本篇以敘說探究法分析三位中山吉他社的社員在社團中的生命歷程與學習歷程，並以社會學習理論、實作社群以及組織認同的文獻為基礎與文本作對話，以探究社群成員參與社團的過程中其所產生的轉變以及學習；並且進一步的往根源挖掘，深入的去瞭解社群成員在過程中如何因為認同而影響其個人在社群中所展現出的樣貌，以及個人如何透過社群的運作推動組織產生新的樣貌，本篇研究聚焦在研究參與者的認同形塑「歷程」，讀者可以透過閱讀本研究感受到歷程中透過實作參與在個人身上產生的認同轉變以及學習。以下為研究發現：

1. 個人認同透過與社群互動中形塑與調適，並與事物的學習能力不斷的相互生成，因此在產生學習的能力以及行為以前，需建立個人對事物的認同才有觸發學習的可能性。
2. 個人在進入社群後，個人認同若與與組織認同產生衝突，會透過共同情緒事件來確認社群成員彼此間的組織認同是否相同，而個人會為了生存於社群中，產生個人的認同調適能力達到個人認同與組織認同的共存狀態。
3. 個人產生感染群體的能力，透過個人當責性，個人在社群中專業能力的展演會推動社群其他成員，產生提升專業能力的影響力。
4. 在社團中，個人的個人認同中對於組織認同強大意念會透過社群軌跡的推演，使得個人的組織認同有機會獲得施展，並推動群體產生改變。

This research uses the approach of narrative inquiry to analyze the life and learning experiences of the memberships of NSYSU Guitar Association. Based on the concept of Social Learning Theory, Community of Practice and Organization Identity, this research presents the process of the members that how they participate in the community. Explore what they change and learn in the process. hrough scrutinizing in the origins of the members identity, what rooted identity is and how the identity changing in the process. Try to understand how identity to influence membership in this process and how a membership to generate new organization identity and push forward this new organization identity for all memberships to recognition. By analyzing the data and literatures, we sorted out the findings of this research :
1. Personal identity interacts with the community to shape and adapt. The identity and the ability to learning form each other constantly. How to generate a person have leaning ability is to establish his identity.
2. They confirm each other’s organization though emotional events. If new comers have conflicts between personal identity and organization identity. They will find the way to adapt their identity to coexist with the community.
3. Personal ability will infect the community through accountability. People in the community performances of professional competence will push other community members.
4. The community’s trajectory makes individual’s organizational identity to have access to display and promote community to have the possibility to change.

論文審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
ABSTRACT iv
目錄 v
表次 vii
圖次 viii
第一章 緒論 - 1 -
第一節 研究動機 - 1 -
第二節 研究問題 - 3 -
第二章 文獻探討 - 5 -
第一節 認同 - 6 -
第三章 研究方法 - 14 -
第一節 敘說探究法 - 14 -
第二節 關鍵事件法 - 16 -
第三節 研究設計與歷程 - 17 -
第四章 個案故事 - 23 -
第一節 阿靠的故事 - 23 -
第二節 修哥的故事 - 29 -
第三節 布蘭蒂的故事 - 35 -
第五章 分析與討論 - 42 -
第一節 個人認同的不斷強化與改變，成為運轉學習的重要推力 - 42 -
第二節 尋求兩者共存的生存之道-群體與個人間的衝突調適 - 49 -
第三節 能力及行動的擴散效應，個人開啟群體的開關 - 55 -
第六章 結論與反思 - 64 -
第一節 分析結論－學習是認同探索的歷程 - 64 -
第二節 管理意涵及研究限制 - 66 -
第三節 研究反思 - 68 -
參考文獻 - 69 -
中文文獻 - 69 -
英文文獻 - 70 -

中文文獻
1. 徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎，（2003）組織，認定與企業倫理效應，應用心理研究，第二十期，115-132。
2. 蕭瑞麟（2006）。不用數字的研究。台北市：培生教育出版股份有限公司。
3. 蔡敦浩、利尚仁、林韶怡（2008）。創業研究的新趨向—敘說探究之應用。中山管理評論，16（2） 321-350。
4. 蔡敦浩、林韶怡、利尚仁，（2010），「行動導向的創業歷程:以複雜調適系統再現創業」，管理學報 ，第二十七卷第一期，頁57-73。
5. 蔡敦浩、劉育忠、王慧蘭(2011)，敘說探究的第一堂課，台北：鼎茂。
6. 蔡珮，（2007），符號互動、媒介、家鄉與離散認同：布里斯本澳籍台裔族裔邊界的形成與流動，國立政治大學新聞研究所 博士論文。
7. 羅世宏（譯）（2004）。文化研究：理論與實踐。台北市：五南圖書出版有限股份公司。（Chris Barker, 2000）

英文文獻
1. Albert, S. & Whetten, D.A.(1985). Organizational Identity. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw(Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol 8, p.263-295. Greenwich. CT: JAI Press
2. Ashforth, B., & Mael, F. (1996). Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. In J.A. C.Baum & J.E. Dutton (Eds.), Advances in strategic management , Vol. 13, p. 17-62. Greenwich, CT: JaI.
3. Ashforth, B. E.., & Mael, F. A (1989). Social identity theory and the organization., Academy of Management Review, Vol14, p20-39.
4. Bruner, Jerome S. (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press
5. Cladinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (2000), Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Freacisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Cope J., 003, Entrepreneurial Learning and Critical Reflection: Discontinuous Events as Triggers for Higher-level Learning, Management Learning, Vol.34, p.429-450.
7. Fenwick, T. (2008). Understanding Relations of Individual–Collective Learning in Work: A Review of Research, Management Learning, 227-243.
8. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identification: A social Psychology of intergroup relations and group process. London: Routledge.
9. Margaret, G. and Bejínez, L. and Hidalgo, N. and Rolón, C. (2004) Belonging and SchoolParticipation: Lessons from a Migrant StudentClub. School Connections: U.S. p129–149 Pratt, M
10. . G. & Rafaeli, A. (1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40, p.862-898. Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
11. Karen A. Cerulo. (1997) Identity construction New Issues, New Direction. Annual：Review of Sociology, 23, 385-409.
12. Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
13. Lindgren, M. & Wåhlin, N. (2001). Identity construction among boundary-crossing individuals. Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol 17, 357-377.
14. Noe, R.A. (2006). Employee Training & Development, McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
15. Pratt, M. G. & Rafaeli, A. (1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, Vol40, p.862-898.
16. Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, Vol13, 65-93
17. Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation, Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology intergoup relations (pp. 77-98).London; Academic Press.
18. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. New York:Cambridge University Press.
19. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. ( 1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20. Tsoukas, H. and M. J. Hatch (2001). Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations 54(8): 979-1013.
21. Turner, J. C. (1982).Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel (ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp.15-40).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Turner, J.C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Blackwell
23. Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice: learning, meaning and identity, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press