Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0624111-003359 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0624111-003359
論文名稱
Title
理性與非理性因素在個人決策過程之介入
The Rational and Irrational Factor Involved in Decision Making
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
66
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2011-05-20
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2011-06-24
關鍵字
Keywords
理性、理性決策、非理性決策、資訊蒐集、婚姻
information collection, rationality, rational decision making, irrational decision making, marriage
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5795 次,被下載 15
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5795 times, has been downloaded 15 times.
中文摘要
雖然每個人都知道理性的思考是很重要的,但為何人們在做決策時還是受情緒影響?過去的研究中,經濟性原則的考量為過去研究再討論決策行為的重點,經濟人為期望最大化自身利益,並且有能力去評估各項選擇方案,他們認為管理者面對決策,都能以理性的、具有邏輯性的決策方式將問題清楚地來分析。但在日常生活中,我們所做的決策是否真的符合理性決策?有情感涉入的非理性決策是否才是現實上符合我們決策的縮影。
人們每天都在為了自己或者他人做大大小小的決策,也可以說:是決策構成我們的生活、也增進我們的生活,因此我們有必要知道自己在決策中是以何種因素考量而下決定。透過相關文獻的整理、訪談、歸納、分析、整合而認清問題,了解決策過程中理性或非理性因素的介入。本論文以婚姻為背景,進一步的討論出在決策步驟中,個體在資訊蒐集、制訂方案、選定方案與執行並審查方案時,理性與非理性因素介入與個人想法。在資訊蒐集時,個體會蒐集理性考量與非理性因素;且在選定方案時,是因為非理性因素(包含情感、情緒、感覺)來影響個人的決定;在執行方案時個體也有他們心中所浮現之想法。
Abstract
Although everyone knows that rational thinking is so important, people still always make some decisions by irrational emotion. Previous studies of making decisions suggest that decision makers mainly maximize their own profit based on economical principle and also with the ability to assess every decision selection’s benefit and cost. They also indicate that most management level decision makers may use analytical, rational and logical ways to analyze every problem they encounter and when it refers to decision making. In our daily life, what do we exactly conform to the suggestion of rational decision making theories? Is irrational decision making with emotional involvement consistent with our daily choice and important decision?
People make all kinds of decisions no matter they are important or easy decision for himself /herself or for the others. In other word, decisions build up and make up our life, so it is important to understand what kind of factors affects our step of decision making. Through reviewing of the essays and theses, induction of the interview information, we realize rational and irrational factors intervene into the process of decision making. In terms to decision making, we choose “marriage” as our research scope, discuss rational and irrational factor affect decision makers’ thinking through the four step of decision making: information collection, development of programs, selection of program and implementation of program. In the step of information collection, individual will search for rational consideration and irrational element. Decision maker will make the decision and influence by irrational factors which include affection, emotion and feeling. When it comes to implementation, some ideas emerge in their mind.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審訂書……………………………………………i
致謝……………………………………………………ii
中文摘要………………………………………………iii
英文摘要………………………………………………iv
第一章 緒論……………………………………1
第一節 研究背景動機…………………………1
第二節 研究目的………………………………5
第三節 研究流程………………………………6
第二章 文獻探討………………………………8
第一節 理性決策………………………………8
第二節 非理性決策……………………………13
第三節 婚姻……………………………………16
第三章 研究方法………………………………21
第一節 研究架構………………………………21
第二節 研究方法的選擇………………………23
第三節 研究方法設計…………………………28
第四章 研究結果與分析………………………32
第一節 決策階段之理性因素…………………35
第二節 決策階段之非理性因素………………40
第三節 其他相關研究發現……………………48
第五章 結論與建議……………………………51
第一節 研究結果與討論………………………51
第二節 研究限制與建議………………………54
參考文獻………………………………………………56
參考文獻 References
1. 莫藜藜,民81,深入訪談法,質化研究在社會工作界的應用論見彙編,中華民國社區發展訓練中心,頁102-頁121
2. 簡春安編,民81,質化工作在社會工作界的運用論見彙編,社區發展研究中心
3. 項靖、陳儒晰、陳玉箴、李美馨等譯(2002)。Locke,L.F,Spirduso,W.W.,&Silverman,S.J.原著。論文計畫與研究方法,原文第四版,台北:韋伯出版。
4. 朱柔若譯(2002)。Neuman,W.L.原著。社會研究方法—質化與量化取向。台北市:揚智。
5. 趙碧華、朱美珍,民84,研究方法—社會工作暨人文科學領域的運用,雙葉出版社
6. 鐘倫納,民82,應用社會科學研究法,台北:台灣商務印書館
7. 王文科,教育研究法,台北:五南圖書出版公司,1986
8. Bazerman,M.(1998).Judgment in managerial decision making,John Wiley&Sons.

9. Corby,S .;White,G.,Stanworth,C.(2005).”No news is good news? Evaluating new pay systems,”Human Resource Management Journal,Vol.15,pp.4-24.
