Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0616113-215318 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0616113-215318
論文名稱
Title
探討慣性的形成對新系統接受之影響-社群網站之實證研究
Investigate the Impact of Inertia Formation on The New System Acceptance-An Empirical Study of Social Network Sites
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
103
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-06-30
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-07-16
關鍵字
Keywords
網路外部性、慣性、相對優勢、關係利益、科技鎖定
relative Advantage, relational Benefits, technological lock-in, inertia, network externality
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5847 次,被下載 431
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5847 times, has been downloaded 431 times.
中文摘要
本研究以實證的方式探討在社群網站的背景下,「慣性」對不同社群平台轉換的影響。慣性,是指「未經強迫情況下,仍會有意識的持續使用目前的系統,即使有更好的替代方案也不會選擇轉換的現象」。主要分成兩個部份進行驗證。第一部份,探討使用者會產生慣性的因素,本研究認為「關係利益」、「科技鎖定」、「經驗開放性」和「認知網路規模」皆是形成慣性的主要因素;第二部份,探討使用者產生慣性時對新系統的影響,本研究認為使用者會因為「自我知覺理論」和「認知失調理論」降低使用者對新社群平台的「相對優勢」和「互補性」的認知。又過去許多研究曾驗證過的「習慣」、「主觀規範」以及「認知易用性」三個重要變數,在本研究並不深入探討,卻也不能忽略,故加入成為本研究的控制變數。

本研究採用兩階段問卷調查方式,以Facebook和Google Plus作為研究的情境,且由於要探究慣性的主要影響,因此我們研究對象須符合目前慣於使用Facebook,但很少或幾乎未曾使用過Google Plus條件的使用者,在不強迫的前提下探討慣性對這群使用者的影響。為符合上述的研究情境,我們採取搭配課程的方式來發放問卷,分別在學期初和學期末,對有分組專案需求的課程進行縱斷面的研究,最後蒐集到153份有效問卷作研究模型與假說的檢定。結果發現:(1)第一階段部分:關係利益、科技鎖定和認知網路規模都對慣性有顯著的正向的影響,唯獨經驗開放性沒有顯著影響;(2)第二階段部分:慣性對採用新系統意圖有顯著負向的影響,也對相對優勢和認知互補性有顯著負向的影響,且兩者對於採用新系統意圖也有顯著的正向影響;(3)控制變數部分:習慣對慣性有正向影響,主觀規範對採用新系統意圖有顯著正向影響,但是認知易用性對採用新系統意圖沒有顯著的影響。
Abstract
This research makes an attempt to explore how “inertia” affects users of social networks in terms of switching platforms through empirical studies. “Inertia” refers to a phenomenon by which a user consciously chooses to use the same system without coercion, even when there are better alternatives. The empirical studies were conducted in two parts. The first part explores the factors involved in the formation of “inertia”. This research targets four factors: “relational benefits”, “technological lock-in”, “openness to experience”, and “perceived scale of online community”. The second part explores how “inertia" affects the users’ cognition on new social platforms. This research makes an assumption that cognitive dissonance impair users' cognition on the “relative advantage” and “complementarity” of new social platforms.
In this study, we adopt a two-stage questionnaire and use Facebook and Google Plus as the research context. In order to explore the impact of inertia, our study objects must be users who are used to using Facebook but hardly or even never use Google Plus. We explore the impact of inertia on these users on the premise of freedom. To comply with the above research context, we sent out questionnaires according to different courses, and made longitudinal studies courses that required grouping projects in both beginning and end of the semester. Finally, we collected 153 effective questionnaires to do inspection for research model and hypothesis. The result shows (1) The first stage : concern, technology target and size of network recognition have positive and significant impact on inertia; (2) The second stage : inertia has significant and negative impact on intention of new system, and it has negative and significant impact on comparative advantage and complementarity of recognition, and what's the more, both of them have significant and positive impact on intention of new system.
目次 Table of Contents
目錄
論 文 審 定 書 i
誌 謝 ii
摘 要 iii
Abstract iv
目錄 v
圖 次 vii
表 次 viii
第一章 緒 論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機 3
第三節 研究目的與架構 5
第四節 研究流程 8
第二章 文獻探討 9
第一節 社群網站 9
第二節 慣性 (Inertia) 15
第三節 慣性形成因素之文獻探討 20
第四節 慣性影響新系統認知之文獻探討 32
第三章 研究方法 38
第一節 研究模型 38
第二節 研究假說 39
第三節 研究變數的定義與操作化 46
第四節 研究設計 54
第四章 資料分析 58
第一節 樣本基本資料分析 58
第二節 模型及假說驗證 61
第五章 結論及建議 71
第一節 研究結果及討論 71
第二節 理論及實務意涵 74
第三節 研究限制 77
第四節 未來研究方向 77
參考文獻 78
【附 錄】:本研究正式問卷 88
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
中文部分:
梁德馨教授, 蘇浚欽, 謝昀東, 陳薪卉, 劉惠婷, 劉峻廷 & 陳儀蔓 (Eds.) (2012)2012年台灣寬頻網路使用調查報告. 全國意向顧問股份有限公司.
