Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0609117-111654 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0609117-111654
論文名稱
Title
企業創投投資行為之研究
A Study on Investment Behavior of Corporate Venture Capitalist
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
101
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2017-06-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2017-07-14
關鍵字
Keywords
能耐、投資行為、商業生態系、企業創投、創新
investment behavior, competence, business ecosystem, corporate venturing, innovation
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5798 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5798 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
企業創投與獨立性財務創投所處的背景條件、投資目的與所能提供新創企業的資源是不同的。因此獨立創投與企業創投在篩選投資項目的標準、投資時所採取的行為與管理模式會是不同的。
本研究為質性探討之個案研究。透過相關文獻的探討與整理,歸納出企業創業投資的目的與動機,並研究相對的投資行為。以技術、市場與產業環境變動快速的台灣資通訊產業作為研究的對象,以個案研究方式進行,受訪公司產業包括IC設計業、資通訊產品品牌商與資通訊代工業者。


本研究將企業創投從企業能耐的角度區分成五類動機,分別是能耐加強型企業創投、新典範能耐型企業創投、突現型能耐企業創投、能耐互補型企業創投與最大化能耐經濟價值型企業創投。不同的企業創投的動機會導致不同企業創投投資行為。能能耐加強型的企業創投主要考量在對新創公司的控制權,其決策主導單位為事業部門、直接投資且投入股權佔比高以收購團隊為理想退出方式。新典範能耐企業創投的主要考量是新核心能耐與投資方母公司文化的管理,投資方直接投資,其決策是由企業高層所主導,股權佔比先低再陸續加碼跟投,退出方式多樣,可以設立新公司、或是納入企業內部成為新的事業部門。能耐突現型的企業創投扮演企業偵察兵的角色,在市場上搜尋與企業目前營運關聯性看起來低的新創公司以免在未來會錯失機會。企業創投會透過成為外部創投基金有限合夥人或是成立特殊目的投資基金以間接投資的方式進行投資,待投資項目發展到一定程度且與投資方母公司有具體綜效時,投資方才進行直接投資並投入企業資源。能耐互補型的企業創投即是在建立供應鏈商業生態系,投資方位居該商業生態系拱頂石角色導入具有新科技的供應鏈廠商,以提供客戶完整解決方案。投資方會與技術方以合資方式設立公司。最大化能耐經濟價值型企業創投目的在於提供投資方建立的資源平台給不同應用的客戶。投資方通常會設立育成中心或是成立專案團隊協助新創公司使用投資方平台,同時投資股權的佔比相對低,也不介入經營,最終期望能夠獲取較好的財務報酬退出。
Abstract
Different context, investment objective and resources provided for startups are so different between corporate venture capitalist(CVC) and independent financial venture capitalist so that the investment behaviors are different. The behavior includes, but not limited to the criteria to select startup candidate, the investment configuration and the way to manage startups at post investment stage.


This study is a qualitative and multiple case study. The purpose of this study is to infer the relation between behavior, strategic goal and raison d'etre of corporate venturing through literature review and interview of the key decision makers of the sampled companies. The four companies to be studied and interviewed comes from Taiwan ICT industry, including IC design, branded PC and OEM/ODM.
Motives of corporate venturing is much more sophisticated than independent financial venture capitalist. Strategic goal is to assist corporate future development from the perspective of innovation and building business ecosystem. Corporate competence is the raison d'etre of corporate venturing motive. This study identifies five fundamental raisons d'etre of corporate venturing, they are competence enhancing, new-paradigm competence building, emergent competence searching, complimentary competence building and maximizing economic competence. Different raison d'etre of corporate venturing leads to different investment behavior. CVC with competence-enhancing motive emphasize more on acquiring control right. CVC with new-paradigm competence building considers the cultural impact on organizational culture. CVC with emergent competence searching diversifies the investment scope through indirect investment with small percentage of shareholding of the startup. CVC of complimentary competence focuses on offering the customers with total solution. Investors are inclined to establish JV with startup team. The motives of maximizing the economic value of competence comes from asymmetric economic scale. Therefore, the shareholding percentage is low with no intension of control. Investors also set up a team or incubation facility to assist startups to utilize the resources.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
論文審定書 i
誌 謝 ii
摘 要 iii
Abstract iv
目 錄 v
圖 次 vi
表 次 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 4
第三節 研究流程 5
第四節 研究範圍與限制 5
第二章 文獻探討 7
第一節 創業投資與企業創業投資 7
第二節 企業創業投資動機 10
第三節 創新 13
第四節 商業生態系 22
第五節 企業創投投資行為 30
第六節 創業投資投資動機與投資行為架構 44
第三章 研究設計 52
第一節 理論架構 52
第二節 研究方法 56
第四章 個案分析 57
第一節 投資母公司個案 57
第二節 新創企業 66
第三節 分析 71
第五章 結論與建議 80
第一節 結論 80
第二節 管理意涵 84
第三節 建議 86
參考文獻 87
附錄 質性訪談大綱 92 
圖 次
圖1.1 企業創投投資行為之研究流程圖 6
圖2.1 生態系角色 25
圖2.2 企業創投類型矩陣圖 34
圖3.1 理論架構圖 52



