醫療利用、照護效果
patient outcome, oral corticosteroids, healthcare utilization, Pay for Performance, Asthma
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5755 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5755 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
背景:中央健康保險局於2001年11月開始推動「全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案試辦計劃」,藉由論質計酬的整合性照護,希望能提升病患自我照護能力及醫療照護品質。但目前針對實施成效之評估大多為分析醫療資源的耗用與醫療費用支出情形,鮮少探討病人照護結果是否改善。因此本文以醫療資源使用及照護成效結果作為評估標準,探討「全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案試辦計畫」介入後的影響。
研究方法:本研究使用單一實驗組進行前、後測比較,資料來源為全民健康保險研究資料庫。研究樣本為2007年間新收案之氣喘病患,共3,764位。醫療資源使用的評估方式為因氣喘至急診與住院之次數,以及因氣喘使用口服、注射型類固醇之次數。而病患照護成效結果則以是否因氣喘使用急診、是否因氣喘住院及是否因氣喘使用口服、注射型類固醇為評估基準。分析方法為配對t檢定及z 檢定,統計工具為STATA 12.0版。
結果:統計結果顯示,在醫療資源利用方面,氣喘急診與住院次數呈現下降趨勢,分別下降0.4、0.5次,而口服、注射型類固醇的使用次數則出現上升趨勢,共增加0.2次。在醫療資源照護效果部分,僅有是否因氣喘而使用急診或住院達到統計上顯著差異且出現使用比例的下降。但是在使用口服、注射型類固醇的可能性方面沒有影響。
結論:氣喘論質計酬的介入可有效控制病情使急性發作的機會降低,並減少病患急診或住院的次數(以及機率)。而使用口服、注射型類固醇的次數也隨著加入方案而明顯增加。(類固醇使用次數增加是否在長期可能影響病患健康,可能是未來研究需要進一步探討的。)因此建議未來研究者可延長追蹤時間,以了解整體表現脈絡,及把口服、注射類固醇的使用,納入方案稽查獎勵標準或執行成效的評估等,以確保醫療照護品質之落實。
Abstract
Background: In November 2001, the Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) implemented the Pay for Performance Program for Asthma. The Program aims to provide support for self-care for patients and improve quality of care. However, the existing work on the effects of implementation mainly focuses on healthcare resource use and expenditures. Few studies have looked into changes in patient outcome related to introduction of the program. Hence, this study analyzes the effect of the Pay for Performance (P4P) Program for Asthma on the utilization of healthcare resources and patient outcome.
Methods: This study uses a before-and-after comparison on a single experimental group. The data were collected form the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). The sample includes 3,764 patients who were diagnosed with asthma in 2007. The healthcare resource use is measured by the number of Emergency Department (ED) and inpatient visits, and the frequency of usage of oral and injected corticosteroids due to asthma. The patient outcome is measured by whether the patient visited the ED, whether the patient was hospitalized, and whether the patient was prescribed with oral and injected corticosteroids due to asthma. The statistical method used includes the paired t-test and z-test. All analysis was conducted by using STATA 12.0.
Results: The results show that, in terms of the utilization of healthcare resources, the number of ED and inpatient visits reduced 0.4 and 0.5 visits, respectively. The frequency of usage of oral and injected corticosteroids increased 0.2 times. With respect to patient outcome, both the probability of the patient visiting ED department and being hospitalized were reduced. However, the program had no effect on the probability of the usage of oral and injected corticosteroids.
Conclusion: P4P for asthma can efficiently reduce the number and the probability of A&E and inpatient visits. The use of oral and injected corticosteroids clearly increases with the implementation of the program. However, it is not clear whether this outcome would have any adverse impact on patient health in the long term. In the future, researchers may consider use a study period that is longer to clarify this issue. The government may closely monitor the utilization of oral and injected corticosteroids in P4P programs to promote better health outcome.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論文審定書 i
論文公開授權書 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖次 vi
表次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究目的與研究問題 4
第三節 研究之重要性 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 論質計酬 6
第二節 氣喘醫療與照護 15
第三節 氣喘與論質計酬方案於結果面評估 24
第三章 研究方法 26
第一節 研究設計 26
第二節 研究架構及研究假設 28
第三節 資料來源與研究樣本 30
第四節 操作型定義 35
第五節 統計分析工具與方法 37
第四章 研究結果 38
第一節 描述性統計 38
第二節 推論性統計 45
第五章 討論 48
第一節 研究結果之討論 48
第二節 研究限制及建議 51
第六章 結論 52
參考文獻 53
參考文獻 References
Chronic respiratory diseases. (2012). Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.who.int/respiratory/asthma/en/
Committee on Geographic Variation in Health Care Spending and Promotion of High-Value Care. (2013). Variation in Health Care Spending: Target Decision Making, Not Geography. (J. P. Newhouse, A. M. Garber, R. P. Graham, M. A. McCoy, M. Mancher & A. Kibria Eds.). Washington (DC): National Academies Press.
