Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0605112-163744 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0605112-163744
論文名稱
Title
泰國的反水庫運動
The Anti-Dam Movements in Thailand
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
125
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2012-01-16
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2012-06-05
關鍵字
Keywords
霸權主義、泰國、超企業影響、反大壩運動
extra-bureaucratic influence, anti-dam movement, fragmented authoritarianism, Thailand
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5746 次,被下載 431
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5746 times, has been downloaded 431 times.
中文摘要
none
Abstract
This dissertation is a qualitative examination of how the anti-dam movements, with so many disadvantages, are able to pursue their goals in a hybrid democratic political system in Thailand. This dissertation tries to prove that the extra-bureaucratic influence, which emerges from the anti-dam movements are gaining their foothold in the dam politics of Thailand and become a major cause in increase in pluralism in the fragmented authoritarian regime of Thailand. There are two major arguments in the dissertation: Firstly, FA framework, which has already been proved applicable to China by Lieberthal and Oksenberg in 1988 and by Metha in 2008 is also applicable to Thailand. Second argument is that the success of anti-dam movement should not be judged simply by the ability to cancel the project. If we only consider the ability to cancel the project, we may either overestimate or underestimate the ability of anti-dam movement. However, it does not mean that the ability to cancel the dam project does not count at all or should be excluded completely because it still proves the short-term success, which means that the project is cancelled as that moment. In sum, the “success” of the anti-dam movement mentioned in this dissertation is the ability to transform the state’s decision-making process for the dam project into the direction of more pluralism and less of authoritarianism so that individuals and groups both inside and outside the traditional arenas of policymaking have increasing role in the policy process. Thus the ability to cancel the dam project is an additional indicator not the main one. This view is illustrated through the four case studies: Bhumibol Dam, Nam Choan Dam, Pak Mun Dam, and Kaeng Sua Ten Dam.
目次 Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1Introduction………………………………………………………….2
1.1 Research Motivations………………………………………….8
1.2 Research Purposes…..………………...……………………...14
1.3 Research Questions…………………………………………...15
1.3 Research Method...…………………………………………...16

2 Analytical Framework …………………………………………….22
2.1 Literature Review…………………………………………….22
2.2 The Approaches to the Study of Thai Politics………………..32
2.2.1 Modernization Approaches…………………………....35
2.2.2 Neo-Pluralist Approaches……………………..……….38
2.2.3 Political Economy Approaches…………….……….....43
2.2.4 Fragmented Authoritarianism.……………………..…..44

3 Dam Construction in Thailand: A Historical Analysis…………..46

4 Major Actors……...…..…………………………………..….…….61

5 Case Studies………………………………………………….……..69

6 Conclusion: A Comparative Analysis...………..……………...…99

Bibliography……………………………………………………………..109

Key Words

anti-dam movement, extra-bureaucratic influence, fragmented authoritarianism, Thailand

Figures

Figure 1 Map of Provinces in Thailand……………………………….... 9
Figure 2 Map of Major Rivers in Thailand………………………….....13
Figure 3 Primary Energy Production and Consumption in Thailand, 1980 – 2008……...………………………………………………... 50

Tables

Table 1.1 Water Levels in Some Major Dams in Thailand (in Percentage % of Its Storage Capacity)……………………………………..5
Table 1.2 Dams Pending Government Approval…………………………7
Table 4.1 Strategies for the Case Selection……………………………..19
Table 3.1 Changes in Forest Areas and Agricultural Land, 1961-1998…………………………………………………………..51
Table 5.1 Numbers of People and Families Relocated for Dam Construction in Thailand……………………………………. 70
Table 5.2 Nam Choan Dam Case: Key events (1971 to 1988)………….73
Table 5.3 Pak Mun Dam case: Key events (1982 to 2007)……..………82
Table 5.4 Kaeng Sua Ten Dam case: Key events (1981 to 2011)…..…..93
Table 6.1 Policy Entrepreneurs………………………………………...103
Table 6.2.1 Issue Framing………………………………………………..105
Table 6.2.2 The Forest Land Lost According to the Dam Projects……...106
Table 6.3 Coalitions and Broad-Based Support………………………..107
參考文獻 References
Bibliography

Aditjondro, G. J. and Kowalewski, David, “Damning the Dam in Indonesia: a Test of Competing Perspectives,” Asian Survey, Vol. 34, No. 4 (April 1994): 381 – 395.

