Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0613107-062622 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0613107-062622
論文名稱
Title
WTO國際機制對台灣與中國的影響:多邊主義與區域主義觀點的分析
WTO, International Regime, and its Interaction with Taiwan and China
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
175
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2007-06-06
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2007-06-13
關鍵字
Keywords
中國、台灣、區域主義、多邊主義、杜哈發展議程、世界貿易組織、國際機制理論
Taiwan, China, regionalism, multilateralism, Doha Development Agenda, International Regime, World Trade Organization
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5745 次,被下載 7291
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5745 times, has been downloaded 7291 times.
中文摘要
WTO不僅是全球唯一處理國與國之間貿易規則的國際組織,也是具有「原則」、「規範」、「規則」、「決策程序」的多邊國際機制。台灣與中國在2001年底陸續加入WTO之時,改革WTO國際機制的「杜哈發展議程」也同時展開。
由於「杜哈發展議程」的多邊談判,觸及各國敏感產業利益而難有進展,此時可彈性處理農工敏感產品的區域主義,遂成為許多國家偏好的另一種貿易政策選擇。自由貿易協定與區域貿易協定原本是WTO國際機制「最惠國待遇」所允許的「例外」,但WTO新回合談判卻讓「最惠國待遇」成為在區域主義下的「歧視待遇」。
中國利用區域貿易主義的「排他性」,使台灣無法參與區域貿易整合,讓台灣的貿易政策傾向WTO多邊主義。但台灣無論是參與多邊WTO國際機制或是區域主義下的優惠貿易安排,都受到外在限制;建立內部對於自由貿易的信念,是突破多邊與區域經貿發展困境的首要政策選擇。
中國除未積極投入「杜哈發展議程」的貿易規則談判,改革入世「非市場經濟地位」條款的限制外,也消極回應國際社會要求其共同推動「杜哈發展議程」改革的呼籲。中國入世後的貿易政策傾向可展現其大國優勢的區域主義,而非仍陌生的多邊主義;惟多邊主義有區域主義所無法取代的功能,中國最終仍將需要WTO多邊國際機制。
Abstract
none
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的
第二節 研究方法
第三節 論文架構
第四節 研究假設

第二章 論文理論架構的建立
第一節 前言
第二節 國際機制理論的發展與演變
第三節 形成國際機制理論的主要學派
第四節 國際機制理論的定義與構成要素
第五節 國際機制與相互依賴
第六節 國際機制與國際組織
第七節 國際機制的改變與改革

第三章 作為國際機制的WTO
第一節 前言
第二節 GATT、WTO與國際機制
第三節 GATT/WTO國際機制的設計
第四節 GATT/WTO國際機制的功能
第五節 小結

第四章 杜哈發展議程與WTO國際機制改革
第一節 前言
第二節 GATT/WTO國際機制的缺陷
第三節 改革WTO國際機制的杜哈發展議程
第四節 WTO國際機制多邊性的挑戰
第五節 區域貿易主義的興起
第六節 小結

第五章 WTO國際機制對台灣的影響
第一節 前言
第二節 WTO多邊國際機制下的兩岸互動
第三節 台灣參與WTO多邊國際機制
第四節 區域貿易主義興起下的台灣
第五節 台灣面對區域貿易主義興起的因應
第六節 區域貿易主義無法取代WTO多邊機制
第七節 小結

第六章 WTO國際機制對中國的影響
第一節 前言
第二節 中國參與WTO多邊國際機制
第三節 未能改革WTO多邊機制的中國
第四節 區域經貿主義興起下的中國
第五節 中國在WTO被控爭端解決的影響
第六節 小結

