Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0620100-211508 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0620100-211508
論文名稱
Title
台灣大型製藥廠技術取得模式之決定因素分析
analysis of decision factor of technique acquiring model in large pharmaceutical company in Taiwan
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
91
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2000-06-07
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2000-06-20
關鍵字
Keywords
技術取得模式、製藥、技術移轉
technique transfer, pharmaceutical
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5683 次,被下載 5628
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5683 times, has been downloaded 5628 times.
中文摘要
台灣醫藥市場其實不大,不過整個製藥產業卻有二佰多家大大小小的製藥廠。過去數十年來,在發展製藥工業上,始終無法跟歐美日等先進製藥國家相比。其中幾個主要原因,是由於製藥工業研究發展工作是一個進入障礙極高的門欄。台灣數家較具規模的大型製藥廠,在過去數十年來也不斷的投入研究與發展工作,如今雖然研發水準尚不能與國外先進大廠相比擬,但其研發工作的經驗也足以作為其他中小型製藥廠做為參考與學習。本研究主要目的是希望探討這幾家大型製藥廠,在進行研究與發展工作時,其技術取得模式之選擇評估因素的探討,以作為政府在發展未來生技製藥產時,訂定獎勵或股利政策的參考依據,以及作為其他中小型製藥廠選擇技術取得模式時的一個依據。

本研究的進行方式,是採取探索式研究的專家訪談法。先整理國內外對於製藥產業、研究發展與技術移轉等相關文獻,從中歸納出技術取得模式背後的相關決定因素;接著再訪談該數家藥廠的研發主管或是高階經理人,蒐集他們對上述研究主題的實際作法與認知。

研究結果發現,由於這些製藥廠,都是家族式經營的中小型企業,對於技術取得模式的考慮因素,多是由企業主與高階經理人、主管等,依照個案的不同,來決定採用的模式,不過大致可以歸納出幾個比較重要的因素,像是技術性或是經濟性的動機、專利權的問題等,是大部分廠商比較重視的問題。本研究也針對這些調查結果提出九個命題、以及相關的討論與建議。

最後,本研究建議後續研究者可以針對,一、整合台灣地區大型製藥廠的可行性分析,二、如何發展製藥產業的研究發展政策等兩方面,作為後續研究的重點。

Abstract
Although the pharmaceutical industry in Taiwan is not at large, there exist such two hundreds companies in this industry. In the past decade, such industrial development is unable to keep up with those of more developed countries, for instance, the United States and the United Kingdom.

A few reasons behind such fact are due to the high barriers on research and development of the pharmaceutical industry. For those larger pharmaceutical companies, investments on research and development are continuously being attempted. Though such attempted level cannot be compared with those pharmaceutical industries from abroad, it serves as a fine learning model for other companies particularly those of smaller ones to take into considerations. The primary goal behind the study is to explore the development and research of the pharmaceutical industry. Furthermore, such finding could provide an important source for other companies and for the government in the future if they plan to develop such type of industry.

In order to carry out the study, interview method suggested by the experts will be utilized. First and foremost, related documents and sources on the pharmaceutical industry field both including the developing and technical aspect will be collected.
The major points will then be sorted and organized for further study. Next, those managers who specialize in this area will be interviewed; and their opinions and their methodological recognitions will then be analyzed.

The study shows that most of these companies belong to the so called small and medium size enterprises. Their methods of modeling acquisition are decisions made by the top managers depending and according to the different situations and different cases. Most companies perceive some common factors like economical motivation, technical motivation and copyright and patent rights as the problems to be emphasized more. Finally, nine questions, comments and related discussion topics from the study are presented.

In conclusion, this study suggests two aspects for further research. One is to analyze the feasibility on the possible integration of large-scale pharmaceutical companies in Taiwan and the second one is to develop policies for research and development of pharmaceutical industry. This is to further expand the purpose behind the research.

目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 3
第三節 研究範圍: 4
第四節 研究對象 4
第五章 研究限制 5
第二章 文獻探討 6
第一節 台灣製藥廠商的內外環境分析 6
第二節 製藥業研究發展(R&D)的分析 21
第三節 技術移轉 30
第三章 研究方法 47
第一節 研究架構 47
第二節 研究方法 49
第三節 研究步驟 50
第四節 問卷架構 50
第四章 分析模式建立 52
第五章 研究結果 60
第一節 廠商基本資料與訪談摘要 60
第二節 研究發現 63
第六章 結論與建議 72
第一節 結論 72
第二節 建議 78
第三節 命題 81
第四節 後續研究 84


參考文獻 References
參考文獻
一、 中文文獻

1.工業簡訊,1998,第29卷,第6期,pp.14-51.
2.方世杰,1998,技術取得模式影響因素之研究-電子業與食品業之實證分析, 中
山管理評論,第六卷,第一期,pp.139-168.
3.中華民國科技政策白皮書,1997,行政院國家科學委員會出版,第四章第七
節。
4.台灣製藥產業,1999,財團法人生物技術開發中心出版。
5.田蔚城,1998,生物科技發展與商機開拓研討會,台北市,遠東國際大飯店。
6.江炯聰,1984,企銀季刊,第九期,pp.15-29.
7.黃俊英,1991,台北市銀月刊,第22卷,第一期,pp.2-5.
8.陳松柏,1997,台灣製藥業的研發類型、管理機制與技術績效之研究 ,
國立空中大學,管理與資訊學報,第二期,pp.109-132.
9.產業經濟,1997,第195期,p92.
10.產業經濟,1999,第212期,pp.45-49.
11.產業經濟,1999,第217期,pp.26-29.
12.國際醫藥資訊服務公司(IMS),1999,台灣地區醫藥銷售統計資料。
13.第二次生物技術產業策略會議,1998,行政院生物技術產業指導小組第一次
委員會議暨第二次生物技術產業策略SRB會議籌備會議,會議記錄摘要
http://www.biopharm.com.tw/chinese/default.htm
14.彰銀資料,1999,第48卷,第一期,pp.64-70.
15.蔡喜雄,1992,台灣地區製藥工業的回顧與展望,台灣經濟研究月刊,第15
卷,第9期,pp.9-28.

二、 英文文獻

1. Allen, T. 1984. Managing the flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. Cambridge.MA: MIT Press.
2. Betz, F. 1994. “ Strategic Technology Management” . McGraw-Hill Inc.
3. Coase, R.H. 1937. “ The Nature of the Firm”. Economica, 4:386-405.
4. Contractor , F. J . 1991. “ Environment Contraints and Technology Acquisition Choices : The Case of Taiwan “ , Symposium on International Technology Transfer , Taipei , Taiwan .
5. Contractor , F. J , & Tagi Sagafi-najad . Fall 1981. “ International Technology Transfer : Major and Policy Responses “ , Journal of International Business Studies , pp.113-135.
6. Davidson , W. & McFetridge, D. 1985. Key characteristics in the choice of
international technology transfer mode. Journal of International Business
Studies , 16:5-21.
7. Dorf, C.R. 1988. “ Models for Technology Transfer from University and Research Laboratories”. Proceedings of the first International Conference on Technology Management . Miami, Florida , Feb,17-19 ,pp.302-312.
8. Fowlston & Brendan. 1988. “Licensing Biotechnology “ . International Journal of Technology Management , 3:51-61.
9. Franco , L.G . 1989. “ Global Corporate Competition : Who’s Winning , Who’s losing , and the R&D Factor as one reason Why “. Strategy management Journal , 10:449-474.
10. Friar, J. & Horwitch, M. 1986. “The Emergence of Technology Strategy” Technology In The Modern Cooperation- A Strategic Perspective. Pergamon Press Inc. New York.
11. Granovetter , M. 1985. “ Economic action and social structure : The problem of embeddedness “ . American Journal of Sociology,6:332-335.
12. Hagedoorn, J & Narula, R. 1996. “ Choosing organization modes of strategic technology partnering : International sectoral differences”. Journal of InternationalBusiness Studies, pp.265-284.
13. Hagedoorn, J. & Schakenraad, J. 1994. The effects of strategic Technology
Alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15:291-
309.
14. Hart, O. & Tirole, J. 1990. Vertical Integration and Market Forclosure, Brookings Papers in Economic Activity. Mircoeconomics, pp.205-286.

