在全球化的趨勢下，台灣汽車零件業面臨市場開放的挑戰，加上市場胃納量先天不足，以及全球車廠策略重組等環境變遷因素，整體結構勢必會重新調整。為維持競爭力，台灣汽車零件業廠商紛紛走向國際化，以各種型態的投資方式成立海外子公司，漸次成為所謂的多國籍企業。在事業版圖不斷擴充的過程當中，各種性質廻異於母公司的海外子公司會日漸浮現，他們各自擔負不同的策略使命，在整體價值鏈中也有著不同的角色。在這樣的國際化營運下，對以往均被歸類為傳統產業的汽車零件業者而言，如何能掌控跨越國際的知識管理策略，使組織產生源源不絕的創新動力，將是未來的一大挑戰。
本研究將透過問卷調查方式探討汽車零件業知識管理與組織創新能力的關係。並加入國際化策略的觀點探討對於上述關係的差異影響，試圖尋求汽車零件業的最適化國際知識管理運作模式。
經過實證研究之後，本研究的主要發現如下：
ㄧ、差異性分析部份：本研究發現，國際化程度對汽車零件業廠商的知識管理與組織創新構面均無顯著差異性存在。
二、影響性分析部份：在知識管理對組織創新之影響方面，本研究發現除知識管理的策略外，其餘知識管理構面的變數對於管理創新與技術創新都存在正向相關性，而其中尤以「學習性文化」對兩者均為最具預測性之因素。此外，「知識支持性資訊系統」以及「知識移轉的促進」都對汽車零件業的管理創新具有顯著的預測性；而「跨國整合型知識創新」對技術創新有顯著的預測性。而在國際化策略的構面上，則只有價值鏈活動因素對部份知識管理及組織創新變數具有影響性。
由對汽車零件業的研究結果可知，學習性文化、知識支持性資訊系統、知識移轉的促進、跨國整合型知識創新，能夠使知識管理對組織創新產生正面顯著影響。因此建議企業組織應該要努力培養學習性的文化；建立知識支持性的資訊系統；盡力促進知識的移轉；應致力以跨國整合之方式創造知識。

Due to the trend of globalization, Auto-parts industry in Taiwan is facing the challenge of market liberalized and global car companies’ tactical regroup that cause the structural readjustment.
In order to maintain market competitive capacity, Auto-parts companies in Taiwan head into internationalization gradually and set up overseas subsidiaries in different investing types, creating so-called multi-national enterprises. The overseas subsidiaries will not only present their different tactical missions they should undertake that are different from their headquarter’s during expanding market share, but also play different roles in monolithic value chain. Under internationalized operation, how to keep track of transcendental international knowledge-management tactics and generate innovative motivity continuously will be a great challenge to reputed traditional industry- Auto-parts in the future.
Through questionnaire-inquire method, this research reports explore the connection of the knowledge management and the ability of organization innovation in Auto-parts industry. Adding the view of internationalized tactics to search the above influence of otherness in order to find out the most optimum international knowledge-management operation mode.
After this research is studied and verified, the main points of it as follows:
1. The analysis of otherness: This research points out that the level of internationalization to the Auto-parts firms does not cause any notable difference in knowledge management and organization innovation.
2. Influential analysis: In the part of affection of knowledge management to organization innovation, this research notes that other variable of knowledge management to management innovation and technology innovation exists positive connection aside from knowledge management tactics. The “learning culture” is the most forecasting factor to management innovation and technology innovation. Besides, both “knowledge-supporting information system” and “knowledge-transfer advancement” get marked forecasting to the management innovation of Auto-parts industry. “Multinational-integration-knowledge innovation” has notable forecasting to technology management. Only value-chain-activity causes influence in variable to the part of knowledge management and organization innovation in internationalized tactics.
The research to Auto-parts industry remarks that learning culture, knowledge-supporting information system, knowledge-transfer advancement and multinational-integration-knowledge innovation enable knowledge management to create positive affection in organization innovation. Thus, as my suggestion, enterprises have to get the effort in cultivating learning culture, establishing knowledge-supporting information system, advancing knowledge transfer and using the method of integration to create knowledge.

