Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0627115-135733 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0627115-135733
論文名稱
Title
工作鑲嵌對員工績效的動機/去動機歷程:探討員工組織鑲嵌、社群鑲嵌對其任務績效與支持性建言的影響─工作專注與情感性組織承諾的中介效果
The motivating and demotivating processes linking organizational embeddedness, community embeddedness, task performance, and supportive voice: The mediating roles of absorption and affective organizational commitment
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
46
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2015-07-22
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2015-07-29
關鍵字
Keywords
情感性組織承諾、工作專注、社群鑲嵌、組織鑲嵌、任務性績效、支持性建言
organizational embeddedness, community embeddedness, absorption, affective organizational commitment, task performance, supportive voice
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5788 次,被下載 0
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5788 times, has been downloaded 0 times.
中文摘要
過去探討工作鑲嵌的研究,主要聚焦於整體性的工作鑲嵌,以及其對組織正面的影響 (如:工作績效、組織公民行為),然而,近期已有研究提及工作鑲嵌對於員工身心與職家衝突的負面效果。有鑑於以往工作鑲嵌的研究,較少探究其對於工作行為的負面效果,且無法釐清其中的影響歷程。故本研究以Hom, Mitchell, Lee, & Griffeth (2012)對於員工留任的動機分類為基礎,探討員工的組織鑲嵌與社群鑲嵌,是否會透過強化或降低工作動機 (工作專注、情感性組織承諾),進而影響任務性績效及支持性建言。
為避免共同方法變異,本研究以不同來源及不同的時間點,採用部屬-主管配對問卷收集資料,由部屬及其主管間隔兩週時間填答,總計回收跨產業別89間公司,共429份有效的配對問卷。研究結果顯示,高度組織鑲嵌的員工,會透過提升工作專注與情感性組織承諾的歷程,進而提高其任務性績效及支持性建言;反之,高度社群鑲嵌的員工,則會經由降低情感性組織承諾的歷程,進而降低其支持性建言。本研究亦針對結果提出管理意涵如下:1. 組織可透過工作設計、獎酬制度、教育訓練與職涯發展的改善,增進員工的組織鑲嵌;2. 藉由涉入社群活動,讓高度社群鑲嵌的員工感受到組織對其社群環境的重視。
Abstract
In recent years, many studies have found the positive effects of job embeddedness on job attitudes and behaviors (e.g., job performance, organizational citizenship behavior). However, some studies have pointed out potential negative impacts of job embeddedness on employees’ well-being and work-to-family conflict. Based on Hom et al.’s (2012) theoretical framework on employee retention, this study investigates whether organizational embeddedness and community embeddedness differentially influence task performance and supportive voice behavior through absorption and affective organizational commitment.
This study collected paired questionnaires from both employees and their supervisors in different time periods. The data was collected from 89 companies of different industries, resulting in 429 valid paired questionnaires. The result of structural equation modeling and Sobel test showed that organizational embeddedness had positive effects on absorption and affective organizational commitment, thereby increasing task performance and supportive voice. In constrast, community embeddedness had a negative impact on affective organizational commitment, reducing supportive voice. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
目次 Table of Contents
論文審定書 i
誌 謝 ii
摘 要 iii
Abstract iv
目 錄 v
圖 次 vii
表 次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻探討與假設推導 4
第一節 工作鑲嵌與動機/去動機歷程:敬業型留任者與受困型留任者的觀點 4
第二節 組織鑲嵌、工作專注與任務性績效:動機歷程的觀點 5
第三節 組織鑲嵌、情感性組織承諾與支持性建言:動機歷程的觀點 7
第四節 社群鑲嵌、工作專注與任務性績效:去動機歷程的觀點 8
第五節 社群鑲嵌、情感性組織承諾與支持性建言:去動機歷程的觀點 10
第三章 研究方法 11
第一節 研究架構 11
第二節 研究樣本與施測程序 11
第三節 研究工具 12
第四節 資料分析方式 14
第四章 研究結果與討論 15
第一節 各變數間敘述統計與相關係數 15
第二節 驗證性因素分析 15
第三節 區別效度檢驗 16
第四節 競爭模式分析 16
第五節 假設檢定 17
第五章 結論與建議 19
第一節 理論貢獻 19
第二節 管理意涵 20
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 21
參考文獻 23
附錄:主管問卷 28
附錄:部屬問卷 31
參考文獻 References
一、 中文
邱莉玲 (2014)。新鮮人就業考量 離家近更勝錢多。中時電子報。2014年12月4日,取自:http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20141204 000145-260204
吳明隆 (2006)。結構方程模式-SIMPLIS 的應用。台北市:五南。
黃芳銘 (2006)。結構方程模式:理論與應用。台北市:五南。
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽 (2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、 測試和補救。管理學報,23,77-98。
韜睿惠悅 (2014)。2014韜睿惠悅全球人才管理與獎酬調查研究發現。2014年10月,取自:http://www.towerswatson.com/zh-TW/Insights/IC-Types/Survey- Research-Results/2014/08/2014-global-talent-management-and-rewards-study-making-the-most-of-employment-deal
二、英文
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
Bakker, A.B., Hakanen, J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 274-284.