Alagappa, Muthiah, Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The Quest for Moral Authority. California: Stanford University Press, 1995.

Alavi, Hamza, “The State in Post-Colonial Societies: Pakistan and Bangladesh,” New Left Review, Vol. I, No. 74 (July-August 1972): 59-81.

Albritton, Robert B. and Bureekul, Thawilwadee, “Civil Society and the Consolidation of Democracy in Thailand,” Asian Barometer (ABS) A Comparative Survey of Democracy, Governance and Development Working Paper Series: No. 4, (2002): 1-27,
< http://www.asianbarometer.org/newenglish/publications/workingpapers/no.4.pdf >.

Asian Development Bank (ADB) : http://www.adb.org/water/topics/dams/dams0120.asp

Baker, Chris and Phongpaichit, Pasuk, The History of Thailand. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Bangkok Post Online News, “Local People Oppose Dam Projects,” Bangkok Post, January 11, 2012 http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/274692/local-people-oppose-dam-projects

Bangkok Post Online News, “More Flood Mayhem On The Way: Discharges From Tak Threaten Lower Provinces,” Bangkok Post, October 6, 2011. http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/259907/more-flood-mayhem-on-the-way


Carter, Neil, The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press: 2007.

Chaloemtiarana, Thak, Thailand: The Politics of Despotic Paternalism&#8236;. New York: Cornell Southeast Asia Publications, 2007.

Christensen, Scott “Thailand After the Coup,” Journal of Democracy, Vol. 2, No. 3, (Summer 1991): 94-106.

Dahl, Gudrun, Green Arguments and Local Subsistence. Stockholm: Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology, 1993.

Dalton, Russell J., The Green Rainbow: Environmental Groups in Western Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994.

David Fahn, James, &#8234;A Land on Fire: The Environmental Consequences of the Southeast Asian Boom. Oxford, Westview Press, 2003.&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;&#8236;

Dieu, Nguyen Thi, The Mekong River and the Struggle for Indochina: Water, War, and Peace. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1999.

Doherty, Brian, Ideas and Actions in the Green Movement. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.

Doyle, Timothy, Green Power: The Environment Movement in Australia. Sydney: University of New South wales Press, 2000.

Doyle, Timothy and McEachern, Doug, Environment and Politics. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.

Doyle, Timothy and Risely, Melissa, Crucible for Survival: Environmental Security and Justice in the Indian Ocean Region (New Brunswick, New Jersey, and London: Rutgers University Press, 2008) 314.

Dryzek, John S., The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Dwivedi, Ranjit, Conflict and Collective Action: The Sardar Sarovar Project in India. New Delhi: Routledge, 2006.

Ekins, Paul, A New World Order: grassroots Movement for Local Change (London: Routledge, 1992)

Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) http://www.egat.co.th/en/

Evans, Peter, “Reinventing the bourgeoisie: State Entrepreneurs and Class Formation in Dependent Capitalist Development,” in Michael Burawoy and Theda Skocpol, eds., Marxist Inquiries: studies of Labor, Class, and States, supplement to American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 88 (1982): S. 217.

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: <http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/AC773E/ac773e07.htm >

Foran, Tira, and Manorom, Kanokwan, “Pak Mun Dam: Perpetually Contested?” in Francois Molle, Tira Foran, and Mira Kakonen, Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, livelihoods, and Governance. London: Earthscan, 2009, 55-80.

Foundation for Ecological Recovery (FER):
<http://www.terraper.org/mainpage/index.php>

Ghai, Dharam P. and Vivian, Jessica M., Grassroots Environmental Action: People’s Participation in Sustainable Development, (London: Routledge, 1992).

Girling, John, The Bureaucratic Polity in Modernizing Societies: Similarities, Differences and Prospects in the ASEAN Region. Singapore: The Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1981.

Guan, Lee Hock, Civil Society in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of southeast Asian Studies, 2004: VII.

