結合「UASB-人工濕地(Constructed wetland, CWL)」尚未用於處理受生活及養豬廢水污染之河川水。因此，本研究取生活污水及經處理後之養豬廢水作成混合污水，以小型UASB串聯人工濕地系統，以UASB之水力停留時間作為操作設定參數，探討污染物之去除效率，並評估其性能以利推廣。
試驗設施為UASB-CWL1-CWL2串聯，UASB反應槽有效容積為2.5 L，CWL1有效容積54.4 L，植栽蘆葦；CWL2有效容積80 L，植水芙蓉。供試進流水取自高雄縣某養豬場放流水及中山大學污水處理場進流水，二者以1：1混合。初始設定UASB反應槽之HRT為6小時，操作至穩定，再次第降至4及2小時。整個試驗共分三階段(phase)，污水在CWL1及CWL2之水力停留時間分別為131、193小時(Phase I)，87、129小時(Phase II)，44、65小時(Phase III)。
試驗結果顯示：
1. 混合污水水質(單位mg/L)範圍(平均值)分別為總COD (CODt) 64-332 (179)、水溶性COD (CODS) 28-267 (129)、水溶性BOD (BODS) 8-120 (70)、SS 110-1330 (372)、氨氮20-99 (48)、硝酸氮1.2-11.9 (2.7)、亞硝酸氮0-3.4 (1.0)、總氮 24.3-95.7 (56.8)、磷酸鹽0-10.4 (2.9)、總磷5.1-52.1 (23.9)、Cu 0.0-0.41 (0.13)、Zn 0.05-0.73 (0.27)、DO 0.2-2.7 (0.7)、pH值 6.9-7.7 (7.4)。
2. UASB出口水質平均值(單位mg/L)分別為CODt 55、CODS 40、BODS 27、SS 93、氨氮42、硝酸氮2.6、亞硝酸氮0.5、總氮43.7、磷酸鹽0.9、總磷17.2、Cu 0.08、Zn 0.07、DO 0.04、pH值 7.4。UASB作為前處理，可去除進流水中CODt、CODS、BODS、SS、亞硝酸氮、Zn、Cu等50%以上。但對營養鹽(氨氮、硝酸氮、總氮、磷酸鹽、總磷)之去除率不佳，故須仰賴人工濕地之去除機制，已達到較好的去除效果。
3. CWL-2出口水質平均值(單位mg/L)分別為CODt 21、CODS 16、BODS 10、SS 38、氨氮 2、硝酸氮1.9、亞硝酸氮0.1、總氮 11.3、磷酸鹽2.6、總磷5.9、Cu 0.06、Zn 0.05、DO 5.4、pH值 7.6。結合UASB前處理及CWL-1、CWL-2作為後處理，對N、P之處理效果較UASB佳。系統出口的Cu、Zn濃度均分別小於0.6、0.2 mg/L，顯示Cu及Zn會累積於植體及底泥中。

A system with the combination of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and constructed wetlands (CWLs) has not yet been applied for cleaning river water polluted by sewage and swine wastewater. In this study, a pilot system with an UASB reactor (effective working volume 2.5 liters) combined with two CWL reactors (effective working volumes 54.4 and 80 liters for CWL-1 and CWL-2, respectively) was used to test the feasibility for treating wastewater samples prepared by mixing 1 volume of sewage and 1 volume of partially-treated swine wastewater. In the system, the UASB reactor was seeded with an anaerobic sludge for sewage treatment and CWL-1 and CWL-2 were planted with emergent macrophyte (reed, Phragmites australis L.) and floating macrophyte (Pistia stratiotes L.), respectively.
Effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT) of the test wastewater in the UASB reactor on the removal efficacy of various pollutants were tested. HRTs of 6, 4, and 2 hours were set for the UASB for the first, second, and third experimental phases, respectively.
The tested influent wastewater had the following properties (unit in mg/L and the number in parentheses indicates the average value): total CODt 64-332 (179), soluble CODS 28-267 (129), soluble BODS 8-120 (70), SS 110-1330 (372), NH3-N 20-99 (48), NO3--N 1.2-11.9 (2.7), NO2--N 0-3.4 (1.0), total nitrogen TN 24.3-95.7 (56.8), PO43--P 0-10.4 (2.9), total phosphorus TP 5.1-52.1 (23.9), Cu 0.0-0.41 (0.13), Zn 0.05-0.73 (0.27), DO 0.2-2.7 (0.7), and pH 6.9-7.7 (7.4).
