Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0613115-201354 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0613115-201354
論文名稱
Title
資訊驅動vs.雜訊驅動之Google搜尋量對市場品質的影響
Information-driven vs. Noise-driven Google search – An empirical study on investor attention and market quality
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
64
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2015-06-26
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2015-07-28
關鍵字
Keywords
門檻回歸、波動性、流動性、Google 搜尋量、投資人注意力
Investor attention, Threshold regression, Liquidity, Volatility, Google search volume index
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5799 次,被下載 27
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5799 times, has been downloaded 27 times.
中文摘要
本研究嘗試利用三段式門檻迴歸模型將由Google搜尋量代理的投資人注意力區分為資訊驅動的搜尋量與雜訊驅動的搜尋量。以2009年1月到2014年12月台灣上市公司為例,本研究發現 (1) Google搜尋量和交易量顯著正相關。我們認為搜尋本身並不會影響報酬,唯有透過交易量才可能對報酬造成影響。(2)不同型態的搜尋量會對市場品質造成不同的影響。實證發現雜訊驅動的搜尋量與流動性和波動性皆正相關,而資訊驅動的搜尋量與流動性呈負相關、與波動性則呈現正相關。(3)上市較久、獲利能力較低與有高股價淨值比的公司有較高的資訊驅動搜尋比例,這代表上市較久、獲利能力較低與有高股價淨值比的公司較不是因為投資人從眾的關係而被搜尋。
Abstract
We propose a new way to distinguish investor attention as measured by Google search volume index (SVI) from information-initiated searches and noise-initiated searches using a three-regime threshold model. In a sample of Taiwan Stock Exchange stocks from January 2009 to December 2014, we find that (1) SVI is significantly and positively correlated with trading volume. We consider that only a stock whose volume can be affected by search queries could see its return affected; (2) different types of SVI have different impacts on investor attention to market quality. Noise-initiated search is positively related to liquidity and positively related to volatility, while information-initiated search is negatively related to market liquidity and positively related to volatility; (3) firms which are older, are less profitable, and have a higher PB ratio will have a higher information search ratio which represents that these companies are less likely to cause herding for search information.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
摘要 ii
Abstract iii
1. Introduction 1
2. Literature Review 3
2.1 Behavioral Finance and Investor Attention 3
2.2 Investor Attention and Return 6
2.3 Investor Attention and Market Quality 8
3. Overview 11
4. Data and Preliminary Studies 12
4.1 Google Search Volume Index (SVI) 13
4.2 Proxy of Market Quality 15
4.3 Threshold Value and Firm Characteristic Variables 17
5. Methodology 20
5.1 Google Search Volume and Trading Volume 20
5.2 Three-Regime Threshold Model 22
5.3 Dynamic Relationship Between Return and Volume of Individual Stocks 27
5.4 Different Types of Investor Attention and Market Quality 28
5.5 Threshold Value and Firm Characteristic Variables 31
6. Empirical Results 33
6.1 Unit Root Test 33
6.2 Google Search Volume and Trading Volume 33
6.3 Dynamic Relationship Between Return and Volume of Individual Stocks of the Three-Regime Threshold Model 37
6.4 Different Type of Investor Attention and Market Quality 38
6.5 Threshold Value and Firm Characteristic Variables 39
7. Conclusion 44
References vi
Appendix x
參考文獻 References
Amal Aouadi, M.A., Frédéric Teulon, 2013. Investor attention and stock market activity: Evidence from France. Economic Modelling, 674-681.
Amihud, Y., 2002. Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 31-56.
Andrei, D., Hasler, M., 2013. Investor Attention and Stock Market Volatility.
Aouadi, A., Arouri, M., Teulon, F.d.r., 2013. Investor attention and stock market activity: Evidence from France. Economic Modelling, 674-681.
Aslan, H., Easley, D., Hvidkjaer, S., O’Hara, M., 2008. Firm Characteristics and Informed Trading: Implications for Asset Pricing.
Bai, J., Perron, P., 2003. Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of applied econometrics.
Bank, M., Larch, M., Peter, G., 2011. Google search volume and its influence on liquidity and returns of German stocks. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management 25, 239-264.
Barber, B.M., Odean, T., 2008. All That Glitters: The Effect of Attention and News on the Buying Behavior of Individual and Institutional Investors. Review of Financial Studies 21, 785-818.
Berkman, H., Koch, P.D., Tuttle, L., Zhang, Y.J., 2012. Paying Attention: Overnight Returns and the Hidden Cost of Buying at the Open. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 47, 715-741.
Chemmanur, T., Yan, A., 2009. Advertising, Attention, and Stock Returns.
Da, Z., Engelberg, J., Gao, P., 2011. In Search of Attention. The Journal of Finance LXVI.