目 錄
論文提要 iv
摘 要 v
Abstract vi
誌謝詞 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究流程 3
第四節 研究範圍 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 企業國際化 5
第二節 知識管理 13
第三節 組織創新 31
第四節 知識管理和組織創新的關係 34
第五節 汽車零件業 38
第三章 研究設計 45
第一節 研究架構 45
第二節 研究假設 46
第三節 問卷設計與計分方式 46
第四節 因素分析與信度分析 48
第五節 相關統計分析方法 55
第四章 汽車零件業之實證資料分析 57
第一節 研究變項之描述性統計分析 57
第二節 國際化在知識管理與組織創新上的差異分析 63
第三節 國際化、知識管理與組織創新之相關分析 71
第四節 知識管理對組織創新之廻歸分析 78
第五節 研究發現 80
第五章 結論與建議 83
第一節 結論 83
第二節 管理意涵與貢獻 86
第三節 研究建議 88
參考文獻 91
一、中文部份 91
二、英文部份 93
三、網站部份 98
附錄一 問卷 99

一、中文部份
王美音譯， Leonard, B.D.著，1998，知識創新之泉－智價企業的經營，台北：遠流出版公司，
吳淑靜，1992，影響組織創造力發展之因素研究— 以新竹科學工業園區高科技公司為例。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所未出版碩士論文。
李依峻，1999，企業知識管理系統之研製，暨南國際大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
李宛蓉譯，1990，無國界管理，台北：遠流出版社。
李俊青，2000，知識管理策略規劃思考方法及其應用之研究一些醫院組識為例，國立成功大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
林秋輝，1999，優勢商品開發過程團隊運用類型之探討，東海大學工業工程研究。
紀經紹，1985，價值革新與創造力啟發，台北：現代企業經營管理公司。
高子雯，2003，台商全球化知識管理之相關研究，中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
張文菁，2001，企業特性、人力資本，產業環境及組織績效之相關性研究，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
陳文宏，2003，多國籍企業產業技術特性、知識管理與全球佈局策略之相關研究，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
曾智顯，2001，我國企業知識管理與組織創新之相關性研究，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃佑安，1997，企業創新能力對新產品研發過程影響之研究，國立政治大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
黃英忠，2002，現代管理學(四版)，台北：華泰書局。
楊子江、王美音譯， Ikujro N. ＆ Takeuchi, H.著，1997，創新求勝－智價企業論，台北：遠流出版公司。
廖肇弘，2000，善用知識管理系統，管理雜誌，310：38~40。
劉常勇，1999，知識管理，劉常勇管理學習資料庫全球資訊網。
劉常勇，2000，後進地區科技產業發展策略探討－以台灣半導體產業與光碟機產業為研究對象，劉常勇管理學習資料庫全球資訊網。
劉碧琴，1998，個人創越、企業文化對組織創新的影響，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
蔡宏明，2000，全球化、數位化與快速時代的全球運籌管理策略，經濟情勢暨評論季刊，6(1)。
蔡啟通，1997，組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係，國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版博士論文。
二、英文部份
Amabile, T.M.1988. A model of creativity and innovation in organization. In L.L.Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.) Research in organizational behavior, 10: 123-167
Arthur Anderson Business Consulting. 1999. Zukai Knowledge Management. Japan :TOKYO Keizai Inc.
Baldridge, J.V., & Burnham, R.A. 1975. Organizational innovation: Individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20: 165-176.
Barney,J.B.1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 23: 14-18.
Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: the ansnational solution. New York, NY: Free Press.
Bartlett, C. A. & Ghoshal, S. 1999. Transnational management: text, cases, and readings in cross-border management (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill.
Blau, J.R., & McKinley, W. 1979. Ideas, complexity, and innovation. AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 24: 200-219.
Bonora, M., & Revang, J. K. 1991. A strategic framework for analyzing professional service firms-development strategies for Sustained Performance, Strategic management 113(2): 54-61
Brynjolfesson, E. 1994. Technologies True Payoff. Information Week, 10: 34-36.
Brynjolfesson, E., & Hitt, L. 1996. Paradox Lost? Firm-level evidence on the returnsto information system spending. Management Science, 42(4): 541-558.
Buckley, P.J., & Casson, M. 1976, The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. NY:Holmes and Meier Publishers, Inc.
Burgess, G.H. 1989. Industrial organization. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Calvet, A. L., 1981. A Synthesis of foreign direct investment theories and theories of the multinational firm. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.12: 141-165.
Child, J. 1977. Organizations: A guide to problems & practice (1st edition). London: Harper & Row.
Christopher, M.G. 1992. Logistics and supply chain management. London, UK: Pitman Publishing.
Cooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M. & Pagh, J.D. 1997. Supply chain management more than a new name for logistics. The Internal Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1): 1-14.
Daft, R.L. 1978. A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2): 193-210.
Damanpour, F. 1987. The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillaryinnovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13: 675-688.
Daniels, B. 1999. Integration of the supply chain for total through-cost reduction. Total Quality Management, 10: S481-490.
Davenport, T.H., & Prusak, L. 1998. Working knowledge: How OrganizationManage What They Know. Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Davenport, T.H., Delong, W.D., & Beers, C.M. 1998. Successful knowledge management projects. Sloan Management Review, winter: 43-75.
Development, 51(12): 25-30.
Dougherty, D., & Bowman, E.H. 1995. The effects of organizational downsizing ofproduct innovation. California Management Review, 37(4): 28-44.
