Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0611102-140150 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0611102-140150
論文名稱
Title
台灣地區都市生產者服務業空間效率之研究
The study of spatial efficience for produer service industry in Taiwanese cities
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
145
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2002-05-27
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2002-06-11
關鍵字
Keywords
生產者服務業、效率、聚集經濟、資料包絡分析法
Data Envelopment Analysis, producer service, Agglomerate Economy, efficiency.
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5664 次,被下載 3155
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5664 times, has been downloaded 3155 times.
中文摘要
過去台灣在經濟上卓越的成績,被喻以「台灣經驗」或「經濟奇蹟」,在這經濟發展過程中,各都市的經濟發展更是顯著,因都市為人類聚集從事經濟活動與群體生活的場所,也是生產消費最為頻繁的地區,因此現代經濟已經發展成為一種都市經濟的型態。在台灣整個產業結構變遷過程中,服務業已成為目前我國第一大產業,也說明台灣已經進入服務化經濟時代(Service Economy),未來都市的機能愈加多樣化及精緻化,產業的分工也趨向專業化,過去單存服務消費者的服務業也無法完全滿足民眾之需要,然而高專業高產值的生產者服務業之成長正好填補製造業外移所留下的空間,成為世界都市之主領產業。
本研究主要目的在於探討台灣地區生產者服務業的成長發展現況與趨勢,並藉由處理多項投入與產出特性的資料包絡分析法(Data Envelopment Analysis, DEA)來衡量22個縣市生產者服務業在三個年度的空間效率表現。本文內容可分為五大部分,第一部份為理論架構的建立與相關文獻分析整理;第二部分則針對資料包絡分析法的理論予以探討;第三部份則進一步分析瞭解生產者服務業變遷與現況發展;在第四部份實證方面,進行對各縣市生產者服務業效率的衡量,同時結合迴歸分析與卡方檢定深入探討效率與聚集經濟、都市規模、公共投資以及和其他產業發展的關係;最後提出綜合分析結論與建議,以作為政府對於經濟產業政策與生產者服務業發展規劃的參考。歸納本研究中所得到的結論:

一、台灣地區生產者服務業成長發展快速,在產值、員工數、廠商數以及區位商數上的表現,大多集中於台北市、台北都會區與都會型都市,並有逐漸向都會區周圍擴散的趨勢。
二、生產者服務業與生產者服務業內多數產業具有向前關聯效果,表示該產業在經濟發展過程中易隨其他產業發展而起飛,為發展其他產業不可缺少之產業。
三、生產者服務業在空間效率的表現,就個別都市而言,以台北市的效率表現最為突出,另一方面就整體台灣地區而言,從75年與80年的個別都市發展有效率表現,到了85年擴散至都會區的鄰近都市發展有效率,其中以台北都會區與高雄都會區表現為優異。
四、生產者服務業效率表現與都市規模、聚集經濟與公共投資存在顯著相關,同時生產者服務業在產業發展過程中與製造業和非生產者服務業具有密切互動關係。
Abstract
In the past few years, the prominent achievement of economy in Taiwan has been called the “ Taiwan Experience” or “The Miracle of Economy”. Urban is not only the place that people gather to take economic activities and live in groups, but also the area that produce and consume goods. Now the modern economy has expanded as the type of urban economic. Nowadays, service industry which has been the major industry during the transition of industrial structure in Taiwan could be an illustration that Taiwan is in the age of Service Economy, the functions of a city are going to be more various and delicate, and the division of industry is tending to be more professional. Though the service industry that just serves customers in the past can’t totally meet the needs of the public, the growth of its high specialization and output value bridges the gap for the problems resulted from the manufacturing industry. Most important, the producer service industry has become the main industry in the world.
The purpose of this research is to understand the development in the present and tendency of producer service industry, and also to measure the space efficiency of producer service industry in 22 counties for three years by Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA). The research is divided into five parts: the first part includes research structure and literature review. The second part is to discuss and figure out the theory of DEA. The third part is to analyze the transition and development of producer service in present days. In the fourth part of the research measures the efficiency of producer service industry in 22 counties, in the mean time it estimates the relation of among efficiency, agglomerate economy, city scale, public investment, and the development of other industries by regression analysis and chi-square test. Then the conclusions and recommendations would be discussed to government that makes the plans of economy industry policy and the development of producer service industry. The conclusions of this research are:

1.The producer service industry in Taiwan grows rapidly, and the industry gathers in Taipei city which Location Quotient is more than one . In addition, Taipei city plays the most role for industry’s output value, the numbers of employees and factories Moreover, the producer service industry in Taipei Metropolitan Area and other Metropolitan city gradually grows. Furthermore, the industry is expanding to the nearby metropolitan gradually.
2.The producer service industry and the industries in the producer service industry are influenced by Forward Linkage Effect. This shows that the industry grows rapidly following other industries development during the development of economy.
3.The producer service industry in Taipei city shows the excellent space efficiency. On the other hand, the some of 22 cities areas showed efficiency from 1986 to 1991, and the nearby metropolitan area also showed efficiency in 1996, especially in Taipei metropolitan area and in Kaohsiung metropolitan area.
4.The space efficiency of producer service industry shows remarkable relation with city scale, agglomerate economy and public investment. Additionally, the producer service industry also has the close relation with manufacturing industry and non-producer service industry during the development of industry.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄

第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………..1
第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………………...1
第二節 研究範圍與內容……………………………………………………...3
第三節 研究方法與流程……………………………………………………...6
第二章 相關理論與文獻回顧……………………………………………………9
第一節 都市經濟與產業發展………………………………………………...9
第二節 生產者服務業內涵…………………………………………………..16
第三節 都市生產力理論……………………………………………………..28
第三章 DEA分析方法之探討……………………………………………………37
第一節 DEA的緣起…………………………………………………………...37
第二節 DEA基本原理與模式………………………………………………...40
第三節 DEA之性質與使用程序……………………………………………...48
第四節 DEA於都市經濟產業之應用………………………………………...54
第四章 台灣地區生產者服務業變遷與現況生產力分析…...............57
第一節 台灣地區生產者服務業產業結構變遷……………………………..57
第二節 台灣地區生產者服務業單一生產力分析………………………....79
第三節 生產者服務業產業關聯分析………………………………………..82
第五章 台灣地區生產者服務業空間效率分析……………….…..........91
第一節 都市生產者服務業投入產出變數界定……………………………..91
第二節 各縣市生產者服務業空間效率分析………………………………..94
第三節 縣市個別生產者服務業之空間效率………………………………..110
第四節 生產者服務業效率與都市都市經濟特性之關係...……………….120
第五節 生產者服務業效率與都市相關產業之關係………………….…….124
第六章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………...127
第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………..127
第二節 建議……………………………………………………………….….131


參考文獻………………………………………………………………………….Ⅰ
附錄…………………………………………………………………………………Ⅵ
參考文獻 References
參 考 文 獻
一、中文部份