DellaVigna, S., Pollet, J., 2009. Investor attention and Friday earnings announcements. Journal of Finance 64, 709-749.
Dimpfl, T., Jank, S., 2012. Can internet search queries help to predict stock market volatility?
Ding, R., Hou, W., 2014. Retail Investor Attention and Stock Liquidity.
Easley, D., O'hara, M., Srinivas, P.S., 1998. Option Volume and Stock Prices: Evidence on Where Informed Traders Trade. THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE LIII.
Fama, E.F., MacBeth, J.D., 1973. Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy 81, 607-636.
Fang, L.H., Peress, J., 2009. Media Coverage and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance 64, 2023-2052.
Fink, C., Johann, T., 2014. May I Have Your Attention, Please The Market Microstructure of Investor Attention, working paper.
Florackisa, C., Gregorioub, A., Kostakisa, A., 2011. Trading frequency and asset pricing on the London Stock Exchange: Evidence from a new price impact ratio. Journal of Banking & Finance 35, 3335–3350.
Gervais, S., Kaniel, R., Mingelgrin, D.H., 2001. The high-volume return premium. Journal of Finance, 877-919.
Grullon, G., Kanatas, G., Weston, J.P., 2004. Advertising, breath of ownership, and liquidity. Review of Financial Studies 17, 439-461.
Hansen, B.E., 1996. Inference When a Nuisance Parameter Is Not Identified Under the Null Hypothesis. Econometrica 64, 413-430.
Hansen, B.E., 1999. Threshold e!ects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics 93, 345-368.
Hansen, B.E., 2000. Sample Splitting and Threshold Estimation. Econometrica 68, 575-603.
Hirshleifer, D., Teoh, S.H., 2003. Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36, 337-386.
Hirshleifer, D.A., Myers, J.N., Myers, L.A., Teoh, S.H., 2008. Do Individual Investors Cause Post-Earnings Announcement Drift? Direct Evidence from Personal Trades.
Hou, K., Peng, L., Xiong, W., 2009. A Tale of Two Anomalies The Implications of Investor Attention for Price and Earnings Momentum.
Kacperczyk, M., Nieuwerburgh, S.V., Veldkamp, L., 2010. Rational Attention Allocation Over the Business Cycle.
Kahneman, D., 1973. Attention and Effort. The American Journal of Psychology.
Kita, A., Wanga, Q., 2015. Investor Attention and FX Market Volatility. Journal of International Financial Markets.
Latoeiro, P., Ramos, S.B., Veiga, H., 2013. Predictability of stock market activity using Google search queries.
Lee, C.M.C., 1992. Earnings news and small traders. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15, 265-302.
Llorente, G., Michaely, R., Saar, G., Wang, J., 2002. Dynamic Volume-Return Relation of Individual Stocks. The Review of Financial Studies 15, 1005-1047.
Lou, D., 2008. Attracting investor attention through advertising.
Merton, R.C., 1987. A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 483-510.
Mondria, J., Wu, T., Zhang, Y., 2010. The determinants of international investment and attention allocation: Using internet search query data. Journal of International Economics 82, 85-95.
Parkinson, M., 1980. The Extreme Value Method for Estimating the Variance of the Rate of Return. The Journal of Business 53.
Peng, L., Xiong, W., 2006. Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. Journal of Financial Economics 80, 563-602.
Seasholes, M.S., Wu, G., 2007. Predictable behavior, profits, and attention. Journal of Empirical Finance 14, 590-610.
Shen, C.-H., Hakes, d.R., 1995. Monetary Policy as a Decision-Making Hierarchy. Journal of Macroeconomics 17, 357-368.
Sims, C.A., 2003. Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 665-690.
Smith, G.P., 2012. Google Internet search activity and volatility prediction in the market for foreign currency. Finance Research Letters 9, 103-110.
Tong, H., 1978. On a Threshold Model. ln: Chen, C, (ed.) Pattern Recognition and Signal Processing. NATO ASI Series E: Applied Sc.(29). Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Netherlands, 575-586.
Tsay, R., 1998. Testing and modeling multivariate threshold models. Journal of the American Statistical Association.
Vlastakis, N., Markellos, R.N., 2012. Information demand and stock market volatility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 1808-1821.
Vozlyublennaia, N., 2014. Investor attention, index performance, and return predictability. Journal of Banking & Finance 41, 17-35.
Yu, H.-Y., Hsieh, S.-F., 2010. The effect of attention on buying behavior during a financial crisis: Evidence from the Taiwan stock exchange. International Review of Financial Analysis 19, 270-280.
Yuan, Y., 2008. Attention and trading.
Yuan, Y., 2014. Market-Wide Attention, Trading, and Stock Returns.
Zhang, W., Shen, D., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., 2013. Open source information, investor attention, and asset pricing. Economic Modelling, 613-619.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code