Doran, T., Fullwood, C., Gravelle, H., Reeves, D., Kontopantelis, E., Hiroeh, U., & Roland, M. (2006). Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med, 355(4), 375-384.
Erickson, S. R., & Kirking, D. M. (2004). Variation in the distribution of patient- reported outcomes based on different definitions of defining asthma severity. Curr Med Res Opin, 20(12), 1863-1872.
Franco, R., Santos, A. C., do Nascimento, H. F., Souza-Machado, C., Ponte, E., Souza-Machado, A., . . . Cruz, A. A. (2007). Cost-effectiveness analysis of a state funded programme for control of severe asthma. BMC Public Health, 7, 82.
Frolich, A., Talavera, J. A., Broadhead, P., & Dudley, R. A. (2007). A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality. Health Policy, 80(1), 179-193.
Gelfand, E. W., Colice, G. L., Fromer, L., Bunn, W. B., 3rd, & Davies, T. J. (2006). Use of the health plan employer data and information set for measuring and improving the quality of asthma care. Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 97(3), 298-305.
GINA report, global strategy for asthma management and prevention. (2012). Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.ginasthma.org/uploads/users/files/ GINA_Report_2012.pdf
Glickman, S. W., Ou, F. S., DeLong, E. R., Roe, M. T., Lytle, B. L., Mulgund, J., . . . Peterson, E. D. (2007). Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 297(21), 2373-2380.
Glickman, S. W., & Peterson, E. D. (2009). Innovative health reform models: pay-for-performance initiatives. American Journal of Managed Care, 15(10 Suppl), S300-305.
Global Initiative for Asthma. (2016). Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://ginasthma.org/wp-content/ uploads /2016/04/GINA-2016-main-report_tracked.pdf
Greb, S., Focke, A., Hessel, F., & Wasem, J. (2006). Financial incentives for disease management programmes and integrated care in German social health insurance. Health Policy, 78(2-3), 295-305.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. (2000). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. In L. T. Kohn, J. M. Corrigan & M. S. Donaldson (Eds.). Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US).
Jowers, J. R., Schwartz, A. L., Tinkelman, D. G., Reed, K. E., Corsello, P. R., Mazzei, A. A., . . . Lochhead, R. A. (2000). Disease management program improves asthma outcomes. American Journal of Managed Care, 6(5), 585-592.
Kovesi, T., Schuh, S., Spier, S., Berube, D., Carr, S., Watson, W., & McIvor, R. A. (2010). Achieving control of asthma in preschoolers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 182(4), E172-183.
Kroegel, C. (2009). Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines: 15 years of application. Expert Rev Clin Immunol, 5(3), 239-249.
Lee, T. A., Fuhlbrigge, A. L., Sullivan, S. D., Finkelstein, J. A., Inui, T. S., Lozano, P., & Weiss, K. B. (2007). Agreement between caregiver reported healthcare utilization and administrative data for children with asthma. Journal of Asthma, 44(3), 189-194.
Linden, A., Berg, G. D., & Wadhwa, S. (2007). Evaluation of a medicaid asthma disease management program. Disease Management 10(5), 266-272.
Masoli, M., Fabian, D., Holt, S., & Beasley, R. (2004). The global burden of asthma: executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee report. Allergy, 59(5), 469-478.
National Academy of Sciences. (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US).
National Committee for Quality Health Care. (2006). CEO survival Guide to pay for performance. Washington.