第七章 結論
第一節 研究發現
第二節 研究限制
第三節 未來研究議題之建議

參考文獻
參考文獻 References
參考文獻

1.書籍:
(a)中、英文論文集:
Baldwin, David A. “Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics,” in Neorealism and Neoliberialism: The Contemporary Debate, ed., by David A. Baldwin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Baldwin, David A. “Imposing Multilatral Discipline on Administered Protection” in The WTO as an International Organiation, ed., by Anne O. Krueger. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Bhagwati, Jagdish. “Regionalism and Multilaterism: an Overview,” in New Dimensions in Regional Integration, ed., by Jaime De Melo. and Arvind Panagariya. Washinton DC: World Bank, 1993.
Boyd, Gavin. “Triad Policy and Interdependencies in the WTO,” in The World Trade Organization in the New Global Economy: Trade and Investment Issues in the Millennium Round, ed., by Alan M. Rugman. UK: Edward Elgar, 2001.
Caporaso, James A. “International Relation Theory and Multilateralism: The Research for Foundations,” in Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Praxis of An Institutional Form, ed., by John G. Ruggie. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Cass, Deborah Z. Williams, Brett G.. and Barker, George. “Introduction: China and the Reshaping of the World Trade Organization,” in China and the World Trade Organization: Entering the New Millennium, ed., by Deborah Z. Cass. Brett G. Williams. and George Barker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Corbet, Hugh. “Agriculture and other Items on the World Trade Organization Agenda,” in Agriculture, Trade and the WTO: Creating a Trading Environment for Development, ed., by Merlinda D. Ingco.: D.C.: The World Bank, 2003.
Finger, Michael J. and Winters, L. Alan. “What Can the WTO Do for Developing Countries?” in The WTO as an International Organiation, ed., by Anne O. Krueger. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Gertler, Jeffrey L. “China’s WTO accession- the final countdown,” in China and the World Trade Organization: Entering the New Millennium, ed., by Deborah Z. Cass. Brett G. Williams. and George Barker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Grieco, Joseph M. “Understanding the Problem of International Cooperation: The Limits of Neoliberal Institutionalism and the Future of Realist Theory,” in Neorealism and Neoliberalism, ed., by David Baldwin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Haas, Peter M. “Epistemic Communities and the Dynamics of International Environmental Cooperation,” in Regime Theory and International Relations, ed., by Volker Rittberger. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
Huang, Dongli. “Legal Interpretation of Paragraph 242 of the Report of the Working Party on the Accession of China under the WTO Legal Framework” in China’s Participation in the WTO. ed., by Henry Gao. and Donald Lewis. London: Cameron May Ltd, 2005.
Huang, Rengang. “Multilateralism v Regionalism—China’s Participation in WTO Agricultural Negotiations,” in China’s Participation in the WTO. ed., by Henry Gao. and Donald Lewis. London: Cameron May Ltd, 2005.
Jiang, Liyong. “WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism and China’s Participation,” in China’s Participation in the WTO. ed., by Henry Gao. and Donald Lewis. London: Cameron May Ltd, 2005.
Johnson, Ian. “The New Trade Debate and Options for Developing Countries,” in Agriculture, Trade and the WTO: Creating a Trading Environment for Development. ed., by Merlinda D. Ingco. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2003.
Keohane, Robert. “Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge After the Cold War,” in Neorealism and Neoliberialism: The Contemporary Debate, ed., by David A. Baldwin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Pietras, Jaroslaw. “The Role of the WTO for Economies in Transition” in The WTO as an International Organiation, ed., by Anne O. Krueger. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Kydd, Andrew. and Snidal, Duncan. ”Progress in Game-Theoretical Analysis of International Regime,” in Regime Theory and International Relations, ed., by Volker Rittberger. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Rugman, Alan M. “The World Trade Organization in the New Global Economy,” in The World Trade Organization in the New Global Economy: Trade and Investment Issues in the Millennium Round, ed., by Alan M. Rugman. and Gavin Boyd: Celtenham. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2001.
Schott, Jeffrey J. “Free Trade Agreement: Boon or Bane of the World Trading System,” in Free Trade Agreement: US Strategies and Priorities, ed., by Jeffrey Schott. Washington DC: Peterson Institute, 2004.
Srinivasan, T. N. “Regionalism and the WTO: Is Nondiscrimination Passé?” in The WTO as an International Organiation, ed., by Anne O. Krueger. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Tan, Joseph L.H. “ASEAN-China Economic Relations: Industrial Restructuring in ASEAN and China- Introductory Overview,” in ASEAN-China Economic Relations: Industrial Restructuring in ASEAN and China, ed., by Joseph L.H. Tan. and Luo Zhaohong. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1994.
Tussie, Diana. and Woods, Ngaire. “Trade, Regionalism and the Threat to Multilateralism,” in The Political Ecnomy of Globalization, ed., by Ngaire Woods. London: Macmillan Press, 2000.
Winham, Gilbert. and Lanoszka, Anna. “Institutional Development of the WTO,” in The World Trade Organization in the New Global Economy: Trade and Investment Issues in the Millennium Round, ed., by Alan M. Rugman. and Gavin Boyd. Celtenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2001.
Yahuda, Michael. “How much has China learned about interdependency?” in China Rising: Nationalism and Interdependence, ed., by David S.G. Goodman. and Gerald Segal. New York: Routledge, 1997.
Zeng, Lingliang. “The Legal Effectiveness and Appriopriateness of Transitional Product-Specific Safeguard Mechanism against China,” in China’s Participation in the WTO. ed., by Henry Gao. and Donald Lewis. London: Cameron May Ltd, 2005.

