Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0608106-135837 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0608106-135837
論文名稱
Title
自來水公司用戶滿意度實證研究:以第七管理處轄區為例
An Empirical Study Of Taiwan Water Corporation’s Customer Satisfaction: the 7th Branch As An Example
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
72
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2006-06-06
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2006-06-08
關鍵字
Keywords
台灣省自來水公司、顧客滿意度
Taiwan Water Corporation, Customer Satisfaction
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5654 次,被下載 1803
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5654 times, has been downloaded 1803 times.
中文摘要
民國六十五年台灣省自來水公司整併各地區水廠,統一營運制度經營全省自來水業務。多年來水公司致力於提供品質優良的民生用水,並拓展自來水的普及率。目前台灣自來水普及率近90%,供水用戶超過500萬戶。身為國營企業的自來水公司,雖具有獨占性質而較無企業競爭壓力,但因具有嚴重影響國民生計的特性,加上乾淨水源取得困難、民眾對水及用水服務的要求愈來愈高,因此水公司以顧客滿意為導向提升自身服務品質,持續改善自己的服務是當前最重要的經營課題之一。
本研究對自來水公司第七管理處的用戶進行滿意度調查,欲研究自來水用戶的滿意程度,以顧客的觀點調查水公司所提供的服務是否達到令人滿意的水準,並了解有哪些服務項目是急需進行改善的。以下節錄三點重要結論與建議:
一、水公司在服務據點硬體設施以及服務/施工的效率效果上,讓客戶十分滿意。但在服務的可靠性上,以及會嚴重影響客戶滿意度的保證性及關懷性這兩個構面的服務項目上,需要再加強。外包項目、第一線服務人員、及供應穩定且水質良好的自來水,為目前水公司加強服務品質、提高顧客滿意度的重點。
二、整體而言,屏東的自來水用戶滿意度高於高雄地區者。高雄地區用戶較要求供水品質、第一線服務人員/其它員工的態度、以及水價。而屏東地區用戶則較要求供水的穩定性、和施工人員及施工維修的效率。這與高屏地區分別使用自來水/地下水供水、和兩地對服務人員的訓練跟要求、以及對外包/委外操作服務跟施工人員的管理上的不同有關。
三、本研究建議水公司需推行品質運動,藉由公司內如品管圈的推行與重視服務品質及顧客滿意的教育訓練,能提升第一線員工的服務品質,且讓水公司各項服務程序更以顧客為導向改善,以及讓服務項目品質的穩定性提高。 而水公司委外的服務項目也是提升顧客滿意度的重點,尤其是施工的效率及安全性、抄表人員的禮儀及正確性、及單位委外操作管理的健全性等等,這些項目都是目前顧客較不滿意的地方。
Abstract
For years, Taiwan Water Corporation (TWC) has been providing quality water to customers and improving the ratio of prevalence. However, with Taiwan’s growth in economy and living-standard, it is becoming more and more difficult for TWC to provide satisfied water and to find clean water source.
As a government owned business, TWC do not have to compete with any other competitor because of its monopolization. On the other hand, due to its social responsibility, TWC should work on providing quality water and continuously improving its service, the effort must be customer-orientated.
In this paper, we survey the customer satisfaction of the TWC 7th branch. Several important findings as following:
1. In terms of physical outlay and the efficiency of service/construction, TWC has done a good job satisfying customers. Nevertheless, on the aspects of Assurance and Empathy, which affect customer satisfaction most seriously, TWC still has much to do. The improvement of outsourcing service, first-line employees, and quality of water are top tasks of TWC.
2. In general, customer satisfaction of Pingtung is better than which of Kaohsiung. When Kaohsiung customers require better quality of water, first-line employees’ attitude, and water price, Pingtung customers ask for steadiness of water providing and the efficiency of construction in stead.
3. We strongly suggest TWC introduce quality activities such as QC Circle and other kinds of trainings. With the implication and emphasis of quality activities and customer satisfaction, could TWC strengthens service quality of its first-line employees, and turns its service process into customer-orientated.
4. Analysis points out outsourcing services are critical to TWC’s customer satisfaction, especially the efficiency/safety of construction, accuracy/politeness of clerks, and the performance of outsourcing water purification station. TWC should make sure its policy and mission are executed perfectly.