表 次
表2.1 投資目的與投資行為 32
表2.2 不同企業背景下企業創業的形式 39
表2.3 學者對企業創投行為之彙整 41
表3.1 研究命題彙整表 54
表3.2 專家訪談清單 56
表4.1全球PC/伺服器銷售成長趨勢 59
表4.2 能耐加強型企業創投命題 72
表4.3 新典範能耐型企業創投命題 73
表4.4 能耐突現型企業創投命題 75
表4.5 能耐互補型企業創投命題 77
表4.6 最大化能耐經濟價值型企業創投命題 79
參考文獻 References
一、中文

吳思華,1998,策略九說:策略思考的本質,台北:臉譜文化。
張又生,2009,突現的概念,政大研學論壇
黃志弘,2007。企業創業投資與企業價值關係之實證研究,國立台灣大學國際企業學系研究所碩士論文

二、英文

Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. ,1985. Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research policy, 14(1), pp3-22.
Aizenman, J., and Kendall J. ,2008. The internationalization of venture capital and private equity. No. w14344. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Anderson P. ,1999. Complexity Theory and Organization Science. Organization Science, 10(3), pp216-232.
Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. ,1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative science quarterly, pp604-633.
Ansari, S. & Krop, P. ,2012. Incumbent Performance in the Face of a Radical Innovation: Towards a framework for Incumbent Challenger Dynamics. Research Policy, 41, pp 1357-1374.
Atuahene-Gima, K. ,1995. An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance a contingency approach. Journal of product innovation management, 12(4), pp275-293.
Black, B. S., and Gilson, R.J. ,2009. Does venture capital require an active stock market?" Journal of Applied Corporate Finance ,11.4 (1999): 36-48.
Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. ,1996. Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1(13), 75-76.
Campbell A., Birkinshaw J., Morris A., and Robert van Basten Batenburg. ,2003. The Future of Corporate Venturing. MIT Sloan Management Review, pp30~37.
Chesbrough H.W. ,2002. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin‐off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), pp529-555.
Christiansen, C. ,1997. The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. ,1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative science quarterly, 128-152.
Crossan, M. M. & Apaydin, M. ,2010. A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic View of the Literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47, pp 1154-1191.
Damanpour, F. ,1991. Organizational Innovation: A meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34, pp 555-590.
Damanpour, F. & Evan, W.M. ,1984. Organizational Innovation and Performance: The problem of “Organizational Lag”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp 392-409.
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M. & Avellaneda, C.N. ,2009. Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46, pp 650-675.
Demaria, C. ,2013. Introduction to Private Equity: Venture, Growth, LBO & Turn-around Capital. Wiley.
Dosi, G. ,1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research policy, 11(3), 147-162.
Dushnitsky, G. ,2004. Limitations to Inter-Organizational Knowledge Acquisition. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings.
Dushnitsky G. and Lenox M.J. ,2006. When Does Corporate Venture Capital Investment Create Firm Value? Journal of Business Venturing, 21, pp753 – 772.
Gapalakrishnan, S. & Damanpour, F. ,1997. A Review of Innovation Research in Economics, Sociology and Technology Management. Omega, 25, pp15-28.
Garvin D. A. ,2002. A Note on Corporate Venturing and New Business Creation. Harvard Business Background Note, 302-091.
Gatignon, H., Tushman, M.L., Smith, W. & Anderson, P. ,2002. A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type and Characteristics. Management Science, 48, pp1103-1122.
Govindarajan, V., & Kopalle, P. K. ,2006. Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), pp189-199.
Hannon, B. ,1997. The use of analogy in biology and economics: From biology to economics, and back. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8(4), pp471-488.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. ,1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly, pp9-30.
Iansiti M. and Levien R. ,2004. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, March 2004
Jolly, V.K., & Kayama, H. ,1990. Venture Management in Japanese Companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(4), pp249-269.
Kessler, E. H., & Chakrabarti, A. K. ,1999. Speeding up the pace of new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(3), 231-247.
Keil, T. ,2004. Building external corporate venturing capability. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 799-825.
