Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0625110-195909 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0625110-195909
論文名稱
Title
後設認知語言學習策略訓練與英語初學者的學習信念、學習成就之研究
The study of metacognitive language learning strategy training, English beginners’ language learning beliefs and achievement
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
109
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2010-06-22
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2010-06-25
關鍵字
Keywords
英語學習成就、語言學習信念、語言學習策略、後設認知
achievement, language learning beliefs, language learning strategy, metacognitive
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5653 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5653 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
本研究目的在於了解不同英語學習經驗、後設認知語言學習策略訓練在語言學習信念、英語學習成就的差異,
研究者以四十二位國小三年級學童作為研究對象,進行準實驗設計,實驗組進行後設認知語言學習策略訓練,對照組不提供後設認知語言學習策略相關知識,
訓練課程為期十三週,以獨立樣本t考驗、變異數分析、共變數分析進行英語學習成就的統計處理,又運用百分比與平均數分析研究對象語言學習信念量表的作答反應。
結果發現:(一)本研究對象擁有較實際的英語學習期望、具有高度學習動機;(二)三年級以前有學過英語者,動機信念較高、投入程度較高、英語學習成就也較高,
並傾向於認為英語學習能力是普遍存在的;未學過英語者,學習英語的信心由高轉低;(三)後設認知語言學習策略能讓學習者擁有較正向的語言學習信念,
在測驗題型困難度較高時才能發揮作用、具有良好的學習遷移效果;(四)在大部分的語言學習信念題項上,學習經驗較後設認知語言學習策略訓練具影響力,
策略訓練對先前學過英語者也較有影響;(五)「英語學習經驗」與「後設認知語言學習策略」在「英語學習成就」上的差異並沒有顯著的交互作用效果;
(六)後設認知語言學習策略對閱讀能力較有助益,口說能力則受先前的英語學習經驗影響較大。最後,研究者根據研究結果提出建議,以供教學及未來研究參考。
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to understand the influence of English learning experience and metacognitive language learning strategy training
on students’ language learning beliefs and achievement. The sample of this study is 42 third grade students in primary school.
The experimental group received metacognitive language learning strategy training while the control group didn’t. The training program lasted for thirteen weeks.
The study adopted a pretest-posttest non-equivalent-control-group design. The t-test, analysis of variance and analysis of covariance were adopted to
examine the differences between participants’ achievement. The percentage and mean were to describe participants’ beliefs.
This study revealed six general findings. First, participants in this study have more realistic expectation and high motivation about learning English.
Second, students with English learning experience have better motivation beliefs, higher involvement and greater achievement.
They also tend to believe that every individual has English learning abilities. However, students without English learning experience changed
their attitude toward learning at the end of this study. Third, the strategy training can improve participants’ beliefs and proved to be useful
with other learning materials, but only in difficult test the trained participants get better scores. Fourth, to most beliefs, learning experience
has better influence and strategy training affects greater on students with learning experience. Fifth, there is no significant interaction between
English learning experience and strategy training on achievement. Finally, metacognitive language learning strategy training can improve participants’
reading abilities, but speaking skill is influenced by learning experience.
The conclusion provides suggestions for future development.
目次 Table of Contents
目 次
第一章 緒論 ……………………………………………………………1
第一節 研究動機、重要性與目的 ………………………………………1
第二節 研究問題與研究假設 ……………………………………………4
第三節 名詞釋義 …………………………………………………………5
第四節 研究範圍與限制 …………………………………………………6

第二章 文獻探討 ………………………………………………………7
第一節 語言學習策略 ……………………………………………………7
第二節 後設認知語言學習策略…………………………………………14
第三節 語言學習信念……………………………………………………23
第四節 英語學習成就……………………………………………………30

第三章 研究方法 ……………………………………………………36
第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………36
第二節 研究對象與取樣方法……………………………………………37
第三節 研究工具…………………………………………………………38
第四節 研究實施程序……………………………………………………40
第五節 量化資料處理與統計分析………………………………………40

第四章 結果分析與討論………………………………………………42
第一節 先前的英語學習經驗在語言學習信念上的差異………………43
第二節 先前的英語學習經驗在英語學習成就上的差異………………47
第三節 後設認知語言學習策略訓練在語言學習信念上的差異………48
第四節 後設認知語言學習策略訓練在英語學習成就上的差異………53
第五節 先前的英語學習經驗、後設認知語言學習策略訓練
在語言學習信念上的差異………………………………………55
第六節 先前的英語學習經驗、後設認知語言學習策略訓練
在英語學習成就上的差異………………………………………60

第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………62
第一節 結論………………………………………………………………62
第二節 建議………………………………………………………………65