Petersen, L. A., Woodard, L. D., Urech, T., Daw, C., & Sookanan, S. (2006). Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann Intern Med, 145(4), 265-272.
Prevention, C. f. D. C. a. (2017). Asthma. Retrieved July 1, 2017, from http://www.cdc.gov/asthma/
Roccaforte, R., Demers, C., Baldassarre, F., Teo, K. K., & Yusuf, S. (2005). Effectiveness of comprehensive disease management programmes in improving clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. A meta-analysis. The European Journal of Heart Failure, 7(7), 1133-1144.
Rosenthal, M. B., Fernandopulle, R., Song, H. R., & Landon, B. (2004). Paying for quality: providers' incentives for quality improvement. Health Affairs, 23(2), 127-141.
Rosenthal, M. B., & Frank, R. G. (2006). What is the empirical basis for paying for quality in health care? Medical Care Research and Review, 63(2), 135-157.
Rosenthal, M. B., Frank, R. G., Li, Z., & Epstein, A. M. (2005). Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(14), 1788-1793.
Rosenthal, M. B., Landon, B. E., Normand, S. L., Frank, R. G., & Epstein, A. M. (2006). Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. N Engl J Med, 355(18), 1895-1902.
Scanlon, D. P. (2005). Evidence for pay for performance: hope for the U.S. health care system? American Journal of Managed Care, 14(12 Suppl), 6-10.
Schatz, M., Dombrowski, M. P., Wise, R., Thom, E. A., Landon, M., Mabie, W., . . . McNellis, D. (2003). Asthma morbidity during pregnancy can be predicted by severity classification. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 112(2), 283-288.
Schoenbaum, S. C., & Holmgren, A. L. (2006). The National Committee for Quality Assurance’s The State of Health Care Quality 2006: The Commonwealth Fund.
Tapp, H., Kuhn, L., Alkhazraji, T., Steuerwald, M., Ludden, T., Wilson, S., . . . Dulin, M. F. (2014). Adapting community based participatory research (CBPR) methods to the implementation of an asthma shared decision making intervention in ambulatory practices. Journal of Asthma, 51(4), 380-390.
Tapp, H., Shade, L., Mahabaleshwarkar, R., Taylor, Y. J., Ludden, T., & Dulin, M. F. (2017). Results from a pragmatic prospective cohort study: Shared decision making improves outcomes for children with asthma. Journal of Asthma, 54(4), 392-402.
Walls, T. A., Hughes, N. T., Mullan, P. C., Chamberlain, J. M., & Brown, K. (2017). Improving Pediatric Asthma Outcomes in a Community Emergency Department. Pediatrics, 139(1).
Weng, H. C. (2005). Impacts of a government-sponsored outpatient-based disease management program for patients with asthma: a preliminary analysis of national data from Taiwan. Disease Management 8(1), 48-58.
Young, G. J., White, B., Burgess, J. F., Jr., Berlowitz, D., Meterko, M., Guldin, M. R., & Bokhour, B. G. (2005). Conceptual issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs. American Journal of Medical Quality, 20(3), 144-150.
方俞尹(2009)。全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案長期影響評估(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。
方喬玲、莊淇源、鄒志翔、樓亞洲、陳立奇(2014)。藥師衛教介入改善氣喘控制之成效。北市醫學雜誌,11(3),39-53。
石雅慧(2007)。全民健保論質計酬財務誘因之增加是否增加醫療院所參與率—以氣喘為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立陽明大學,台北市。
何心磊(2005)。氣喘住院病人醫療照護品質測量之先導性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。
金金金(2016)。2015氣喘治療指引GINA guideline。取自https://meddataspe
aks.wordpress.com/2016/02/27/臨床藥學-2015氣喘治療-gina-guideline/
吳冠逸(2015)。氣喘醫療給付改善方案調降財務誘因對兒童氣喘醫療利用率與資源耗用之影響評估(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北護理健康大學,台北市。
李純馥(2012)。全民健保支付制度與審查。取自http://thia-health.org.tw/we
bmag/traumaseminar/traumaseminarPPT/13/04李純馥.pdf
周昭宏(2004)。全民健保疾病管理模式運用於氣喘病患連續性照護之成效評估-以南部某區域教學醫院為例(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學,高雄市。
林谷峰(2004)。以全民健保1996-2001年承保抽樣歸人檔分析氣喘病人之醫療利用(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,台北市。
林慶雄(2013)。國際性氣喘臨床整合照護計畫評鑑。台灣氣喘衛教學會會刊,29, 10-12。
林鴻銓、王志祿、王家弘、呂克桓、林慶雄、孫海倫…謝孟亨(2017)。台灣氣喘診療指引。台灣氣喘諮詢協會。取自http://www.taiwanasthma.com.tw
/uploads/1/0/3/1/103176700/tac_台灣氣喘診療指引_final.pdf
徐世達、黃立心、余泰昌(2007)。成人氣喘診療指引。台灣氣喘衛教協會。取自http://www.asthma-edu.org.tw/asthma/photo/成人氣喘診療指引.pdf
徐慧君、翁慧卿、林育慈、陳淑銘、李佩儒、李集美…李洮俊(2004)。糖尿病患介入疾病管理在經濟面、臨床面及滿意度成效評估之初探-以南部某區域醫院糖尿病病患為例。醫務管理期刊,5(2),222-242.
