Responsive image
博碩士論文 etd-0628101-060328 詳細資訊
Title page for etd-0628101-060328
論文名稱
Title
公立幼稚園教師效能感及其相關因素之研究
An Empirical Study of Factors Affecting the Sense of Teacher Efficacy in Public Kindergarten Teachers
系所名稱
Department
畢業學年期
Year, semester
語文別
Language
學位類別
Degree
頁數
Number of pages
169
研究生
Author
指導教授
Advisor
召集委員
Convenor
口試委員
Advisory Committee
口試日期
Date of Exam
2001-06-05
繳交日期
Date of Submission
2001-06-28
關鍵字
Keywords
幼稚園教師、工作特性知覺、教師效能感、社會評價知覺
the kindergarten teacher, the perception of job characteristics, the sense of teacher efficacy, the perception of social evaluation.
統計
Statistics
本論文已被瀏覽 5726 次,被下載 34
The thesis/dissertation has been browsed 5726 times, has been downloaded 34 times.
中文摘要
論文摘要內容:
本研究旨在探討公立幼稚園教師效能感之現況,與背景變項及主觀知覺變項間之關係。主要目的有六:1.瞭解我國公立幼稚園教師效能感之情形;2.探討不同背景變項(教師屬性與學校屬性變項)的公立幼稚園教師,其教師效能感之差異情形;3.分析公立幼稚園教師工作特性知覺及社會評價知覺等主觀知覺變項與教師效能感之關係;4.探討不同背景變項與主觀知覺變項對教師效能感的預測力;5.比較高、低效能感的公立幼稚園教師對幼兒、教學、工作態度的看法之差異情形;6.歸納研究發現,提出具體建議,以供幼稚園教師、幼稚園、師資培育單位和教育行政機關作為提昇幼稚園教師效能感之依據。
本研究採用兩種研究方法:調查研究法與訪談研究法。在調查研究方面,係以全國的公立幼稚園教師為研究對象,以研究者自編之「幼稚園教師效能量表」、「幼稚園教師工作特性知覺量表」及「幼稚園教師社會評價知覺量表」為研究工具,抽取127所公立幼稚園的354位幼稚園教師為有效樣本。問卷調查所得資料,分別採用描述統計、t考驗、單因子多變量變異數分析、積差相關、典型相關、及逐步多元迴歸等統計方法,進行資料分析與處理。在訪談研究方面,以十位高低教師效能感之公立幼稚園教師為訪談對象,藉以了解高低教師效能感公立幼稚園教師對幼兒、教學、工作態度等看法之差異情形。
本研究得到下列主要研究發現:
一、我國公立幼稚園教師之教師效能感有偏高的傾向,其中個人教學效能感高於一般教學效能感。
二、不同教師屬性變項的公立幼稚園教師,其教師效能感有顯著差異。
三、公立幼稚園教師之工作特性知覺、社會評價知覺變項與教師效能感間有相關存在。
四、不同工作特性知覺及社會評價知覺的公立幼稚園教師,在整體教師效能感與個人教學效能感、一般教學效能感上有顯著的差異。
五、背景變項的「任教年資」、「最高學歷」、「任教班別」及工作特性知覺變項的「技能變化性」、「工作重要性」、「工作自主性」、「工作回饋性」以及社會評價知覺變項對公立幼稚園教師效能感具有預測力。
六、高、低教師效能感之公立幼稚園教師對幼兒、教學、工作態度等看法有差異存在。
最後,本研究根據主要研究發現與結論,提出下列各項建議:
一、對幼稚園教師個人的建議
(一)時時自我充實,以促進專業成長
(二)增進教師本身適應社會變遷的效能
二、對幼稚園的建議
(一)盡量減少混齡班的編制
(二)推廣親職教育,廣開親師溝通之門
三、對師資培育單位的建議
(一)提供資深教師的教學經驗,作為準幼教老師的學習範本
(二)培養準教師對幼教工作的熱愛,並體認幼教工作的重要性
四、對教育行政機關的建議
(一)宣揚正確的幼兒教育理念,以導正家長與社會大眾的觀念
(二)建立初任教師研修制度
五、對未來研究的建議
(一)擴充研究對象
(二)建立多面向的幼稚園教師效能感量表
(三)改變研究變項
(四)採用多樣化的研究設計
Abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the present state of the sense of teacher efficacy in public kindergarten teachers as it relates to their background and subjective perception variables. The aim of this study was (1) to understand the condition of the sense of teacher efficacy in public kindergarten teachers, (2) to investigate the differences in teachers’ sense of efficacy among public kindergarten teachers with diverse background variables (the teachers’ attribute and schools’ attribute variables), (3) to analyze the relationships between the subjective perception variables (the job characteristics perception and the social evaluation perception variables) and the teachers’ efficacy sense, (4) to explore the predictive power of the diverse background variables and subjective perception variables for the teacher efficacy sense, (5) to compare the attitudes toward children, instruction and work between high and low sense of teacher efficacy, (6) based on the results of this study, the researcher proposed several suggestions for improving the sense of teacher efficacy in kindergarten teachers.