Drucker, P.F. 1985. Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles.London: Heinemann.
Drucker, P.F. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. New York: Harper Business.
Drucker, P.F.1999. Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Review, 41: 79-94.
Drucker, P.F.2000. Knowledge Work. Executive Excellence, April: 11-12
Dunning, J. H. 1980, Toward, an eclectic theory of international production: Someempirical tests, Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1): 9-31.
European Commission 1995. Green Paper on Innovation. Brussels.
Fruin, W.M. 1997. Knowledge Works: Managing Intellectual Capital at Toshiba. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ganeshan, R. & Harrison, T. P. 1995. An introduction to supply chain management. http://silmaril.smeal.psu.edu/misc/supply_chain_ intro.html.
Gilbert, W., & Gordey, H. 1996. Understanding the Process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation, Technovation, 16(4): 301-302.
Heenan, D. A., & Perlmutter, H. V.1979. Multinational organation development reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hegarty, W.H., & Hoffman, R.C. 1990. Product/market innovations: A study of topmanagement involvement among four cultures, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(3): 186-199.
Hoffman, R.C. 1999. Organizational innovation：management influence acrosscultures, Multinational Business Review, 7(1): 31-49.
Johannessen, J.A., & Dolva, J.O. 1994. Competence and innovation: Identifyingcritical innovation factors. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Change, 3(3): 209-222.
Johannessen, J.A., Olsen, B., & Olaisen, J. 1999. Aspects of Innovation Theory Based Knowledge Management. Journal of International Management, 19: 121-139.
Juran, J.M. 1989. Juran on Leadership for Quality. New York: The Free Press.
Kalakota, R. & Whinston, A. B. 1996. Frontiers of electronic commerce. NY: Addison-Wesley.
Karl Sveiby, What Is Knowledge Management, website (as of October 2000), http://www.sveiby.com.au/knowledgeManagement.html.
Kelm, K.M., Narayanan, V.K., & Pinches, G.E. 1995. Shareholder value creationduring R&D innovation and commercialization stages. Academy of
Kim, L. 1980. Organizational innovation and structure. Journal of Business Research, 8: 225-245.
Kimberly, J.R., & Evanisko, M.J.1981. Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption oftechnological and administrative innovations. Academy of ManagementJournal, 24: 689-713.
Kochhar, R., & David, P.1996. Institutional Investors and Firm Innovation: A test ofcompeting hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 73-84.
Laurie, J. 1997. Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Capital. Training and
Leonard, B. D. 1995. Wellspring of Knowledge. Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review.
Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G.1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135-172.
Management Journal, 38(3): 770-786.
Metal Bulletin. 2001. http://www.metalbulletin.com/, first accessed March 15.
Nonaka, I. 1998. The concept of ba: building a foundation of knowledge creation. California Management Review , 40(3): 40-54.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-Creating Company. New York:Oxford University Press.
O’Dell, C. 1998. If Only We Knew What We Know. New York : The Free Press.
Papows, J. 1999. Enterprise.com. Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing.
Porter, M. 1985. Competitive Advantage. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Prahalad, C.K., & Doz Y.Z. 1987. The Multinational Mission: Balancing Global Demands and Global Visison, New York, NY : Free Press.
Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel G. 1994. Strategy as a Field of Study: Why search for a new paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 237-242.
Prahalad,C.K. & Hamel,G.1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 23: 123-140.
Rosenzweig, P., and Singh, J. 1991. Organizational environments and the multinationalenterprise. Academy of Management Review, 16(2): 340-361.
Rugman, A. M., & Hodgetts, R. M. 1999. International Business: A Strategic Management Approach. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill.
Russell, R.D. 1995. An investigation of some organizational correlates of corporateentrepreneurship: Toward a system model of organizational innovation. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Change, 4(4): 295-314.
Sarvary, M.1999. Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry, California Management review, 41(2): 34-44.
Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A.1994. Determinants of innovative behavior: A path modelof individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal,37(3): 580-607.
Senge, P.M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New Yo rk: Doubleday/Currency.
Stewart, T. 1997. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Tang, H.K. 1999. An Inventory of Organizational Innovativeness. Technovation,19(1): 41-51.
Tushman, M.L., & Anderson, P.1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 439-465.
Tusman, M.L., & Nadler, D. 1986. Organizing for Innovation. California Management Review, 28(3): 74-92.
Vernon, R., 1966. International investments and international trade in the product cycle.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80: 190-207.
Walton, R. 1985. From control to commitment in the Workplace, Harvard Business Review, March-April: 109-113.
Williamson, O.E., 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications,New York, NY: Free Press
Wolfe, R.A. 1994. Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3): 405-430.
Zack, M. H. 1999. Managing codified knowledge, Sloan Management Review, Summer: 45~47.