Keller, A., & Hüsig, S. ,2009. Ex ante identification of disruptive innovations in the software industry applied to web applications: The case of Microsoft's vs. Google's office applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(8), 1044-1054.
Kortum, S., and Lerner, J. ,1998. Stronger protection or technological revolution: what is behind the recent surge in patenting? Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy. Vol. 48. North-Holland.
Lerner, J. ,2009. Boulevard of Broken Dreams, Why Public Efforts to Boost Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital Have Failed –and What to Do about It. Princeton University Press.
Lewin, R. ,1999. Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. University of Chicago Press.
Lucas, H. C., & Goh, J. M. ,2009. Disruptive technology: How Kodak missed the digital photography revolution. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 18(1), pp46-55.
MacMillan C., 1990. Resource Cooptation Via Social Contracting: Resource Acquisition Strategies for New Ventures. Strategic Management Journal, Vol 11, pp79~92.
Maula M., Autio E. & Murray G. ,2005. Corporate Venture Capitalists and Independent Venture Capitalists: What do they know, who do They Know and Should Entrepreneurs Care? Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, 7(1), pp3~21.
Miles, M. P., and Covin, J.G. ,2002. Exploring the practice of corporate venturing: Some common forms and their organizational implications. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 26.3 (2002): 21-41.
Möllers, M. ,2008. "Strategic Use of Corporate Venturing."
Moore, J. F. ,1998. The rise of a new corporate form. Washington Quarterly, 21(1), pp167-181.
Mount, M. P., & Fernandes, K. ,2013. Adoption of free and open source software within high-velocity firms. Behavior & Information Technology, 32(3), pp231-246.
Peltoniemi, M. and Vuori E. ,2004. Business Ecosystem as the New Approach to Complex Adaptive Business Environments. Proceedings of eBusiness Research Forum, p 267~281.
Power, T., & Jerjian, G. ,2001. Ecosystem: Living the 12 principles of networked business. Financial Times Management.
Roberts, P. W., & Amit, R. ,2003. The dynamics of innovative activity and competitive advantage: The case of Australian retail banking, 1981 to 1995. Organization Science, 14(2), 107-122.
Robertson, T. S. ,1967. The process of innovation and the diffusion of innovation. The Journal of Marketing, 14-19.
Rogers, E. M. ,2010. Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
Rothschild. J. ,1999. Protecting the Digital Consumer: The Limits of Cyberspace Utopianism. Indiana Law Journal, 74, 893.
Starr, J.E. and MacMillan, I.C. ,1990. Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal 11(1):79-92.
Schumpeter J. A. ,1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper & Brothers, 3rd edition.
Schumpeter J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interests and Business Cycle. Transaction PublishersStarr J.A.,
Sheremata, W. A. ,2004. Competing through innovation in network markets: Strategies for challengers. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 359-377.
Skyes, H. ,1986. The anatomy of a corporate venturing program. Journal of Business Venturing 1, 275–293.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. ,1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp509-533.
Tidd, J. ,1995. Development of novel products through intraorganizational and interorganizational networks the case of home automation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(4), 307-322.
Tripsas, M. ,1997. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, pp119-142.
Trott, P. ,2005. Innovation Management and New Product Development.
Tushman, M.L. & Anderson, P. ,1986. Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, pp 439-465.
Utterback, J. M. & Abernathy, W. J. ,1975. A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation. Omega, 3, pp639-656.
Winters, T.E. and Murfin D. L. ,1988. Venture Capital Investing for Corporate Development Objective. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, pp 207~222.
Wolfe, R.A. ,1994. Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31, pp405-431.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.135.219.166
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.135.219.166
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code