Heggelund, Gorild, Environment and Resettlement Politics in China, The Three Gorges Project, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2004.

Hewison, Kevin, “Contemporary Politics: Thaksin Shinawatra and the Reshaping of Thai Politics,” Contemporary Politics, Vol. 16, No. 4 (June 2010): 119-133.

Hewison, Kevin, Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. London: Routledge, 1997.

Heywood, Andrew, Key Concept in Politics. New York: Palgrave, 2000.

Higgott, Richard and Robison, Richard with Hewison, Kevin J. and Rodan, Garry, “Theories of development and underdevelopment: implications for the study of Southeast Asia,” in Richard Higgott and Richard Robison (eds) Southeast Asia: Essays in the Political Economy of Structural Change, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul: 16-61.

Hirsch, Philip, “Advocacy, Civil Society and the State in the Mekong Region,” in Barbara Rugendyke, NGOs as Advocates for Development in a Globalising World (New York: Routledge, 2007): 185-199.

Hirsch, Philip, “Dams, Resources and the Politics of Environment in Mainland Southeast Asia,” in Philip Hirsch and Carol Warren, The Politics of Environment in Southeast Asia: Resources and Resistance. London & New York: Routledge, 1998, 55-70.
Hirsch, Philip, “The Politics of Environment: Opposition and Legitimacy,” in Kevin Hewison, Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation: London & New York: Routledge, 1997, 179-194

Hori, Hiroshi, The Mekong: Environment and Development. New York: United Nations University Press, 2000.

Huntington, Samuel P., Political Order in Changing Societies, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1968.

International Rivers: http://www.internationalrivers.org/en/node/1006

IPS Inter Press Service, “Three Gorges Dam May Displace Millions More,” October 12, 2007. <http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=39621>

Ismail, Rahil, Shaw, Brian et al, Southeast Asian Culture and Heritage in a Globalising World: Diverging Identities in a Dynamic Region. Surrey: Ashgate, 2009.

Israngkura, Adis, “Why Can’t Thailand Afford More Irrigation Dams?” TDRI Quarterly Review, Vol. 15 No. 3 (September 2000): 3-7.

Jackson, Karl D. and Pye, Lucian W., Political Power and Communications in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.

Jain, Purnendra “Jumin Tohyo and the Tokushima Anti-Dam Movement in Japan: The People Have Spoken,” Asian Survey, Vol. 40, No. 4, (Jul. – Aug., 2000): 551-570.

James, David, The Application of Economic Techniques in Environmental Impact Assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.


Jobin, William, Dams and Disease: Ecological Design and Health Impacts of Large Dams, Canals and Irrigation Systems, New York: E & FN Spon, 1999.

Jumbala, Prudhisan and Mitprasat, Maneerat, “Non-governmental Development Organisations: Empowerment and Environment,” in Kevin Hewison, ed., Political Change in Thailand: Democracy and Participation. London & NewYork: Routledge, 1997, 196 – 216.

Khagram, Sanjeev, Dams and Development: Transnational Struggles for Water and Power, London: Cornel University Press, 2004.

Khagram, Sanjeev, Riker, James V. and Sikkink, Kathryn “From Santiago to Seattle: transnational Advocacy Groups Restructuring World Politics,” in Sanjeev Khagram, James V. Riker and Kathryn Sikkink, ed., Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Social Movements, Networks, and Norms. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.

Kitschelt, Herbert P., “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies,” in Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper ed., Social Movements: Critical Concepts in Sociology. London and New York: Routledge, 2007.

Klandermans, Bert, “New Social Movements and Resource Mobilization: The European and the American Approach Revisited,” in Dieter Rucht, ed., Research on Social Movements: The State of the Art in Western Europe and the USA. Colorado: Westview Press, 1991, 17-44.

Kripakorn, Dome, “Social movement and the Natural Resources Management: A Study of the Anti Nam Chon Dam Movement (1982-1988),” Silpakorn University International Journal, Vol. 7, No.112-142 (2007): 123.

Laothamatas, Anek, Business Associations and the New Political Economy of Thailand: From Bureaucratic Polity to Liberal corporatism. Singapore: Westview Press, 1992.