15. von . Hippel, E., 1987. Cooperation between rivals : Informal know-how
trading. Research Policy, 16:291-302.
16. Kogut , B. 1988. “ Joint ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Prespectives”.
Strategic Management Journal , 9:319-332.
17. Macneil ,I. R . 1978. The new social contract . Yale university Press , New Haven , CT.
18. Miller , W. R. 1988 . “Productivity and Competition : A Look At the
pharmaceutical Industry “ . Columbia Journal of World Business , pp.85-88.
19. Makhija, M. V. & Ganesh, U. 1997. “ The relationship between control and parnter learning in Learning-related joint venture “ . Organization Science, 8(5):508-527.
20. Mansfield, E. 1975. “ International Technology Transfer : Forms , Resource
Requirements, and Policies”. American Economic Association, 68(2):372-
376.
21. Mowery, D.C. 1988. Colloaborative ventures between U.S. and Froeign
manufacturing firms: An Overview in Mowery, International Collaborative
Ventures in U.S. Manufacturing, Ballinger Publishing Company:1-22.
22. Pandia & Rajeev, M. 1989. “Transfer of technology : Techniques for Chemical and Pharmaceutical Projects”. Project Management Journal ,20:39-45.
23. Poppo, L. & Zenger , T. 1998. “ Testing alternative theories of the firm : Transaction cost , knowledge-based measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in informations services”. Strategics Management Journal , 19 :853-877.
24. Poter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analyzing Industries and Competition , New York: The Free Press.
25. Pisano, G.P. 1991. “The governance of innovation: vertical integration and
Collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry “. Research Policy,
20:237-249.
26. Pisano, G.P. 1990. “The R&D boundaries of the firm: A nempircal analysis”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1):153-176.
27. Pavitt, K. 1984. “Sectoral putterns of technical change: Toward 25 taxonomy and a theory”. Research Policy, 13:343-373.
28. Rogers, E.M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press.
29. Rosenberg & Firschtak. 1985. International Technology Transfer: Concepts Measures, and Comparisons. New York: Praeger.
30. Solow, R. 1957. “ Technical change and the Aggregate Production Function.”.
Review of Economics and Statistics, August:312-320.
31. Taggart, J.H. & Blaxter , T.J. 1992. “ Strategy in Pharmaceutical R&D : A Portfolio risk Matrix “ , R&D management ,22(3):241-254.
32. Tapon, F. 1989. “A transaction cost analysis of innovations in the organization of pharmaceutical R&D”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12:197-213.
33. Teece, D.J. 1992. “Competition , cooperation , and innovation organizational
arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress”. Journal of
EconomicBehavior and Organization, 18:1-25.
34. Tidd, J. & Trewhella, M. J. 1997. “ Organizational and technologicalantecedents of knowledge acquisition and learning “. R&D Management, 27(4):359-375.
35. Tunisini, A. & Zanfei, A. 1988. “ Exploiting and creating knowledge through customer-supplier relationship : Lessons from a case study “ , R&D Management, 28(2):111-118.
36. Vagelos , P.R. 1991. “ Are prescription drug prices high ?” . Science , 252:1080-1084.
37. Williamson , O.E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust
Implication, New York, Free press.
38. Zaheer , A & VenKatraman , V . 1995 . “Relational governance as an
interorgainzational strategy : An empirical test of the role of the trust in
economic exchange”. Strategy Management Journal, 16:373-392.
39. Zunsheng . 1992. “ Technological Capabilities as Determmants of the Success of Technology Transfer Project “ . Technological Forecasting and Social change , pp.17-29.


電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code