Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0624113-052202 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0624113-052202
論文名稱
Title
市場進入競爭與內生性平行輸入政策選擇
Market-Entry Competition and Endogenous Policy Choice Relevant to Parallel Imports
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
64
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2013-07-15
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2013-07-24
關鍵字
Keywords
貿易政策、品質偏好、雙佔、垂直差異、平行輸入
Trade Policy, Qualitative Preference, Duopoly, Vertical Differentiation, Parallel Imports
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5778 次,被下載 917
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5778 times, has been downloaded 917 times.
中文摘要
在雙佔廠商生產垂直差異產品的南北貿易模型中,我們分析平行輸入政策對廠商價格競爭的影響,並探討國家間平行輸入政策的互動關係。本文的分析得到:(1)當兩國消費者的產品品質偏好差異程度小時,北國政府一定會允許平行輸入,南國政府對於平行輸入的態度則是無關緊要,其市場均衡結果對於北國政府而言是最佳的結果。(2)當兩國消費者的產品品質偏好差異程度中等時,兩國政府必定採取同樣的平行輸入政策,兩國可能同時允許或禁止平行輸入,並且產生兩個市場均衡結果,其中北國偏好兩國同時允許平行輸入,而南國則是偏好兩國同時禁止平行輸入。(3)當兩國消費者的產品品質偏好差異程度大時,兩國政府同時採取禁止平行輸入的政策,其市場均衡結果對於南國政府而言是最佳的結果。
Abstract
Based on the vertically differentiated duopoly in a North-South trade model we analyze the impact of parallel imports on price competition and the interaction of national parallel policies. We conclude that (1) when the difference between qualitative preferences of two countries is sufficiently small, the North will permit parallel imports and the South`s attitude toward parallel policy is irrelevant which leads to the North`s most preferred outcome. (2) when the difference between qualitative preferences of two countries is relatively intermediate, the North and the South will both permit or prohibit parallel imports. The former is preferred by the North and the latter is preferred by the South. (3) when the difference between qualitative preferences of two countries is sufficiently large, the North and the South will both prohibit parallel imports which is the South`s most preferred outcome.
目次 Table of Contents
目 錄
論文審定書………………………………………………………………………………i
謝辭……………………………………………………………………………………...ii
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iii
英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………..iv
第一章 前言…………………………………………………………………………….1
第二章 基本模型………………………………………………………………….........6
第三章 市場競爭均衡………………………………………………………………….8
第四章 兩個國家都不實施平行輸入政策下的市場均衡…………………………...17
第五章 至少有一個國家實施平行輸入政策時的市場均衡………………………...21
第一節 北方國家實施平行輸入政策,南方國家不實施平行輸入政策……….21
第二節 北方國家不實施平行輸入政策,南方國家實施平行輸入政策……….25
第三節 北方國家實施平行輸入政策,南方國家實施平行輸入政策………….27
第六章 廠商研究與消費者剩餘……………………………………………………...31
第一節 廠商研究………………………………………………………………...31
第二節 消費者剩餘……………………………………………………………...32
第七章 社會福利極大化下的最適平行輸入政策…………………………………...38
第一節 當λ= 1…………………………………………………………………..38
第二節 當λ= 0…………………………………………………………………..43
第三節 當λ= 1/2………………………………………………………………..43
第八章 模型探討……………………………………………………………………...49
第九章 結論…………………………………………………………………………...50
參考文獻…………………………………………………………………….................53
附錄……………………………………………………………………….....................55
參考文獻 References
參考文獻
Andaluz, J. (2000), “On protection and vertical product differentiation”, Regional
Science and Urban Economics, 30, 77-97.
Biadgleng, E.T. (2009), “TRIPS post-grant flexibilities”, Presentation at the
UNCTAD workshop on flexibilities in international intellectual property rules and
local production of pharmaceuticals for the southern central and west African
region 7-9 December 2009, Cape Town, South Africa.
Cosac, T. (2003), “Vertical restraints and parallel imports with differentiated products”, Mimeo.
Crampes, C. and Hollander, A. (1995), “Duopoly and quality standard”, European
Economics Review, 39, 71-82.
Cremer, H. and Thisse, J. F. (1994), “Commodity taxation in differentiated
oligopoly”, International Economic Review, 35, 613-633.
Danzon, P. and Epstein, A. (2008), “Effects of regulation on drug launch and pricing in
Interdependent markets”, NBER Working Paper No.14041.
Ecchia G. and Lambertini, L. (1997), “Minimum quality standards and collusion”,
Journal of Industrial Economics, 45, 101-113.
Fajgelbaum, P. D., Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (2009), “Income Distribution,
product quality, and international trade”, NBER Working Paper No. 15329.
Foellmi, R., Hepenstrick, C. and Zweimuller, J. (2010), “Non-homothetic preferences,
parallel imports and the extensive margin of international trade”, Discussion Paper No.7939. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR).
Ganslandt, M. and Maskus K. E. (2004), “Parallel imports and the pricing of
pharmaceutical products: evidence from the European Union”, Journal of Health Economics, 23, 1035-1057.
Ganslandt, M. and Maskus K. E. (2007), “Intellectual property rights, parallel imports
and strategic behavior”, Working Paper Series 704, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
Goldberg, P. K. (2010), “Intellectual property rights protection in developing
countries: the case of pharmaceuticals”, Journal of the European Economic
Association, 8, 326-353.
Knox, D. and Richardson, M. (2002), “Trade policy and parallel imports”, European
Journal of Political Economy, 19, 133-151.
Kyle, M. K. (2007), “Strategic responses to parallel trade”, NBER Working Paper
No.12968.
Lanjouw, J. O. (2005), “Patents, price controls and access to new drugs: how policy
affects global market entry”, NBER Working Paper No.11321.
Malueg, D. A. and Schwartz, M. (1994), “Parallel imports, demand dispersion, and
International price discrimination”, Journal of International Economics, 37,
167-195.
Maskus, K. E. (2000), “Parallel imports”, World Economy, 23, 1269-1284.
Maskus, K. E. and Chen, Y. (2002), “Parallel imports in a model of vertical
distribution: theory, evidence, and policy”, Pacific Economic Review, 7, 319-
334.
Maxwell, J. W. (1998), “Minimum quality standards as a barrier to innovation”,
Economics Letters, 58, 355-360.
Richardson, M. (2002), “An elementary proposition concerning parallel imports”,
Journal of International Economics, 56, 233-245.
Roy, S. and Saggi K. (2012), “Equilibrium parallel import policies and international
market structure”, Journal of International Economics, 87, 262-276.
Valletti, T. M. and Szymanski, S. (2006), “Parallel trade, international exhaustion and
Intellectual property rights: a welfare analysis”, The Journal of Industrial
Economics, 54, 499-526.
Wauthy, X. (1996), “Quality choice in models of vertical differentiation”, Journal of
Industrial Economics, 44, 345-353.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外完全公開 unrestricted
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus: 已公開 available


紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code