1.于宗先(1985),硬、軟體之間,台北,中國生產中心。
2.于明誠(1997),都市計畫概要,詹氏書局,台北市。
3.王翔煒(1997),高雄都會區生產者服務業之發展與產業競爭優勢分析,國立中山大學公 共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
4.王志文(1997),「台灣地區都市聚集經濟之研究」,台灣經濟,第247期,頁19-33。
5.王憶靜(1997),生產者服務業區位特性之研究-以台北都會區為例,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
6.石滋宜(1985),自動化、合理化、無人化,台北,中國生產中心。
7.江勁毅、曾國雄(2000),新的DEA效率衡量方式:以模糊多目標規劃建立之效率達成度,管理學報,17(2),pp.369-388.
8.江佩玉(2001),都市特性與產業生產效率關係之研究,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
9.吳濟華(2000),「台灣地區都市經濟效率之探討-製造業部門之生產效率」,中山大學教師著作。
10.吳濟華(1996),資料包絡分析法與效率分析理論應用講義,未出版。
11.吳韻儀(1996),服務業決定國家競爭力,天下雜誌,第180期,頁44-45
12.李曜全(1997),台灣地區各縣市資訊電子業生產效率比較之研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
13.行政院主計處(1996),中華民國現行職業標準分類。
14.行政院主計處(1988),中華民國七十五年台閩地區工商及服務業普查報告。
15.行政院主計處(1993),中華民國八十年台閩地區工商及服務業普查報告。
16.行政院主計處(1998),中華民國八十五年台閩地區工商及服務業普查報告。
17.行政院主計處(2000),八十八年產業關聯表編製報告。
18.林坤龍(2000),工業區生命週期及其效率評估之研究-以台灣地區工業區為例,國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。
19.林慶霖(2001),資訊科技基礎建設之服務與醫院技術效率之相關性探討,國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
20.林育諄(2001),台灣都市生產者服務業之區位決定因素,國立台北大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
21.徐千雲(1998)台北都會區產業空間變遷與都會中心高階層服務業專業化之研究,國立中興大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文。
22.徐旻穗(1995),聚集經濟與都市發展關係之檢證-台灣地區之實證研究,國立成功大學都市計劃所碩士論文。
23.姜樹翰(1996),都市聚集經濟之研究-以台灣製造業為例,國立政治大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
24.陳澄隆(2000),國內定期航運公司營運績效之研究-應用資料包絡分析法,國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文。
25.陳湘裕(1996),台灣地區都市經濟效率之探討,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
26.陳記章(1999),產業聚集化與地方都市成長相關研究,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
27.黃旭男(1993),資料包絡分析方法使用程序之研究及其在非營利組織效率評估上之應用,國立交通大學管理科學研究所博士論文。
28.黃俊英(1987),台灣服務業發展與未來展望,服務業管理研討會論文。
29.黃立國(1994),服務業分類理論與實務,企銀季刊,第19卷第4期,頁62-75。
30.黃文櫻(2001),都市競爭力與製造業生產力關係之研究,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
31.楊俊宏(1996),DEA應用在行政機關生產力衡量方法之研究-以北高二市各戶政事務所為例,國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
32.劉錚錚(1974),都市經濟學選論。
33.薛立敏、杜英儀、王素彎(1995),台灣地區生產性服務業之發展與展望-國際比較之研究,中華經濟研究院,台北。
34.薛立敏、杜英儀、王素彎(1993),生產性服務業與製造業互動關係之研究,行政院經濟建設委員會經濟研究處,台北市。
35.蕭大立(1999),服務業與地方發展關係之研究,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。
36.邊泰明(1997),生產性服務業區位與區域發展之研究,台北,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
37.蘇月香(1993),台灣中區製造業結構與空間分佈之研究,國立政治大學地政研究所碩士論文。