Effluents from the UASB reactor for the third phase test had average values of CODt 55, CODS 40, BODS 27, SS 93, NH3-N 42, NO3--N 2.6, NO2--N 0.5, TN 43.7, PO43--P 0.9, TP 17.2, Cu 0.08, Zn 0.07, DO 0.04, and pH 7.4. For the phase, effluents from the combined UASB-CWL1-CWL2 system had average values of CODt 21, CODS 16, BODS 10, SS 38, NH3-N 2, NO3--N 1.9, NO2--N 0.1, TN 11.3, PO43--P 2.6, TP 5.9, Cu 0.06, Zn 0.05, DO 5.4, and pH 7.6. The system has been shown to be economically and technically feasible for cleaning the test wastewater.

摘要. I
目錄. II
圖目錄 IV
表目錄 VI
第一章 前言 1
1-1. 研究緣起 1
1-2. 研究目的及內容 3
第二章 文獻回顧 4
2-1. UASB反應槽發展沿革與應用 4
2-2. UASB反應槽概說 4
2-3. 厭氣代謝反應機制 5
2-4. 影響厭氣生物處理程序之因素 10
2-4-1. 溫度 10
2-4-2. pH 10
2-4-3. VFAs 11
2-4-4. 鹼度 11
2-4-5. 營養鹽 11
2-4-6. 氧化還原電位 12
2-4-7. 毒性物質 12
2-5. 厭氣污泥之顆粒化現象 12
2-6. 各種厭氣處理程序 12
2-6-1. 上流式厭氣污泥床反應槽 13
2-6-2. 傳統厭氣消化槽 13
2-6-3. 完全混合型厭氣接觸槽 14
2-6-4. 厭氧接觸槽 14
2-6-5. 固定床程序 15
2-6-6. 膨脹/流體化床程序 15
2-7. 各種污水之厭氣處理 16
2-8. 人工濕地發展歷史 20
2-8-1. 德國的發展情形 20
2-8-2. 美國的發展情形 20
2-8-3. 台灣的發展情形 22
2-9. 濕地之定義 22
2-10. 濕地之分類 24
2-11. 人工濕地之類型 25
2-12. 人工濕地的水質淨化機制 25
2-12-1. 懸浮固體之去除 29
2-12-2. 有機物的去除 29
2-12-3. 氮之去除 29
2-12-4. 磷之去除 29
2-12-5. 致病原之去除 30
2-13. 濕地植物種類及扮演角色 31
2-14. 人工濕地用於處理各種污水 35
2-15. UASB反應槽-後處理(post-treatment)系統 37
第三章 實驗設備及方法 39
3-1. 實驗設備 39
3-2. 系統操作條件 39
3-3. 系統操作與採樣 40
3-4. 試驗研究內容 40
3-5. 採樣分析 40
3-6. 計算式說明 41
第四章 結果與討論 43
4-1. 反應槽操作狀況 43
4-2. COD處理效果 43
4-2-1. CODt 43
4-2-2. CODs 43
4-3. BODt處理效果 45
4-4. SS處理效果 47
4-5. 氨氮處理效果 48
4-6. 總氮處理效果 49
4-7. 亞硝酸氮處理效果 50
4-8. 硝酸氮處理效果 51
4-9. 總磷處理效果 52
4-10. 磷酸鹽磷處理效果 53
4-11. 水中Cu及Zn處理效果 54
4-12. 底泥/蘆葦/水芙蓉中Cu及Zn濃度隨時間及處
理階段之變化 55
第五章 結論與建議 78
參考文獻 80
附 錄 90

1. Agrawal LK, Ohashi Y, Mochida E, Okui H, Ueki Y, Harada H and Ohashi A, 1997. Treatment of raw sewage in a temperate climate using a UASB reactor and the hanging sponge cubes process. Water. Sci. Technol., 36, 433-440.
2. Ansola G, Gonzalez JM, Cortijo R and de Luis E, 2003. Experimental and full-scale pilot plant constructed wetlands for municipal wastewaters treatment. Ecol. Eng., 21, 43-52.
3. Aiyuk S, Amoako J, Raskin L, van Haandel A and Verstrate W, 2004. Removal of carbon and nutrients from domestic wastewater using a low investment, intergrated treatment concept. Water Res., 38, 3031-3042.
4. Abbasi SA, Ramasamy EV, Gajalakshmi S, Sanjeevi R and Jithesh MN, 2004. Feasibility studies on the treatment of dairy wastewaters with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Bioresour. Technol., 93, 209-212.
5. Aiyuk S, Forrez I, Lieven D, van Haandel A, Verstraete W, 2006. Anaerobic and complementary treatment of domestic sewage in regions with hot climates－A review. Bioresour. Technol., 97, 2225-2241.