房美玉. (2002). 儲備幹部人格特質甄選量表之建立與應用-以某高科技公司為例. 人力資理管理學報], 第二卷第一期, 1-18.
林芬慧, 朱彩馨, 許瓊文, 吳梅君, 楊子青, 劉家儀, .林杏子. (2011). 網路行銷:e網打盡無限商機: 智勝出版社.

英文部分:
Ajzen, Icek. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior: Springer.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i-171. doi: 10.1037/h0093360
Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2003). Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(1), 71-80. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00014-6
Anderson, J. C, & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42-58.
Anthony, L. M., Clarke, M. C., & Anderson, S. J. (2000). Technophobia and personality subtypes in a sample of South African university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(1), 31-44. doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00050-3
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy: University of Michigan Press.
Barnes, William, Gartland, Myles, & Stack, Martin. (2004). Old Habits Die Hard: Path Dependency and Behavioral Lock-in. Journal of Economic Issues (Association for Evolutionary Economics), 38(2), 371-377.
Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the Concept of Commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66(1), 32-40. doi: 10.2307/2773219
Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74(3), 183-200. doi: 10.1037/h0024835
Bhattacherjee, Anol. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
boyd, danah m, & Ellison, Nicole B. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
Boyd, T. C, & Mason, C. H. (1999). The link between attractiveness of “extrabrand” attributes and the adoption of innovations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 306-319.
Buchanan, J. M. (1962). Externality. Economica, 29(116), 371-384.
Cattell, R.B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality.
Chavis, David M, Hogge, James H, McMillan, David W, & Wandersman, Abraham. (1986). Sense of community through Brunswik's lens: A first look. Journal of community psychology, 14(1), 24-40.
Chen, Chau Shen , & Hung, Chih-Ping. (2012). The Behavior Research of Social Networking Sites for College Students. Journal of China University of Science and Technology, vol. 150, pp. 127~146.
Chen, Pei-Yu, & Hitt, Lorin M. (2002). Measuring Switching Costs and the Determinants of Customer Retention in Internet-Enabled Businesses- A Study of the Online Brokerage Industry. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 255-274.
Chin, Wynne W, Marcolin, Barbara L, & Newsted, Peter R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189-217.
Colgate, Mark, & Lang, Bodo. (2001). Switching barriers in consumer markets: an investigation of the financial services industry
Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 332-347. doi: 10.1108/07363760110393001
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1997). Stability and change in personality assessment-the revised NEO Personality Inventory in the year 2000. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(1), 86-94.
David, P. A. (2007). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review, 75, 332-337.
Davis, F. D, Bagozzi, Richard P, & Warshaw, Paul R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Diamantopoulos, Adamantios, & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17(4), 263-282.
Ergun, Gokmen, & Stopher, P. R. (1999). Captivity Revisited. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 125(1), 1.
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory Of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of marketing research, 382-388.
Gandal, Neil, & Shy, O. (2001). Standardization policy and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 53(2), 363-383. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00067-2
Ganesh, Jaishankar, Arnold, Mark J., & Reynolds, Kristy E. (2000). Understanding the Customer Base of Service Providers: An Examination of the Differences between Switchers and Stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 65-87. doi: 10.2307/3203488
Hagel, John. (1999). Net gain: expanding markets through virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13(1), 55-65.
Hamman, Robin. (1997). Introduction to Virtual Communities Research and Cybersociology Magazine Issue Two. Cybersociology Magazine, 2.
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149-164.
Harmon-Jones, Eddie Ed, & Mills, Judson Ed. (1999). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Paper presented at the Scientific Conferences Program, 1997, U Texas, Arlington, TX, US; This volume is based on papers presented at a 2-day conference at the University of Texas at Arlington, winter 1997.
Harter, Susan. (1982). The perceived competence scale for children. Child development, 87-97.
Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten. (2000). Relationship Quality and Customer Retention through Strategic Communication of Customer Skills. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1-3), 55-79.
Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Gwinner, Kevin P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding Relationship Marketing Outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 4, 230-247.
Howard, Pierce J, & Howard, Jane M. (1995). The Big Five Quickstart: An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model of Personality for Human Resource Professionals.
Huigang, Liang, Saraf, Nilesh, Qing, Hu, & Yajiong, Xue. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 59-87.
Jermias, Johnny. (2001). Cognitive dissonance and resistance to change: the influence of commitment confirmation and feedback on judgment usefulness of accounting systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(2), 141-160.
Jones, Michael A., Motherbaugh, David L., & Beatty, Sharon E. (2002). Why customers stay: measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 55(6), 441-450.
Jones, Michael A., Mothersbaugh, David L., & Beatty, Sharon E. (2000). Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 259.
Kannan, P. K., Chang, A.M., & Whinston, A. B. (2000). Electronic Communities in E-Business: Their Role and Issues. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(4), 415-426. doi: 10.1023/A:1010022226639
Kaplan, A. M, & Haenlein, Michael. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
Katz, M. L, & Shapiro, Carl. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. The journal of political economy, 822-841.
