Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0619116-142502 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0619116-142502
論文名稱
Title
團隊情感氛圍影響團隊創造力的雙重路徑:團隊任務複雜度與時間壓力的干擾效果
The Dual Pathway Model of Group Affective Tone on Team Creativity: The Moderating Roles of Task Complexity and Time Pressure
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
68
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2016-07-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2016-07-20
關鍵字
Keywords
團隊情感氛圍、團隊歷程、任務複雜度、時間壓力、團隊創造力
Group Affective Tone, Task Complexity, Team Processes, Time Pressure, Team Creativity
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5785 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5785 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
過去團隊情感氛圍研究,大多分別聚焦於正、負向團隊情感氛圍對團隊的影響,較少研究同時納入正、負向團隊情感氛圍於模型中。再者,過去雖有研究檢驗團隊情感氛圍影響團隊的中介機制,但多聚焦於人際關係層面的機制(如:合作行為、滿意度、團隊向心力等等),本研究提出雙重路徑的觀點,認為團隊情感氛圍會經由同時影響人際關係層面的機制(即:社會整合)和任務層面的機制(即:團隊資訊深化),進而影響團隊創造力。此外,本研究也檢驗任務複雜度、時間壓力兩個情境因素對團隊情感氛圍與團隊歷程的干擾效果。
  本研究採問卷法,以56個團隊、共245位團隊成員與主管為樣本,以兩週為時間區隔蒐集資料。結果發現,正向團隊情感氛圍會透過正向影響團隊資訊深化,進而提升創造力;同時,也會透過正向影響社會整合,進而降低團隊創造力。負向團隊情感則會降低團隊資訊深化,不利於團隊創造力;但同時也會透過減緩團隊社會整合,而有助於團隊創造力。此外,本研究也發現,任務複雜度、時間壓力分別與正、負向團隊情感氛圍有交互作用:當任務複雜度低時,正向團隊情感氛圍對社會整合與團隊資訊深化的正向效果會更加強;當任務複雜度低時,此效果轉為負向。當時間壓力高時,負向團隊情感氛圍對於社會整合與團隊資訊深化的負向效果會更為加強;當時間壓力低時,此段關係轉為正向。
Abstract
Past group affect-creativity research examined the effect of either positive or negative group affective tone (P/NGAT) on team creativity separately. Moreover, although there were studies investigating the underlying mechanisms, most of them retained their attention exclusively on relationship-oriented mechanisms (e.g. team collaboration, satisfaction, cohesiveness). This study presents a dual pathway model that includes both PGAT and NGAT to examine whether they influence team creativity through two distinct mechanisms- social integration and elaboration of task-relevant information. We also examine the influence of contextual moderators (i.e. task complexity & task time pressure) on PGAT/NGAT-creativity relationship.
Data was collected from 56 teams in real workplace. The results supported our hypotheses: (a) PGAT was positively related to, whereas NGAT was negatively related to social integration and elaboration of task-relevant information, which in turn differentially predicts team creativity. (b) Task complexity moderated the relationship between PGAT and the two group processes; time pressure moderated that of NGAT and the two group processes. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.
目次 Table of Contents
學位論文審定書 i
謝誌 ii
摘要  iii
Abstract iv
Table of Content v
Figure vi
Table vi
Introduction p.1
Theory and Hypotheses p.6
The Dual Pathways from PGAT to Team Creativity: The Mediating Role of Social Integration and Elaboration of Task-Relevant Information p.6
The Dual Pathways from NGAT to Team Creativity: The Mediating Role of Social Integration and Elaboration of Task-Relevant Information p.11
PGAT, Group Processes, Team Creativity: Task Type as A Moderator p.14
NGAT, Group Processes, Team Creativity: Time Pressure as A Moderator p.16
Research Method p.18
Theoretical Framework p.18
Sample and Procedure p.19
Measurement p.21
Confirmatory Factor Analysis p.25
Data Analysis p.25
Results p.27
Hypothesis Testing p.27
Discussion p.35
Theoretical Implications p.35
Practical Implication p.40
Limitation and Direction for Future Research p.41
Reference p.43
Appendix 1: Team Members Questionnaire p.54
Appendix 2: Team Leader Questionnaire p.58
參考文獻 References
Reference
Chen, L. (2014). Can Negative Group Affective Tone Facilitate Team Innovation? Exploring the Moderating Roles of Innovation Rewards and Team Promotion Focus: A Multi-Sample and Multi-Source Investigation. Unpublished Master Thesis, National Sun Yet Sen University. (In Chinese)
Tsai, W. C., Chi, N. W. (2008). Exploring Antecedents, Boundaries, and Individual-level Consequences of Group Affective Tone. Organization & Management, Vol.1, No.1, pp.1-37. (In Chinese)
Anderson, N., De Drue, C. K. W., & Nijstad., B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147-173
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
Allen, T., Katz, R., Grady, J. J., & Slavin, N. (1988). Project team aging and performance: The roles of project and functional managers. R&D Management, 18(4), 295-308.
Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(5), 1054.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to" the social psychology of creativity.". Westview press.
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative science quarterly, 50(3), 367-403.
Amabile, T. M., Mueller, J. S., Simpson, W. B., Hadley, C. N., Kramer, S. J., & Fleming, L. (2002). Time pressure and creativity in organizations: A longitudinal field study.
Barsade, S. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 644-675.
Barsade, S. G., & Knight, A. P. (2015). Group affect. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior., 2(1), 21-46.
Barsade, S. G., Ward, A. J., Turner, J. D. F., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (2000). To your heart’s content: A model of affective diversity in top management teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 802–836.
Bless, H. (2001). Mood and the use of general knowledge structures. In L. L. Martin (Ed.), Theories of mood and cognition: A user’s guidebook (pp. 9–26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Bless, H., & Fiedler, K. (2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. Affect in social thinking and behavior, 65-84.
Chernikova, M., Destro, C. L., Mauro, R., Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2016). Different strokes for different folks: Effects of regulatory mode complementarity and task complexity on performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 134-142.
Chi, N., Chung, Y.-Y., & Tsai, W.-C. (2011). How do happy leaders enhance team success? The mediating roles of transformational leadership, group affective tone, and team processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 1421–1454.
Chi, N. W., & Huang, J. C. (2014). Mechanisms linking transformational leadership and team performance: The mediating roles of team goal orientation and group affective tone. Group & Organization Management, 39, 300-325
Chi, N. W., Huang, Y. M., & Lin, S. C. (2009). A double-edged sword? Exploring the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation: the moderating role of team-oriented HR practices. Group & Organization Management, 34, 698-726
Clore, G. L., Gasper, K., & Garvin, E. (2001). Affect as information. Handbook of affect and social cognition, 121-144.
Collins, A. L., Lawrence, S. A., Troth, A. C., & Jordan, P. J. (2013). Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S43-S62.
De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., Bechtoldt, M. N., & Baas, M. (2011). Group creativity and innovation: A motivated information processing perspective. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 81.
De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 22-49.
De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 88(4), 741.
Dineen, B., Noe, R., Shaw, J., Duffy, M. K., & Wiethoff, C. (2007). Level and dispersion of satisfaction in teams: Using foci and social context to explain the satisfaction-absenteeism relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 623– 643.
Fredrickson B. L. 1998. What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology 2:300–19
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American psychologist, 56(3), 218.
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical transactions-royal society of London series of biological sciences, 1367-1378.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313-332.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological science, 13(2), 172-175.
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological bulletin, 117(1), 39.
Forgas, J. P. (2002). Feeling and doing: Affective influences on interpersonal behavior. Psychological inquiry, 13(1), 1-28.
Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: An information processing perspective. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(1), 3-34.
Garcia-Prieto, P., Mackie, D. M., Tran, V., & Smith, E. R. (2007). Chapter 7 Intergroup Emotions in Workgroups: Some Emotional Antecedents and Consequences of Belonging. Affect and Groups (Research on Managing Groups and Teams, Volume 10) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 10, 145-184.
George J. M., 1990. Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology. 75:107–16
George, J. M. (1995). Leader positive mood and group performance: The case of customer service. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(9), 778-794.
George, J. M. (1996). Group affective tone. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 77–93). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
George, J. M., & Bettenhausen, K. (1990). Understanding prosocial behavior, sales performance, and turnover: A group-level analysis in a service context. Journal of applied psychology, 75(6), 698.
George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological bulletin, 112(2), 310.
George, J. M., & James, L. R. (1993). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 798–804.
George, J. M., & King, E. B. (2007). Potential pitfalls of affect convergence in teams: Functions and dysfunctions of group affective tone. Research on managing groups and teams, 10, 97-123.
George, J. M. (2011). Dual tuning A minimum condition for understanding affect in organizations. Organizational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147-164.
George, J. M., & Zhou, Z. (2002). Understanding what bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 687-697.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622.
Grawitch, M. J., Munz, D. C., Elliott, E. K., & Mathis, A. (2003). Promoting creativity in temporary problem-solving groups: The effects of positive mood and autonomy in problem definition on idea-generating performance. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 7(3), 200.
Gong, Y., Kim, T. Y., Lee, D. R., & Zhu, J. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 827-851.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of applied psychology, 55(3), 259.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(6), 1122.
Isen, A. M. (1990). The influence of positive and negative affect on cognitive organization: Some implications for development. Psychological and biological approaches to emotion, 75-94.
Isen, A. M. (2008). Some ways in which positive affect influences decision making and problem solving. Handbook of emotions, 3, 548-573.