6. Barbosa RA and Sant Anna Jr. GL, 1989. Treatment of Raw Domestic Sewage in an UASB Reactor. Water Res, 23(12), 1483-1490.
7. Brix, h, 1993a. Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands: system design, removal processes, and treatment performance. In G.A. Moshiri, Ed., Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement. Lewis.
8. Boardman GD, Tisinger JL and Gallagher DL, 1995. Treatment of clam processing wastewater by means of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket technology. Water Res., 39(6), 1483-1490.
9. Brock TD and Madigan MT. Biology of microorganisms〔微生物學〕. （謝哲松 譯），國立編譯館，民國八十四年。
10. Behling E, Diaz A, Colina G, Herrera M, Gutierrez E, Chacin E, Fernanderz N and Forster CF, 1997. Domestic wastewater treatment using a UASB reactor. Bioresour. Technol., 61(3), 239-245.
11. Cronin C and Lo KV, 1998. Anaerobic treatment of brewery wastewater using UASB reactors seeded with activated sludge. Bioresour. Technol., 64, 33-38.
12. Castillo A, Llabres P and Mata-alvarrez J, 1999. A kinetic study of a combined anaerobic-aerobic system for treatment of domestic sewage. Water Res., 33(7), 1742-1747.
13. Cuervo-Lopez FM, Martinez F, Gutierrez-Rojas M, Noyola RA and Gomez J, 1999. Effect of nitrogen loading rate and carbon source on denitrification and sludge settleability in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Water Sci. Technol., 40(8), 123-130.
14. Cameron K, Madramootoo C, Crolla A and Kinsley C, 2003. Pollutant removal from municipal sewage lagoon effluents with a free-surface wetland. Water Sci. Technol., 37, 2803-2812.
15. Chavez C, Castillo R, Dendooven L and Escamilla-Silva EM, 2005. Poultry slaughter wastewater treatment with an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Bioresour. Technol., 96, 1730-1736.
16. Chernicharo CA, 2006. Post-treatment options for the anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater. Environmental Science and Bio/technology, 5, 73-92.
17. DeMaeseneer JL, 1997. Constructed wetlands for sludge dewatering. Water Sci. Technol., 35(5), 279-285.
18. Ronald L. Droste, Theory and practice of water and wastewater treatment譯者:六和出版社，〔水及廢水處理理論與實務〕. （林正芳、林瑤勤、羅棋穎、吳忠信譯），地景出版社，民國九十一年。
19. El-Gohary FA and Nasr FA, 1999. Cost-effective pre-treatment of wastewater. Water Sci. Technol., 39(5), 97-103.
20. El-Shafai SA, El-Gohary FA, Nasr FA, van der Steen NP and Gijzen HJ, 2007. Nutrient recovery from domestic wastewater using a UASB-duckweed ponds systems. Bioresour. technol, 98, 798-807.
21. Green MB, Griffin P, Seabridge JK and Dhobie D, 1997. Removal of bacteria in subsurface flow wetlands. Water Sci. Technol., 35(5), 109-116.
22. Greenway M, 1997. Nutrient content of wetland plants in constructed wetlands receiving municipal effluent in tropical Australia. Water Sci. Technol., 35(5), 135-142.
23. Gopal B, 1999. Natural and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment : potentials and problems. Water Sci. Technol., 40(3), 27-35.
24. Garcia J, Aguirre P, Mujeriego R, Huang Y, Ortiz L and Bayona JM, 2004. Initial contaminant removal performance factors in horizontal flow reed beds used fo treating urban wastewater. Water Res., 38, 1669-1678.
25. Hammer, DA, 1996. Creating freshwater wetlands, 2nd ed., Lewis.
26. Hendriksen HV and Ahring B, 1996. Integrated removal of nitrate and carbon in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor: operation performance. Water Res. 3(6), 1451-1458.
27. Jeganathan J, Nakhla G and Bassi A, 2006. Long-term performance of high-rate anaerobic reactor for the treatment of oily wastewater. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 6466-6472.
28. Ji GD, Sun TH and Ni JR, 2007. Surface flow constructed wetland for heavy oil-produced water treatment. Bioresour. Technol., 98, 436-441.
29. Kadlec RH and Knight RL, 1996. Treatment wetlands, 2nd ed., Lewis.
30. Kadlec RH, Burgoon PS and Henderson ME, 1997. Integrated natural systems for treating potato processing wastewater. Water Sci. Technol., 35, (5), 263-270.
