Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0612113-110517 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0612113-110517
論文名稱
Title
台灣美元即期與遠期匯率關係之探討:考慮條件異質變異數的共整合分析之應用
The Relationship of Spot and Forward NTD/USD Exchange Rate: The Application of Cointegration Analysis with Conditional Heteroscedasticity
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
49
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-07-03
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-07-12
關鍵字
Keywords
一般化最小平方法、條件異質變異數、共整合、效率市場、遠期外匯
GARCH, FGLS, cointegration, market efficiency, forward exchange rate
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5786 次,被下載 1388
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5786 times, has been downloaded 1388 times.
中文摘要
本研究以 Johansen 共整合檢定方法來檢驗新台幣兌美元的未來即期匯
率及一個月期、 兩個月期、 三個月期、 和六個月期的遠期匯率之間的共整合
關係, 以了解台灣單一國家內的外匯市場是否為效率市場。 實證上, 大多採用
Johansen 提出的 RRML (reduced rank maximum likelihood) 估計共整
合參數, 本文將誤差項的 GARCH (generalized autoregressive conditional
heteroskedasticity) 效果納入考慮, 採用 Herwartz & L¨utkepohl 的方法, 在
考慮 GARCH 效果之下, 以 FGLS (feasible generalized least squares) 估
計共整合參數。
由 Johansen 的共整合檢定方法得到台灣的即期匯率與兩個月期、 三個月
期和六個月期的遠期匯率並不存在共整合關係。 而一個月期遠期匯率和即期
匯率所估計出共整合參數的結果可以了解, Herwartz & L¨utkepohl 的 FGLS
方法得到的結果比 Johansen 提出的 RRML 更接近外匯市場效率性的理論
值, 顯示 FGLS 方法更一般化, 在考慮 GARCH 效果之下, 可得到更精準的
共整合向量。
Abstract
According to simple market efficiency hypothesis, the long-run relationship between spot exchange and forward exchange rate would exist as exchange markets are efficient. With the purpose of this study is to examine if forward exchange market in Taiwan is efficient by cointegration theory. Instead of Johansen’s reduced rank MLE, we consider a new method - Herwartz & L¨utkepohl’s FGLS with GARCH to re-estimate the cointegration vector of simple market efficiency hypothesis in Taiwan.
Conclusively, the result of cointegration relationships exist only in maturity of one month forward and spot exchange rate. and the cointegration
vector gets more precisely by Herwartz & L¨utkepohl’s FGLS method with
GARCH.
目次 Table of Contents
1 緒論 1
1.1 研究動機與目的 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 文章架構 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2 理論模型與文獻回顧 3
2.1 理論基礎 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.2 文獻回顧 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3 研究方法 9
3.1 單根檢定 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2 共整合檢定 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.3 一般化自我相關條件異質變異模型 GARCH . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.4 GARCH 效果檢定 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.5 理論模型 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.6 以 FGLS 方法估計 GARCH 效果之下的共整合參數 . . . . . 22
4 實證結果分析 26
4.1 資料來源與處理 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.2 單根檢定結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.3 VAR 模型最適落後期數 p 之選擇 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.4 共整合數目的檢定結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
4.5 ARCH 效果檢定 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
4.6 共整合參數估計結果 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5 結論與建議 33
參考文獻 35
參考文獻 References
1. 張堯鈞 (1993)《我國遠期外匯市場重新開放後之效率性檢定》, 國立中央大學財務管
理研究所碩士, 未出版, 桃園縣。
2. 彭榮茂 (1997)《台灣美元遠期外匯市場訊息效率性之檢定》, 輔仁大學金融研究所碩
士論文, 未出版, 臺北市。
3. 吳慧雅 (2001)《無本金交割遠期外匯與即期外匯市場之相關性分析》, 義守大學金融
研究所碩士論文, 未出版, 高雄市。
4. 楊奕農 (2003)《時間序列分析: 經濟與財務上應用》, 臺北: 雙葉書廊。
5. 李慶男 (2006)《時間數列講義》, 高雄: 未出版。
原文部分:
1. Baillie. R. and T. Bollerslev, 1989. Common stochastic trends in a system of
exchange rates, Journal of Finance, 44, 167-181.
2. Baillie. R. and T. Bollerslev, 1994a, Cointegration, fractional cointegration,
and exchange rate dynamics, Journal of Finance, 49, 737-745.
3. Bollerslev, T., 1986, Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity,
Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307-327.
4. Bollerslev, T., 1990, Modeling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange
rate:A multivariate generalized ARCH model, Review of Economics and Statis-tics, 72, 498-505.
5. Cavaliere, G., Rahbek, A. and Taylor, R., 2010, Co-integration rank testing
under conditional heteroskedasticity, Econometric Theory, 26, 1719-1760.
6. Chen, S. W., 2010, Testing the hypothesis of market efficiency in the Taiwan-US forward exchange market since 1990, Applied Economics, 42, 121-132.