Lebel, Louis, Sinh, Bach Tan et al, “The Promise of Flood Protection: Dikes and Dams, Drains and Diversions in Francois Molle, Tira Foran and Mira Kakonen, Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, Livelihoods, and Governance. London: Earthscan, 2009, 283 – 306.

Lee, Yok-shiu E. and So, Alvin Y., Asia’s Environmental Movements: Comparative Perspectives. New York and London: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 1999.

Lieberthal, Kenneth G. and Lampton, David M., Bureaucracy, Politics, and decision Making in Post-Mao China (Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press, 1992) 7.

M., Diani, “The Concept of Social Movement,” Sociological Review, Vol. 40, No. 1 (1992): 3-4.

Malloy, J. M., Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America. America: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1977.

McCormick, John, Reclaiming Paradise: The Global Environment Movement, (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989).

McCormick, Sabrina, “The Brazilian Anti-Dam Movement: Knowledge Contestation as Communicative Action,” Sage: Organization & Environment, Vol. 19, No. 3, (September 2006): 323.

Martin, Ross, “Pluralism and the New Corporatism,” Political Studies, Vol. XXXI, No. 1, (1983): 86-101.

Marx, Gary T. Marx and McAdam, Douglas, Collective Behavior and Social Movements: Process and Structure, (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1994), 104-105.

May, R.J. et al, The Military and Democracy in Asia and the Pacific. Canberra: ANU E Press, 2004.

Mekong Energy and Ecology Network (MEE Net): <http://www.meenet.org/about_meenet.php>

Merchant, Carolyn, Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World, (London and New York: Routledge, 1992).

Mertha, Andrew C., China’s Water Warriors, Citizen Action and Policy Change. New York: Cornell University Press, 2008.

Middleton, Carl, Garcia, Jelson and et al, “Old and New Hydropower Players in the Mekong Region: Agendas and Strategies,” in Francois Molle, Tira Foran, and Mira Kakonen, Contested Waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, livelihoods, and Governance. London: Earthscan, 2009, 30.

Milton, Key, Environmentalism. London: Routledge, 1993.

Mitsuo, Nakamura et al, Islam & Civil Society in Southeast Asia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2001.

Missingham, Bruce. D., The Assembly of the Poor in Thailand: From Local Struggles to National Social Movement. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books, 2003.

Mitchell, Michael, “The Political Economy of Mekong Basin Development” in Philip Hirsch and Carol Warren, The Politics of Environment in Southeast Asia: Resources and Resistance. London & New York: Routledge, 1998, 87.

Molle, Francois, Irrigation and Water Policies in the Mekong Region: Current Discourses and Practices. Colombo: International Water Management Institute, 2005.

Moore, Mik, “Coalition Building Between Native American and Environmental Organizations in Opposition to Development: The Case of the New Los Padres Dam Project,” Organization & Environment, Vol. 11, No. 3, (September 1998): 287-313.

Mydans, Seth, “As Thailand Floods Spread, Experts Blame Officials Not Rains,” New York Times, October 13, 2011.

Nelson, Michael H., “People’s Sector Politics’ (Kanmueang Phak Prachachon) in Thailand: Problems of Democracy in Ousting Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra,” Southeast Asia Research Centre Working Paper Series, No. 87 (May 2007): 4.

Palang Thai: <http://www.palangthai.org/>

Pearce, Fred, When the Rivers Run Dry: Water –The Defining Crisis of the Twenty-First Century. Boston: Beacon Press, 2006.

Pickvance, Chris, “Social Movements in the Transition from State socialism: Convergence or Divergence?” in ed. Louis Maheu, Social Movements and Social Classes: The Future of Collective Action (London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 1995), 123-150

Pongpaichit, Pasuk, “Thailand under Thaksin: a regional and international perspective” Core University Project, Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University, (2004): 2.

Princen T. and Finger M., Environmental NGOs in World Politics, London: Routledge, 1994.

Ray, Dixy Lee, Environmental Overkill: What Happened to Common Sense? New York: HarperPerennial,1994.

Rich, Bruce, Mortgaging The Earth: The World Bank, Environmental Impoverishment, and the Crisis of Development. Boston: Beacon Press, 1994.

