論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available
論文名稱 Title |
Rightovers:誠信行為如何透過信任增加公司績效? How can behavioral integrity increase the performance of a company through trust? |
||
系所名稱 Department |
|||
畢業學年期 Year, semester |
語文別 Language |
||
學位類別 Degree |
頁數 Number of pages |
100 |
|
研究生 Author |
|||
指導教授 Advisor |
|||
召集委員 Convenor |
|||
口試委員 Advisory Committee |
|||
口試日期 Date of Exam |
2015-06-12 |
繳交日期 Date of Submission |
2015-07-25 |
關鍵字 Keywords |
知覺、行為、文化、溝通、競爭、誠信、信任、表現 Behavior, Perception, Culture, Communication, Trust, Competition, Integrity, Performance |
||
統計 Statistics |
本論文已被瀏覽 5746 次,被下載 485 次 The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5746 times, has been downloaded 485 times. |
中文摘要 |
本論文主要目的為帶出一個新概念:如何藉由管理偏誤(如誠信與信任)來提升企業中員工的表現。此主題是被個人的興趣所挑起,因此也嘗試去擴展關於這方面的學術研究。在筆者所設的假設中,提出管理上的建議以提升個人在企業中表現。 經由發展後,在第一部分,不同的概念被加到這個主題(分為五個章節),筆者會從這個理論框架中闡述假設。然後在第二部分是筆者實作的框架,結果將會顯示支持或是拒絕這些假設。因此,筆者將會分析參與者的回答,並分別管理這些一對一的訪談內容。 此論文中,我們將會更進一步看見:筆者測試的兩個假設將會是「缺少對管理者的信任是因為缺少溝通」與「競爭的環境將會導致信任的減少」。這些假設緊緊聯繫著核心問題: 如何透過信任影響誠信行為來提升公司的表現。因為此主題內容十分的廣泛,我們將會將焦點放在此主題的兩個主要觀點,尤其是在研究「如何」,如我們將會在實驗中看到。 筆者得到的結果並不會完全是原本所期待的。筆者希望研究者與管理者將會在此研究中找到樂趣,像是筆者嘗試去的面對那些可能與假設相反的概念,如:即便在競爭的環境中信任仍然存在。希望您閱讀愉快。 |
Abstract |
This thesis’ purpose is to bring new elements to how, through management bias such as integrity and trust, we can increase employees’ performance in a company. This subject has been picked by personal interest but also to try to expand the existing academic literature about it. Among the hypotheses we will emit, we will give management leads to enhance individual performance in a company. After developing, in our first part, the different concepts attached to this subject (divided into 5 chapters), we will elaborate our hypotheses from this theoretical framework. Then, in our second part, our empirical framework, we will prove or reject these hypotheses. To do so, we will analyze our respondents’ answers to our interview guide, administrated in one to one interviews. In this thesis, as we will see further, the two hypotheses we will test will be “lack of trust towards manager is due to lack of communication” and “competitive environment leads to decrease of interest for trust”. These hypotheses are tied to our core question, how behavioral integrity, through trust, can increase company’s performance. Because this topic is really wide, we had to focus on these two specific aspects of our subject, with a peculiar attention to the “how”, as we will see in the empirical framework. The results we obtained were not exactly those we were expecting. We hope that researchers and managers will find an interest in our work, seen that we tried to confront concepts that might seem to be opposite, such as trust in a competitive environment. We wish you a good reading. |
目次 Table of Contents |
Introduction 1 The interest of this topic 1 The theoretical framework outlining my research 1 The empirical framework to test our hypotheses 2 Managerial & academic implication 3 Thesis structure 4 Part 1: THE THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK 5 Chapter 1: The role of integrity in organizations 5 Definition 5 Behavioral integrity in organization 6 Integrity for managers 7 Integrity for employees 8 Chapter 2: How our perception may vary 10 Definition 10 Perception and the attribution theory 10 Why employee’s perception matters for companies? 12 Perception and integrity . 13 Chapter 3: Trust, how is it necessary in organizations 15 Definition 15 Different approaches 15 Trustworthiness 17 From trust to distrust 18 Trust and risk taking: 19 Chapter 4: How to assess performance 22 Definition 22 Performance measurement 22 Advantages and limitations 23 Chapter 5: Corporate culture and its impact on our behavior 25 Definition . 25 The different organization culture’s designs 28 Importance of employee’s culture assimilation . 29 Limits of these theories 30 Part 1: Conclusion . 31 Hypotheses 32 Hypothesis 1 32 vi Hypothesis 2 32 Part 2: THE EMPIRICAL FRAMEWORK 33 Chapter 1: How to test our hypotheses 33 Methodology 33 The field of investigation 34 Collecting method and data processing 37 Chapter 2: Presentation of the results obtained 39 Hypothesis 1 39 Hypothesis 2 44 Chapter 3: Contribution and limitations . 49 Benefits of the research 49 Limits of the research 51 Conclusion of our thesis 53 Annexes 55 Interview guide 55 Interviews’ transcription 57 Matrix 77 Additional Material 81 Concepts definition 87 Theory dictionary 89 References 91 Academic articles 91 Books 93 Internet websites 93 |
參考文獻 References |