目次 Table of Contents
誌謝詞……………………………………………………………………………….…i
摘要…………………………………………………………………………………....ii
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….iii
目錄………………………………………………………………………………..….iv
表目錄………………………………………………………………………………...vi
圖目錄……………………………………………………………………………….viii
第一章 緒論 ..………………………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究背景與動機 …………..…………………………………………1
第二節 研究步驟與方法 …………..…………………………………………2
第三節 研究範圍與限制 …………..…………………………………………4
第二章 文獻回顧 …………………………………………………………………..5
第一節 服務之定義與特性 ………………………………..…………………6
第二節 服務品質之定義、特性、與衡量………………..…………………….7
第三節 顧客滿意度之定義與衡量 ……..…………………………………..18
第四節 自來水公司現況 ……………………………………………………23
第三章 研究方法 …………………………………………………………………19
第一節 研究對象及研究架構 ………………..……………………..………27
第二節 研究變數及變數內容 ………………..……………………………..28
第三節 問卷收發及有效樣本結構 ……………..…………………………..31
第四章 研究發現 …………………………………………………………………33
第一節 整體滿意度分析 ………………..…………………………………..33
第二節 高雄及屏東間滿意度差異分析 …………..………………………..36
第三節 滿意度分群間差異分析 …………..………………..………………40
第四節 其它人口統計變數間差異分析 …………………………………....33
第五章 結論與建議 ………………………………………………………………48
參考文獻 ………………………..…………………………………………………53
附錄一 本研究使用之問卷 ………………………………………………………58
參考文獻 References
一、中文部份
1. 杜壯,2000,服務復原管理概念性模式之建構,國立交通大學經營管理研究所博士論文。
2. 林秋明,2001,自來水公司民營化之研究,國立東華大學公行所碩士論文。
3. 洪順慶,1998,行銷管理學,新陸書局,台北。
4. 周泰華、黃俊英、郭德賓,1999,服務品質與顧客滿意評量模式比較研究,輔仁管理論,第六卷第一期,頁37-68。
5. 張晃銘,2004,臺灣區自來水事業績效評估―資料包絡分析法的應用,真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
6. 董書炎,2002,服務品質之實證研究-以台灣省自來水公司第一區為例,國立台灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
7. 穆岳鈞,2003,台灣地區自來水業民營化研究-英國經驗分析,東海大學公共事務所碩士論文。
8. 蘇雲華,1996,服務品質衡量方法之比較研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所博士論文。

二、英文部份
1. Anderson, C. and C. P. Zeithaml. 1984. Stage of the Product Life Cycle, Business Strategy, and Business Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 27(1): 5-24.
2. Anderson, E. W., and M. W. Sullivan. 1993. The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms, Marketing Science, 12(2): 125-143.
3. Anderson, E. W., C. Fornell, and D. R. Lehmann. 1994. Customer Satisfaction, Market Share, and Profitability: Findings From Sweden, Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 53-66.
4. Bolton, R. N. 1998. A Dynamic Model of the Duration of Customer ’s Relationship with A Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction, Marketing Science, 17(1): 45-65.
5. Bolton, R. N. and J. H. Drew. 1991. A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on, Journal of Marketing, 55(3): 1-9.
6. Bolton, R. N. and J. H. Drew. 1991. A Multistage Model of Customers’ Assessments of Service Quality, Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4): 375-385.
7. Brown, T. J., G. A. Churchill, Jr., and J. P. Peter. 1993. Research Note: Improving the Measurement of Service Qu ality, Journal of Retailing, 69(1).
8. Cardozo, R. N. 1965. An Experimental Study of Customer Effort, Expectation and Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research, 2(3): 244-249.
9. Churchill, G. A. and C. Surprenant. 1982. An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4): 491-504.
10. Cronin, Jr. J. J. and S. A. Taylor. 1992. Measuring Service Quality: Are Examination and Extension, Journal of Marketing, 56(3): 55-68.
11. Crosby, P. B. 1979. Quality Is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain, New American Library, New York.
12. Czepiel, J. A. 1974. Persprctive on Customer Satisfaction, American Management Association, New York.
13. Dabholkar, P. A. 1996. Consumer Evaluations of New Technology-Based Self-Service Options: An Investigation of Alternative Models of Service Quality, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1): 29-51.
14. Dabholkar, P. A., D. I. Thorpe, and J. O. Rentz. 1996. A Measure of Service Quality for Retail Stores: Scale Development and Validation, Journal of Travel Research, 24(1): 3-16.