Riggs, Fred W., Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity (Honolulu: East-West Center Press, 1966).

Rigg, Jonathan, Counting the Costs: Economic Growth and Environmental Change in Thailand. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1997.

River Net: http://www.rivernet.org/general/movement/14mars.htm

Rodan, Garry, Transparency and Authoritarian Rule in Southeast Asia: Singapore and Malaysia. London and New York: Routledge Curzon, 2004.

Roskin, M. G. et al, Political Science: An Introduction. New Jersey: Pearson, 2006.

Rothman, Franklin Daniel and Oliver, Pamela E., “From Local to Global: The Anti-Dam Movement in Southern Brazil 1979-1992,” Mobilization: An International Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1 (1999): 41-57.

Royal Irrigation Department (RID): http://www.rid.go.th/2009/

Rush, James R., The Last Tree: reclaiming the Environment in Tropical Asia, (New York: The Asia Society).

Schmitter, Philippe C., “Still the Century of Corporatism?,” The Review of Politics. Vol. 36, No. 1, (Jan., 1974): 93-94.


Scholte, Jan Aart, “Global Civil Society Changing the World?” Silpakorn University International Journal, CSGR Working Paper, No.31/99 (May 1999): 2.

Scudder, Thayer, The Future of Large Dams: dealing with Social, Environmental, Institutional and Political Costs. London: Earthscan, 2005.

Sheth, Pravin, “The Narmada Project: Patterns of Trans-State Confrontation, Co-operation and Conflict Management” in Conflict Management of Water Resources, (Hampshire and Burlington: Ashgate, 2002), 275-289.

Siriyuvasak, Ubonrat, “New Media for Civil Society and Political Censorship in Thailand,” Asia Rights Journal: No. 8, July 2007.

Swain, Ashok, Managing Water Conflict: Asia, Africa and the Middle East. New York: Routledge, 2004.

Swain, Ashok and Ming Chee, Ang, “Political Structure and ‘Dam’ Conflicts: Comparing Cases in Southeast Asia” in Water and Politics: Understanding the Role of Politics in Water Management (Marseilles: World Water Council, 2004), 95-114.

Taylor, Bron Raymond, Ecological Resistance Movements: The Global Emergence of Radical and Popular Environmentalism. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.

The Economist, “Damming Evidence: The Pros and Cons of Big Earthworks,” July 17, 2003. <http://www.economist.com/node/1906890>

Towards Ecological Recovery and Regional Alliance (TERRA):
< http://www.terraper.org/mainpage/index.php>

Tullos, Desiree, “Assessing the Influence of Environmental Impact Assessments on Science and Policy: An Analysis of the Three Gorges Project,” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 90, No. 3 (2009): S208-S223.

Unger, Danny, Building Social Capital in Thailand: Fibers, Finance, and Infrastructure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Wapner, Paul, Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.

Weatherbee, Donald E., International Relations in Southeast Asia: The Struggle for Autonomy. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.

Whaley, Floyd, “Country Water Action: Thailand,” Asian Development Bank, February, 2005, <http://www.adb.org/water/actions/THA/learning-from-history.asp>.

Wiarda, H. J., Corporatism and Comparative Politics: The Other Great “Ism”. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc., 1997.

Winkler, J. T., “Corporatism,” Archives Europeennes de Sociologie, Vol. 17, No. 1 (1976): 109.

Wipatayotin, Apinya, “District Hit By Yearly Deluge Pleas For Dam” Bangkok Post, August 21, 2011, http://www.bangkokpost.com/news/local/252708/district-hit-by-yearly-deluge-pleas-for-dam

World Bank: http://www.worldbank.org/

Yearley, Steven, The Green Case: A Sociology of Environmental Issues, Arguments and Politics, (London: HarperCollins Academic, 1991).

Yuvejwattana, Suttinee and Suwannakij, Supunnabul, “Bangkok Will Escape Flooding As Barriers Hold, Yingluck Says,” Bloomberg, October 14, 2011, http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-10-14/bangkok-will-escape-flooding-as-barriers-hold-yingluck-says.html
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code