Isen, A. M., & Labroo, A. A. (2003). 11 Some Ways in Which Positive Affect Facilitates Decision Making and Judgment. In Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (Vol. 365). Cambridge University Press.
Isen, A. M., & Means, B. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social cognition, 2(1), 18-31.
James, K., Brodersen, M., & Eisenberg, J. (2004). Workplace affect and workplace creativity: A review and preliminary model. Human Performance, 17, 169-194.
James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational research methods, 9(2), 233-244.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (Vol. 349). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort‐reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and organizational psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
Jordan, P. J., Lawrence, S. A., & Troth, A. C. (2006). The impact of negative mood on team performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 12(02), 131-145.
Jones, E. E., & Kelly, J. R. (2009). No pain, no gains: Negative mood leads to process gains in idea-generation groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13(2), 75.
Kafetsios, K., & Zampetakis, L. A. (2008). Emotional intelligence and job satisfaction: Testing the mediatory role of positive and negative affect at work. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(3), 712-722.
Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R. (1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 542–571.
Kelly, J. R., & Loving, T. J. (2004). Time pressure and group performance: Exploring underlying processes in the Attentional Focus Model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 185-198.
Kelly, J. R., & Spoor, J. R. (2006). Affective influence in groups. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Affect in soci al thinking and behavior (pp.311-325). New York: Psychology Press.
Kelly, J. R., & Spoor, J. R. (2007). Naïve theories about the effects of mood in groups: A preliminary investigation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 10, 203-222.
Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members' need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581-598.
Knight, A. P. (2013). Mood at the midpoint: Affect and change in exploratory search over time in teams that face a deadline. Organization Science, 26(1), 99-118.
Knight, A. P., & Eisenkraft, N. (2015). Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1214.
Kooij‐de Bode, H. J., Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Ginkel, W. P. (2010). Good Effects of Bad Feelings: Negative Affectivity and Group Decision‐making. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 375-392.
Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of psychology.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological methods, 7(1), 83.
Maier, N. R. (1950). The quality of group decisions as influenced by the discussion leader. Human Relations, 3(2), 155-174.
Mason, C. M., & Griffin, M. A. (2005). Group Task Satisfaction The Group’s Shared Attitude to its Task and Work Environment. Group & Organization Management, 30(6), 625-652.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological bulletin, 115(2), 210.
Nordqvist, S., Hovmark, S., & Zika-Viktorsson, A. (2004). Perceived time pressure and social processes in project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 22(6), 463-468.
O’Reilly, C. A., Caldwell, D. F., & Barnett, W. P. (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 21–37.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.
Rhee, S. Y. (2006, August). Shared emotions and group effectiveness: the role of broaden-and-build interactions. In Academy of management Proceedings (Vol. 2006, No. 1, pp. B1-B6). Academy of Management.
Rhee, S. Y. (2007). Group emotions and group outcomes: The role of group-member interactions. In E. A. Mannix, M. A. Neale, & C. P. Anderson (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (vol. 10, pp.65–95). San Francisco, CA: JAI Press.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(3), 513.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296-303.
Schwarz, N. (2011). Feelings-as-information theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology, 1, 289-308.
Shin, Y. (2014). Positive group affect and team creativity mediation of team reflexivity and promotion focus. Small Group Research, 45(3), 337-364.
Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of applied Psychology, 92(6), 1709.
Simsek, Z., Veiga, J. F., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2005). Modeling the multilevel determinants of top management team behavioral integration. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 69-84.
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662–673.
Spoor, J. R., & Kelly, J. R. (2004). The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 398 - 412.
Stewart, G. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32, 29–54.
Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of applied psychology, 90(2), 295.
Teuchmann, K., Totterdell, P., & Parker, S. K. (1999). Rushed, unhappy, and drained: an experience sampling study of relations between time pressure, perceived control, mood, and emotional exhaustion in a group of accountants. Journal of occupational health psychology, 4(1), 37.
To, M. L., Fisher, C. D., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Rowe, P. A. (2012). Within-person relationships between mood and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 599.
Tsai, W. C., Chen, C. C., & Liu, H. L. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1570–1583.
Tsai, W. C., Chi, N. W., Grandey, A. A., & Fung, S. C. (2012). Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 638-656.
Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. Journal of applied psychology, 89(6), 1008.
Van Knippenberg, D., Kooij-de Bode, H. J., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2010). The interactive effects of mood and trait negative affect in group decision making. Organization Science, 21(3), 731-744.
Warr, P. B., Barter, J., & Brownbridge, G. (1983). On the independence of positive and negative affect.
West, M., Smith, K. G., & Tjosvold, D. (2003). Past, present, and future perspectives on organizational cooperation. International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working, 575-597.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.231.146.172
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.231.146.172
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code