Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0619108-152859 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0619108-152859
論文名稱
Title
廣告、顧客滿意度與研究發展對股價非系統風險之影響
The Effects of Advertising, Research and Development, and Customer Satisfaction on Unsystematic Risk of Stock Price
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
58
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2008-06-12
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2008-06-19
關鍵字
Keywords
非系統風險、研究發展、顧客滿意度、廣告
Research and Development, Customer Satisfaction, Advertising, Unsystematic Risk
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5753 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5753 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
公司經理人的最終目標是使股東利益極大化,因此,企業內各部門主管甚至是高階經理人,都必須透過此一原則來檢視其策略能否使公司股東受益。廣告、顧客滿意度和研究發展是近年來企業所重視的投入要素,但這些投入要素卻也經常被質疑是否真能為公司帶來實質利益,意即使股東受益。據此,本文以美國和台灣股票市場的上市公司為研究對象,探討廣告、顧客滿意度和研究發展對公司股價風險之影響。

實證結果發現,不論在美國或台灣,廣告、顧客滿意度皆能顯著降低公司股價之總風險、系統風險和非系統風險。至於研究發展對公司股價風險之影響則較不一致,在美國方面,研究發展會增加公司股價之總風險、系統風險和非系統風險;而在台灣,研究發展會增加公司股價的系統風險,但卻降低非系統風險。

對於公司經理人而言,本研究提供控管公司風險的新方向,讓不同部門間的經理人可以用共同的財務語言溝通,更進而帶給高階主管分配公司資源與風險控管之新思維。
Abstract
There is a growing consensus that senior management in either marketing or finance department should not evaluate the marketing performance only by marketing metrics, e.g. market share, sales growth, customer satisfaction, and etc., but focusing on maximizing shareholder value because they do not understand how or even whether those marketing metrics benefit shareholders. To follow this trend, this article investigates whether a firm’s advertising expenditure, customer satisfaction, and research-and-development (R&D) expenditure have effects on total risk, systematic risk, and unsystematic risk of its common stock. After examining American and Taiwan stock market in the period from 2001 to 2005, the study finds that, conforming to the hypotheses in the study, advertising and customer satisfaction can significantly lower all a firm’s total risk, systematic risk, and unsystematic risk of its common stock. The result of R&D, however, rejects the hypotheses in the study and even previous research and states that R&D would increase a firm’s total risk, systematic risk, and unsystematic risk of its common stock in American stock market, yet increase systematic risk and decrease unsystematic risk in Taiwan stock market. The implication of this study may offer senior managers an alternative thinking of controlling business risk and resource allocation.
目次 Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Review of Systematic Risk and Unsystematic Risk
2.2. Stock Volatility and Unsystematic Risk
2.3. Advertising
2.4. Consumer Satisfaction
2.5. R&D
3. Hypotheses and Methodology
3.1. Hypotheses
3.2. Data
3.3. Method
4. Results
4.1. American case
4.2. Taiwan case
5. Conclusion
5.1. Conclusion
5.2. Research constrains
5.3. Suggestion for Further research
Reference
參考文獻 References
Anderson, Eugene W., Claes Fornell, and Sanal K. Mazvancheryl (2004), “Customer Satisfaction and Shareholder Value,” Journal of Marketing, 68 (October), 172-85.

---- and Mary W. Sullivan (1993), “The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms,” Marketing Science, 12(2), 125-43.

Bearden, William O. and Jesse E. Teel (1983), “Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (February), 21–28.

Bharadwaj, Sundar G. and Anil Menon (1993), “Determinants of Success in Service-Based Industries: A PIMS-Based Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Services Marketing, 7 (4), 19–40.

Bolton, Ruth N. (1998), “A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer’s Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction,” Marketing Science, 17 (Winter), 45–65.

---- and James H. Drew (1991), “A Multistage Model of Customers’ Assessments of Service Quality and Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (March), 375–84.

Boulding, William, Ajay Kalra, Richard Staelin, and Valarie Zeithaml (1993), “A Dynamic Process Model of Service Quality: From Expectations to Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (February), 7–27.