10. Eeckhoudt,L.(1996).Expected Utility Theory-Is It Normative or Simply “Practical”? Medical Decision Making, 16(1),12-13
11. Einhorn,H.J.&Hogarth R.M.(1981).Behavioral decision theory:Processes of judgment and choice.Annual Review of Psychology,32,53-88
12. Ekman, P. 1971. Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotions. In J. K. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. 19: 207-283. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
13. Ferdern P. 1936. Zur Unterscheidung des gesunden and Krankhaften. Narzimus, 22: 5-39
14. Glueck,F.,W.(1980).Management,2nd Ed.,Hinsdale,III:Dryden Press.
15. Harris,R.(1998).Introduction to Decision Making.Retrieved November 15th,2005,from http://www.virtualsalt.com/crebook5.htm
16. Harrison,E.F.(1999).The Managerial Decision-Making Process,5th Ed.Boston:Houghton Mifflin,75-102
17. Hogarth,D.M.&Einhorn,H.J.(1992).Order effects in belief updating:the belief adjustment model.Cognitive Psychology,24,1-55.
18. Ian,S.(2002).A rational choice model of the book of revelation.Journal for the Study of the New Testament.24:85,97-116
19. Izard, C. E. 1972. Patterns of emotions: A new analysis of anxiety and depression. New York: Academic Press.
20. Janis,L.&Mann,L.(1977).Decision-making: a psychological analysis of conflict , choice and commitment.New York
21. Johnson-Laird,P.N., &Shafir,E.(1993).The Interaction between reasoning and decision making: An Introduction.Cognition,49(1/2),1-9
22. Juvva,Srilatha&Ranbir S.Bhatti(2006).”Epigenetic Model of Marital Expectations.”Contemporary Family Therapy,28(1),61-72.
23. Langley,A.(1989).In Search of Rationality :the Purpose Behind the Use of Formal Analysis in Organizations,Administrative Science Quarterly,598-631.
24. Laville F.(2000)”Should we abandon optimization theory? The need for bounded rationality,Journal of Economic Methodology,Vol.7,pp.395-426.
25. Mellers,B.A.,Schwartz,A.,&Cooke,A.D.J(1998).Judgment and Decision Making,Annual Review of Psychology,49,447-477
26. Patton, Michael Quinn.(1990),Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi:Sage
27. Payne,J.W.(1982).Contingent decision behavior, Psychological Bulletin,92,382-402
28. Rest.J.R.(1986).Moral Development:Advance in Research and Theory.New York:Praeger.
29. Robbins,P.Stephen.(2001).Organization Behavior,9th Ed.,New Jersey:Prentice-Hall
30. Rubin&Babbie(1984)Research for social work
31. Seth J. G., Jennifer K., & Martha J. F. 2007. Memories affect mood: Evidence from cover experimental assignment to positive, neural and negative memiry recall. Acta Psychologica, 125(1): 144-154
32. Shulman,Shmuel,Eliyahu Rosenheim,&Danielle Knafo(1999).”The Interface of Adolescent and Parent Marital Expectations.”The American Journal of Family Therapr,27,213-222
33. Simon,H.A.,(1960).The New Science of Management Decision.NEW York:Harper&Row
34. Simon,H.A.,(1977).The New Science of Management Decision,Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall
35. Simon,H.A.(1986).Rationality in Psychology and Economics, the Journal of Business,209-244
36. Sinclair,J.(2001).English dictionary for advance learners,HarperCollins Publishers
37. Soelberg,P.O(1967).A study of decision making :Job choice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,Carnegie-Mellon University.
38. Schwarz,N.,&Clore,G.L.(1983).Mood,misattribution,and judgements of well-being:Informative and directive functions of affective states.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,45,513-523.
39. Schwarz,N.,&Clore,G.L.(2003).Moods as Information:20 Years Later.Psychological Inquiry,Vol.14,No.3&4,p296-303.
40. Wyer,R.S.,&Carlston,D.E.(1979).Social cognition, inference, and attribution.Hillsdale,Nj:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. Zey.,M.(1992a).Criticisms of rational choice models.In M.Zey(Ed.),Decision Making: Alternative to Rational Choice Models.Newbury Park,USA:Sage Publications,9-31.
42. Zey.,M.(1992b).Introduction to Part 1‘Critiques of Rational Choice Models’In M.Zey(Ed.),Decision Making: Alternative to Rational Choice Models.Newbury Park,USA:Sage Publications,1-8.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.137.161.222
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.137.161.222
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code