This study adopted both questionnaire survey and interview methods. The participant’s questionnaire survey included 354 public kindergarten teachers in Taiwan. The instruments employed were The Scale of Kindergarten Teachers’ Efficacy, The Scale of Job Characteristics Perception, and The Scale of Social Evaluation Perception. The quantitative data obtained were analyzed by Descriptive Statistics, t-test, Hotelling’s T2, One-Way MANOVA, Product-moment Correlation, Canonical Correlation Analysis and Stepwise multiple regression analysis. The participants in the interview for understanding the different attitudes toward children, instruction and work between high and low sense of teacher efficacy were 10 high and low efficacy sense teachers.
Major findings of this study are summarized as follows:
1. The public kindergarten teachers possessed higher teachers’ efficacy sense.
2. There were significant differences in the teachers’ efficacy sense of the public kindergarten teachers with the diverse teachers’ attribute variables.
3. There were relationships between the subjective perception variables (the job characteristics perception and the social evaluation perception variables) and the teachers’ efficacy sense.
4. There were significant differences in the teachers’ efficacy sense of the public kindergarten teachers with the diverse job characteristics perception and the social evaluation perception variables.
5. Number of working years, diploma and class grade background variables, skill variety, task importance, task autonomy, task feedback of the job characteristic perception variables, and the social evaluation perception variables could predict the sense of teacher efficacy of the kindergarten teachers.
6. There were differences in opinions and attitudes toward children, instruction and work between high and low sense of teacher efficacy.
Finally, according to the results and conclusions of this study, the researcher proposed several suggestions to the kindergarten teachers, the kindergartens, the teacher education institutes, the educational administration institutions, and for future study.
目次 Table of Contents
第一章 緒 論 1
第一節 研究動機與目的 1
第二節 研究問題 5
第三節 名詞釋義 5
第四節 研究範圍與限制 8
第二章 文獻探討 10
第一節 效能感之涵義分析 10
第二節 教師效能感之理論探討 13
第三節 教師效能感之相關研究 23
第四節 教師效能感與相關因素之關係 30
第三章 研究方法與步驟 38
第一節 研究架構 38
第二節 研究假設 39
第三節 研究對象 40
第四節 研究工具 44
第五節 研究步驟 51
第六節 資料處理和分析 53
第四章 研究結果與討論 55
第一節 公立幼稚園教師效能感之現況分析 55
第二節 公立幼稚園教師背景變項在教師效能感之差異比較與討論 56
第三節 公立幼稚園教師工作特性知覺、社會評價知覺與教師效能感關係之分析與討論 73
第四節 公立幼稚園教師背景變項、工作特性知覺與社會評價知覺對教師效能感的預測與 討論 82
第五節 公立幼稚園高、低效能感教師之訪問結果分析 88
第五章 結論與建議 100
第一節 主要研究發現 100
第二節 結 論 106
第三節 建 議 108
參考文獻 113
一、中文部分 113
二、英文部分 115
附 錄 120
附錄一:專家效度之專家學者 120
附錄二:幼稚園教師效能感量表之編擬 121
附錄三:幼稚園教師工作特性知覺量表之編擬 130
附錄四:幼稚園教師社會評價知覺量表之編擬 135
附錄五:「幼稚園教師教學工作知覺問卷」正式問卷 140
附錄六:訪問同意書 144
附錄七:高低效能感之公立幼稚園教師訪談問題卷 145
附錄八:高、低效能感之公立幼稚園教師訪談紀錄 146

參考文獻 References
一、中文部分
王受榮(民81)。我國國民中小學教師效能感及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
王連生(民83)。幼兒教育研究。台北:五南出版。
毛國楠(民84)。國中教師的樂觀信念、自我效能、對壓力的認知評估、因應方式與工作調適及身心健康的關係。教育心理學報,28,177-194。
李玉嬋(民81)。實習教師效能訓練與同儕支持小團體輔導在團體歷程、治療因素及效果之比較。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
李俊湖(民81)。國小教師專業成長與教學效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
吳明清(民83)。教育研究-基本觀念與方法分析。台北:五南出版。
何郁玲(民88)。中小學教師職業倦怠、教師效能感與生命意義感關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林清江(民69)。教師職業聲望與專業形象之調查研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,23,99-175。
林清江(民81)。我國教師職業聲望與專業形象之調查研究。載於比較教育學會主編:兩岸教育發展之比較。台北:師大書苑。
林進材(民89)。國小教師教學效能的理論與實際。高雄:復文出版。
周新富(民80)。國民中學教師專業承諾、教師效能信念與學生學業成就關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