15. Day, R. L. 1977. Extending the Concept of Consumer Satisfaction, Association for Consumer Research, 4(1): 149-154.
16. Fornell, C. 1992. A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience, Journal of Marketing, 56(1): 6-22.
17. Griffin, A. and A. L. Page. 1996. PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(6): 478-496.
18. Gronroos, C. 1984. A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications, European Journal of Marketing, 18(4): 37-45.
19. Haywood, F. J. 1988. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 8(6): 19-29.
20. Hepworth, P. 1998. Weighing it up-A Literature Review for the Balanced Scorecard, The Journal of Management Development, 17(8): 559-563.
21. Jones, T. O. and W. E. Sasser, Jr. 1995. Why Satisfied Customer Defect, Harvard Business Review, 73(6): 88-99.
22. Kettinger, W. T. and C. C. Lee. 1994. Perceived Service Quality and User Satisfaction with the Information Service Function, Decision Science, 25(6): 737-766.
23. Kim, J. B., J. Lee and P. H. Tae. 1996. Transaction Responses to Analysts' Earnings Forecasts, News Type and Trader Type, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23(7): 1043-1059.
24. Kotler, J. and Scheff. 1996. Crisis in the arts: The marketing response, California Management Review, 39(1): 28-53.
25. Kotler, P. 1999. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 9th Ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
26. Lam, S. S. K. 1997. Measuring Service Qu ality: A Test-Retest Reliability Investigation of SERVQUAL, Journal of the Market Research Society, 39(2): 381-396.
27. Lam, S. S. K. 1995. Measuring Service Quality: An Empirical Analysis in Hong Kong, International Journal of Management, 12(2): 182-188.
28. Lethinen, U. and J. R. Lethinen. 1991. Two Approaches to Service Quality Dimensions , Service Industries Journal, 11(3): 287-303.
29. Levitt, T. 1972. Production-Line Approach to Service, Harvard Business Review, 50(4): 41-52.
30. Lovelock, C. H. and R. F. Young. 1979. Look to Consumers to Increase Productivity, Harvard Bussiness Review, 57(3): 168-180.
31. Martin, W. B. 1986. Defining What Quality Service Is For You, Cornell Hotel And Administration Quarterly, 26(4): 32-38.
32. Murdick, R. G., B. Render, and R. S. Russell. 1990. Service Operations Management, , Allyn and Bacon Inc., New York.
33. Oliver, R. L. 1993. Cognitive Affective and Attributes Bases of Satisfaction Response, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3): 419-422.
34. Oliver, R. L. 1981. Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processes in Retailing Setting, Journal of Retailing, 57(3): 25-48.
35. Oliver, R. L., R. T. Rust, and S. Varki. 1997. Customer Delight: Foundations, Findings, and Managerial Insight, Journal of Retailing, 73(3): 311-336.
36. Ostrom, A., and D. Iacobucci. 1995. Consumer Trade-Offs and the Evaluation of Services,” Journal of Marketing, 59(1): 17-28. 107.
37. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, L. L. Berry. 1985. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implication for Future Research, Journal of Marketing, 49(4): 41-50.
38. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1994. Alternatives Scales for Measuring Service Quality: A Comparative Assessment Based On Psychometric and Diagnostic Criteria , Journal of Marketing, 70(3): 201-230.
39. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1985. Quality Counts in Service, Too, Business Horizons, 28(3): 44-53.
40. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1994. Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further Research, Journal of Marketing, 58(1): 111.
41. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1991. Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale, Journal of Retailing, 67(4): 420-450.
42. Parasuraman, A., V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry. 1988. SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of Retailing, 64(1): 12-40.
43. Reichheld, F. F., and W. E. Sasser. 1990. Zero Defections : Quality Comes to Service, Harvard Business Review, 68(5): 105-111.
44. Scitovsky, T. 1945. Some Consequences of the Habit of Judging Quality by Price, Review of Economic Studies, 12(32): 100-105.
45. Shane S. J., T. Enkawa, and M. Miyakawa. 1991. Consumer Evaluation Perspectives of Service Quality: Evaluation Factors and Two-way Model of Quality, Total Quality Management, 2(3): 149-161.
46. Singh, J. 1991. Understanding the Structure on Consumer Satisfaction Evaluation of Service Delivery, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19: 223-234.
47. Woodruff, R. B., R. C. Ernest, and R. L. Jenkins. 1983. Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Processes Using Experience-Based Norms, Journal of Marketing Research, 20(3): 296-304.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內立即公開,校外一年後公開 off campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code