參考書目 ………………………………………………………………68

附錄 ……………………………………………………………………78
附錄一 後設認知語言學習策略訓練課程與學習單……………………78
附錄二 家長同意書………………………………………………………91
附錄三 語言後設認知學習情形量表……………………………………92
附錄四 語言學習信念量表與使用授權…………………………………93
附錄五 英語學習成就測驗卷……………………………………………95
參考文獻 References
參考書目
王振世、何秀珠、曾文志、彭文松(譯) (2009)。R. L. Linn,& M. D. Miller著。教育測驗與評量(Measurement and assessment in teaching, 9th ed)。台北市:培生。
吳青蓉 (2004)。知情意整合的語言學習策略對國中生英語學習表現影響之研究。國立臺北師範學院學報(教育類),17(1),227-249。
吳青蓉、張景媛 (2004)。意志控制訓練課程融入國中英語課堂教學之研究。教育與心理研究,27(3),555-581。
周啟葶 (2007)。高中生英語自我效能、英語學習焦慮、英語學習策略與英語學習成就關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
林美伶 (1998)。認知學徒合作學習對國中生英語科學習成就表現、動機信念、學習策略之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
洪安祺 (譯) (2002)。J. B. Heaton著。課堂測驗編寫指南(Classroom testing)。台北市:師德。
張春興 (1996)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華書局。
陳李綢 (1996)。「學習策略訓練方案」對國中生閱讀理解學習之影響。教育心理學報,28,77-98。
陳密桃 (1990)。國民中小學生的後設認知及其與閱讀理解之相關研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
陳萩卿 (2005)。知識信念影響學習運作模式之驗證暨「調整知識信念的教學策略」對國中生學習歷程影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
莊維貞、簡曉琳 (2007)。彰化縣近郊國小五年級學童英語學習動機、英語學習策略及英語學習成就狀況探討。研究與動態,15,159-178。
楊淑晴 (1999)。英文學習策略研究之綜覽。國立編譯館館刊,28(1),307-328。
管秋雄、陳秀紋 (2007)。英語學習策略之覺察訓練對高中學生英語學習成效影響。中華輔導學報,21,135-166。
黎瓊麗 (2005)。國小學童英語學習動機、學習策略與學習成就之相關性研究:以屏東地區國小為例。屏東師範學院教育行政研究所博士論文,未出版,屏東。
謝沛樺 (2007)。國中生英語學習動機信念、學習策略、學業情緒與學業成就關係之探討。屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
蘇旻洵 (譯) (2007)。R. L. Oxford著。語言學習策略手冊(Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know)。台北市:湯姆生。
Abdelhafez, A. M. M. (2006). The effect of a suggested training program in some metacognitive language learning strategies on developing listening and reading comprehension of university EFL students. Online Submission.
Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. Modern Language Journal, 76, 160-178.
Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, R. M. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. Reading Teacher, 61(1), 70-77.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed.). New York: Longman.
Chamot, A. U. (1993). Student responses to learning-strategy instruction in the foreign-language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 26(3), 308-321.
Chamot, A. U., & El-Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children's learning strategies in language immersion classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 83(3), 319-338.
Chan, C. Y. (2005). A Study of Metacognitive Strategies in EFL Listening Comprehension. Unpublished master's thesis, National Yunlin University of Science & Technology, Taiwan.
Chen, M. H. (2007). Language learning strategies and English proficiency of Taiwan language college students. Languages, Literary Studies and International Studies: An International Journal, 4, 49-72.
De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Van Landeghem, G., Opdenakker, M. C., & Onghena, P. (2003). The effect of schools and classes on language achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 841-859.
DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). A model of academic enablers and elementary reading/language arts achievement. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 298-312.
Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research, and applications. Language Learning, 53(1), 3-32.
Ehrman, M. E., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of adult language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 79, 67-89.
Elbaum, B. E., Berg, C. A., & Dodd, D. H. (1993). Previous learning experience, strategy beliefs, and task definition in self-regulated foreign language learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 318-336.
Fan, H. (2009). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategies in facilitating Taiwanese university learners in EFL reading comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, KS.
Gan, Z., Humphreys, G., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2004). Understanding successful and unsuccessful EFL students in chinese universities. The Modern Language Journal, 88(2), 229-244.
Gathercole, V. C. (1997). The linguistic mass/count distinction as an indicator of referent categorization in monolingual and bilingual children. Child Development, 68, 832-842.
Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.
Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on course performance: Goals, perceived ability, and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181–192.
Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462-482.
Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of winne and hadwin's model of self-regulated learning: New perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 334-372.
Guich, S. A. (2007). Relationships among reading self-concept, beliefs about concepts of ability, and reading achievement in emergent readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Horwitz, E. K. (1985). Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals, 18(4), 333-340.
Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 119-129). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72, 283-294.
Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners' beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 557-576.
Horwitz, E. K. (2008). Becoming a language teacher: Practical guide to second language learning and teaching. Allyn & Bacon.
Hsiao, T. Y., & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: A confirmatory factor analysis. Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368-383.
Hsieh, P. (2004). How college students explain their grades in a foreign language course: The interrelationship of attributions, self-efficacy, language learning beliefs, and achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Jou, Y. J. (2003). Variables affecting the successful learning of freshman English. Journal of Cheng Shiu University, 16, 59-73.
Kern, R. G. (1995). Students and teachers beliefs about language-learning. Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), 71-92.
Khalil, A. (2005). Assessment of language learning strategies used by Palestinian EFL learners. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 108-119.
Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 178–181.
Kyungsim Hong, B. S., M.L.S. (2006). Beliefs about language learning and language learning strategy use in an EFL context: A comparison study of monolingual Korean and bilingual Korean-chinese university students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, TX.
Li, J. H. (2005). The effect of learner autonomy promotion on listening comprehension for senior high school students. Unpublished master's thesis, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan.
Liao, P. S., & Chiang, M. Y. (2004). How college students’ beliefs about English learning related to their strategy use. Journal of National Hsin Chu Teachers College, 19, 137-154.