----, and Richard Staelin (1993), “A Look on the Cost Side: Market Share and Competitive Environment,” Marketing Science, 12 (Spring), 144–66.

Chambers, Dennis, Ross Jennings, and Robert P. Thompson (2002), “Excess Returns to R&D Intensive Firms,” Review of Accounting Studies, 7 (July–September), 133–58.

Chan, Louis K., Josef Lakonishok, and Theodore Sougiannis (2001), “The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures,” Journal of Finance, 56 (6), 2431–56.

Fornell, Claes (1992), “A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience,” Journal of Marketing, 56 (January), 6–21.

Frieder, Laura and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam (2005), “Brand Perceptions and the Market for Common Stock,” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 40 (1), 57–85.

Gruca, Thomas S. and Lopo L. Rego (2005), “Customer Satisfaction, Cash Flow, and Shareholder Value,” journal of marketing, 69 (July), 115–30

Grullon, Gustavo, George Kanatas, and James P. Weston (2004), “Advertising, Breadth of Ownership and Liquidity,” The Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2), 439–61.

Jaffe, Adam B. (1986), “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value,” The American Economic Review, 76 (5), 984–1001.

Kothari, S.P., Ted E. Laguerre, and Andrew J. Leone (2002), “Capitalization Versus Expensing: Evidence on the Uncertainty of Future Earnings from Capital Expenditures Versus R&D Outlays,” Review of Accounting Studies, 7 (4), 355–82.

Lintner, John (1965), “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 47 (1), 13–37.

Markowitz, Harry M. (1959), Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, Wiley, Yale University Press, 1970, Basil Blackwell, 1991.

Miller, Kent D. and Philip Bromiley (1990), “Strategic Risk and Corporate Performance: An Analysis of Alternative Risk Measures,” Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 756–79.

Mittal, Vikas and Wagner Kamakura (2001), “Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics,” Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (February), 131–42


Mizik, Natalie and Robert Jacobson (2003), “Trading Off Between Value Creation and Value Appropriation: The Financial Implications of Shifts in Strategic Emphasis,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (January), 63–76.

Mossin, Jan (1966), “Equilibrium in a Capital Asset Market,” Econometrica, 34 (4), 768–83.

Narayanan, Sridhar, Ramarao Desiraju, and Pradeep K. Chintagunta (2004), “Return on Investment Implications for Pharmaceutical Promotional Expenditures: The Role of Marketing-Mix Interactions,” Journal of Marketing 68 (4): 90-105.

Nelson, Phillip (1974) “Advertising as information,” Journal of Political Economy, 81, 729–45.

Oliver, Richard L. (1980), “A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (November), 460–69.

---- and John E. Swan (1989), “Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 53 (April), 21–35.

Pakes, Ariel (1985), “On Patents, R&D, and the Stock Market Rate of Return,” Journal of Political Economy, 93 (2), 390–409.

Roberts, Peter W. (2001), “Innovation and Firm-Level Persistent Profitability: A Schumpeterian Framework,” Managerial and Decision Economics, 22 (4–5), 239–50.

Rust, Roland T. and Anthony J. Zahorik (1993), “Customer Satisfaction, Customer Retention, and Market Share,” Journal of Retailing, 69 (Summer), 145–56.

----, ----, and Timothy L. Keiningham (1994), Return on Quality: Measuring the Financial Impact of Your Company’s Quest for Quality. Chicago: Probus.

----, ----, ---- (1995), “Return on Quality (ROQ): Making Service Quality Financially Accountable,” Journal of Marketing, 59 (April), 58–70.

Sharpe, William F. (1964), “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk,” Journal of Finance, 19 (3), 425–42.

Srivastava, Rajendra K., Tasadduq A. Shervani, and Liam Fahey (1998), “Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (January), 2–18.

Yi, Youjae (1991), “A Critical Review of Customer Satisfaction,” in Review of Marketing 1989, Valarie A. Zeithaml, ed. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 68–123.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.141.30.162
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.141.30.162
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code