7. Colemam, M., 1990, Cointegration-based tests of daily foreign exchange market efficiency, Economics Letters, 32, 53-59.
8. Copeland, L.S., 1991, Cointegration tests with daily exchange rate data, Ox-ford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 53, 185-198.
9. Crowder, J., 1992, Spot and forward exchange rates and the efficiency of foreign exchange markets, University of Texas at Arlington, working paper.
10. Crowder, J., 1994, Foreign exchange market efficiency and common stochastic
trends, Journal of International Money and Finance, 13, 551-564.
11. Dickey, D. A. and W. A. Fuller, 1979, Distribution of the Estimators for
Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431.
12. Diebold, F. X., J. Gardeazabal and K. Yilmaz, 1994, On cointegration and
exchange rate dynamics, Journal of Finance, 49, 727-735.
13. Engle, R. F., 1982, Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica, 50, 987-1006.
14. Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger, 1987, Co-integration and Error Correction:
Representation, Estimation, and Testing, Econometrica, 55, 251-276.
15. Engle, R. F. and Kroner, K. F., 1995, Multivariate simultaneous generalized
GARCH, Econometric Theory, 11, 122-50.
16. Fama, E. F., 1970, Efficient Capital Market: A Review of Theory and Empir-ical Work, Journal of Finance, 25, 383-423.
17. Fama, E. F., 1984. Forward and spot exchange rate, Journal of Monetary
Economics, 14, 319-338.
18. Frankel, J. A., 1980, Tests of Rational Expectations in the Forward Exchange
Market, Southern Economic Journal, 46, 1083-1101.
19. Granger, C. and Newbold, P., 1974, Spurious Regressions in Econometrics,
Journal of Econometrics, 2,111-120.
20. Granger, C. W. J. and P. Newbold, 1974, Spurious Regressions in Econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, 2,111-120.
21. Hakkio, C. S. and M. Ruth, 1989, Market Efficiency and Efficiency and Cointe-gration: An Application to the Sterling and Deutschemark Exchange Market,
Journal of International Money and Finance, 88, 829-853.
22. Hamilton, J., 1996,Time Series Analysis, Princeton University Press.
23. Hansen, L. P. and R. J. Hodrick, 1980, Forward exchange rates as optimal
predictors of future spot rates: An econometric analysis, Journal of Political
Economy, 829-853.
24. Herwartz, H. and L¨utkepohl, H., 2011, Generalizes least aquares Estimation
for cointegration parameters under conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of
Time Series Analysis, 32(3),281-291.
25. Johansen, S., 1988, Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors, Journal of
Economics Dynamics and Control, 12, 231-254.
26. Johansen, S. and K. Juselius, 1990, Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference On Cointegration with Applications to the Demand for Money, Oxford
Bulletion of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210.
27. Johansen, S., 1991, Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models, Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580.
28. Johansen, S., 1995, Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autore-gressive Models, Oxford : Oxford university Press.
29. JLai, K. S. and M. Lai , 1991, A Cointegration Test for Market Efficiency, The
Journal of Futures Markets, 11, 567-575.
30. Kwiatkowski, D., P. Phillips, P. Schmidt and Y. Shin, 1992, Testing the Null
Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure
are We that Economic Time Series have a Unit Root?, Journal of Econometrics, 54, 159-178.
31. Lee, J. H., 1991, A Lagrange multiplier test for GARCH models, Economic
Letters, 37, 265-271.
32. Levich, R. M., 1979, Are Forward Exchange Rates Unbiased Predictors of
Future Spot Rates ? , Columbia Journal of World Business, 14, 49-61.
33. MacDonald, R., 1983, Some tests of the rational expectations hypothesis in the
foreign exchange market, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 30,235-250.
34. McMillan, D. G., 2005, Cointegrating behavior between spot and forward ex-change rates, Applied Financial, 15, 1135-1144.
35. Naka, A. and G. Whitney, 1995, The Unbiased Forward Rate Hypothesis Re-examined, Journal of International Money and Finance, 14, 857-867.
36. Ng, S. and P. Perron, 2001, Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit
Root Tests with Good Size and Power, Econometrica, 69, 1519-1554.
37. Phillips, P. C. B. and Perron, P., 1988, Testing for a unit root in time series
regression, Biometrika, 75, 335-346.
38. Sanderson, P., 1984, Rational Expectations and Forwar Exchange Market Ef-ficiency, Applied Economics, 16, 99-109.
39. Said, E. and D. A. Dickey, 1984, Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order, Biometrika, 71, 599-607.
40. Seo, B., 2007, Asymptotic distribution of the cointegrating vector estimator in
error correction models with conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics, 137, 68-111.
41. Wu, J. L. and S. L. Chen, 1998, Foreign Exchange Market Efficiency Revisited,
Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 831-838.
42. Zivot, E., 2000, Cointegration and forward and spot exchange rate regressions,
Journal of International Money and Finance, 19, 785-512.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code