Lin, W. T. (2009). Beliefs about language learning and language learning strategy use in a college freshman EFL context: A comparative study of high and low English proficiency learners. Unpublished master's thesis, Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taiwan.
Littlewood, W. (1996). Autonomy: An anatomy and a framework. System, 24, 427-435.
Liu, M. L. (2004). A study of beliefs about language learning and learning strategies of senior high school students. Unpublished master's thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Taiwan.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Toward a social psychological model of strategy use. Foreign Language Annals, 27, 185-195.
Mantle-Bromley, C. (1995). Positive attitudes and realistic beliefs: Links to proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 79(3), 372-386.
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R., & Debus, R. (1998). Structure, stability, and development of young children's self-concepts: A multicohort-multioccasion study. Child Development, 69(4), 1030-1053.
McDonald, A. S. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 89-101.
McIlroy, D., Bunting, B. P., & Adamson, G. (2000). An evaluation of the factor structure and predictive utility of a test anxiety scale with reference to students' past performance and personality indices. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 17-32.
Metallidou, P., & Vlachou, A. (2007). Motivational beliefs, cognitive engagement, and achievement in language and mathematics in elementary school children. International Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 2-15.
Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindram, B., & Nicholls, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 388–442.
Negretti, R. (2009). Metacognitive awareness in developmental writing students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, Manoa, HI.
Noels, K. A. (2001). Learning Spanish as a second language: Learners' orientations and perceptions of their teachers' communication style. Language Learning, 51(1), 107-144.
Nunan, D. (1995). Closing the gap between learning and instruction. Tesol Quarterly, 29(1), 133-158.
O'Malley,J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Opdenakker, M., & Damme, J. V. (2001). Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematics achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 407-432.
Opdenakker, M., & Van Damme, J. (2000). Effects of schools, teaching staff and classes on achievement and well-being in secondary education: Similarities and differences between school outcomes. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 11(2), 165-196.
Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Human learning (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle.
Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies. IRAL, 41(4), 271-278.
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. (1993). Second language research on individual differences. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 188-205.
Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
Peacock, M. (2001). Match or mismatch? learning styles and teaching styles in EFL. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 1-20.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Mistretta-Hampston, J., & Echevarria, M. (1998). The nature of literacy instruction in ten grade 4-5 classrooms in upstate New York. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 159–194.
Rivera-Mills, S. V., & Plonsky, L. (2007). Empowering students with language learning strategies: A critical review of current issues. Foreign Language Annals, 40(3), 535-548.
Sammons, P. (1995). Gender, ethnic and socio-economic differences in attainment and progress: A longitudinal analysis of student achievement over 9 years. British Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 465-485.
Sammons, P., & Nuttall, D. (1993). Differential school effectiveness: Results from a reanalysis of the inner London education authority's junior school project data. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 381-392.
Scheerens, J., Bosker, R. J., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2001). Time for self-criticism: On the viability of school Effectiveness Research. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 12(1), 131-157.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Staley, R., & DuBois, N. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research & Evaluation, 10(2), 117-139.
Su, M. H. (2003). An investigation of Taiwanese grade 5-6 students' EFL language learning strategies and language learning experience. The Journal of Educational Science, 3 (1), 138-177.
Thomas, S., & Sammons, P. (1997). Differential secondary school effectiveness: Comparing the performance of different pupil groups. British Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 451-469.
Tymms, P. (2001). A test of the big fish in a little pond hypothesis: An InvestigationInto the feelings of seven-year-old pupils in school. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 12(2), 161-181.
Van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., & Guldemond, H. (2001). Improving involvement in primary education in Indonesia: Implementation, effects and costs. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 12, 447–466.
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.
Wenden, A. L. (1987). How to be a successful language learner: Insights and prescriptions from L2 learners. In A. L. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall International.
Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515-537.
White, C. (1999). Expectations and emergent beliefs of self-instructed language learners. System, 27(4), 443-457.
Wolters, C. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27-47.
Wolters, C. A., & Yu, S. L. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning & Individual Differences, 8(3), 211-238.
Yamamori, K., Isoda, T., Hiromori, T., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Using cluster analysis to uncover L2 learner differences in strategy use, will to learn, and achievement over time. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41(4), 381-409.
Yang, N. D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27, 515-535.
Yee, V. N. (2007). An evaluation of the impact of a standards-based intervention on the academic achievement of English language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, CA.
Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition poor environment. Language Awareness, 10(4), 268-288.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內校外均不公開 not available
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.17.174.239
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.17.174.239
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code