Katz, M. L., & Srapiro, Carl. (1985). Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility. American Economic Review, 75(3), 424.
Keaveney, S. M. (1995). Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Marketing, 59(2), 71-82. doi: 10.2307/1252074
Kim, Hee-Woong, & Kankanhalli, Atreyi. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation- a status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 567-582.
Kim, Moon-Koo, Park, Myeong-Cheol, & Jeong, Dong-Heon. (2004). The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunications Policy, 28(2), 145-159. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2003.12.003
Klemperer, Paul. (1987). The Competitiveness of Markets with Switching Costs. The RAND Journal of Economics, 18(1), 138-150. doi: 10.2307/2555540
Korukonda, Appa Rao. (2007). Differences that do matter: A dialectic analysis of individual characteristics and personality dimensions contributing to computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1921-1942. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.02.003
Lee, JinKyu, Bharosa, Nitesh, Yang, Jing, Janssen, Marijn, & Rao, H. R. (2011). Group value and intention to use — A study of multi-agency disaster management information systems for public safety. Decision Support Systems, 50(2), 404-414. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2010.10.002
Limayem, Moez, Hirt, Sabine Gabriele, & Cheung, Christy M. K. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: the case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 705-737.
Lin, Chieh-Peng, Tsai, Yuan Hui, Wang, Yi-Ju, & Chiu, Chou-Kang. (2011). Modeling IT relationship quality and its determinants: A potential perspective of network externalities in e-service. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(1), 171-184. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.015
McMullan, Rosalind. (2005). A multiple-item scale for measuring customer loyalty development. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(7), 470-481. doi: 10.1108/08876040510625972
Newbert, S. L. (2008). Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual‐level empirical investigation of the resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 745-768.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574-583. doi: 10.1037/h0040291
o'Reilly, Tim. (2009). What is web 2.0: O'Reilly Media.
Oliver, Pamela, Marwell, Gerald, & Teixeira, Ruy. (1985). A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 522-556. doi: 10.2307/2780201
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research, 460-469.
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 33-44.
Oreg, Shaul. (2003). Resistance to Change: Developing an Individual Differences Measuer. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680-693.
Piderit, Sandy Kristin. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: a multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783-794. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2000.3707722
Ping, R. A., & Jr. (1993). The Effects of Satisfaction and Structural Constraints on Retailer Exiting, Voice, Loyalty, Opportunism, and Neglect. Journal of Retailing, 69(3), 320.
Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, Elena. (2012). Shackled to the status quo the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS Quarterly, 36, 21-42.
Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors: New York: Free Press.
Rheingold, Howard. (2000). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier: MIT Press.
Robert, C. P. (1999). The human whole an outline of the 'Higher' Psychology. Retrieved July 4, 2013, from http://robertpriddy.com/psy.html
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations: Simon and Schuster.
Rohlfs, Jeffrey. (1974). A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(1), 16-37. doi: 10.2307/3003090
Rothaermel, F. T, & Sugiyama, Stephen. (2001). Virtual internet communities and commercial success: individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of TimeZone. com. Journal of Management, 27(3), 297-312.
Rumelt, R. P. (1995). Precis of Inertia and Transformation. 101-132.
Saadé, Raafat, & Bahli, Bouchaib. (2005). The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(2), 317-327. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
Samuelson, William, & Zeckhauser, Richard. (1988). Status Quo Bias in Decision Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7-59.
Shapiro, Carl, & Varian, Hal. (1998). Information rules: Harvard business school press.
Shih, Hung-Pin. (2012). Cognitive Lock-In Effects on Consumer Purchase Intentions in the Context of B2C Web Sites. Psychology & Marketing, 29(10), 738-751. doi: 10.1002/mar.20560
Suls, Jerry, Green, Peter, & Hillis, Stephen. (1998). Emotional reactivity to everyday problems, affective inertia, and neuroticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(2), 127-136.
Terzis, Vasileios, Moridis, C. N., & Economides, A. A. (2012). How student’s personality traits affect Computer Based Assessment Acceptance: Integrating BFI with CBAAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1985-1996. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.019
V'azquez-Carrasco, Rosario, & Foxall, G. R. (2006). Positive vs. negative switching barriers: the influence of service consumer's need for variety. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 367-379. doi: 10.1002/cb
Yan, Li, Chuan-Hoo, Tan, Hock-Hai, Teo, & Tan, B. C. Y. (2006). Innovative usage of information technology in Singapore organizations: do CIO characteristics make a difference? Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 53(2), 177-190. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2006.872250
Zauberman, G. (2003). The Intertemporal Dynamics of Consumer Lock-In. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 405-419.
Zhao, Ling, & Lu, Yaobin. (2012). Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities: An empirical study on micro-blogging service satisfaction and continuance intention. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 825-834. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.019
Zhou, Tao, & Lu, Yaobin. (2011). Examining mobile instant messaging user loyalty from the perspectives of network externalities and flow experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 883-889. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.013
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code