31. Kalker TJJ, Maas JAW and Zwaag RR, 1999. Transfer and acceptance of UASB technology for domestic wastewater: two case studies. Water Sci. Technol., 39(5), 219-225.
32. Kern J and Idler C, 1999. Treatment of domestic and agricultural wastewater by reed bed systems. Ecol. Eng., 12, 13-25.
33. Knight RL, Payne VWE, Borer RE, Clarke Jr. RA and Pries JH, 2000. Constructed wetlands for livestock wastewater management. Ecol. Eng., 15, 41-55.
34. Karathanasis AD, Potter CL and Coyne MS, 2003. Vegetation effects on fecal bacteria, BOD, and suspended solid removal in constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater. Ecol. Eng., 20, 157-169.
35. Laber J, Perfler R and Haberl R, 1997. Two strategies for advanced nitrogen elimination in vertical flow cinstructed wetlands. Water Sci. Technol, 35(5), 71-77.
36. Laber J, Haberl R and Shrestha R, 1999. Two-stage constucted wetland for treating hospital wastewater in Nepal. Water Sci. Technol., 40(3), 317-324.
37. Lettinga G, Kato MT and Field JA, 1997. The anaerobic treatment of low strength wastewaters in UASB and EGSB reactor. Water Sci. Technol., 36(6-7), 375-382.
38. Lettinga G, Mahmoud N, Zeeman G and Huub G, 2004. Anaerobic sewage treatment in a one-stage UASB reactor and a combined UASB Digester system. Water res., 38, 3348-2358.
39. Lettinga G, Halasheeh M, Sawajneh Z, Zeeman G, Lier J and Fayyad M, 2005. Treatment of strong domestic sewage in a 96 m3 UASB reactor operated at ambient temperatures: two-stage versus single-stage reactor. Bioresour. Technol., 96, 577-585.
40. Luostarinen SA and Rintala JA, 2005. Anaerobic on-site treatment of black water and dairy parlour wastewater in UASB-septic tanks at low temperature. Water Res., 39, 436-448.
41. Lin CY, Chang FY and Chang CH, 2000. Co-digestion of leachate with septage using a UASB reactor. Bioresour. Technol., 73, 175-178.
42. Lee CY, Lee CC, Lee FY, Tseng SK and Liao CJ, 2004. Performance of subsurface flow constructed wetland taking pretreated swine effluent under heavy loads. Bioresour. Technol., 92, 173-179.
43. Martinez J, Borzacconi L, Mallo M, Galisteo M and Vinas M, 1995. Treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater. Water Sci. Technol., 32(12), 99-104.
44. Mungur AS, Shutes RB, Revitt DM and House MA, 1997. An assessment of metal removal by a laboratory scale wetland. Water Sci. Tech., 35(5), 125-133.
45. Malina JF and Pohland FG. Design of Anaerobic Processes for the Treatment of Industrial and Municipal wastes〔厭氧程序處理工業廢水及都市污水之設計〕. （洪仁陽 譯），國立編譯館，民國八十七年。
46. Mitsch WJ and Gosselink JG, 1993. Wetlands〔濕地〕. （章盛傑，邱文雅 譯），地景出版社，1998.
47. Mays PA and Edwards GS, 2001. Comparison of heavy metal accumulation in a natural waetland and constructed wetlands receiving acid mine drainage. Ecol. Eng., 16, 487-500.
48. Mantovi P, Marmiroli M, Maestri E, Tagliavini S, Piccinini S and Marmiroli N, 2003. Application of a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland on treatment of dairy parlor wastewater. Bioresour. Technol., 88, 85-94.
49. Molle P, Lienard A, Grasmick A and Iwema A, 2006. Effect of reeds and feeding operation on hydraulic behavior of vertical flow constructed wetlands under hydraulic overloads. Water Res., 40, 606-612.
50. Neralla S, Weaver RW, Lesikar BJ and Persyn RA, 2000. Improvement of domestic wastewater quality by subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Bioresour. Technol., 75, 19-25.
51. Oliva LCHV, Zaiat M and Foresti E, 1995. Anaerobic reactor fo food processing wastewater treatment: established technology and new developments. Water Sci. Technol., 32(12), 157-163.
52. Punal A and Lema JM, 1999. Anaerobic treatment of wastewater from a fish-canning factory in a full-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Water Sci. Technol., 40(8), 57-62.
53. Singh KS and Viraraghavan T, 1998. Start-up and operation of UASB reactor at 20℃ for municipal wastewater treatment. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 85(6), 609-614.