翁慧卿(2003)。全民健保連續性完整照護氣喘病患之疾病管理模式先導研究。行政院衛生署九十一年度委託研究計畫(編號:DOH91-NH-1021),未出版。
國家衛生研究院(2013)。國家衛生研究院電子報第 528 期。取自http://enews
.nhri.org.tw/enews_list_new2_more.php?volume_indx=528&showx=showarticle&article_indx=9757
郭育良(2001)。台灣地區六至十四歲學生氣喘盛行率調查(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,台南市。
郭珮君(2006)。健康保險支付政策對於病人醫療費用之影響-以加入氣喘論質計酬方案病人為例(未出版之碩士論文)。義守大學,高雄市。
陳宗泰、鍾國彪、賴美淑(2007)。另一種流行趨勢-論成效計酬的趨勢與展望。台灣公共衛生雜誌,26(5),353-370。
陳琦華(2007)。氣喘病人使用類固醇結合長效乙二型交感神經作用劑單一吸入劑之氣喘控制指標及醫療資源利用評估(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北醫學大學,台北市。
陳詩律(2012)。氣喘納入論質計酬之照護品質效益分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立陽明大學,台北市。
黃姝慈(2012)。氣喘門診照護連續性對氣喘兒童氣喘醫療利用之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立陽明大學,台北市。
黃詩桓(2013)。接受單一藥物治療兒童氣喘病人醫療資源耗用之長期縱貫性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學,高雄市。
劉貞娟、翁慧卿、蔡魯(2006)。氣喘疾病管理在醫療資源耗用、臨床指標改善與自我照護能力的影響。福爾摩莎醫務管理雜誌,2(1),36-46。
蔡淑鈴(2012)。全民健保醫療支付制度之發展。海峽兩岸健康保險現況與改革發展研討會。取自http://thia-health.org.tw/webmag/medInfo/medInfoFi
le/19/20130219全民健保醫療支付制度之發展.pdf
鄭守夏、陳啓禎(2014)。健保制度下的醫療體系。台灣醫學,18(1),74-84。
衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2001)。全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案第一版。台北市:衛生福利部中央健康保險署。
衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2004)。全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案第二版。台北市:衛生福利部中央健康保險署。
衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2006)。全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案第三版。台北市:衛生福利部中央健康保險署。
衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2007)。全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案第四版。台北市:衛生福利部中央健康保險署。
衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2014)。全民健保20週年叢書系列-白色守護(全民健保醫療支付與管理施政紀實)。編者張鈺旋、廖哲慧、林千媛、孫碧雲、王美珠、王暄晴、林巽音、陳尚斌…嚴海樹。台北市:衛生福利部中央健康保險署。
衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2015)。全民健康保險氣喘醫療給付改善方案第十一版。台北市:衛生福利部中央健康保險署。
衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2015)。氣喘診療指引。取自https://www.hpa.gov.tw
/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=633&pid=1194
謝慧敏、林怡潔、邱亨嘉(2014)。論質計酬支付制度與慢性疾病照護品質成效。醫療品質雜誌,8(2),28-31。
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.119.253.93
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.119.253.93
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code