Audi R. and Murphy Patrick (Jan., 2006), The Many Faces of Integrity, Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 3-21 Barney and Hansen (1994), Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 15, pp. 175-190 Becker Thomas (1998), Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 154-161 Davis Anne and Rothstein Hannah (2006), The Effects of the Perceived Behavioral Integrity of Managers on Employee Attitudes: A Meta-analysis, Journal of Business Ethics vol.67 pp 407–419 Eisenberg Robert and Huntington Robin (1986), Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 71 no. 3 pp 500-507 Govier (1994), Is it a jungle out there? Trust, distrust, and the construction of social reality, Dialogue, 33: 237-252 Heh Jason Huang (2011), Scenario-based Approach as a Teaching Tool to Promote Integrity Awareness: a Chinese Perspective, Management Education for Integrity: Ethically Educating Tomorrow's Business Leaders, pp 156-167 Kaplan (1983), Psychological distress in sociological context: Toward a general theory of psychosocial stress, New York: Academic Press, pp. 195–264 Kaplan and Norton (1992), The Balanced Scorecard Measure that Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, January-February 1992 issue, pp 71-80 Kaplan and Norton (2007), Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System, Harvard Business Review, July August 2007 issue, pp 1-15 Kee and Knox (1970) Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust, Journal of Conflict Resolution vol.14 pp. 357-366 Kirkpatrick & Locke (1991) Leadership: Do traits matter? Academy of Management Executive, vol. 5 pp 48-60. Lewicki, Tomlinson and Nicole Gillespie (2006), Models of Interpersonal Trust Development: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Evidence, and Future Directions, Journal of Management, vol. 32 no. 6, pp 991-1022 March and Shapira (1987), Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking, Management Science, Vol. 33, No. 11, pp. 1404-1418 Mayer, Davis and Schoorman (1995), An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 709-734 McLain and Hackman (1999), Trust, Risk, and Decision Making in Organizational Change, Public Administration Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 152-176 Mc Sweeney (2002) Hofstede’s Model of National Cultural Difference and their consequences: A triumph of Faith – A failure of Analysis, The Tavistock Institute vol. 55 no. 1 pp 89-118 Morrison Allen (May, 2001), Integrity and Global Leadership, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 65-76 Nishii Lisa, Lepak David, Schneider Benjamin (2011), Perception Is Reality: How employees Perceive What Motivates HR Practices Affects their Engagement, Behavior and Performance, CAHRS Research Link 14 pp 1-6 Prottas David (2013), Relationships Among Employee Perception of Their Manager’s Behavioral Integrity, Moral Distress, and Employee Attitudes and Well Being, Journal of business ethics, vol. 113 pp 51-60 Rajczi Alex (2007), Integrity and Ordinary Morality, American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 15-26 Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data. 2nd edition. Sage Publications. Ring and Van de Ven (1992), Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations, Strategic Management Journal, 13 pp. 483-498 Robles Marcel (December 2012), Executive Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace, Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, vol. 75 pp 453-465 Rousseau (1995), Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreement, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 43, no. 1 (Mar., 1998), pp. 184-186 Sabel, C. F. (1993), Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy, Human Relations, 46 (9), pp. 1133-1170. Simons Tony (2002), Behavioral Integrity: The Perceived Alignment Between Managers’ Words and Deeds as a Research Focus, Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp 18-35 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Trevino, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000), Moral person and moral manager, California Management Review, 42(4), pp 128-142. Verstegen and Buchholtz (2001), Trust, Risk, and Shareholder Decision Making: an Investor Perspective on Corporate Governance, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 11, Issue 1, pp 177-193 Whitener, Brodt, Korsgaard and Werner (1998), Managers as Initiators of Trust: an Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior, The Academy of Management Review; 23; 3; pp 513-531 Books Amann, Stachowicz-Stanusch (2012), Integrity in Organizations: Building the Foundations for Humanistic Management, Palgrave Macmillan, 656p Armstrong (1994), Performance Management, Kogan Page, 215p Daft (2013), Understanding the Theory & Design of Organizations, Cengage South-Western, 640p George and Sims (2010) True North: Discover Your Authentic Leadership, John Wiley & Sons, 288p Johnson (2011), Meeting The Ethical Challenges Of Leadership: Casting Light Or Shadow, Sage Publications, 536p Robbins, Judge (2012), Organizational Behavior 15th Edition, Prentice Hall, 711p Trompenaars, Charles Hampden-Turner (1997), Riding The Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, McGraw-Hill, 274p Trompenaars (1993) Riding The Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business, The Economist Books, 192p Internet websites The Hofstede Center, The National Cultural Dimensions, document available online: http://geert-hofstede.com/national-culture.html, accessed on 15/06/2014 The Ethics Resource Center, Business Ethics Timeline, document available online: www.ethics.org/resources/busienss-ethics-tiemline.asp, accessed on 13/01/2015 |
電子全文 Fulltext |
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。 論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted 開放時間 Available: 校內 Campus: 已公開 available 校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available |
紙本論文 Printed copies |
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。 開放時間 available 已公開 available |
QR Code |