論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
限價單下單風險與價格積極度 Picking-off Risk, Non-execution Risk and Order Aggressiveness of Limit Orders |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
51 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2014-06-24 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2014-07-07 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
Picking-off risk、價格積極度、限價單、成交率、委託單存活時間、未成交風險 order aggressiveness, non-execution risk, picking-off risk, limit order, filled rate, order survival time |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5805 次,被下載 1066 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5805 times, has been downloaded 1066 times. |
中文摘要 |
本文主要研究限價單的未成交風險、picking-off風險與委託價格積極度之關系。使用臺灣證券交易所的委託檔與揭示檔資料,對逐筆委託單進行價格積極度的分類。本文建立了衡量未成交風險與picking-off 風險的方法,將未成交風險與picking-off 風險相加視為總風險。 本文主要發現有:(1)委託價格越積極,成交率越高及成交所需時間越短。(2)使用賣單下越積極的價格,總風險越小。(3)當市場流動性充足或波動不劇烈的時候,限價買單越不積極,總風險越小。(4)未成交風險與picking-off風險存在抵換關係。(5)越積極的委託單主要影響總風險的因素是picking-off風險。(6)越不積極的委託單主要影響總風險的因素是未成交風險。 |
Abstract |
This study investigates the relationship between non-execution risk, picking-off risk and order aggressiveness. We use order-level data and display data from the Taiwan Stock Exchange to classify the order aggressiveness of each order. We construct the measurement of non-execution risk and, picking-off risk. We define total risk as non-execution risk plus picking-off risk. Our main findings are as follows. (1) The more aggressive the order, the higher the filled rate and the shorter the execution time. (2) When investors want to trade using sell orders, the more aggressive the price, the lower the total risk. (3) Under sufficient liquidity and low volatility market conditions, the lower the aggressive price, the lower the total risk when investors want to trade using buy orders. (4) There exists a tradeoff relationship between non-execution risk and picking-off risk. (5) The main risk affecting total risk of more aggressive orders is picking-off risk. On the other hand, (6) the main risk affecting total risk of less aggressive orders is non-execution risk. |
目次 Table of Contents |
審定書 i 誌謝辭 ii 摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background Information . 1 1.2 Research Purpose 2 1.3 Limitations of Research 2 1.4 Research Contributions 2 1.5 Research Structure . 3 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 4 3. DATA AND METHODOLOGY . 8 3.1 Trading of Security on the Taiwan Stock Exchange . 8 3.2 Sample and Data Description 9 3.3 Research Methodology . 12 3.3.1 Classification of Order Aggressiveness 12 3.3.2 Measuring Risks 12 3.3.3 Regression Model 15 4. EMPIRICAL RESULTS 17 4.1 Execution Quality 17 4.2 Order Survival Time 18 4.3 Component of Risks 22 4.4 Analyzing Risks under Extreme Market Condition 28 4.5 Regression Results 35 5. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 41 5.1 Conclusion 41 5.2 Research Suggestion 41 REFERENCES 42 |
參考文獻 References |
Aitken, M., Almeida, N., Harris, F. H. deB., & McInish, T. H. (2007). Liquidity supply in electronic markets. Journal of Financial Markets, 10(2), 144–168. Biais B., Hillion P., & Spatt C. (1995). An empirical analysis of the limit order book and the order flow in the paris bourse. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1655-1689. Cho J. W., & Nelling E. (2000). The Probability of Limit-Order Execution. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(5), 28-33. Chen H. K., Hsieh S. F., & Ma T. (2011). Who wins and who loses in transparent markets? Daily and intraday analysis of Taiwan stock market. Taiwan Economic Forecast and Policy, 41(2), 127-178. Duong H. N., Kalev P. S., & Krishnamurti C. (2009). Order aggressiveness of institutional and individual investors. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(5), 533-546. Daníelssona J., & Payne R. (2012). Liquidity determination in an order-driven market. The European Journal of Finance, 18(9), 799–821. Foucault, T. (1999). Order flow composition and trading costs in a dynamic limit order market. Journal of Financial Markets, 2(2), 99–134. Foucault T., Röell A., & Sandås P. (2003). Market making with costly monitoring: an analysis of the SOES controversy. The Review of Financial Studies, 16(2), 345-384. Griffiths M. D., Smith B. F., Turnbull D. A. S., & White R. W. (2000). The costs and determinants of order aggressiveness. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(1), 65-88. Goettler R. L., Parlour C. A., Rajan U. (2005). Equilibrium in a dynamic limit order market. The Journal of Finance, 60(50, 2149-2192. Hollifield B., Miller R. A., & Sandås P. (2004). Empirical analysis of limit order markets. Review of Economic Studies, 71(4), 1027-1063. Hall A.D., & Hautsch N. (2006). Order aggressiveness and order book dynamics. Empirical Economics, 30(4), 973-1005. Hollifield B., Miller R. A., Sandås P., & Slive J. (2006). Estimating the Gains from Trade in Limit-Order Markets. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2753-2804. Liu W. M. (2009). Monitoring and limit order submission risks. Journal of Financial Markets, 12(1), 107-141. Loa I., & Sapp S. G. (2010). Order aggressiveness and quantity: How are they determined in a limit order market? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 20(3), 213–237. Parlour C. A. (1998). Price Dynamics in Limit Order Markets. The Review of Financial Studies, 11(4), 789-816. Ranaldo, A. (2004). Order aggressiveness in limit order book markets. Journal of Financial Markets, 7(1), 53–74. Verhoeven P., Ching S., & Ng H. G. (2004). Determinants of the decision to submit market or limit orders on the ASX. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 12(1), 1-18. Yamamoto R. (2012). Intraday technical analysis of individual stocks on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(11), 3033-3047. |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |