Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0622119-002659 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0622119-002659
論文名稱
Title
角色衝突與組織公民行為:關係的中介效果與助人者性別的調節效果
Role Conflict and Organizational Citizenship Behavior:The Effect of Guanxi as Mediator and Gender of Helper as Moderator
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
91
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2019-06-06
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2019-07-22
關鍵字
Keywords
角色衝突、組織公民行為、關係、助人者性別
guanxi, the gender of helper, role conflict, OCB
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5801 次,被下載 52
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5801 times, has been downloaded 52 times.
中文摘要
本研究目的在了解角色衝突與組織公民行為之間的影響,關係是角色衝突影
響組織公民行為的中介因素,且助人者的性別會調節此段中介關係。此研究同時
也探討組織公民行為對隔日之角色衝突和關係的影響,本研究以經驗抽樣法,於
連續 10 天收集 36 名全職印尼華人之行為作為樣本資料。研究結果顯示角色衝突
與組織公民行為之間存在正向關係。除此之外,本研究還發現組織公民行為對角
色衝突和關係之間存在正相關關係。此外,本研究結果也顯示,關係可以成為角
色衝突與組織公民行為之間的中介效果,而助人者的性別可以弱化角色衝突和關
係之間的關係。
Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between role conflict and
Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), which is mediated by guanxi and
moderated at the first stage of the model by gender of helper. Also, this study tested the
impact of OCB to role conflict and guanxi in the next day. This study applied the
experience sampling method by using 36 full-time overseas Chinese Indonesian as
samples in ten days, and this study found that role conflict was positively related to
OCB. Besides that, this study found that OCB was positively related to both role
conflict and guanxi. Moreover, the results indicated that guanxi could be a mediator
between role conflict and OCB. Gender of helper could moderate the relationship
between role conflict and guanxi
目次 Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Thesis Validation Letter i
摘要 .........................................................................................................................................ii
Abstract ...................................................................................................................................iii
Table of Contents..................................................................................................................... iv
List of Figures.......................................................................................................................... vi
List of Tables.......................................................................................................................... vii
Chapter 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................1
1.1 Background Literature..............................................................................................1
1.2 Research Objectives ..................................................................................................4
Chapter 2 Literature Review .....................................................................................................5
2.1 Relationship between Role Conflict and OCB..........................................................5
2.2 Relationship between OCB and Role conflict ...........................................................9
2.3 Guanxi as the mediator between role conflict and OCB.........................................10
2.4 Gender as a moderator between role conflict and OCB.........................................13
Chapter 3 Research Method ....................................................................................................16
3.1 Research Framework ..............................................................................................16
3.2 Sample and Procedure.............................................................................................19
3.3 Measure ...................................................................................................................22
3.3.1 Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)................................................22
3.3.2 Role Conflict..................................................................................................23
3.3.3 Gender...........................................................................................................24
3.3.4 Guanxi ...........................................................................................................24
3.3.5 Control Variables..........................................................................................25
3.4 Analyzing Method ...................................................................................................26
Chapter 4 Results....................................................................................................................27
4.1 Factor Analysis ........................................................................................................27
4.2 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations ...................................................................28
4.3 Hypothesis Testing...................................................................................................29
4.3.1 Linear Regression-Normal Analysis.............................................................29
4.3.2 Linear Regression-Time Lagged Analysis....................................................37
Chapter 5 Discussion ..............................................................................................................42
5.1 Theoretical Implication ...........................................................................................42
5.2 Practical Implication ...............................................................................................44
5.3 Limitation and Future Suggestions.........................................................................45
REFERENCES.......................................................................................................................47
APPENDIX 1 – Personal Information Form (English Version)................................................52
APPENDIX 2 – Personal Information Form (Bahasa Version) ................................................58
APPENDIX 3 – Daily Questionnaire (English Version) ..........................................................64
APPENDIX 4 – Daily Questionnaire (Bahasa Version) ...........................................................74
參考文獻 References
Arnsten, A. F. (1998). The biology of being frazzled. Science, 280(5370), 1711-1712.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in
social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical
considerations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
Belogolovsky, E., & Somech, A. (2010). Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior:
Examining the boundary between in-role behavior and extra-role behavior from
the perspective of teachers, principals and parents. Teaching and Teacher
education, 26(4), 914-923.
Bergeron, D. M. (2007). The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior:
Good citizens at what cost? Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1078-1095.
doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26585791
Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H.-H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2015). “Well, I’m tired of
tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 100(1), 56.
Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the
relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and
work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 740.
Bowling, N. A., Khazon, S., Alarcon, G. M., Blackmore, C. E., Bragg, C. B., Hoepf, M.
R., . . . Li, H. (2017). Building better measures of role ambiguity and role
conflict: The validation of new role stressor scales. Work & Stress, 31(1), 1-23.
Bragger, J. D., Rodriguez-Srednicki, O., Kutcher, E. J., Indovino, L., & Rosner, E.
(2005). Work-family conflict, work-family culture, and organizational
citizenship behavior among teachers. Journal of Business and psychology, 20(2),
303-324.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of
cross-cultural psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
Brown, S. L., & Brown, R. M. (2015). Connecting prosocial behavior to improved
physical health: Contributions from the neurobiology of parenting. Neuroscience
& Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 1-17.
Cannon, W. B. (1932). The wisdom of the body.
Chang, C.-H., Johnson, R. E., & Yang, L.-Q. (2007). Emotional strain and
organizational citizenship behaviours: A meta-analysis and review. Work &
Stress, 21(4), 312-332.
Cheung, F. Y. M., Peng, K., & Wong, C.-S. (2018). Beyond exchange and prosocial
motives, is altruistic helping a valid motive for organizational citizenship
behavior? Chinese Management Studies, 12(1), 222-242.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary
review. Journal of management, 31(6), 874-900.
Dunning, J. H., & Kim, C. (2007). The cultural roots of guanxi: An exploratory study.
World Economy, 30(2), 329-341.
Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the
social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644.
Eatough, E. M., Chang, C.-H., Miloslavic, S. A., & Johnson, R. E. (2011). Relationships
of role stressors with organizational citizenship behavior: a meta-analysis.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 619.
Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual review of sociology, 2(1),
335-362.
Farh, J.-L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B.-S. (1998). The influence of relational
demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization science, 9(4),
471-488.
Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory Social exchange (pp. 77-94):
Springer.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family
roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process
analysis: A regression-based approach: Guilford Publications.
Heinrichs, M., & Domes, G. (2008). Neuropeptides and social behaviour: effects of
oxytocin and vasopressin in humans. Progress in brain research, 170, 337-350.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing
stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. Journal
of occupational and organizational psychology, 84(1), 116-122.
Hong, C. H., Zhu, D.-S., & White, L. P. (2013). Colleague guanxi intensity: Scale
development and validation. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(6),
756-778.
Hwang, K.-k. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American journal of
Sociology, 92(4), 944-974.
Jaramillo, F., Mulki, J. P., & Boles, J. S. (2011). Workplace stressors, job attitude, and
job behaviors: is interpersonal conflict the missing link? Journal of Personal
Selling & Sales Management, 31(3), 339-356.
Jaskyte, K. (2005). The impact of organizational socialization tactics on role ambiguity
and role conflict of newly hired social workers. Administration in Social Work,
29(4), 69-87.
Karam, C. M. (2011). Good organizational soldiers: conflict-related stress predicts
citizenship behavior. International journal of conflict management, 22(3),
300-319.
Kim, S., & Kuo, M.-H. (2015). Examining the relationships among coaching,
trustworthiness, and role behaviors: A social exchange perspective. The Journal
of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(2), 152-176.
Klein, N. (2017). Prosocial behavior increases perceptions of meaning in life. The
Journal of positive psychology, 12(4), 354-361.
Lin, L.-H., & Ho, Y.-L. (2010). Guanxi and OCB: the Chinese cases. Journal of
Business Ethics, 96(2), 285-298.
Liu, D., Chen, X. P., & Holley, E. (2017). Help yourself by helping others: The joint
impact of group member organizational citizenship behaviors and group
cohesiveness on group member objective task performance change. Personnel
Psychology, 70(4), 809-842.
Liu, X.-Y., & Wang, J. (2013). Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship
behaviour: is supervisor–subordinate guanxi a mediator? The International
Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(7), 1471-1489.
Lovell, S. E., Kahn, A. S., Anton, J., Davidson, A., Dowling, E., Post, D., & Mason, C.
(1999). Does gender affect the link between organizational citizenship behavior
and performance evaluation? Sex Roles, 41(5-6), 469-478.
Luo, J.-D., Cheng, M.-Y., & Zhang, T. (2016). Guanxi circle and organizational
citizenship behavior: Context of a Chinese workplace. Asia Pacific Journal of
Management, 33(3), 649-671.
Lykes, M. B. (1983). Discrimination and coping in the lives of Black women: Analyses
of oral history data. Journal of Social Issues, 39(3), 79-100.
Malhotra, N., & Ackfeldt, A.-L. (2016). Internal communication and prosocial service
behaviors of front-line employees: Investigating mediating mechanisms. Journal
of Business Research, 69(10), 4132-4139.
Matud, M. P. (2004). Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personality and
individual differences, 37(7), 1401-1415.
Midlarsky, E. (1991). Helping as coping.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior : the good soldier syndrome.
Lexington, Mass. :: Lexington Books.
Peterson, M. F., Smith, P. B., Akande, A., Ayestaran, S., Bochner, S., Callan, V., . . .
Viedge, C. (1995). Role Conflict, Ambiguity, and Overload: A 21-Nation Study.
Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 429-452. doi:10.5465/256687
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000).
Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and
empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of management,
26(3), 513-563.
Pritchard, R. D. (1969). Equity theory: A review and critique. Organizational behavior
and human performance, 4(2), 176-211.
Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R. E., & Dodge, K. L. (1994). Gender differences in coping with
stress: When stressor and appraisals do not differ. Personality and social
psychology bulletin, 20(4), 421-430.
Raposa, E. B., Laws, H. B., & Ansell, E. B. (2016). Prosocial behavior mitigates the
negative effects of stress in everyday life. Clinical Psychological Science, 4(4),
691-698.
Rioux, S. M., & Penner, L. A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior:
a motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1306.
Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in
complex organizations. Administrative science quarterly, 150-163.
Rose, A. J., & Asher, S. R. (2004). Children's strategies and goals in response to help‐
giving and help‐seeking tasks within a friendship. Child Development, 75(3),
749-763.
Schwartz, C., Meisenhelder, J. B., Ma, Y., & Reed, G. (2003). Altruistic social interest
behaviors are associated with better mental health. Psychosomatic Medicine,
65(5), 778-785.
Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Organizational citizenship behaviour and
employee's strain: Examining the buffering effects of leader support and
participation in decision making. European Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology, 22(2), 138-149.
Taormina, R. J., & Gao, J. H. (2010). A research model for Guanxi behavior:
Antecedents, measures, and outcomes of Chinese social networking. Social
Science Research, 39(6), 1195-1212.
Taylor, S. E., Klein, L. C., Lewis, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., Gurung, R. A., &
Updegraff, J. A. (2000). Biobehavioral responses to stress in females:
tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychological review, 107(3), 411.
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2015). Job crafting and job performance: A
longitudinal study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,
24(6), 914-928.
Tompson, H. B., & Werner, J. M. (1997). The impact of role conflict/facilitation on
core and discretionary behaviors: Testing a mediated model. Journal of
management, 23(4), 583-601.
Tunc, T., & Kutanis, R. O. (2009). Role conflict, role ambiguity, and burnout in nurses
and physicians at a university hospital in Turkey. Nursing & health sciences,
11(4), 410-416.
Vaillant, G. E. (2000). Adaptive mental mechanisms: Their role in a positive
psychology. American Psychologist, 55(1), 89.
van der Kolk, B., & Kaufmann, W. (2018). Performance measurement, cognitive
dissonance and coping strategies: exploring individual responses to
NPM-inspired output control. Journal of Management Control, 1-21.
Von Dawans, B., Fischbacher, U., Kirschbaum, C., Fehr, E., & Heinrichs, M. (2012).
The social dimension of stress reactivity: acute stress increases prosocial
behavior in humans. Psychological science, 23(6), 651-660.
Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for
prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient.
Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(2), 222.
Wey Smola, K., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting
generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational
Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and
Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(4), 363-382.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job Satisfaction and Organizational
Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors.
Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. doi:10.1177/014920639101700305
Zellars, K. L., & Tepper, B. J. (2003). Beyond social exchange: New directions for
organizational citizenship behavior theory and research Research in personnel
and human resources management (pp. 395-424): Emerald Group Publishing
Limited.
Zhai, Q., Lindorff, M., & Cooper, B. (2013). Workplace guanxi: Its dispositional
antecedents and mediating role in the affectivity–job satisfaction relationship.
Journal of Business Ethics, 117(3), 541-551.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Geiger, T. C., & Crick, N. R. (2005). Relational and physical
aggression, prosocial behavior, and peer relations: Gender moderation and
bidirectional associations. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 25(4), 421-452.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code