周惠民(民88)。原住民地區國小教師自我效能感與工作投入之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
邱繼智(民84)。組織結構與個人屬性差異對知覺工作特性及工作滿足的影響。國立臺北商專學報,45,101-147。
邱皓政(民89)。量化研究與統計分析。台北:五南出版。
孫志麟(民80)。國民小學教師自我效能及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
洪瑞峰(民89)。台北縣市國小教師效能感與家長參與班級教育活動關係之研究。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
徐昊杲(民85)。我國專科學校技職類科教師其教師效能感研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
教育部統計處(民89)。公私立幼稚園名錄。教育部出版。
陳木金(民86)。國民小學教師教室領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
陳寶山(民74)。國民小學教師的教育價值觀。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
張世彗(民88)。國小一般智能優異班教師自我效能模式之驗證暨相關因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
張春興(民83)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。台北:東華書局。
張俊紳(民86)。國民小學教師教學效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
郭丁熒(民84)。我國國民小學教師角色之探討-一個晤談研究報告。載於國立教育資料館、中華民國師範教育學會主編:邁向二十一世紀的師範教育。台北:師大書苑。
郭丁熒(民89)。教學。載於陳奎熹主編:現代教育社會學。台北:師大書苑。
郭峰偉(民89)。國中教師工作壓力與教師效能關係之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
梁茂森(民81)。高級職業學校教師教學成敗歸因及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
馮麗雅(民86)。國中教師角色衝突、專業成長與其教師效能感關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
趙美鈴(民86)。國小已婚教師工作特性知覺、角色壓力與其工作投入關係之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
萬家春(民85)。追求高品質的幼兒教育。教改通訊,17,22-26。
鄭英耀(民81)。國小教師創造思考、批判思考及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
劉威德(民83)。國中教師教學成敗歸因、社會支持與教學自我效能相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
廖吳勇(民87)。國民小學教師工作動機、參與決定與自我效能關係之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
謝文全(民86)。教育行政-理論與實務。台北:文景出版。
謝寶梅(民84)。國小教師自我效能感之調查研究。國立台中師院初等教育集刊,3,79-96。
簡紅珠(民77)。教學研究的趨勢。載於黃光雄主編:教學原理。台北:師大書苑。
簡楚瑛、廖鳳瑞、林佩蓉、林麗卿(民84)。當前幼兒教育問題與因應之道。教改通訊,14,32-33。
顏銘志(民85)。國民小學教師教學信念、教師效能與教學行為之相關研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
二、英文部分
Anderson, R., Greene, M., & Loewen, P. (1988). Relationships among teachers’ and students’ thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34(2), 148-165.
Ashton, P. T. (1984). Teacher efficacy : A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 28-32.
Ashton, P. T., Webb, R. B., & Doda, N. (1983). A study of teachers’ sense of efficacy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED231 834)
Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. NJ: Longman.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1996). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
Berman, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, G., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G. (1977). Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol.7: Factors affecting implementation and continuation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED140 432)
Brownell, M. T., & Pajares, F. (1999). Teacher efficacy and perceived success in mainstreaming students with learning and behavior problems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22(3), 154-164.
Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and commitment to teaching. Journal of Experimental Education, 60(4), 323-327.
Deemer, S. A., & Minke, K. M. (1999). An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 3-10.
Denham, C., & Michael, J. (1981). Teacher sense of efficacy: A definition of the structure and a model for further research. Educational Research Quarterly, 5, 39-61.
Dunham, R. B. (1977). Reaction to job characteristics: Moderating effects of the organization. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 46-65.
Fuller, B., Wood, K., Rapoport, T., & Dornbusch, S. (1982). The organizational context of individual efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 52, 7-30.
Gecas, V., & Schwalbe, M. L. (1983). Beyond the looking-glass self: Social structure and efficacy-based self-esteem. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 77-88.
Ghaith, G., & Shaaban, K. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of teaching concerns, teacher efficacy, and selected teacher characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 487-496.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 568-582.
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211.
Greenwood, G. F., Olejnik, S. F., & Parkay, F. W. (1990). Relationships between four teacher efficacy belief patterns and selected teacher characteristics. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23(2), 102-107.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy in writing: A construct validation with primary grade teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(2), 177-202.
Guskey, T. R. (1981). Measurement of responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 44-51.
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 627-643.
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler. E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259-286.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.
Harrison, W. D. (1983). A social competence model of burnout. In B. A. Farber (Ed.), Stress and burnout in the human service professions. New York: Pergamon Press.
Hebert, E., Lee, A., & Williamson, L. (1998). Teachers’ and teacher education students’ sense of efficacy: Quantitative and qualitative comparisons. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 31(4), 214-225.
Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R., & Vacha-Haase, T. (2000). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED442 812)
Hillman, S. J. (1986). Measuring self-efficacy: Preliminary steps in the development of a multidimensional instrument. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED271 505)
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Bassler, O. C., & Brissie, J. S. (1987). Parent involvement: Contributions of teacher efficacy, school socioeconomic status and other school characteristics. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 417-435.
Lin, H., & Gorrell, J. (1998). Preservice teachers’ efficacy beliefs in Taiwan. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32(1), 17-25.
Madden-Szeszko, M. G. (2000). Variables contributing to teacher efficacy: An examination of burnout, affect, demographic variables, and general self-efficacy. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2000, 61(3-A), 881.
Melby, L. C. (1995). Teacher efficacy and classroom management: A study of teacher cognition, emotion, and strategy usage associated with externalizing student behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Newman, F. M., Rutter, R. A., & Smith, M. S. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community and expectations. Sociology of Education, 62(4), 221-238.
Raudenbush, S., Rowan, B., & Cheong, Y. (1992). Contextual effects on the self-perceived efficacy of high school teachers. Sociology of Education, 65, 150-167.
Rose, J. S., & Medway, F. J. (1981). Measurement of teachers’ beliefs in their control over student outcome. Journal of Personality, 46, 224-259.
Rosenholtz, S. J., & Simpson, C. (1990). Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teachers’ commitment. Sociology of Education, 63, 241-257.
Ross, J. A. (1994). Beliefs that make a difference: The orginal impacts of teacher efficacy. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED379 216)
Ross, J. A., Cousins. J. B., & Gadalla. T. (1996). Within-teacher predictors of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 385-400.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reiforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.
Shimoni, R. (1991). Professionalisation and parent involvement in early childhood education: Complementary or conflicting strategies? International Journal of Early Childhood, 23(1), 11-20.
Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1996). Teacher efficacy: Toward the understanding of a multi-faceted construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(4), 401-411.
Soodak, L. C., & Podell, D. M. (1997). Efficacy and experience: Perceptions of efficacy among preservice and practicing teachers. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30(4), 214-221.
Trentham, L., Silvern, S., & Brogdon, R. (1985). Teacher efficacy and teacher competency ratings. Psychology in the School, 22, 343-352.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
Turner, A. N., & Lawrance, P. R. (1965). Industrial jobs and the work. Boston: Harvard University.
Watkins, L. L. (2000). Teacher development: The concerns and personal teacher efficacy of preservice and in-service teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2000, 60(12-A), 4327.
Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. (1990). Prospective teacher’s sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 81-91.
Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. (1993). Teacher’s sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355-372.
電子全文 Fulltext
本電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。
論文使用權限 Thesis access permission:校內一年後公開,校外永不公開 campus withheld
開放時間 Available:
校內 Campus: 已公開 available
校外 Off-campus:永不公開 not available

您的 IP(校外) 位址是 3.95.2.54
論文開放下載的時間是 校外不公開

Your IP address is 3.95.2.54
This thesis will be available to you on Indicate off-campus access is not available.

紙本論文 Printed copies
紙本論文的公開資訊在102學年度以後相對較為完整。如果需要查詢101學年度以前的紙本論文公開資訊,請聯繫圖資處紙本論文服務櫃台。如有不便之處敬請見諒。
開放時間 available 已公開 available

QR Code