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Dollard, M. F. (2008). How job demands affect partners’ experience of exhaustion: Integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 901-911.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Becker, T. E., & Kernan, M. C. (2003). Matching commitment to supervisors and organizations to in-role and extra-role performance. Human Performance, 16(4), 327-348.
Bono, J. E., Foldes, H. J., Vinson, G., & Muros, J. P. (2007). Workplace emotions: The role of supervision and leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1357-1367.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851-875.
Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Farh, J. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96 (3), 541-557.
Crossley, C. D., Bennett, R. J., Jex, S. M., & Burnfield, J. L. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 1031-1042.
Feldman, D. C., Ng, T. W. H., & Vogel, R. M. (2012). Off-the-job embeddedness: A reconceptualization and agenda for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 31, 209-251.
Gonza´lez-Roma´, V., Schaufeli, W.B., Bakker, A.B., & Lloret, S. (2006). Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles?. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 165-174.
Halbesleben, J.R.B., & Wheeler, A.R. (2008). The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave. Work & Stress, 22, 242-256.
Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural Equation Modeling With LISREL. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
Holtom, B. C., & O’Neill, B. S. (2004). Job embeddedness: A theoretical foundation for developing a comprehensive nurse retention plan. Journal of Nursing Administration, 34(5), 216-227.
Holtom, B. C., & Inderrieden, E. J. (2006). Integrating the unfolding model and job embeddedness model to better understand voluntary turnover. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(4), 435-452.
Hom, P. W., Mitchell, T. R., Lee, T. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012). Reviewing employee turnover: Focusing on proximal withdrawal states and an expanded criterion. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 831-858.
Ilies, R., Scott, B. A., & Judge, T. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 561-575.
Jiang, K., Liu, D., McKay, P. F., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2012). When and how is job embeddedness predictive of turnover? A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1077-1096.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 User's Reference Guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1966). The social psychology of organization. N.Y.: Wiley.
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., Sablynski, C. J., Burton, J. P., & Holtom, B. C. (2004).The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 711-722.
Lee, T. W., Burch, T. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (2014). The story of why we stay: A review of job embeddedness. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 199-216.
Luchak, A. A. (2003). What kind of voice do loyal employees use? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41, 115-134.
Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87-112.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551.
Mitchell, T. R., Holtom, B. C., Lee, T. W., Sablynski, C. J., & Erez, M. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102-1121.
Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475-480.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). The effects of organizational and community embeddedness on work-to-family and family-to-work conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1233-1251.
Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2014). Embeddedness and well-being in the United States and Singapore: The mediating effects of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(3), 360-375.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 293-315.
Sekiguchi, T., Burton, J. P., & Sablynski, C. J. (2008). The role of job embeddedness on employee performance: The interactive effects with leader-member exchange and organization-based self-esteem. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 761-792.
Shore, L. M., & Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 774-780.
Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482-497.
Sun, Tao, Zhao, X. W., Yang, L. B., Fan, H. L. (2011). The impact of psychological capital on job embeddedness and job performance among nurses: A structural equation approach. Journal of Advance Nursing, 68(1), 69-79.
Sweet, S., Swisher, R., & Moen, P. (2005). Selecting and assessing the family-friendly community: Adaptive strategies of middle-class, dual-earner couples. Family Relations, 54, 596-606.
Tsai, W., Chen, C., & Liu, H. (2007). Test of a model linking employee positive moods and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1570-1583.
Voydanoff, P. (2005). The differential salience of family and community demands and resources for family-to-work conflict and facilitation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26, 395-417.
Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 118-154.
Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617.
Zhang, M., Fried, D. D., & Griffeth, R. W. (2012). A review of job embeddedness: Conceptual, measurement issues, and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 22(3), 220-231.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:自定論文開放時間 user define
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus:永不公開 not available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 18.226.251.22
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 18.226.251.22
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 永不公開 not available

QR Code