54. Seghezzo L, Zeeman G, van Lier JB, Hamelers HVM and Lettinga G, 1998. A review: the anaerobic treatment of sewage in UASB and EGSB reactor. Bioresour. Technol., 65, 175-190.
55. Schaafsma JA, Baldwin AH and Streb CA, 2000. An evalution of a constructed wetland to treat wastewater from a dairy farm in Maryland, USA. Ecol. Eng., 14, 199-206.
56. Stone KC, Poach ME, Hunt PG, Reddy GB and Johnson MH, 2004. Swine wastewater treatment by marsh-pond-marsh constructed wetlands under varying nitrogen loads. Ecol. Eng., 23, 165-175.
57. Tarutis Jr. WJ and Unz RF, 1995. Iron and maganese release in coal mine drainage wetland microcosms. Water Sci. Technol., 32(3), 187-192.
58. Urbanc-Bercic O and Bulc T, 1995. Integrated constructed wetland for small communities. Water Sci. Technol., 32(3), 41-47.
59. Uemura S and Harada H, 2000. Treatment of sewage by a UASB reactor under moderate to low temperatue conditions. Bioresour. Technol., 72, 275-282.
60. Vymazal J, 1995. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech republic-State of the art. Water Sci. Technol., 32(3), 357-364.
61. Vrhovsek D, Kukanja V and Bulc T, 1996. Constucted wetland（CW）for industrial waste water treatment. Water Res., 30(10), 2287-2292.
62. Von Felde K and Kunst S, 1997. N- AND COD removal in vertical-flow systems. Water Sci. Technol., 35(5), 78-85.
63. Van der Steen P, Brenner A, van Buuren J and Oron G, 1999. Post-treatment of UASB reactor effluent in an integrated duckweed and stabilization pond system. Water Sci. Technol., 33(3), 615-620.
64. Watson JT, Reed SC, Kadlec RH, Knight RL, and Whitehouse AE, 1989. Performance expectations and loading rates for constructed wetlands. In D. A. Hammer, Ed., Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Lewis.
65. Yu H, Tay JH and Wilson F, 1997. A sustainable municipal wastewater treatment process for tropical and subtropical regions in developing countries. Water Sci. Technol., 35(9), 191-198.
66. Zehnder AJB, 1985. Biology of anaerobic microorganisms. A Wiley-Interscience publication.
67. IWA Specialist Group on Use of Macrophytes in Water Pollution Control., Constructed Wetlands for Pollution Control, Processes, Performance, Design and Operation , IWA Publishing, London, UK. 2000.
68. 王姿文、荊樹人、林瑩峰、李得元、鄭光男、陳可薇“不同人工溼地系統對大腸桿菌(E. coli)之去除效能”，第二十五屆廢水處理技術研討會論文集，第871-875頁，民國89年。
69. 王姿文、荊樹人、林瑩峰、李得元、錢紀銘、吳堅瑜、陳德致、童俊龍“人工溼地去除校園廢污水中大腸桿菌之效能”，第二十六屆廢水處理技術研討會論文，民國90年。
70. 行政院公共工程委員會，「2004生態工法案例編選集」，民國九十三年三月。
71. 李得元、荊樹人、林瑩峰、王姿文、何茂賢、魏家美、張庭憲，「經人工濕地處理後校園廢污水再利用之探討」，第七屆水再生及再利用研討會，民國91年。
72. 吳獻凱、劉明全、林榮和、萬騰州，「中洋子溼地對朴子溪之淨化成效之探討」，中華民國環境保護學會學刊，第二十九卷，第二期，民國95年。
73. 周印能，以厭氣法串連好氧法處理都市污水的實場研究，國立中山大學環境工程研究所碩士論文，民國八十八年六月。
74. 周明顯、彭致豪，人工濕地污水處理技術(上、下)，永續發展簡訊，第十二、十三期，經濟部水利署，民國九十四年三月、六月。
75. 林秋裕，「環境工程微生物學」，國彰出版社，第三版，民國90年。
76. 林瑩峰、荊樹人、李得元、王姿文、陳益銘、顏文尚、陳韋志，「水產養殖廢水之人工濕地處理—啟動特性及效能」，第二十五屆廢水處理技術研討會論文集，第888-893頁，民國89年。
77. 林瑩峰、荊樹人、李得元、王姿文、施凱鐘、楊雅淨、陳庭剛“表面流人工溼地對水中硝酸鹽之去除效能”，第二十五屆廢水處理技術研討會論文集，第882-887頁，民國89年。
78. 林瑩峰、荊樹人、李得元、王姿文、陳益銘、顏文尚、陳韋志“水產養殖廢水之人工溼地處理