Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0621117-150556 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0621117-150556
論文名稱
Title
當員工被迫當個好公民:探討公民行為壓力知覺對破壞性建言、組織公民行為及任務績效的影響─知覺公平、印象管理與個人成本觀點的檢視
The Effects of OCB Pressure on Destructive Voice Behavior, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Task Performance: The Integration of Justice, Impression Management, and Personal Cost Perspectives
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
48
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2017-07-06
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2017-07-21
關鍵字
Keywords
印象管理動機、公平知覺、公民行為壓力、任務績效、組織公民行為、破壞性建言
organizational citizenship behavior, task performance, impression management motives, destructive voice behaviors, OCB pressure
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5884 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5884 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
過去關於公民行為壓力的研究多聚焦在單一的後果變數,例如職家衝突、組織公民行為等,較少研究同時納入負面行為(破壞性建言)、正面行為(組織公民行為)、工作表現(任務績效)一同探討。因此,本研究透過知覺公平、印象管理與個人成本觀點探討公民行為壓力對員工的影響,並納入公平敏感性、自我監控、親和性三種人格特質作為干擾變數。
本研究收集了跨產業60家公司共279筆主管-部屬配對資料。研究結果顯示:公民行為壓力會降低員工的公平知覺,進而提高破壞性建言行為;公民行為壓力會增強員工印象管理動機,進而提高組織公民行為。此外,公民行為壓力與公平敏感性的交互作用,會透過知覺公平的完全中介效果,進而提升破壞性建言行為;而公民行為壓力與自我監控的交互作用,會透過印象管理動機的完全中介效果,提升組織公民行為。本研究並針對研究結果對公民行為壓力的理論貢獻進行探討,並提出具體管理意涵與未來研究方向供實務界與後續研究者參考。
Abstract
To examine OCB pressure, this study includes negative behaviors (destructive voice behaviors, DSV), positive behaviors (organizational citizenship behaviors, OCB), performance (task performance) together. Furthermore, this study includes justice perception, impression management motivation (IMM) and personal cost perspectives to examine OCB pressure and its consequences. In addition, personalities as equity sensitivity, self-monitoring, and agreeableness are included as moderators. Data from 60 companies across various industries and 279 supervisor-subordinate pairs were collected. The results showed that justice perception mediated the relationship of OCB pressure and DSV. The effect of OCB pressure and OCB was mediated by IMM. Moreover, the results also indicated that the mediation effects could be explained by equity sensitivity and self-monitoring. Theoretical and practical implications of the present findings are discussed.
目次 Table of Contents
摘要 i
Abstract ii
List of Figures iv
List of Tables v
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Theory and hypotheses 4
Chapter 3 Methods 11
3.1 Sample and Procedures 11
3.2 Measures 12
3.3 Data Analysis 15
Chapter 4 Results 16
4.1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Alternative Models Comparison 18
4.2 Hypothesis Testing 19
Chapter 5 Discussion 24
5.1 Theoretical Implications 24
5.2 Practical Implications 25
5.3 Limitations and future suggestions 26
Reference 28
Appendix 1-Supervisor’s questionnaire 33
Appendix 2-Subordinate’s questionnaire 36
參考文獻 References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267-299.
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
Allen, T. D., & Rush, M. C. (1998). The effects of organizational citizenship behavior on performance judgments: a field study and a laboratory experiment. Journal of applied psychology, 83(2), 247.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15(5), 327-353.
Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior: Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32, 1078–1095.
Bergeron, D. M., Shipp, A. J., Rosen, B. & Furst, S. A. (2013). Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Career Outcomes: The Cost of Being a Good Citizen. Journal of Management, 39 (4), 958–984.
Blakely, G. L., Andrews, M. C., & Fuller, J. (2003). Are chameleons good citizens? A longitudinal study of the relationship between self-monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 131–144.
Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24, 82–98.
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 740.
Bolino, M. C., Kacmar, K. M., Turnley, W. H., & Gilstrap, J. B. (2008). A multi-level review of impression management motives and behaviors. Journal of Management Review, 27, 505-522.
Bolino, M. C., Klotz, A. C., Turnley, W. H. & Harvey, J. (2013). Exploring the dark side of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 542-559.
Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Gilstrap, J. B. & Suazo, M. M. (2010). Citizenship under pressure: What’s a “good soldier” to do? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 835-855.
Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., Gilstrap, J. B. & Suazo, M. M. (2010). Citizenship under pressure: What’s a “good soldier” to do? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 835-855.
Borman, W. C. and Motowidlo, S. (1997). Task Performance and Contextual Performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99–109.
Bourdage, J. S., Lee, K., Lee, J. H. & Shin, K. H. (2012). Motives for Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Personality Correlates and Coworker Ratings of OCB, Human Performance, 25(3), 179-200.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Chu, C. C., Chou, L. F., & Tseng, C. J. (2017). The consequence when employees’ feelings are involuntary to do OCB: A perspective of psychological reactance theory. Journal of Human Resource Management.
Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 86(2), 278-321.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.
Dalal, R. S., Lam, H., Weiss, H. M. & Hulin, C. L. (2009). A within-person approach to wrok behavior and performance: concurrent and lagged citizenship-counterproductivity associations, and dynamic relationships with affect and overall job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 1051–1066.
Day, D. V., & Kilduff, M. (2003). Self-monitoring personality and work relationships. In M. R. Barrick, & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations (pp. 205–228). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Devonish, D., & Greenidge, D. (2010). The Effect of Organizational Justice on Contextual Performance, Counterproductive Work Behaviors, and Task Performance: Investigating the moderating role of ability‐based emotional intelligence. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18(1), 75-86.
Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530–555.
Goodman, P. S. (1974). An examination of referents used in the evaluation of pay. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12(2), 170-195.
Goodman, P., & Friedman, A. (1968). An examination of the effect of wage inequity in the hourly condition. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3(3), 340-352.
Grant, A. M. & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: Prosocial and impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 900–912.
Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. H. (1997). Agreeableness: a dimension of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnston, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 795–824). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Greenberg, J. (1979) Protestant ethic endorsement and the fairness of equity inputs. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 81-90.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling.
Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of management Review, 12(2), 222-234.
Ilies, R., Fulmer, I. S., Spitzmuller, M., & Johnson, M. D. (2009). Personality and citizenship behavior: the mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 945.
James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A., & Brett, J. M. (2006). A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 233-244.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 User's Reference Guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
Kamdar, D., & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance. Journal of applied psychology, 92(5), 1286.
Klotz, A. C., & Bolino, M. C. (2013). Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: A moral licensing view. Academy of Management Review, 38, 292–306.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological bulletin, 107(1), 34.
Lennox, R. D., & Wolfe, R. N. (1984). Revision of the self-monitoring scale.
Major, B., & Deaux, K. (1982) Individual differences in justice behavior. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 43-76). New York: Aca-demic Press.
Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2010). Organizational tenure and job performance. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1220-1250.
Oh, I. S., Charlier, S. D., Mount, M. K., & Berry, C. M. (2014). The two faces of high self-monitors: Chameleonic moderating effects of self-monitoring on the relationships between personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 92–111.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good solider syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 122–141.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of management, 12(4), 531-544.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual review of psychology,63, 539–569.
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227.
Pritchard, R. D., Dunnette, M. D., & Jorgenson, D. 0. (1972) Effects of perceptions of equity and inequity on worker performance and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 75-94.
Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: a motivational analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306.
Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and Location in the Personality Space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 202–211.
Selig, J. P., & Preacher, K. J. (2008), June. Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org/.
Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2010a). Theorizing about the deviant citizen: An attributional explanation of the interplay of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 20, 132–143.
Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2010b). Counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Are they opposite forms of active behavior? Applied Psychology, 59, 21–39.
Takeuchi, R., Bolino, M. C. & Lin, C. C. (2015). Too many motives? The Interactive Effects of Multiple Motives on Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1239-1248.
Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C. (2001). Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 351.
Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2006). Compulsory citizenship behavior: Theorizing some dark sides of the good soldier syndrome in organizations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 77–93.
Vigoda-Gadot, E., (2007). Redrawing the boundaries of OCB? An empirical examination of compulsory extra-role behavior in the workplace. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 377–405.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behavior. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617.
Zhao, H. D., Peng, Z. L., & Chen, H. K. (2014). Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Role of Organizational Identification and Perceived Interactional Justice. Journal of Psychology, 148(2), 177–196.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.149.214.32
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.149.214.32
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code