(b)中、英文專書:
王杰,國際機制論。北京:新華出版社,2002年。
帕思卡爾 拉米(Pascal Lamy)著,苗建敏譯,以歐洲的名義 (L’europe en Premiere Ligne)。北京:中信出版社,2004年。
張漢林,張漢林解讀中國入世,第一版。北京:經濟日報出版社,2002年。
倪世雄,當代西方國際關係理論。上海:復旦大學出版社,2001年。
Acharya, Rohini. and Daly, Michael. Selected Issues Concerning the Multilateral Trading System. Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2004.
Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia Uinversity Press, 1977.
Burchill, Scott. et al. Theories of international relations. New York: Palgrave, 2001.
Cadot, Olivier. De Melo, Jaime. and Olarreaga, Marcelo. Can Bilateralism Ease the Pain of Multilateral Trade Liberalization?. Geneva: World Trade Organization Economic Research and Analysis Division, 1988.
Cohn, Theodor H. Global Political Economy: Theory and Practice. New York: Longman, 2000.
Crawford, Jo-Ann. and Fiorentino, Roberto V. The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements, Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2005.
Finger, Michael J. The Doha Agenda and Development: A View from the Uruguay Round. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2002.
Fiorentino, Roberto V. Verdeja, Luis. and Toqueboeuf, Christelle. The Changing Landscape of RTAs: 2006 Update. Geneva: WTO Publications, 2007.
Gilpin, Robert. The Political Economy of International Relations. New Jersey: Princeton University, 1987.
Goode, Walter. Dictionary of Trade Policy Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Hasenclever, Andreas. Mayer, Peter. and Rittberger, Volker. Theories of International Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Kostecki, Michel M. The Political Economy of the World Trading System – from GATT to WTO. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Hoekman, Bernard M. and Kostecki, Michel M. The Political Economy of the World Trading System: the WTO and Beyond. 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Jones, Kent. Who’s afraid of the WTO? New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Kegley, Charles W. Jr. Controversies inIinternational Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1995.
Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Keohane, Robert. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989.
Keohane, Robert. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview Press, 1989.
Keohane, Robert. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London: Routledge, 2002.
Keohane, Robert. and Nye, Joseph. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, 2nd Edition, Boston: Little and Brown Company, 1977.
Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Longman, 2001.
Kong, Qingjiang. China and the World Trade Organization: A Legal Perspective. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2002.
Krasner, Stephen D. et al. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983.
Narlikar, Amrita. International Trade and Developing Countries Bargaining Coalition in the GATT & WTO. New York: Routledge, 2003.
Spero, Joan E. and Hart, Jeffrey A. The Politics of International Economic Relations. New York: Worth Publishers, 1997.
Suthland, Peter. The Future of the WTO: Addressing institutional challenges in the new millennium. Geneva: WTO Publications, 2004.
Waltz, Kenneth. The Theory of International Relations. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1979.
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Young, Oran R. International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.
Young, Oran R. International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.