二、英文部份
1.Airoldi, Angela, (1997), “The impact of urban structure on the location of producer services,” The Service Industries Journal.
2.Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W,.(1984), “Some Model for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies inData Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 30(9),pp.1078-1092.
3.Bhagwati, Jagdish N., (1984), “Splintering and Disembodiment of Service and Development Nations,” The World Economy.
4.Browing, H.C.& Singelman J., (1975), “The Emergence of a Service Society,”Spr-ingfield.
5.Charnes, A Cooper,W.W&Rhodes,E.,(1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decis-ion Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Reserarch, 2, pp.429-444.
6.Carlino, G.A., (1979), “Declining City Productivity and the Growth of Rural Regions:A Test of Alternative,” Journal of Urban Economics,18,pp.11-27.
7.Coffey, W.J. & Bailly,A.S., (1991), “Producer Service and Flexible Production:An Exploratory Analysis,” Growth & Change,22,pp.95-117.
8.Coffey, W. J., (1988), “Service industries and regional development: patterns, theo-ry and policy, in: J. J. McRAE and M. M. DESBOIS (Eds) Traded and Non-Traded Services: Theory,” Measurement and Policy, pp. 205-214.
9.Coffey, W. J.,and J.J.McRae, (1989), “Service industries in regional development,” The Institute for Research on Public Policy.
10.Coffey, W. J.,and M. Polese, (1989), “Producer Service and regional development:A policy oriented perspective,” Papers of the Regional Science Assocation,67,pp.13-27.
11.Daniels, P.W.,and O'Connor, K.(1991), “The planning response to urban service sector growth: An international comparison,” Growth & Change,22(4),pp.24-26.
12.Eberts,derrek and Randall,James, (1998), “Producer services, labor market segme-ntation and peripheral regions: The case of Saskatchewan.,” Growth & Change,29(4),p.401.
13.Frost, M and Spence N., (1993), “Global city characteristics and central London’s employment,” Urban studies, 30(3), pp.547-558.
14.Farrell, M.J., (1957), “The Measurement of Producture Efficiency,” Joural of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), pp.253-281.
15.Grubel, Herbert G. & Michael A. Walker, (1989), “Service Industry Growth-Gauses and Effects,” The Fraser Institute.
16.Golauy, B.& Roll, Y., (1989), “An Application Procedure for DEA,” Omega, 17(3), pp.237-250.
17.Hong Yan, Quanling Wei & Gang Hao, (2002), “DEA models for resource reallocation and production input/output estimation,” European Journal of Operational Research,136(1), pp.19-31.
18.Hansen, E.J., (1990), “Agglomeration economies and industrial decentralization: The wage-productivity trade-offs,” Journal of Urban Economics, 28, pp. 140-159.
19.Henderson, J.V., (1986), “Efficiency of resource usage and city size,” Journal of Urban Economics, 19, pp. 47-70.
20.Holtz Eakin, (1994), “Public sector capital and the productivity puzzle,” Review of Economics and Satistics,76,pp.12-21.
21.Hirsch. Seev, (1989), “Service and Service Intensity in International Trade,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 125,pp.45-60.
22.Hill, T. P., (1997), “The service sector: current state of knowledge and research frontiers, in: H. G. GRUBEL (Ed.) Conceptual Issues in Service Sector Resources: A Symposium,” Vancouver: Fraser Institute, pp.37-45.
23.Irving H. Siegel, (1980), “Productivity Measurement-An Evolving Art,” Work in America Institute,p1.
24.Juleff-Tranter, L E., (1996), “Advanced producer services: Just a service to manufacturing?, ” The Service Industries Journal; London.
25.Lewin, A. Y. & Minton, J.W., (1986), “Determining Organizational Effectiveness:Another Look and An Agenda for Research,” Management Science,132(5), pp.514-538.
26 Merja Halme, Tarja Joro, & Matti Koivu, (2002), “Dealing with interval scale data in data envelopment analysis,” European Journal of Operational Research, 137(1), pp.22-27.
28.Milan Martic & Gordana Savic(2001) “An application of DEA for comparative analysis and ranking of regions in Serbia with regards to social-economic develop-ment,” European Journal of Operational Research,132(2), pp.343-356.
29.Moomaw, R.L. ,(1986), “Have changes in localization economies been responsible for declining productivity advantages in large cities,” Journal of Regional Science, 26, pp.19-32.
30. Mumell, A.H., (1990), “Why has productivity declined?Productivity and public investment,” New England Economics Review,pp.3-22.
31. MacPherson, A., (1997),. “The Role of Producer Service Outsourcing in the Innov-ation Performance of New York State Manufacturing Firms, ”,Annals of the Associ-ation of American Geographers, 87,pp. 52-71.
32. Markusen James,(1989), “Trade in Producer Services and other Specialized Intermeiate Inputs,”The American Economic Review,79(1),PP.85-95.
33. Norio Hibiki & Toshiyuki Sueyoshi, (1998), “DEA sensitivity analysis by chang-ing a reference set:regional contribution to Japanese industrial development,” Omega, 27, pp.139-153.
34. Noel D Uri, (2001), “Changing productive efficiency in telecommunications in the United State,” International Journal of Production Economic,72(2), pp.121-137.
35. O,huallachain,B., (1991), “The Location and Growth of Business and Professional Services in American Metropolitan Area 1976-1986,” Annals of the Association ofAmerican Geographers,81(2),pp.254-270.
36. O,huallachain,B., (1989), “Agglomeration of Services in American MetropolitanAreas, ” Growth and Change,20(3),pp.34-49.
37. Perry,M., (1991), “The Capacity of Producer Service to Generate Regional Growth:Some Evidence from a Peripheral Metropolitan Economy,” Environment and PlannIng,23(1),pp.1331-1347.
38. Poter M.E.,(1990), “The Competitive Advantage of Nations, ” The free press:a div-ision of Macmillan,Inc.
39. Reibstein, David J.,(1985), “Maketing:Concept, Strategics and Decision,” EnglewoodCliffs, Nj:Prentice-Hall,Inc,p607.
40. Sveikauskas, Leo, (1988), “The Productivity of Cities,” Quarterly Journal of Econ-omics,3,pp.393-413.
41. Segal, D., (1976), “Are there returns to scale in city size,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 58, pp.339-350.
42. Toshiyuki Sueyoshi & Mika Goto, (2001), “Slack-adjusted DEA for time series analysis: Performance measurement of Japanese electric power generation industry in 1984-1993,” European Journal of Operational Research, 133(2), pp.232-259.
43 Thomas N Chirikos & Alan M Sear, (2000), “Measuring hospital efficiency: A comparison of two approaches,” Health Services Researc,34(6), pp.1389-1408.
44. Wernerheim C. Michael & Sharpe Christopher A., (2001), “The Potential Bias in Producer Service Employment Estimates: The Case of the Canadian Space Econo-my,” Urban Studies,38(3),pp.563-592.

電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code