2.期刊、論文:
宿景祥,”「中國『非市場經濟地位』與美國貿易政治」,”世界經濟與政治,2004年第10期:頁57-62。
劉志云,”「全球化背景下國際經濟立法勃興的國際關係理論詮釋」,”國際經濟法學刊,第12卷第2期:頁18-41。
Bhagwati, Jagdish. “Don’t Cry for Cancùn,” Foreign Affairs, vol 83, no.1 (2004): 52-63.
Cohen, Benjamin J. and Murphy, Gregory L. “Models of concepts,” Cognitive Science, vol. 8, no. 1 (1984): 27-58.
Finger, Michael J. “GATT Tariff Concession and the Export of Developing Countries: United Concessions at the Dillon Round,” Economic Journal, vol. 84, no.335 (1974): 566-575.
Finger, Michael J. “Effect of the Kennedy Round Tariff Concession on the Export Developing Countries,” Economic Journal, vol.86, no.361 (1976): 87-95.
Finlayson, Jock A. and Zacher, Mark W. “The GATT and the Regulation of Trade Barriers: Regime Dynamics and Functions,” International Organization, vol. 35, no.4 (1981): 561-602
Grieco, Joseph M. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3 (1988): 485-507.
Hasenclever, Andreas. Mayer, Peter. and Rittberger, Volker. “Interests, Power, Knowlegde: The Study of International Regimes,” Mershon International Studies Review, vol. 40, no.2 (1996): 177-228.
Hass, Ernst. “Is there a hole in the whole? Knowledge, Technology, Interdependence, and the Construction of International Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 29, no.3 (1975): 827-876.
Hass, Ernst. “Technological Self-reliance for Latin America: The OAS Contribution,” International Organization, vol. 34, no. 4 (1980): 541-570.
Hass, Ernst. “World Can Hurt You; or, Who Said What to Whom about Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (1982): 207-243.
Haas, Peter M. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination,” International Organization, vol. 46, no.1 (1992): 1-35.
Haggard, Stephan. and Simmons, Beth A. “Theories of International Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 41, no.3 (1987): 491-517.
Huettel, Scott A. and Lockhead, Gregory. “Psychological Rational Choice: Selection Between Alternatives in a Multiple-Equilibrium Game,” Journal of Cognitive System Research, vol. 1, no.3 (2000): 143-160.
Jervis, Robert. “Security Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2, (1982): 357-378.
Keohane, Robert. “The Demand for International Regime,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (1982): 141-171.
Keohane, Robert. “International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies Quaterly, vol. 32, no. 4 (1988): 379-396.
Keohane, Robert. “International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work?” Foreign Policy, no. 110 (1998): 82-96.
Keohane, Robert. and Nye, Joseph. “Power and Interdependence in the Information Age,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 77, no.5 (1998): 87-88.
Krasner, Stephen D. “Transforming International Regimes: What the Third World Wants and Why?” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1 (1981): 119-148.
Krasner, Stephen D. “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regime as Intervening Variables,” International Regimes, vol. 36, no.2 (1982): 185-205.
Krasner, Stephen D. “Regimes and the Limits of Realism: Regimes as Autonomous Variables,” International Regimes, vol. 36, no. 2 (1982): 497-510.
Lipson, Charles. “The Transformation of Trade: the sources and effects of regime change,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (1982): 233-271.
Lipson, Charles. “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs,” World Politics, vol. 37, no. 1 (1984): 1-23.
Lipson, Charles. “Why Are Some International Agreements Informal?” International Organization, vol. 45, no. 4 (1991): 495-538.
Litwak, Robert S. “Non-proliferation and the Dilemmas of Regime Change,” Survival, vol. 45, no. 4 (2003): 7-22.
Mattoo, Aaditya. and Subramanian, Arvind. “The WTO and the Poorest Countries: The Stark Reality,” World Trade Review, vol. 3, no.3 (2004): 385-407.
McMillan, M. Susan., “Interdependence and Conflict,” Mershon International Studies Review, vol. 41, no.1 (1997): 33-58.
Milner, Helen. “International Regimes and World Politics: Comments on the Articles by Smouts, de Senarclens and Jonsson,” International Social Science Journal, vol. 45, no.138 (1993): 491~497.
Mkapa, Benjamin Williams. “Cancùn’s False Promise: A View from the South,” Foreign Affairs, vol 83, no.3, (2004): 133-135.
Moore, Mike. “The WTO’s First Decade,” World Trade Review, vol.4. no.3 (2005): 359~365.
Narlikar, Amrita. and Wilkinson, Rorden. “Collapse at the WTO: A Cancùn Post-mortem,” Third World Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3 (2004): 447-460.
Nye, Joseph S. & Keohane, Robert O. “Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction,” International Organization, vol. 25, no. 3 (1971): 329-349.
Puchala, Donald J. and Hopkins, Raymond F. “International Regimes: Lessons from Inductive Analysis,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (1982): 245-275.
Reisman, Michael W. “The Manley O. Hudson Lecture: Why Regime Change Is (Almost Always) a Bad Idea,” The American Journal of International Law, vol. 98, no.3 (2004): 516-525.
Ruggie, John Gerard. “International Responses to Technology: Concepts and Trends,” International Organization, vol. 29, no.3 (1975): 557-583.
Ruggie, John Gerard. “International Regimes, Transaction, and Change: Embeded Liberalsim in the Postwar Economic Order,” International Organization, vol. 36, no. 2 (1982): 379-415.
Ruggiero, Renato. “The World Trade Organization: Three Priorities,” World Trade Review, vol. 4, no.3 (2005): 355-357.
Stein, Arthur A. “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World,” International Organization, vol. 36, no.2 (1982): 299-324.
Strange, Susan. “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regimes Analysis”, International Organization, vol. 36, no.2 (1982): 479-496.
Wendt, Alexander. "Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics," International Organization, vol. 46, no. 2 (1992): 391-425.
Young, Oran R. “International Regime: Problems of Concept Formation,” World Politics, vol. 32, no.2 (1980): 331-356.
Young, Oran R. “International regimes: toward a new theory of institutions,” World Politics, vol. 39, no.1 (1986): 104-122.

3.研究計畫報告:
張榮豐,”我國如何利用WTO「與貿易相關之技術援助及能力建構」(TRTA/CB)機制及捐助WTO TCB Fund以進行經濟援助,”94年度國際經貿事務研究及培訓中心計畫,2005年1月1日至2005年12月31日。
劉大年,”WTO新回合談判對我國經濟之影響評估,” 93年度國際經貿事務研究及培訓中心計畫,2004年1月1日至2004年12月31日。
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code